Top Marine Says Service Has Finally Settled on 13-Grunt Rifle Squads
After years of experimentation, the Marine Corps has finally settled on a 13-person rifle squad, including a grunt trained in long-range precision weapons as the service looks to increase the distance from which its most fundamental ground unit can destroy the enemy.
The Corps' top officer, Commandant Gen. Eric Smith, made the announcement Monday at the Navy League's Sea-Air-Space 2025 conference in National Harbor, Maryland, where military and defense industry leaders are gathering this week to discuss national security aims and challenges.
The service had used a 13-Marine rifle squad for decades. But in 2018, as the Corps embarked on its most ambitious organizational shift since before World War II -- known as Force Design -- and it began to tinker with the number of infantrymen in the unit, ranging from 12 people to 15 over the last several years.
Read Next: House Republicans and Democrats Say the US Must Maintain Its Troop Totals in Europe
"This includes a school-trained squad leader sergeant and three fire teams," Smith said at the conference. "While this structure sounds familiar, it now includes an organic precision fires specialist."
Those specialists will use drones carrying loitering munitions, a move that comes as the service is looking to insert unmanned aerial vehicles, or UAVs, not only into its most elemental infantry units, but also into the broader culture of the service, Military.com previously reported.
Smith also said that the service will be standing up dedicated fire units within its infantry battalions, taking weapon systems like the 81mm mortar out of its headquarters companies, and creating a single unit within the battalion to better "integrate intelligence, precision fires and reconnaissance at greater ranges."
The commandant said that the changes were informed by bottom-up feedback from Marines in the fleet, "empowered by our campaign of learning to refine and adapt" -- a core aim of Force Design as the service looks to challenge China in the Indo-Pacific.
"So as we experiment, we have our young battalion commanders telling us how to do things, and we're complying with them," Smith said. "We're executing what they direct from the bottom up."
The revamped infantry squads will apply to all traditional infantry battalions, as well as littoral combat teams, which are part of the service's latest Indo-Pacific-oriented formations known as Marine Littoral Regiments, Cathy Close, a spokesperson for the Marine Corps' Combat Development and Integration Division, told Military.com in an emailed statement Tuesday.
The service dabbled with rifle squads with 14- and even 15-Marine units, which would have included a corpsman, she said. Now, the squads will include three teams of four Marines, with a sergeant squad leader, corporal assistant squad leader and corporals as team leaders.
After experimenting for years, the service settled on 13, Close said, noting that any less than that "indicated risk regarding resilience within the formation" related to its ability to take casualties. The current revamp, she said, gives squads and platoons more flexibility with three fire teams, as opposed to just two.
"The Marine Corps has looked to current conflicts, including the war in Ukraine, to help determine the capabilities the infantry battalions, including their rifle squads, need to be effective on the battlefield," Close said when asked whether the service took lessons from modern combat to codify its rifle squad structure. "The impacts of multi-domain operations, to include the importance of drone, counter-drone and loitering munitions, have been considered as an integral requirement for modern warfare."
The changes -- which the commandant said were made last week -- have not come without their challenges. Smith said that "unpredictable funding" due to Congress' inability to pass a long-term budget has slowed the modernization efforts, requiring the Corps to "make tough decisions."
Military.com reported recently that Marines were at risk of losing out on bonuses, and the service was unable to move thousands of troops for routine military moves because the funding wasn't there. Congress has relied on continuing resolutions -- stop-gap measures that require the services to rely on the previous year's funding levels -- to manage the budget.
"I'll stay out of politics, but I will say that we need predictable, on-time funding that only Congress can provide, meaning that continuing resolutions aren't continuing anything," Smith said. "They stop our progress."
Related: Every Marine a Drone Operator? New Team Aims to Compete, Set Standards for Unmanned Aircraft Warfare.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Shift4 appoints new CEO
This story was originally published on Payments Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Payments Dive newsletter. Shift4 named founder Jared Isaacman as executive chairman after President Donald Trump abruptly dropped the executive's nomination to run NASA over the weekend, the digital processor said in a regulatory filing Thursday. "Mr. Isaacman will remain an executive officer and Class I member of the Board," the filing said. The change is effective on Thursday, according to the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Allentown, Pennsylvania-based payments processing company had selected Shift4 President Taylor Lauber to succeed Isaacman if Trump's December nomination was confirmed by the Senate, but the chamber never voted on it. Isaacman, who has been the company's CEO and chairman since it was founded in 1999, will retain his super voting shares in Shift4, according to the filing. Lauber said during an April earnings call that Isaacman would convert his class B and class C shares into class A shares, which are worth a single vote per share. That agreement was "subject to several conditions, including the ratification and confirmation by the U.S. Senate of Mr. Isaacman's appointment as administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration," the SEC filing said. "As a result of this condition not being met, Mr. Isaacman is no longer required to reduce his voting shares." Isaacman had a 76% voting power ownership stake in Shift4, according toan April 30 proxy filing. Trump cited Isaacman's "prior associations" when he withdrew the NASA nomination. The president pulled the nomination over the Shift4 founder's past contributions to Democrats, according to a report from the New York Times. However, Isaacman suggested on a Wednesday episode o fthe All-In podcast that his ties to billionaire SpaceX and Tesla CEO Elon Musk cost him the nomination, Bloomberg reported. Musk may also have helped him win the nomination from Trump, given Isaacman's participation in past SpaceX missions. Recommended Reading Shift4 CEO likely to keep post


New York Post
22 minutes ago
- New York Post
White House staffer went on a revenge tour against Elon Musk, fanning flames with Trump — while bragging about Tesla stock drop
WASHINGTON — A top White House aide is taking the blame for helping trigger President Trump's fiery clash with Elon Musk — after speaking for months about giving the billionaire 'payback' and even gloating to colleagues when Tesla's stock price dropped, The Post has learned. Sergio Gor, Trump's director of presidential personnel, was instrumental in the president's decision late Saturday to yank the nomination of Musk's personal friend Jared Isaacman to be NASA administrator, turning a contained disagreement on legislation into a firestorm of insults, four sources inside or close to the White House tell The Post. 5 Sergio Gor, director of the White House presidential personnel office, during a Kennedy Center Board dinner with US President Donald Trump in Washington, DC, on Monday, May 19, 2025. Bloomberg via Getty Images Isaacman's donations to Democrats — including $100,000 in 2021 to a PAC linked to Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) — would disqualify most nominees under Gor's standard vetting process. But Isaacman wasn't pulled by Trump until hours after Musk left his unpaid White House role, at Gor's urging. Musk was Trump's top financial backer in the 2024 election and this week's clash has put the president's legislative agenda at risk — and even threatens long-term political damage after Musk endorsed Trump's potential impeachment. Musk and Gor disliked each other since before Trump reclaimed power on Jan. 20 — with the Tesla and SpaceX CEO describing Gor as 'sleazy' during the transition and questioning his staffing picks. But the world's richest man had the president's ear and friendship through last week. 5 Donald Trump and Elon Musk watch the launch of the sixth test flight of the SpaceX Starship rocket on November 19, 2024 in Brownsville, Texas. Getty Images Simmering behind the scenes was a grudge nursed by Gor over a March 6 cabinet meeting, during which Musk 'humiliated' him by slamming the pace of staffing the administration, said the four sources, each of whom have interacted closely with Gor. 'He was bragging to other people that he was going to get one last shot at Elon out the door. He was going to get Elon back for making him look bad,' said one source. 'Elon was always telling the president 'Sergio's not moving fast enough to hire people. He's not the right guy for the job.' In front of the entire cabinet he said that. It's not just humiliating, but the president starts looking at him like, 'Why aren't you doing your f—ing job?'' Another said: 'Sergio was upset about Elon dressing him down at the meeting and said he was going to 'get him'. [Isaacman's nomination being pulled] was the modern-day equivalent of the assassination of Franz Ferdinand. Sure, Sergio got a scalp, but what did POTUS get?' Three sources say Gor's intensely personal dislike of Musk was illustrated by his periodic celebrations when Tesla's stock cratered. One source said that they were present when Gor laughed with satisfaction while showing off the dips in Musk's wealth. 'He'd go around showing Tesla stock prices going down and laugh about it, like he was responsible for taking the Tesla stock down,' one White House source revealed. The other said they heard from Gor repeatedly when Tesla stock tumbled. 5 White House Senior Advisor to the President and Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk departs the U.S. Capitol Building on March 5, 2025 in Washington, DC. Getty Images 5 President Donald Trump and Elon Musk attend a press conference in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., May 30, 2025 REUTERS Gor denied to The Post that he ever sought revenge against Musk and insisted that claims he openly rejoiced at Tesla stock falling were false. Steve Bannon, a Gor supporter, told The Post that he believes that the breakdown had nothing to do with the relatively obscure White House aide — citing months of disagreements, including Musk's dislike of Trump's tariffs, Trump's cancelation of a planned Pentagon briefing for Musk about China and the president not acting to extend Musk's 130-day tenure as a special government employee. 'It's the president and Elon. This has nothing to do with Sergio Gor. Sergio Gor is a staffer that the president has to do things,' Bannon argued. 'Did Elon have a problem with Sergio? Yes, the fact that we are not hiring enough — guess what? — liberal f–king progressive Democrats.' Bannon, who has pushing for Musk to be deported despite him being a naturalized American citizen since 2002, added claims that Gor was at the root of the clash were 'absolutely ludicrous' 'This is all about the behavior … the incompetence, the lack of performance, the drugs which President Trump is very upset about, all of it, of Elon Musk,' Bannon said. Although the White House was rife with tension for months with Musk and Gor 'hating each other,' the bad feeling never spiraled out of hand until Thursday, when Trump and Musk went at each other with personal attacks. Although Musk's criticisms of the 'Big, Beautiful Bill' gained significant attention, the president was chummy with the tech mogul on his last day in government May 30 — despite clips circulating for three days of the billionaire telling 'CBS Sunday Morning' that 'I think a bill can be big or it can be beautiful but I don't know if it can be both.' As part of the send-off, Trump and Musk praised each other in the Oval Office, with the latter receiving an ornate key to the White House. Only after Isaacman's nomination was pulled Saturday night did the tit-for-tat build, with Musk calling the bill a 'disgusting abomination' Tuesday. The fight erupted further Thursday as Trump contended he would have won the election even without Musk's help and the businessman firing back that the Jeffrey Epstein files contain information on the president. 'The NASA guy was the straw that broke the camel's back,' one White House source said, arguing that Gor wanted 'to bury the knife in [Musk's] back.' 5 Elon Musk embraces Republican presidential nominee, former President Donald Trump during a campaign rally at the Butler Farm Show fairgrounds on October 05, 2024 in Butler, Pennsylvania. Getty Images Musk is not the only White House figure to cross Gor, according to this source, who added that the personnel boss helped far-right activist Laura Loomer gain a meeting with Trump in the Oval Office, after which six National Security Council officials were fired — while national security adviser Mike Waltz was moved out to become ambassador to the United Nations. 'There's just one staffer that's in the middle of every drama, leak and chaos that exists. It's been a detriment to the president and the organization,' they said. 'We've bounced basically two billionaires from the party and from the movement, because Sergio doesn't like them. And what does that do for anyone, or the cause?' White House Communications Director Steven Cheung called Gor 'a vital member of the team and he has helped President Trump put together an administration that is second to none.' But one source close to the White House said that illumination of the roots of the Trump-Musk feud could help prevent potentially devastating political consequences for Republicans. 'I think it will help,' the insider said. 'If Elon understands that this was not the president that was going after him and that the president was played by Sergio, I think Elon might look at it as an opportunity to say, 'Ok, let's put this s— to bed. And this guy thinks he's going to get me? I'm going to get him.''


Washington Post
32 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Senate Republicans revise ban on state AI regulations in bid to preserve controversial provision
WASHINGTON — Senate Republicans have made changes to their party's sweeping tax bill in hopes of preserving a new policy that would prevent states from regulating artificial intelligence for a decade. In legislative text unveiled Thursday night, Senate Republicans proposed denying states federal funding for broadband projects if they regulate AI. That's a change from a provision in the House-passed version of the tax overhaul that simply banned any current or future AI regulations by the states for 10 years.