
Toll of Trump's USAID cuts on Australian aid revealed, with projects to help children among hardest hit
Acfid has surveyed its members and their partners, who deliver projects on the ground, on the impact of the US Agency for International Development (USAID) cuts, which took effect when the president, Donald Trump, froze funding for 90 days from 20 January.
By the time the 90 days expired, despite a waiver for humanitarian assistance, 5,200 of the agency's 6,200 programs had been stopped. Those that were left were absorbed into the state department.
Workers in Australian programs described 'chaos' and 'total panic' at the time, and warned programs could shut, causing 'unnecessary deaths and suffering'.
Some Australian aid projects had direct USAID funding, while others were jointly funded or subsidised through US funding.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
'Australian NGOs and their partners have had to reduce operations and staff with dire consequences to local communities that are now no longer receiving essential healthcare, education, food or other assistance,' Acfid's report, released on Monday, says.
'At least 20 partner organisations and/or country offices of Australian NGOs have closed. Some local organisations have also had to close their doors permanently.'
The report points out that it collected information during that 90-day period, that it was a time of 'upheaval' and many organisations did not have a clear picture of the impacts.
Less than half provided financial data, so the figures 'should be read as a low estimate of impact on the Australian aid agencies and the local partners they work with around the world', the report states.
More than 120 projects were hit, with a financial value of more than $400m. The projects were mostly in the Pacific and south-east Asia.
Projects to help children, combat climate change and provide humanitarian support were the hardest hit.
In Nepal, 307 girls are no longer able to go to school after an education project closed. Without education, girls are at higher risk of child marriage and being trafficked, Acfid says.
In Kiribati, almost 2,000 people lost access to improved water, sanitation and hygiene practices, leading to reduced access to clean water and increased risk of disease.
The Acfid policy and advocacy chief, Jessica Mackenzie, said the development sector was only now fully grasping the scale of the fallout.
'We've heard first-hand accounts from people on the ground ranging from communities in the Pacific losing access to clean water, to girls in Nepal deprived of education and fearful they may be forced into marriage,' she said.
'At least $400m in humanitarian and development projects have been directly impacted by the USAID freeze for Australian NGOs. That's millions of people losing access to food, healthcare and education.'
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
The cuts could not have come at a worse time, she said.
'Communities already on the frontline of climate change are losing access to programs that were helping them adapt, prepare and survive.'
Acfid says Australia's own foreign aid spending is the lowest it has ever been, at a time when the world needs it most.
Other countries including the UK, the Netherlands and Germany have cut their foreign aid, despite the context of growing global conflict and uncertainty.
Acfid is calling for the government to increase spending on foreign aid from 0.65% to 1% of the federal budget. Save the Children Australia has made a similar call.
Its proposals include spending on climate action, development, and work on gender, disability and social inclusion.
In March, Australia moved to plug the funding gaps in the region by directing about $120m in foreign aid to support economic, health, humanitarian and climate responses in the Indo-Pacific.
That money came from funding for other programs, which the foreign affairs minister, Penny Wong, called 'hard strategic decisions'.
DFAT has also committed to 2.5% annual increases in aid funding.
Wong announced on Friday that another $10m would go to help distribute urgent medical and food supplies in Gaza, taking the total assistance there to $110m since 7 October 2023.
On Thursday, the Trump administration announced it would eliminate all USAID overseas positions by 30 September.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
17 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Putin jabs Joe Biden by saying he would have never invaded Ukraine if Trump were in charge
Vladimir Putin pointed the finger at former President Joe Biden for allowing the war with Ukraine to materialize. The Russian leader confirmed that if President Donald Trump were still in office at the time in 2022, he wouldn't have started the war more than three years ago. Putin said during remarks at a joint press conference in Anchorage, Alaska on Friday that he warned Biden that he shouldn't let the situation progress to 'the point of no return when it would come to hostilities.' 'I said it quite directly back then that it's a big mistake,' Putin said, according to a real-time translation. He insisted: 'President Trump saying that if he was the president back then there would be no war, and I'm quite sure that would indeed be so, I can confirm that.' Putin's comments were the ultimate flattery on an impressionable president, who he was desperately trying to keep from fully embracing Ukraine and Europe's cause. Trump has repeatedly claimed that he would have been able to use his relationship with Putin to stop Russia from invading Ukraine if he were reelected in 2020. On June 16, 2021, Biden and Putin met in-person for a summit in Geneva, Switzerland amid rising tensions between Moscow and Washington, D.C. Just eight months later on February 24, 2022, Putin invaded Ukraine, kick-starting a deadly war that still wages on today and has left thousands dead and displaced. Trump's negotiations with Putin appear to be Ukraine's last chance to get an end to the bloodshed and land grab by Russia. European leaders have expressed concern that Trump will concede too much land, but Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has recognized that a peace deal might need to include handing over more land area to Putin's regime. President Putin said on Friday that having a good trustworthy business relationship with Trump makes him confident that 'we can come to see the end of the conflict in Ukraine.' Though the two leaders acknowledged there is still a far way to go. Additionally, no ceasefire was announced in their joint press conference. 'I have every reason to believe that moving down this path we can come to see the end of the conflict in Ukraine,' Putin said at the end of his remarks. And if the greeting between Trump and Putin was any indication of their relationship, it's very likely the two are chummy. The two were smiling as they saw each other in the flesh for the first time since 2018. With an abundance of physical contact and a round of applause from Trump for the authoritarian leader, body language expert Judi James tells the Daily Mail that he gave Putin 'the ultimate ego-stroke' by publicly treating him like a celebrity guest. Putin appeared visibly pleased with how the lengthy greeting went, and James said he was left 'purring' with delight. Experts warn that Trump already handed Putin a 'victory' by inviting him to U.S. soil for the first time in more than a decade and agreeing to exclude Zelensky. But James notes that the U.S. president's tone swiftly altered when they were in a room for their official talks. He took a more 'heavyweight, power pose' as it was time to get down to business, she notes. 'After the overkill cordiality of his greeting ritual Trump's grim expression and his tapping fingertips here suddenly gave him a tougher and less optimistic look,' James notes. After their nearly three-hour face-to-face meeting, Trump and Putin took turns speaking in a 12-minute joint press conference. They took no questions. The meeting was the first time they sat down in-person since Trump came back into office. It also was the first time that Putin stepped foot on U.S. soil since he was in New York City in 2015 for a United Nations General Assembly gathering where he also met with then-President Barack Obama.


Daily Mail
17 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Trump reacts to Hillary Clinton's surprising suggestion she would nominate president for Nobel Peace Prize
Donald Trump expressed gratitude to Hillary Clinton after she said she would nominate him for a Nobel Peace Prize if he ended the Ukraine-Russia war. The Former Secretary of State made the surprise statement ahead of Trump's meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska. When asked about the comments by Fox News anchor Bret Baier aboard Air Force One Friday, Trump said: 'That's very nice. I might have to start liking her again.' Clinton put forward her suggesting during an appearance on Jessica Tarlov's 'Raging Moderates' podcast 'If he could end it without putting Ukraine in a position where it had to concede its territory to the aggressor, could really stand up to Putin, something we haven't seen, but maybe this is the opportunity,' she said. 'If President Trump were the architect of that, I'd nominate him for a Nobel Peace Prize. 'Because my goal here is to not allow capitulation to Putin', the meeting between the two on Friday ended up being largely fruitless after not reaching a deal to end the war. The president has made no secret of his desire for the award. Barack Obama was the last president given the honor. Trump has posted about it on multiple occasions on social media, but he claims he is not working to secure the prize. 'A lot of people say because I'm of a certain persuasion, no matter what I do they won't give it [to me.],' he said last week after hatching a peace agreement between Armenia and Azerbaijan. Both leaders thanked Trump for his role in the peace talks and said they would recommend him for the Nobel Peace Prize. 'I think President Trump deserves to have the Nobel Peace Prize and we will defend that and promote that, that's obvious,' Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. Trump had campaigned to end wars in Gaza and Ukraine within 24 hours of taking office, which has proven elusive. Trump has also been credited with helping calm tensions between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Israel and Iran, and India and Pakistan. The president also claimed in June he was able to stop a war between Kosovo and Serbia, revealing on social media they were on the verge of war until he stopped it. Following their meeting on Friday, Trump said he and Putin didn't reach a deal to end the war, though Putin suggested they had hammered out 'an understanding'. 'There's no deal until there 's a deal,' Trump said. He said that while there were many points where agreement was reached, they fell short on others. Trump said he planned to speak with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders soon, to brief them on the discussions. He added: 'We had an extremely productive meeting, and many points were agreed to. 'And there are just a very few that are left. Some are not that significant. One is probably the most significant, but we have a very good chance of getting there.' The high-profile summit ended without a deal to end, or even pause, the brutal conflict - the largest land war in Europe since 1945 - which has raged for three years.


Reuters
17 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump-Putin summit yields no deal on ending war in Ukraine
ANCHORAGE, Alaska, Aug 15 (Reuters) - A highly anticipated summit between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday yielded no agreement to resolve or pause Moscow's war in Ukraine, despite both leaders describing the talks in Alaska as productive. During a brief appearance before the media following the nearly three-hour talks, the two leaders said they had made progress on unspecified issues. But they offered no details and took no questions, with the normally loquacious Trump ignoring shouted questions from reporters. "There were many, many points that we agreed on. I would say a couple of big ones that we haven't quite got there, but we've made some headway," Trump said, standing in front of a backdrop that read, "Pursuing Peace." "There's no deal until there's a deal," he added. The talks did not initially appear to have produced meaningful steps toward a ceasefire in the deadliest conflict in Europe in 80 years - or toward a subsequent meeting between Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, both goals Trump had set ahead of the summit. Putin said he expected Ukraine and its European allies to accept the results of the U.S.-Russia negotiation constructively and not try to "disrupt the emerging progress." "I expect that today's agreements will become a reference point, not only for solving the Ukrainian problem, but will also launch the restoration of business-like, pragmatic relations between Russia and the United States," Putin said. But Putin also repeated Moscow's long-held position that what Russia claims to be the "root causes" of the conflict must be eliminated to reach a long-term peace, a sign he remains resistant to a ceasefire. As the two leaders were talking, the war raged on, with most eastern Ukrainian regions under air raid alerts. Governors of Russia's Rostov and Bryansk regions reported that some of their territories were under Ukrainian drone attacks. Zelenskiy has ruled out formally handing Moscow any territory and is also seeking a security guarantee backed by the United States. Trump said he would call Zelenskiy and NATO leaders to update them on the Alaska talks. There was no immediate reaction from Kyiv to the summit. Ukraine's opposition lawmaker Oleksiy Honcharenko said on the Telegram messaging app, "It seems Putin has bought himself more time. No ceasefire or de-escalation has been agreed upon." Czech Foreign Minister Jan Lipavsky said in a statement that he welcomed Trump's efforts but doubted Putin's interest in a deal. "If Putin were serious about negotiating peace, he would not have been attacking Ukraine all day today," he said. The anticlimactic end to the closely watched summit was in stark contrast to the pomp and circumstance with which it began. When Putin arrived at an Air Force base in Alaska, a red carpet awaited him, where Trump greeted Putin warmly as U.S. military aircraft flew overhead. For Putin, the summit - the first between him and a U.S. president since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 - was already a big win, regardless of its outcome. He can portray the meeting as evidence that years of Western attempts to isolate Russia have unravelled and that Moscow is retaking its rightful place at the high table of international diplomacy. Trump hopes a truce in the 3-1/2-year-old war that Putin started will bring peace to the region as well as bolster his credentials as a global peacemaker worthy of the Nobel Peace Prize. Putin is wanted by the International Criminal Court, accused of the war crime of deporting hundreds of children from Ukraine. Russia denies the allegations, and the Kremlin has dismissed the ICC warrant as null and void. Russia and the United States are not members of the court. Both Moscow and Kyiv deny targeting civilians in the war. But thousands of civilians have died in the conflict, the vast majority Ukrainian, and the war has killed or injured well over a million people from both sides. Trump and Putin, along with top foreign-policy aides, conferred in a room at an Air Force base in Anchorage, Alaska in their first meeting since 2019. Zelenskiy, who was not invited to the summit, and his European allies had feared Trump might sell out Ukraine by essentially freezing the conflict and recognizing - if only informally - Russian control over one-fifth of Ukraine. Trump had sought to assuage such concerns on Friday ahead of the talks, saying he would let Ukraine decide on any possible territorial concessions. "I'm not here to negotiate for Ukraine, I'm here to get them at a table," he said. Asked what would make the meeting a success, he told reporters: "I want to see a ceasefire rapidly ... I'm not going to be happy if it's not today ... I want the killing to stop." The meeting also included U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio; Trump's special envoy to Russia, Steve Witkoff; Russian foreign policy aide Yury Ushakov; and Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov. Trump, who once said he would end Russia's war in Ukraine within 24 hours, conceded on Thursday it had proven a tougher task than he had expected. He had said if Friday's talks went well, quickly arranging a second, three-way summit with Zelenskiy would be more important than his encounter with Putin. Zelenskiy said ahead of Friday's summit that the meeting should open the way for a "just peace" and three-way talks that included him, but added that Russia was continuing to wage war. "It's time to end the war, and the necessary steps must be taken by Russia. We are counting on America," Zelenskiy wrote on Telegram.