Trump Is Deploying the National Guard to D.C.—Power Grab or Public Safety? Newsweek Writers Debate
Was this announcement a sign of creeping authoritarianism? A legitimate measure to combat crime in the nation's capital city? Or just a publicity stunt? Newsweek contributors David Faris and Mark Davis debate:
David Faris:
Deploying the National Guard to Washington D.C. is an unconscionable abuse of federal power and another worrisome signpost on our road to autocracy. Using the military to bring big, blue cities to heel, exactly as "alarmists" predicted during the 2024 campaign, isn't about a crisis in D.C.—violent crime is actually at a 30-year low. President Trump is, once again, testing the limits of his power, hoping to intimidate other cities into submission to his every vengeful whim by making the once unimaginable—an American tyrant ordering a military occupation of our own capital—a terrifying reality.
Mark Davis:
In another masterstroke of messaging and practicality, President Trump has taken aim at crime in America's capital city, vowing to use the resources under his control to "make Washington safe again." No big city is ever safe enough, and there are cities with worse crime problems than D.C., but this is the city where Trump lives, as do countless politicians and media types who will criticize him while quietly enjoying a city with less violent crime. Democratic mayors and governors have done too little; Trump will act, and residents of every political stripe will benefit.
Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Associated Press
Faris:
There is nothing practical about deploying an expensive military force when crime is already in freefall. If President Trump actually cared about the city he escapes every weekend to go golfing, he would empower it with statehood or voting representation in Congress, not occupy it with troops.
Davis:
Washington residents—and I know plenty—may beg to differ on the "crime in freefall" observation. Last year provided a momentary breather by some measures, but this decade's crime numbers have spiked over the 2010s. Whatever current levels are, they will decrease with Trump's D.C. strategy, a goal that should be appreciated by all.
Faris:
I doubt that even one in ten Washingtonians would approve of deploying the military to combat a fabricated crime crisis. Trump did not consult with residents and doesn't care what they think. This is about dictatorial pageantry, a strongman applying the boot to places he believes are full of domestic enemies.
Davis:
My kingdom for a reliable flash poll, which I believe would show surprising support. But even if D.C. is filed with voters with a taste for high-crime Democratic governance as in Chicago, Philadelphia, Baltimore, and elsewhere, that doesn't mean Trump has to agree. And perhaps viewing murderers and carjackers as domestic enemies will actually dissuade those behaviors.
Faris:
It's telling that the cities Republicans bring up in these conversations are always in blue states, as if there aren't problems in Dallas or St. Louis, both of which are ruled by Republican-dominated state governments and policies. Why isn't the president threatening to send the National Guard to these cities?
Davis:
There are problems in every large city. The worst are the ones saddled with unchecked Democratic governance. I'm sure the president would love to send the National Guard into Chicago, but cities in both blue and red states are not under his direct authority. Washington is, and its residents are about to benefit from it.
Faris:
The American far right fears and loathes cities, and President Trump has long publicly fantasized about unleashing the military on them. A sanitized, terrorized capital city, with uniformed soldiers brandishing assault rifles on street corners, has been a hallmark of every authoritarian society I've visited. The militarization of Washington will not have any lasting effects on violent crime. But it's not intended to. It will only clarify President Trump's contempt for American democracy and his endless need to humiliate people he sees not as equal citizens but as disloyal subjects. Our depressing slide into sclerotic autocracy continues.
Davis:
In the final analysis, this comes down to whether safer streets are good. It is hard to fathom an argument to the contrary. The objections seem ginned up from the usual complaint that "Trump wants it, so it's bad." Critics tried that with borders and it failed. They said tariffs would sink us into depression. Hasn't happened, and it won't. Is there an element of political theater to this D.C. crime strategy? Sure, but it's also sound policy of the type that shows a president in touch with a concern real people have, which is served him well, and also the nation.
David Faris is a professor of political science at Roosevelt University and the author of It's Time to Fight Dirty: How Democrats Can Build a Lasting Majority in American Politics. His writing has appeared in Slate, The Week, The Washington Post, The New Republic, Washington Monthly, and more. You can find him on Twitter @davidmfaris and Bluesky @davidfaris.bsky.social.
Mark Davis is a syndicated talk show host for the Salem Media Group on 660AM The Answer in Dallas-Ft. Worth, and a columnist for the Dallas Morning News and Townhall.
The views expressed in this article are the writers' own.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
19 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Trump's Pick To Oversee Social Security COLA Says 'Need To Sunset' Program
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's pick for commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics has argued for "sunsetting" Social Security, calling it a "Ponzi scheme." Trump nominated Heritage Foundation economist E.J. Antoni to lead the BLS less than two weeks after firing the agency's former commissioner, Erika McEntarfer, in response to weaker-than-expected job numbers. The dismissal has fueled concerns that upcoming BLS reports could be altered to advance Trump's political agenda. Newsweek has contacted Antoni for comment via his profile on the Heritage Foundation's website. Why It Matters Social Security provides benefits to more than 70 million Americans every month, paying out retirement, survivor and disability benefits. Often referred to as the "third rail" of American politics for its enduring popularity, advocating against the program is considered politically perilous to members of either party. The BLS is the federal agency responsible for producing essential inflation data, including the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers—the official index used to calculate Social Security Cost of Living Adjustments. As commissioner, Antoni would oversee how that data is produced and published. President Donald Trump listens to questions from reporters after speaking on economic data in the Oval Office in Washington, D.C., on August 7. President Donald Trump listens to questions from reporters after speaking on economic data in the Oval Office in Washington, D.C., on August 7. Win McNamee/GETTY What To Know Speaking on KTRH's Houston's Morning News in December, Antoni said Social Security was set up as a "Ponzi scheme" where "today's investors are—their funds are being used to pay yesterday's investors." A Ponzi scheme is a fraudulent investment setup where money from new investors is used to pay existing ones. Social Security payments are financed from a dedicated payroll tax collected from current workers. Any excess that is not used is kept in dedicated trust funds: the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance trust fund and the Disability Insurance trust fund. These trust funds are scheduled to reach depletion in 2034 unless Congress acts, according to the 2025 Social Security Trustees report. "And unless you are going to grow the number of investors at an exponential rate, that system is eventually going to collapse. Well, since we can't grow the workforce at an exponential rate, especially today when our population is actually in a state of decline, you're not going to be able to sustain a Ponzi scheme like Social Security," Antoni continued. "Eventually you need to sunset the program." Antoni said current benefits need not be touched, but future retirees should not rely on the program. He advocated for transitioning to a system that uses private accounts "for just them." "There's plenty of money available to pay for folks who are already retired," he said. "But the people who are going to retire 10, 20, even 30, or certainly 40 years from now—I'm sorry, but the program is not going to be viable at that time." Antoni argued for "some kind of transition program where, unfortunately, you'll need a generation of people who pay Social Security taxes but never actually receive any of those benefits," he continued. "And that sounds harsh, but unfortunately that's the price to pay for unwinding a Ponzi scheme that was foisted on the American people by the Democrats in the 1930s." Who Is E.J. Antoni? Antoni is the chief economist for the conservative think tank the Heritage Foundation, which published Project 2025. According to his bio on its website, he was previously "an economist at Texas Public Policy Foundation and has taught courses ranging from labor economics to money and banking." He also holds master's and doctoral degrees in economics. Writing on Truth Social regarding Antoni's appointment to the BLS, Trump said, "E.J. will ensure that the Numbers released are HONEST and ACCURATE." In a statement on X, Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer said Antoni would "provide the American people with fair and accurate economic data they can rely on." What People Are Saying White House assistant press secretary Taylor Rogers told Newsweek: "President Trump selected Dr. E.J. Antoni III to restore America's trust in the jobs data that has had major issues, without any real attempt at resolution, for years. Antoni's education and vast experience as an economist has prepared him to produce accurate public data for businesses, households, and policymakers to inform their decision-making." Democratic Representative John B. Larson of Connecticut said in a news release on August 11: "It should alarm everyone when a yes-man determined to end Social Security is installed in this position. I call on every Senate Republican to stand with Democrats and reject this extreme nominee—before our seniors are denied the benefits they earned through a lifetime of hard work." Jason Furman, a Harvard economist and former chair of Barack Obama's Council of Economic Advisers, posted on X: "I don't think I have ever publicly criticized any Presidential nominee before. But E.J. Antoni is completely unqualified to be BLS Commissioner. He is an extreme partisan and does not have any relevant expertise. He would be a break from decades of nonpartisan technocrats." What Happens Next It remains to be seen whether the Senate will confirm Antoni's nomination to lead the BLS, which is an independent agency under the Labor Department.
The Hill
21 minutes ago
- The Hill
Bessent calls for steep interest rate cuts
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Wednesday that short term interest rates should be 1.5 to 1.75 percentage points lower than their current level, keeping up the administration's pressure campaign on the Federal Reserve. Bessent called for a half-point reduction in September at the next meeting of the Fed's interest rate-setting committee, starting a series of cuts that would lower rates substantially below their current level of 4.25 to 4.5 percent. 'We could go into a series of rate cuts here, starting with a 50 basis point rate cut in September,' he said on the Bloomberg News television network. 'We should probably be 150, 175 lower. I think the committee needs to step back.' Bessent's remarks were his clearest yet on what should happen with short-term interest rates. Treasury secretaries, which handles debt issuance and tax collection, don't traditionally weigh in on monetary policy, which is left to the Fed. While Bessent has called the Fed's independence on monetary policy a 'jewel box' not to be tampered with, he has also joined President Trump and other administration officials in criticizing the bank's handling of interest rates. Trump has been calling for interest rate cuts since the beginning of the year and has nicknamed Fed Chair Jerome Powell 'Too Late' due to his reluctance to begin cuts this year and the bank's sluggish response to post-pandemic inflation. The Fed has kept interbank lending rates at an effective level of 4.33 percent since January after making three cuts in the back half of last year. The Fed has been waiting to see the effects of tariffs on the economy. Inflation held steady from June to July at a 2.7-percent annual increase in consumer price index (CPI) after ticking up from 2.4 percent in May. The job market slowed down significantly over the past three months, adding just 106,000 jobs from May through July. Asked Wednesday if a half-percent rate cut in September would signal that the fundamentals of the economy are not in good shape, Bessent said the signal would be one of transition. 'That signals that there's an adjustment, and that rates are too constrictive,' he said. FPowell has said recently that he believes interest rates are now 'modestly restrictive,' meaning that inflation-adjusted interest rates are lowering potential profitability and restraining the level of investment. Bessent criticized Powell's reliance and reactivity to incoming data, which the Fed chair has often stressed during his tenure as chair. 'He's not Alan Greenspan, who was very forward-thinking. They try to be more data-driven, which I think is a mistake,' Bessent said. 'It's just very old-fashioned thinking.'
The Hill
21 minutes ago
- The Hill
‘Jurassic World Rebirth' is the perfect metaphor for Mamdani's socialism
' Jurassic World Rebirth ' is the perfect metaphor for Zohran Mamdani's mayoral campaign. The New York City Democratic mayoral nominee and Democratic socialist Mamdani is enthralled with the dinosaur that is socialism. He wants to take New Yorkers to a place where the dinosaur will roam free. Despite all previous visitors having been devoured, Mamdani promises he can do it right. What could go wrong? Socialism is undisputedly a dinosaur. Dressed up as new and avant garde, it goes back centuries in Europe. In the 1820s America had socialist Owenite communes; even its now standard Marxist variant is a product of the late 19th century. It's not timeless; it's Jurassic-age technology. 'Jurassic World Rebirth,' where the dinosaurs live, is a place people should not go. The movie explicitly tells us this. We moviegoers know all too well why: Dinosaurs devour people. Whatever their rationale, dinosaur projects always fail. Always. Yet, filled with humanity's hubris (and that is what the 'Jurassic' movies are about), each new group imagines it holds the key: Dinosaurs can be lived with. We will all be better for it. And each new group is wrong. The movie's cast is young and attractive; after all, hunting dinosaurs is a young person's game — at least when the dinosaurs are breathing and not merely bones. There's a young woman, a young male professor, a father, children scattered from teen to 'tween,' some locals for color and a corporate executive, for greed. Like the movie, Mamdani's attempt at socialism features stock characters. Through all runs the thread of passion — and anger, always anger: clenched fists thrust upward, clenched jaws thrust forward. All represent far more than they actually are. Of course, Mamdani is the lead: young, earnest, with a beard that adds just the touch of gravitas, while maintaining the millennial vibe. An accomplished actor, Mamdani began his career auditioning as a Black student for a role at Columbia University. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) is the femme fatale, just a beret short of Che. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) brings the tousle-haired head of experience, an avuncular mentor and guide. Although he has never been to where he professes to take his followers, the others don't doubt he knows the way. And there are ensemble characters. The Squad, not intended to be closely scrutinized, communicate by their presence. They look so right for right now, how could they be wrong? The movie's location is exotically tropical — an island just offshore of Suriname and next door to Guyana, which by coincidence is where another American, Jim Jones, failed to establish a socialist utopia half a century ago. Mamdani socialism's intended location is New York City. Here, in the words of Frank Sinatra, it is looking to 'make a brand-new start of it.' If socialism can 'make it there,' it can 'make it anywhere.' As for the movie's plot, no spoiler alert is needed. If you've seen one of the earlier versions you know what happens here. It's a good romp, but suffice it to say, people get eaten. The same applies to Mamdani's socialism's plot: If you've seen one attempt, you've seen them all. People will get 'eaten' here too — lots and lots and lots of them. Everything will come crashing down at the end, or it will die with a whimper. Socialism has many routes to its coda, but always the same one: failure. 'Jurassic World Rebirth,' offers a new cast, higher production costs, better special effects and an updated plot. Mamdani's socialist project offers the same. He brings with him a cast of mostly young, new faces dressing up the old premise that you can somehow get something for nothing — housing, free bus rides, government-run grocery stores and childcare. His New York special effects are new to the U.S., and if he gets his hands on the city's budget, his production costs will be massively larger than any other American socialism project before it. 'Jurassic World Rebirth' is a summer blockbuster. People are lining up to see it. People are also crowding to see Mamdani's socialism project. And if he wins the mayoral race, they will be lining up too, only then, to get out. J.T. Young is the author of 'Unprecedented Assault: How Big Government Unleashed America's Socialist Left.' He has over three decades' experience working in Congress, the Department of Treasury, the Office of Management, and Budget, and representing a Fortune 20 company.
