logo
Citrus Heights police shoot man who officers say pulled knife, made threats

Citrus Heights police shoot man who officers say pulled knife, made threats

Yahoo22-04-2025
Citrus Heights police shot and wounded a man Monday morning after officers said he threatened people with a knife in a shopping center parking lot.
Officers responded around 10:30 a.m. to reports of a man with a knife near Lichen Drive and Antelope Road, said Lt. Nicole Garing, a Citrus Heights Police Department spokesperson. Officers found the man at 10:42 a.m., still armed, and at least one officer opened fire, Garing said.
The man was taken to a hospital with injuries that were not life-threatening, police said. No officers or bystanders were hurt.
In line with department policy, the officers who fired on the man were expected to be placed on administrative leave pending an investigation of the incident by the department.
This incident is also being investigated by the Sacramento County District Attorney's Office, a standard procedure for officer-involved shootings in the county.
Police were also expected to release video from body-worn and patrol car cameras, as mandated by Senate Bill 1421, which requires disclosure of police records pertaining to incident of great bodily injury within 30 days of an incident.
Monday's officer-involved shooting was the first by city law enforcement since October 2024, according to previous Bee reporting.
Justin Jerome Phillips, now 42, survived the shooting and was arrested on suspicion of robbery, corporal injury of a spouse and threatening with a weapon. Phillips remains held in Sacramento County sheriff's custody in lieu of $1 million bail. Phillips returns Thursday to Sacramento Superior Court in connection with the October incident.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

ABC News anchor reveals she was ‘jumped' by a ‘half-dressed' vagrant in DC: ‘We're all experiencing it firsthand'
ABC News anchor reveals she was ‘jumped' by a ‘half-dressed' vagrant in DC: ‘We're all experiencing it firsthand'

New York Post

time12-08-2025

  • New York Post

ABC News anchor reveals she was ‘jumped' by a ‘half-dressed' vagrant in DC: ‘We're all experiencing it firsthand'

ABC News anchor Kyra Phillips on Monday recounted a harrowing encounter she had with a 'half-dressed' homeless man who mugged her in downtown Washington, DC, as she noted that many in the nation's capital are experiencing crime 'firsthand' despite what official statistics show. 'I can tell you firsthand here in downtown DC where we work, right here around our bureau, just in the past six months, you know, there were two people shot, one person died, literally two blocks down here from the bureau,' Phillips explained. 'It was within the last two years that I actually was jumped walking just two blocks down from here,' she revealed. 'And then, just this morning, one of my co-workers said her car was stolen, a block away from the bureau,' Phillips added. 3 Kyra Phillips described her encounter with a deranged mugger in downtown DC as 'scary as hell.' ABC News 'We can talk about the numbers going down, but crime is happening every single day because we're all experiencing it firsthand, working and living down here,' the 'ABC News Live' host continued, as she reported on President Trump's decision to place the city's police department under federal control and deploy National Guard troops into the streets. Phillips later described her encounter with the mugger as 'scary as hell,' as she interviewed DC US Attorney Jeanine Pirro. 'So, I was jumped just two blocks here from the ABC bureau. It was not a minor, though,' she told Pirro, noting that 'it's happened to a lot of people in our building, sadly.' 'He was homeless and half-dressed – clearly wasn't in his clear mind,' Phillips said of her attacker. The former CNN journalist said she felt her best option was to fight back. 'It was scary as hell, I'm not going to lie, but I fought back. I didn't see any weapons in his hands. I felt like it was my only choice,' Phillips recalled. 3 Trump has ordered federal law enforcement and National Guard troops to patrol DC streets in an effort to crackdown on violent crime. Kyle Mazza/NurPhoto/Shutterstock 3 Trump has threatened a federal takeover of Washington, DC, if the district doesn't do more to protect its citizens from crime. Getty Images Trump fumed Monday that DC has been 'overtaken by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals, roving mobs of wild youth, drugged-out maniacs and homeless people.' The president vowed that his administration is 'not going to let it happen anymore,' and will remove homeless encampments from all public places, including in parks and underpasses. The latest data from DC's Metropolitan Police Department shows violent crime has dropped 26% in the district so far this year, compared to 2024. Overall crime is down 7% so far, according to MPD. Trump claimed Monday that the numbers were 'phony' and promised that Attorney General Pam Bondi will be 'looking into that.' The president noted that a DC police commander was suspended last month for allegedly falsifying crime data to make trends appear more positive.

Jess Phillips condemns 'idiot' councils that don't believe they have grooming gang problem
Jess Phillips condemns 'idiot' councils that don't believe they have grooming gang problem

Yahoo

time06-08-2025

  • Yahoo

Jess Phillips condemns 'idiot' councils that don't believe they have grooming gang problem

Safeguarding minister Jess Phillips has told Sky News that councils that believe they don't have a problem with grooming gangs are "idiots" - as she denied Elon Musk influenced the decision to have a national inquiry on the subject. The minister said: "I don't follow Elon Musk's advice on anything although maybe I too would like to go to Mars. "Before anyone even knew Elon Musk's name, I was working with the victims of these crimes." Politics latest: Starmer responds to report suggesting tax rises needed Mr Musk had called Ms Phillips a "rape genocide apologist" in one of a series of inflammatory posts on X in January and said she should go to jail. Mr Musk, then a close aide of US President Donald Trump, sparked a significant political row with his comments - with the Conservative Party and Reform UK calling for a new public inquiry into grooming gangs. At the time, Ms Phillips denied a request for a public inquiry into child sexual exploitation in Oldham on the basis that it should be done at a local level. But the government announced a national inquiry after Baroness Casey's rapid audit on grooming gangs, which was published in June. Asked if she thought there was, in the words of Baroness Casey, "over representation" among suspects of Asian and Pakistani men, Ms Phillips replied: "My own experience of working with many young girls in my area - yes there is a problem. There are different parts of the country where the problem will look different, organised crime has different flavours across the board. "But I have to look at the evidence… and the government reacts to the evidence." Ms Phillips also said the home secretary has written to all police chiefs telling them that data collection on ethnicity "has to change", to ensure that it is always recorded, promising "we will legislate to change the way this [collection] is done if necessary". Read more: Operation Beaconport has since been established, led by the National Crime Agency (NCA), and will be reviewing more than 1,200 closed cases of child sexual exploitation. Ms Phillips revealed that at least "five, six" councils have asked to be a part of the national review - and denounced councils that believed they don't have a problem with grooming gangs as "idiots". "I don't want [the inquiry] just to go over places that have already had inquiries and find things the Casey had already identified," she said. She confirmed that a shortlist for a chair has been drawn up, and she expects the inquiry to be finished within three years. Ms Phillips's comments come after she announced £426,000 of funding to roll out artificial intelligence tools across all 43 police forces in England and Wales to speed up investigations into modern slavery, child sex abuse and county lines gangs. Some 13 forces have access to the AI apps, which the Home Office says have saved more than £20m and 16,000 hours for investigators. The apps can translate large amounts of text in foreign languages and analyse data to find relationships between suspects.

Blake Lively Slams & Shames Justin Baldoni's Lawyers Over Making Her Deposition Public, Leaking Details Of Last Week's Sit-Down For 'Media Campaign'
Blake Lively Slams & Shames Justin Baldoni's Lawyers Over Making Her Deposition Public, Leaking Details Of Last Week's Sit-Down For 'Media Campaign'

Yahoo

time05-08-2025

  • Yahoo

Blake Lively Slams & Shames Justin Baldoni's Lawyers Over Making Her Deposition Public, Leaking Details Of Last Week's Sit-Down For 'Media Campaign'

(Updated with Lively's sanctions motion against Bryan Freedman) Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni came face-to-face last week as the It Ends With Us actress gave a deposition in the fierce fight over whether sexual harassment and retaliation occurred on the film and the online fallout around its premiere a year ago. Regardless of what Lively did or did not say in response to questions by Wayfarer Studios co-founder Baldoni's lead lawyer Bryan Freedman and others, a letter from the Another Simple Favor star's own attorneys filed today in federal court makes it pretty clear in hindsight the July 31 sit-down did not go well. More from Deadline ADVERTISEMENT 'In rushing to file on the public docket the entirety of the 292-page transcript on the day they received it, with no plausible legal reason to do so, the Wayfarer Defendants and their counsel have proved Ms. Lively's point,' the correspondence Monday from Esra Hudson to Judge Lewis Liman says slamming Team Baldoni's blunt move and wanting everything permanently sealed ASAP. 'The transcript was ostensibly filed in support of their argument that there is no basis to assert that Bryan Freedman or his firm have participated in, fueled and advanced a smear campaign against Ms. Lively such that their conduct has 'amounted to public relations work rather than that of an attorney.' 'But, in fact, this tactic perfectly demonstrates the counsel-as-PR agent role because there is no conceivable legal purpose to file the whole transcript, particularly given that it has not been reviewed, corrected or finalized, and a mere two pages of it were cited in their argument,' the Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP partner adds, also pointing the finger at Baldoni's side for 'immediately' leaking 'details from the deposition to the tabloid media.' Hudson adds: 'The letter and attachment should be seen for what they are: a manufactured excuse to force the transcript into the public domain as fodder for the Wayfarer Defendants' media campaign.' In an August 1 letter from Baldoni's side, which was filed the same day the depo transcript was under temporary seal, attorney Kevin Fritz certainly teases out what was said the day before. 'Upon questioning by Freedman at her recent deposition, Lively admitted that the only ongoing 'smear campaign' about which she has personal knowledge involves (redacted).' Among the details that were dribbled out of the meeting at Lively's lawyers' Manhattan offices last Thursday was what Lively was wearing, what time the deposition started (10:13 am ET) how husband Ryan Reynolds was there with her, what her side did and said, and that Baldoni himself was in the room. 'Consistent with their goal of creating a media circus around Ms. Lively's deposition, it also appears that the Wayfarer Defendants immediately leaked details from the deposition to the tabloid media,' Hudson's letter notes to Judge Liman, who has been short tempered about such actions in the past. Now, whether or not those leaks came from Team Baldoni or not, the fact is such info did quickly end up in the likes of the Daily Mail and TMZ, which have had a lot of Team Baldoni scoops over the past year. 'The narrative created was that Ms. Lively needed a large contingent of people with her to testify, while misleadingly suggesting that only Mr. Baldoni and Mr. Freedman were present for the deposition on their side,' today's three-page letter said. 'The reality is that Ms. Lively testified across the table from Mr. Baldoni, Jamey Heath, Steve Sarowitz, Melissa Nathan, and Jennifer Abel, all of whom attended this deposition in person, as well as eight attorneys representing the Wayfarer and Wallace Parties, two of whom questioned her.' ADVERTISEMENT With Baldoni's $400 million countersuit tossed out in June and Deadpool star Reynolds, the New York Times and others dropped from the matter altogether, Lively's trial against Baldoni is set to start on March 9, 2026. At the same time, a sideshow of sorts is playing out in federal and California state court with the billionaire Sarowitz-backed-Baldoni battling insurance companies over covering his legal fees. And let's be honest, from the get-go, this whole case has been a media feeding feast with highs and lows, literally and figuratively. Also, truth be told, very soon after Lively filed her initial complaint with California's Civil Rights department last December, and saw it covered exclusively by the NYT, the actress accused Baldoni's legal team of playing to the media as much as the court docket in the clash between the duo and their inner circles. Both in and out of court, the often hard-nosed and media savvy (Hello Megyn Kelly) Freedman has become the magnet for most of this criticism with some bold moves and some ham-handed tactics (the Madison Square Garden crack as exhibit #1) Monday Lively's team had no comment on her lawyer's letter to Judge Liman, and reps for Baldoni could not be reached for comment. A rare case of duel silence in this high volume and high profile case. ADVERTISEMENT Later in the day, not for the first time and clearly for public consumption, Lively's lawyers filed a motion for sanctions against Freedman, claiming the successful LA-based attorney has frequently let loose with 'biased and inflammatory pre-trial indictments of Ms. Lively's character, credibility, and reputation' and 'publicly slandering' the actress, as they said in a slightly redacted memorandum of law accompanying the motion. Best of Deadline Sign up for Deadline's Newsletter. For the latest news, follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store