India-EU Free Trade Agreement feasible by end of 2025: S Jaishankar
Live Events
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
India places a high priority to its relations with the European Union, the centrepiece of which is the Free Trade Agreement negotiations that are making very good progress, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar said here on Wednesday.During a conversation with The Financial Times Brussels Bureau Chief Henry Foy at the German Marshall Fund (GMF) Forum, the external affairs minister expressed confidence that the year-end timeline set for the completion of the India-EU Free Trade Agreement (FTA) seems "feasible" following his in-depth talks with EU officials this week.He also highlighted the strength of the two-way relationship that goes beyond trade to cover aspects of defence and security, mobility, talent flows and education."I would give it (India-EU ties) pretty high priority... right now you catch us at a very important moment," said Jaishankar."We had the (EU) College of Commissioners, very soon after they came into office, visit India collectively. We know that's a very unusual and very positive step, and we are really looking at deepening our ties," he said."So, the centrepiece is the FTA, which has been under negotiation for some time now but everything I have heard... I think we are making very good progress," he added.Against the backdrop of his talks earlier on Wednesday with MaroS Šefčovič, the EU Commissioner for Trade and Economic Security, Jaishankar was asked about the prospect of completing the FTA by the end of this year."A lot has been done, and everything that I heard on this trip gives me the confidence that it's within sight, that by the end of the year it is feasible to do this," he said.The conversation session at the high-profile forum covered a broad spectrum of issues governing India's foreign policy perspectives, from its relations with the US and closer in its neighbourhood with China."We are conditioned to deal with situations and challenges, think it through for ourselves and essentially make decisions based on what capabilities we have and what we are able to leverage from the world. And that's because we have never been an alliance partner. So, by the nature of our foreign policy structure, our strategic choices, we sort of have that mindset and approach," Jaishankar said.Contrasting this with Europe's history and experiences, the minister noted that India is accustomed to dealing with shifting geopolitical realities and any "trans-Atlantic divergences" in outlooks that emerge."We are objective about it. We value our relations with the US, as we do with the EU, we will deal with each one on terms which are best for both of us," he said.On the issue of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, Jaishankar highlighted India's stance favouring a negotiated settlement of differences.He said: "We have felt from the start that even if two countries, two neighbours, have differences, even very deep differences, it cannot be settled by recourse to war. If war has started, you are not going to get a solution out of the battlefield. If you're not going to get a solution out of the battlefield, then the answer is to negotiate."And if you are going to negotiate, it makes sense to negotiate directly, rather than through very convoluted signalling. So that's been our position. It wasn't necessarily widely accepted in 2022, but I think a lot of people have come around to that point of view right now... the United States today, under President Trump, also is an advocate of the fact that there has to be a negotiated solution."On China, Jaishankar reflected upon the "incredibly complicated matrix" with several different dimensions. Asked if the EU remains naive vis-a-vis China, he added: "I would point to a certain evolution in Europe's position and stance, but I would also make the point that it's a very differentiated picture."Not all of Europe is obviously moving at the same speed and on the same wavelength. So, there are some which have different views, some who are more hard-headed. I would make that distinction."Jaishankar has been holding a series of wide-ranging discussions in Brussels this week, including with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas for the first India-EU Strategic Dialogue.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Print
32 minutes ago
- The Print
Modi-Carney to reset ties at G7 in Canada, MEA says all issues of ‘mutual concern' to be raised
Canada will likely seek further cooperation between law-enforcement agencies, with particular reference to the killing of Sikh separatist Hardeep Singh Nijjar in June 2023. The previous Canadian administration led by Justin Trudeau had alleged the Indian government was linked to the killing, a claim New Delhi strongly refuted. All issues of 'mutual concern' will be raised during the meeting, the Ministry of External Affairs said. The issues, among others, include India's concerns about the space given by Ottawa to Sikh separatists and transnational organised crime gangs. New Delhi: Ties between India and Canada, which have plummeted over the past year-and-a-half, are set for a reboot as Prime Minister Narendra Modi attends the G7 Summit in Alberta next week, and holds a bilateral meeting with his counterpart Mark Carney on the margins of the summit. On June 6, Carney called PM Modi and invited him to the G7 Summit in Kananaskis, Alberta. Modi will be in Canada 16 and 17 June. 'Both leaders also had an opportunity to reflect on the India-Canada relationship and the way forward. India and Canada are vibrant democracies bound by shared democratic values, a steadfast commitment to the rule of law, and vibrant people-to-people ties,' MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal told the weekly press briefing Thursday. Jaiswal added, 'We believe that the forthcoming meeting between the two leaders on the sidelines of the G7 Summit will offer an important opportunity to exchange views on bilateral and global issues, and to explore pathways to reset the relationship based on mutual respect, shared interests, and sensitivity to each other's concerns. Our views on some of these issues have already been shared publicly in considerable detail.' The potential thaw comes after months of frayed relations. The ties between the two countries hit rock bottom under the Trudeau administration in 2023, when he accused the Indian government of being linked to the killing of Nijjar. Nijjar, an Indian-designated terrorist, was gunned down outside a Gurudwara 18 June 2023. India has denied any links to his killing and is yet to receive any evidence from Ottawa supporting their charge. Last October, New Delhi expelled the acting high commissioner of Canada and five other diplomats from the country, while withdrawing its own high commissioner and five other diplomats from Canada. Under Carney, Ottawa has signalled its intent to carve out the issue of Nijjar's killing from the overall ties. Carney announced last week that India and Canada will resume cooperation between law-enforcement agencies. On Carney's statement, Jaiswal said, 'There are existing mechanisms between Indian and Canadian law-enforcement agencies that have discussed issues of mutual security concern over a period of time. This engagement is likely to continue.' Modi's meeting with Carney is set to take place roughly a day or two before the anniversary of Nijjar's killing. The acceptance of the invitation by Modi to attend the G7 summit is a serious declaration of intent from New Delhi to reset ties. For Canada, India has gained importance since the return of President Donald Trump to the White House. Trump has attacked Canada for its trade surplus with the US and has gone as far as labelling the country the 51st state of the United States of America. Earlier this week, Carney announced that Canada will be investing close to $9 billion more in defence spending, with a view to diversify its security partnership away from the US. This leaves Canada with the European Union and India as other democratic options to increase its engagement with. The Canadian prime minister has some political breathing room to act in a positive fashion with India, following the success of the Liberal Party in the recently concluded federal election. The meeting between the two leaders may set the stage for the reappointment of high commissioners between the two countries and normalising diplomatic ties. (Edited by Ajeet Tiwari) Also Read: Fresh trouble hits India-Canada ties, New Delhi protests threatening language at Khalsa Day parade
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Hyphenating US-Pak: Doing business with gunmen
Howdy, phenomenal pardners! Michael Kurilla (left) & Asif Munir, Florida, 2023 The Trump regime's reported invitation to Pakistan Army chief Asim Munir to attend the 250th US Army Day celebrations in Washington tomorrow has stirred various vectors of speculation. Chief among them: Potential reset in US-Pakistan relations. Pakistan's prospective utility within an emergent Trump doctrine that views bilateral ties primarily through an economic lens. Revival of a counterterrorism partnership between Islamabad/Rawalpindi and Washington. Implications of such a warming of US-Pakistan ties on US-India relations. In New Delhi, this apparent shift in Washington's posture has come as a surprise. What is even more startling is the timing - coming on the heels of India's retaliation against Pakistan for its involvement in the Pahalgam terrorist attacks on civilians. A significant part of Trump's appeal among Indians, both in India and the diaspora, stemmed from his tough stance on terrorism. During Trump 1.0, he publicly called out Pakistan's duplicity in his very first tweet of 2018, accusing it of 'lies and deceit' while receiving billions in US aid. He subsequently cut $300 mn in aid to Pakistan, a move that built on the Obama administration's earlier decision to withhold one-third of all military assistance to the country. During Trump 2.0, consistent with his recalibrated approach toward various global actors, the US president has markedly diverged from his earlier stance, Pakistan being no exception. In February, the Trump regime departed from its broader aid-cutting policy to authorise $397 mn in security assistance to Pakistan. This was specifically aimed at supporting a US-backed programme for maintenance and technical support of Pakistan's F-16 fighter the assistance explicitly stated that it was not to be used for operations against India, reopening of funding channels to Pakistan signalled a broader trend of policy reversal. In March, Trump publicly thanked Pakistan for its assistance in the arrest of Mohammad Sharifullah, a suspect linked to multiple terrorist attacks, including the 2021 Abbey Gate bombing in recently, Trump's consistent attempts to place Pakistan on equal footing with India, particularly following the India-Pak military escalation in May, appear driven by strategic reinforcing this shift, US Centcom chief Michael Kurilla referred to Pakistan as a 'phenomenal partner' in counterterrorism efforts. Similarly, Paul Kapur, Trump's incoming assistant secretary of state for South and Central Asian affairs, affirmed that the US would 'pursue security cooperation where it is beneficial to US interests while seeking opportunities for bilateral collaboration in trade and investment'. Together, these moves reflect a deliberate and coordinated strategy for renewed strategic engagement with apparent rapprochement between the US and Pakistan may be driven largely by Trump's personal inclinations, and a possible desire to secure future economic deals. For Pakistan, warming ties with Washington represent a strategic gain, however temporary. Any signs of improving relations between Islamabad/Rawalpindi and Washington stand in sharp political contrast to the stance of former PM Imran Khan and his supporters in Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI).Khan had accused the US of orchestrating the fall of his government, and maintained that he would never have agreed to American demands for military bases in his country. If PTI continues to remain a significant political force, any future US requests for enhanced military presence - even under the guise of counterterrorism - are likely to face resistance. Conversely, if Trump intensifies efforts to strike an economic deal with Pakistan, the resulting political reverberations within the country could become even more tough posture during his first term - marked by launching a trade war with China, pursuing a 'maximum pressure' strategy against Iran culminating in the killing of Iranian general Qasem Soleimani, and publicly calling out countries like Pakistan for sponsoring terrorism - is now giving way to a policy of modus vivendi, driven by an outsized prioritisation of US interests, particularly economic US-China economic deal reportedly 'finalised' on June 11 underscores this clear shift in US diplomacy - one that increasingly sidelines concerns of Washington's allies, partners and friends. While this approach may serve immediate US interests, especially in economic terms, it risks prompting a strategic recalibration by other nations in how they engage with the the shadow of recent military escalation between India and Pakistan, Pakistan's detente with the US may present an opportunity for Trump. But the strain this reset places on India-US relations could prove detrimental to both countries in the long run. The divergence between New Delhi and Washington is now most pronounced on the issue of Pakistan and, more broadly, on India has strongly reaffirmed its zero-tolerance stance against terrorism following the Pahalgam attack, the Trump regime appears increasingly willing to engage Pakistan as a counterterrorism partner. In doing so, Trump seems to be prioritising unilateral US interests over shared strategic concerns that have long underpinned the India-US partnership. Unlike his first term, when Trump's South Asia policy broadly aligned with the US-India strategic convergence, his bilateral bets in his second gig risk further destabilising an already fragile region. (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. How a nudge from Cyrus Mistry helped TCS unlock a USD1 billion opportunity Explainer: The RBI's LAF corridor and its role in rate transmission Is Zomato under siege? Quick commerce may be the next telecom Operation Sindoor, Turkey, Bangladesh played out as India hosted global airlines after 42 years Coal on one hand and green on the other; this company balances both Stock Radar: Bandhan Bank stocks break out from 1-month consolidation; what should traders do? Check target & stop loss Combination of strong brand & higher margins equals long-term investment: 5 stocks with an upside potential of up to 23% Two Trades for Today: A PSU energy major for 7.5% rise, a large-cap refinery stock for close to 6% upmove These mid-cap stocks with 'Strong Buy' & 'Buy' recos can rally over 25%, according to analysts
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Donald Trump to set unilateral tariff rates for trading partners within two weeks, ‘Can take it or leave it'
United States President Donald Trump on June 11 said he intends to send letters to trading partners within the next week or two setting unilateral tariff rates, according to a Bloomberg report. The move will come ahead of a July 9 deadline to reimpose higher duties on severeal countries, it added. Speaking to reporters, Donald Trump said, 'At a certain point, we're just going to send letters out. And I think you understand that, saying this is the deal, you can take it or leave it.' When reporters questioned if countries would get more time to make trade deals before the higher tariffs start, the US president said he would be open to it, but 'But I don't think we're gonna have that necessity'. While Donald Trump had initially said he would engage in talks with each country, the US strategy has since moved towards prioritising key economic partners with the administration acknowledging that it lacks the capacity to negotiate dozens of individual deals, the report said. While deals with China and the United Kingdom have had extensive discussions and 'near' completion, Trump's team is working to secure bilateral deals with India, Japan, South Korea and the European Union. Also speaking to reporters on June 11, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said that a deal with the EU is likely to be among the last to be completed, expressing frustration with conducting talks with a 27-nation bloc. At present it is unclear if Donald Trump will follow through with his intent as he has often set two-week deadlines only for dates to be postponed or for the matter to be dropped, the report noted. Notably, on May 29, a reporter invited Donald Trump ire by asking his opinion on Wall Street dubbing his tariffs plan as TACO i.e. Trump Always Chickens Out — mocking the US president's frequent tariff impositions and subsequent reductions, followed by waivers. A visibly offended Donald Trump went on a defensive rant: 'Don't ever say what you said. To me, that's the nastiest question.' In April, the US president announced higher tariffs for dozens of trading partners, and then paused action for 90 days. Then, on May 16, Donald Trump said he would be setting tariff rates for US trading partners 'over the next two to three weeks'. Till date (June 11 last), the only trade framework the US has reached is with the UK, along with a shaky tariff truce with China. First coined by The Financial Times' Robert Armstrong, the term 'TACO' has been picked up for use by Wall Street traders, who see large sell-offs each time Donald Trump's tariffs are announced, followed by recovery when the demand is cut down or removed. (With inputs from Bloomberg)
