Do direct Putin-Trump talks in Alaska signal ‘symbolic victory for Russia'?
Since then, as the war has escalated and peace has looked increasingly distant, he recently claimed that pledge was sarcastic.
But a meeting between Trump and his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, in Alaska on Friday has raised hopes among some Russians.
'It may be a signal for a restart of relations,' Moscow resident Damir Gurin said. 'Formally, Washington has all the legal mechanisms to lift sanctions and restrictions at once, opening the way to the deal of the century.
'This is no longer just diplomacy. It is a redrawing of the geopolitical map.'
Others are more sceptical.
'Between Putin's senile stubbornness and Trump's spontaneousness, everything can still change 100 times over,' said Katherine, a St Petersburg pensioner who asked that her surname be withheld because she feared repercussions. 'God willing, they agree to end the war, of course.'
In recent months, Trump has expressed growing frustration with Putin's unwillingness to halt attacks on Ukraine, calling recent strikes on Kyiv 'disgusting'. On July 31, Russian drones and missiles killed dozens of civilians in the Ukrainian capital in one of the worst wartime assaults.
Last month, Trump threatened more sanctions unless Russia stops the fighting within 50 days. That deadline, mocked by senior Russian politicians, has now passed. New sanctions have not materialised, but 50 percent tariffs were slapped on India last week to punish the country for buying Russian oil.
Even so, Trump has suggested a peace deal is close.
'We're gonna get some [land] back. We're gonna get some switched,' the US president said at the White House on Friday. 'There'll be some swapping of territories to the betterment of both [Russia and Ukraine],' he added, without elaborating on what land would be given up by whom.
'I've already seen memes how we'll swap the Crimea for Alaska,' Anya, a Muscovite, quipped.
According to Ilya Budraitskis, a Russian political scientist and visiting scholar at the University of California at Berkeley, the irreconcilable positions of the warring parties make real compromise unlikely. Instead, the Alaska summit will have a more symbolic nature, he predicted.
'From Putin's side, this shows the restoration of his position in the world, that he comes to American territory and meets with the president, who shows signs of respect. It is clear this meeting is a symbolic victory for Russia by the very fact it is being held, regardless that no one expects any results from it,' Budraitskis told Al Jazeera.
'It is a proof of the effectiveness of [Putin's] strategy, which is that there is no need to make any compromises – you need to stubbornly repeat your maximalist positions, and at some point, everyone will be so tired of this that they will be forced to accept them, and the international isolation of Russia will gradually disappear.'
Budraitskis believes the meeting holds a similar value for Trump.
'The fact he is confused about whether Russia should give up its territory shows he doesn't take any meaningful agenda of this meeting very seriously,' he continued.
'What the symbolic meaning of this meeting is for Trump is in showing he continues to play a key role in the situation in Ukraine, that he is the only person who is capable of talking to Putin, whom Putin listens to and respects.'
While Russia currently occupies vast chunks of eastern Ukraine, Ukraine no longer occupies any Russian territory after being ousted from the Kursk region of western Russia earlier this year.
Bloomberg reported on Friday that Russian and US diplomats were hammering out a deal that would allow Russia to keep the territory it has conquered so far, halting its invasion along the existing battle lines in the Kherson and Zaporizhia regions of southern Ukraine.
The Polish online newspaper Onet said Trump envoy Steve Witkoff proposed to Putin a de facto recognition of what the Kremlin considers its 'new territories' and the lifting of sanctions.
Officially, the Kremlin lays claim to the entire Donbas area of eastern Ukraine. If Ukraine were to abide by those terms, its forces would have to retreat from those parts of its Luhansk and Donetsk regions still under its control.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy fired back in a Telegram post on Saturday, reiterating: 'Ukrainians will not gift their land to the occupiers.'
But Zelenskyy will not be present at Friday's meeting.
'The summit will be held without the participation of the EU countries and Ukraine,' stated Zaurbek Khugaev, director of the Digoria Platform think tank.
'This is an eloquent signal that both Trump and Putin understand the destructive position of Zelenskyy and European officials for the development of mutually acceptable agreements, who, by the way, are persistently trying to include the Ukrainian leader in the agenda of the event.'
Budraitskis said certain token measures may be granted without seriously hindering the war effort.
'It's possible that Putin will take some symbolic steps, for example limiting or temporarily refraining from bombing Ukraine, because, in general, this aerial warfare does little to help advance Russian troops.'
Although Putin and Trump have spoken several times by phone this year, Friday's talks will mark the first face-to-face meeting between the two statesmen since they met in Osaka, Japan, in 2019. Putin is wanted by the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague over alleged war crimes in Ukraine, but because the United States is not a member of the ICC, it is under no obligation to arrest him.
Alexey Nechayev, a political scientist and member of the Digoria Expert Club, said Ukraine is unlikely to be the only item on Friday's agenda. Also of interest are arms control treaties, the situation in the Middle East and of course, given how the meeting is taking place in Alaska, the Arctic Circle.
'Finally, the key issue for Russia is the new security framework in Europe,' Nechayev said.
'Moscow views the Ukrainian conflict as part of a broader crisis in relations with NATO. This means that the solution requires eliminating the root causes, including legally enshrined nonexpansion of the alliance to the east.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
an hour ago
- Al Jazeera
US appeals court lifts injunction on Trump effort to slash foreign aid
A United States appeals court has ruled that President Donald Trump can proceed with efforts to slash foreign aid payments, despite such funds being designated by Congress. The two-to-one ruling on Wednesday overturned a previous injunction that required the State Department to resume the payments, including about $4bn for the US Agency for International Development (USAID) and $6bn for HIV and AIDS programmes. But the majority opinion from the appeals court did not weigh the merits of whether Trump could nix congressionally approved funds. Instead, it decided the case based on the idea that the plaintiffs did not meet the legal basis to qualify for a court injunction. Writing for the majority, Circuit Judge Karen Henderson said the groups in question 'lack a cause of action to press their claims'. They include the AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition and the Journalism Development Network, both recipients of federal aid. 'The grantees have failed to satisfy the requirements for a preliminary injunction in any event,' wrote Henderson, who was appointed by former President George HW Bush. She was joined in her decision by Gregory Katsas, a Trump appointee. However, the panel's third judge — Florence Pan, nominated under former President Joe Biden — issued a dissenting opinion that argued Trump should not be allowed to violate the separation of powers by cutting the aid. 'The court's acquiescence in and facilitation of the Executive's unlawful behaviour derails the carefully crafted system of checked and balanced power that serves as the greatest security against tyranny — the accumulation of excessive authority in a single Branch,' Pan wrote in her opinion. The ruling hands a victory to the Trump administration, which has faced a series of legal challenges over his efforts to radically reshape the federal government. That includes through dramatic cuts to spending and government agencies like USAID, which was established by an act of Congress. Almost immediately upon taking office, Trump announced a 90-day pause on all foreign aid. He has since moved to gut USAID, prompting outcry from two of his predecessors, presidents Barack Obama and George W Bush. By March, the Trump administration had announced it planned to fold USAID into the State Department, fundamentally dismantling the agency. That same month, Secretary of State Marco Rubio also said he had cancelled 83 percent of USAID's contracts. Part of Trump's reasoning for these changes was to reduce 'waste' and 'bloat' in the government. He also sought to better align government programming with his 'America First' agenda. But critics say the executive branch does not have the power to tear down congressionally mandated agencies. They also argue that Congress has the power to designate funds for aid, framing Trump's efforts as a push for extreme presidential power. Republicans, however, control both houses of Congress, and in July, it passed the Rescission Act of 2025, allowing the government to claw back nearly $9bn in foreign aid and funding for public broadcasting. US District Judge Amir Ali previously ruled that the Trump administration must pay its agreed-upon funds with humanitarian groups and other contractors that partnered with the government to distribute aid. Administration officials in February estimated there was $2bn in outstanding aid payments due by the deadline Judge Ali set. But the appeals court's ruling has set back cases to restore the foreign aid to the contractors. Attorney General Pam Bondi celebrated the decision on Wednesday, stating that the Justice Department would 'continue to successfully protect core Presidential authorities from judicial overreach'.
Al Jazeera
2 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
What's at stake at the Alaska summit for all sides?
Ukraine and European allies are anxious about the upcoming Trump-Putin summit in Alaska. US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin are set to meet in Alaska for talks on the war in Ukraine. But concern is increasing in Kyiv and among its European allies over fears of Ukraine being sidelined. So, what's at stake at the Alaska summit for all sides? Presenter: Adrian Finighan Guests: Anatol Lieven – Director of the Eurasia Program at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft Steven Erlanger – Chief diplomatic correspondent in Europe for The New York Times Alex Titov – Lecturer at Queen's University Belfast and a specialist in Russian foreign policy
Al Jazeera
4 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump touts second trilateral meeting before Putin summit; Zelenskyy pushes
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has reiterated that there should be no peace talks to end the Russia-Ukraine war now in its fourth year without representation from his country, and also said Russia should face sanctions if it does not agree to an immediate ceasefire, following a virtual meeting between him, United States President Donald Trump and European leaders. Zelenskyy delivered the message after the call on Wednesday, two days ahead of a summit between Trump and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin in Alaska, which comes as part of Washington's so far failed attempts to end the war in Ukraine. Meanwhile, Trump promised to hold trilateral talks with both Ukraine and Russia, if Friday's summit 'goes OK'. 'I would like to do it immediately,' he said. 'We'll have a quick second meeting between President Putin and President Zelenskyy and myself if they'd like to have me there.' The rapid developments came after Trump met virtually with Zelenskyy and other European leaders including France's Emmanuel Macron and the United Kingdom's Keir Starmer on Wednesday. Arranged in a bid for Europe to try and influence Trump's meeting with Putin on Friday, this second call took place after talks earlier in the day between Zelenskyy, European leaders and the heads of NATO and the European Union. Trump and European leaders called their joint meeting a success, with the US president describing it as a 'very good call'. 'I would rate it a 10. Very friendly,' he said, speaking during a press conference at the Kennedy Center. Trump noted that he would be calling Zelenskyy and European leaders immediately following his meeting with Putin. At a press conference with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Zelenskyy expressed his hope that the Trump-Putin summit would focus on an 'immediate ceasefire'. 'Sanctions must be in place and must be strengthened if Russia does not agree to a ceasefire,' he added. As the Russian army continues to make sizable territorial gains in the east Ukrainian province of Donetsk, Zelenskyy told the US president and his European colleagues that Putin was 'bluffing' about pursuing peace. His choice of words, a term commonly used in reference to poker, evoked Trump telling Zelenskyy, 'you don't have the cards' in the infamously hostile news conference at the White House on February 28th. 'He is trying to apply pressure before the meeting in Alaska along all parts of the Ukrainian front,' Zelenskyy suggested. 'Russia is trying to show that it can occupy all of Ukraine.' After the Trump call, Merz, who described the meeting as 'exceptionally constructive', stressed that Ukraine is willing to negotiate, but noted that 'legal recognition of Russian occupation is not up for debate'. 'The principle that borders cannot be changed by force must continue to apply,' Merz said. 'Negotiations must include robust security guarantees for Kyiv,' he added. 'The Ukrainian armed forces must be able and remain able to effectively defend the sovereignty of their country. They must also be able to count on Western aid in the long term.' After the online meeting, France's Macron said Trump would be seeking a ceasefire in Ukraine during his meeting with Putin on Friday. The US president would also seek a trilateral meeting with Putin and Zelenskyy in the future, the French president noted. The Trump-Putin summit in Alaska has been a cause for anxiety in Kyiv and Europe more widely, after Trump declared that both Ukraine and Russia would have to swap land if a truce is to be reached. Speaking from the UK on Wednesday, JD Vance, the US vice-president, seemed to try to allay fears in Europe. 'I just talked to him [Trump] right before I came on the stage, and he said very simply that we are going to make it our mission as an administration to bring peace to Europe once again,' Vance said. Reporting from Berlin, Al Jazeera's Step Vaessen said there was 'some optimism' in Europe that Trump had agreed to Wednesday's meeting. However, Vaessen noted that European leaders were still 'concerned that everything changes as soon as President Trump is in that room with President Putin, who they know is a very keen, a very sharp negotiator'. Elsewhere, the Russian Foreign Ministry sought to downplay the relevance of Europe's last-minute diplomatic efforts with Trump, branding them 'practically insignificant'. On the battlefield, Russia has claimed to have captured the villages of Suvorovo and Nikanorovka as its gains in Donetsk continue, with the Ukrainian authorities issuing evacuation orders for around a dozen settlements. The Kremlin's forces achieved their largest 24-hour advance in more than a year on Tuesday, according to data from the US-based Institute for the Study of War.
