Nigeria's Minister of Information: After Aid Cuts in Africa, Only Markets Can Deliver
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Severe aid cuts have forced a reckoning for African governments. Aid dependency was never the intention, but too often it became the path of least resistance. With support suddenly withdrawn, the continent is now confronting deep structural flaws in governance.
A reflex toward economic intervention has long stymied African governments. At best, it stems from an urge to shield citizens from high prices; at worst, to protect reserves of patronage. Either way, it has failed to meet the continent's most urgent need: creating enough jobs for its rapidly growing youth population.
The Honorable Minister of Information Mohammed Idris addresses the media at the Ministry of Information & National Orientation's ministerial press briefing, on May 16, 2025.
The Honorable Minister of Information Mohammed Idris addresses the media at the Ministry of Information & National Orientation's ministerial press briefing, on May 16, 2025.
Photo Courtesy of the Ministry of Information & National Orientation
In the wake of aid cuts, it is more important than ever that government focus on doing fewer things—but doing them well. The impulse to control prices for food and energy or manage sprawling state-owned enterprises must be rejected. Most governments lack the capacity or financial firepower to sustain such roles, regardless of ideology.
My country, Nigeria, was long caught in the throes of statism—and crisis after crisis followed. Now, at the midpoint of President Bola Tinubu's first term, market reforms are reshaping the economy. Though painful, they are beginning to pay off.
Coming from a minister, this may sound like predictable rhetoric. But dispassionate observers seem to agree. The World Bank's chief economist described Nigeria as being at a turning point, and its latest report noted that Nigeria grew at its fastest pace in over a decade (excluding the post-COVID-19 rebound), with further gains projected next year. Ours is only one example—but it shows that the difficult path toward market reform is worth it. Granted, much work still lies ahead.
Many preach reform but shrink from short-term political costs. Lifting controls often leads to price spikes or inflation. In Nigeria, the removal of the fuel subsidy and exchange rate controls caused disruption: the naira fell, fuel prices initially tripled, and food prices spiked. Had any previous Nigerian government acted sooner, the adjustment would likely have been less turbulent. But they did not.
Few policies have hung heavier around Nigeria's neck than its fuel subsidy. One of the most expensive price controls in the world, it stands as a cautionary tale of state intervention gone awry. Introduced in the 1970s when local refineries still functioned, it later spiraled into a costly political fixture. By 2022, with nearly all fuel imported, the subsidy devoured over 80 percent of government revenue—more than twice the combined spending on health and education. Meanwhile, international aid filled the gaps, offering cover for the dysfunction to persist.
Despite reforms in Zambia, Ghana, and Egypt, fuel subsidies remain widespread across Africa—leaving import-reliant nations' public finances at the mercy of external shocks, instead of freeing up funds for infrastructure and public services.
A controlled exchange rate was meant to conserve Nigeria's foreign currency reserves and guard against inflation. Instead, it deterred foreign investment in the non-oil sectors Nigeria needs to diversify its economy.
The move to a market-determined exchange rate has been predictably bumpy. But foreign investment has begun to return, as companies are reassured they can repatriate profits. Alongside fuel subsidy cuts, it has helped rebuild foreign reserves—a critical buffer in an era where uncertainty is becoming the norm. When fears of global recession sent oil prices tumbling and put pressure on the naira, the central bank had the firepower to step in, selling reserves to smooth out temporary disorder.
Yet across Africa, controlled exchange rates remain common. They risk complicating the African Continental Free Trade Area—the continent's flagship initiative to create the world's largest free-trade area—by distorting markets and undermining the deeper alignment needed to build larger, more attractive investment destinations.
However, the Nigerian government will do more to cushion the impact of reforms on the most vulnerable. A taskforce was recently established to accelerate the rollout of a cash transfer program, which so far has reached only a third of its intended beneficiaries. The goal is to extend support to an additional 15 million households.
Next on the reform block are state-owned enterprises. The Nigerian National Petroleum Company (NNPC), the state energy firm, is taking its final step toward an initial public offering. A former Shell executive was appointed to oversee the transition to private sector practices, with the board replaced in its entirety. Successive governments have sought to reform the entity, but the results have remained insufficient. A change of course had become necessary.
Nigeria, like much of Africa, faces an urgent need: jobs. Only the private sector can deliver employment at the scale required. Government intervention has repeatedly shown it cannot. And only a thriving private sector can generate the revenues needed to fill the gap left by the withdrawal of aid. Nigeria lags even the continent's already low tax-to-GDP ratios. Yet following recent reforms, government revenues grew by more than 50 percent. A landmark tax bill recently passed. It should help us surpass the African average by 2027.
It is easy to rely on aid, just as it is easy to rely on market controls. Yet neither has proved sustainable. The withdrawal of the former demands a deliberate rollback of the latter.
Mohammed Idris is the minister of information for the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
23 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump BLS pick suggests suspending monthly jobs report over data concerns
President Trump's nominee to lead the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) suggested the agency should stop issuing monthly jobs reports, claiming that the data the agency uses to calculate them is not reliable. E.J. Antoni, whom Trump nominated Monday to lead BLS, said the agency should 'suspend issuing the monthly jobs reports, but keep publishing more accurate, though less timely, quarterly data.' 'Major decision-makers from Wall Street to D.C. rely on these numbers, and a lack of confidence in the data has far-reaching consequences,' the nominee told Fox Business. Trump nominated Antoni, the chief economist at the far-right Heritage Foundation think tank, to lead BLS after the president fired the agency's previous chief, Erika McEntarfer, after the release of the dismal July jobs report. The report showed not only showed meager job growth last month, but also included steep downward revisions to the May and June employment reports. On net, the report showed the U.S. adding roughly 100,000 jobs over the past three months — barely a third of what economists deem necessary to prevent unemployment from rising. Trump fired McEntarfer the same day, accusing her and the agency of manipulating jobs data to make Republicans look bad and hide Democratic mismanagement of the economy. The president has provided no evidence to support his claim, and BLS veterans from both parties have said that manipulating employment data for political purposes is nearly impossible based on the way the agency calculates it. BLS also frequently makes revisions to employment and inflation reports based on data compiled and received after the reports have already been released. While most economists attribute the scale of recent BLS revisions to post-COVID-19 pandemic issues with data collection and survey response times, Antoni is among a handful pro-Trump economists who've accused BLS of massaging data to protect Democrats and harm Republicans. 'For four years, the Biden administration and its sycophants in the media kept telling Americans that we had the strongest economy in history,' Antoni wrote in a May op-ed published by Townhall, claiming the Labor Department 'admitted' that thousands of jobs added during the prior administration, 'were fake.' 'The financial pain of families was ignored while misleading (and often inaccurate) statistics were paraded on the news to convince Americans not to believe their lying eyes or empty wallets,' he added at the time. Antoni, who contributed to Project 2025 blueprint for Trump's second term, is expected to be easily confirmed by the Senate, where he'll only need a majority of votes from the GOP-controlled upper chamber. But his actions at BLS could cast a shadow over the agency's influential reports on employment and inflation — especially if he makes major changes to the frequency or compilation of those reports. Economists across the ideological spectrum have accused Antoni of making misleading and inaccurate claims about the economy to support Trump's policies and criticize Democrats. 'EJ Antoni's commentary on labor statistics has unfortunately been quite poor,' Alan Cole, a senior economist at the conservative Tax Foundation, wrote on social platform X. 'I do not think it's anywhere near the capability or knowledge of e.g. Keith Hall or William Beach, both excellent Republican appointees, the latter of whom was appointed by Trump in his first term.' Kyle Pomerleau, senior fellow at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, said on social media, 'There are a lot of competent conservative economists that could do this job. E.J. is not one of them.'
CNBC
25 minutes ago
- CNBC
30-year-old worth $700,000 shares 4 spending habits she avoided in her early 20s: 'I don't have any regrets'
Personal finance consultant Michela Allocca made some financial sacrifices in her 20s, and she has no regrets. At age 30, Allocca has a net worth of more than $700,000 according to documents reviewed by CNBC Make It. In her experience, you sometimes need to make temporary sacrifices to stay grounded financially, even when it feels like everyone else is spending, she says. "We act like not having these things in our early 20s means we're never going to have them," says Allocca, the Chicago-based author of "Own Your Money." But often, "they're status signal things," rather than things people "genuinely and sincerely care about," she tells CNBC Make It. Holding off on certain expenses early in her career helped her stay on track financially, Allocca wrote in a recent LinkedIn post that detailed four financial habits she avoided in her own early 20s. Here are those habits, and what she did instead: The social pressure to travel in your 20s can be strong, whether to become more worldly or simply because it seems like everyone else is doing it, says Allocca. Many young people take big trips right after college, often with little thought about whether it's affordable because they believe, "well, money will always come," she notes. Even a budget-conscious trip can cost $1,000 to $2,000, an expense that's particularly hard to justify early in your career when you're earning a low salary, says Allocca. A single trip can cost as much as an entire month's rent: Gen Z spends an average of $1,600 per month on rent, according to data published in January by credit firm Allocca was 22 and earning $60,000 per year in Boston, flights in particular felt expensive relative to her income, so she focused on taking affordable, domestic trips, she says. While she began taking bigger trips by her late 20s — including a recent visit to Japan — she says they were planned and budgeted for well in advance. While she now travels on her own terms, she says it's "both normal and OK" for people in their 20s to hold off until they can afford the expense. "If I am going to go on a vacation, it has to be something that I actually want to go on, not because I'm feeling pressured to go somewhere," she says. Whether it was sharing one bathroom with three other roommates or moving back in with her parents during the Covid-19 pandemic, Allocca chose not to live alone for most of her 20s. "I was able to continue to save, on average, about $1,000 a month because I wasn't dumping all my money into rent. And that actually really helped me get ahead" on investments, she says. Social media can create unrealistic expectations for what early-career earners can afford, says Allocca. In large cities like San Francisco or New York, residents need to earn more than $100,000 annually to keep rent below the commonly recommended 30% of their budget, according to a Zillow report published in May. "I feel bad for Gen Z, because their perception of what's normal at their age is so warped," she says. "There's all this [online] pressure for young people to live in a high-rise or live alone in these major cities, and it's just not reasonable." At age 27, Allocca finally decided to live alone in a nicer apartment with more space and amenities. She needed a home office, and by that point, knew her income could support a roughly $1,000-per-month rent increase without derailing her financial goals, she says. Allocca took a minimalist approach to her wardrobe in her early 20s, often buying the same pieces in different colors and sticking to a few signature shades so everything was easy to mix and match, she says. She shopped mostly at inexpensive stores like Primark and Old Navy, she adds. "When you have a general color scheme, you can match your clothes easier," says Allocca. "It also helps eliminate the paradox of choice." Her approach kept her clothing costs low. "I wasn't prioritizing shopping as part of my budget," Allocca says. "If I did need to buy something, I was going to those really inexpensive stores so I could get the least expensive version possible." Today, she uses the same principles for what she calls a capsule wardrobe of "elevated basics" — versatile pieces that work with most of what she already owns, she says. She's now more willing to spend money on better quality that she knows will last for years, she adds — like a roughly $450 cashmere sweater that's currently the most expensive item in her closet. In her 20s, Allocca avoided spending on things she could easily do herself. When her walk to work was about 30 minutes, she'd make the trip on foot rather than paying for a ride or public transit, she says. "I didn't take any unnecessary Ubers, I never ordered delivery," she wrote on LinkedIn. Many people justify convenience purchases by thinking "my time is so valuable." Allocca didn't see it that way, she says: "The time that I was saving, I wasn't doing anything valuable with it. So what difference does it make if I spend the 10 extra minutes to go walk and pick up my dinner?" She only ordered out from restaurants within walking distance, she notes. "If I'm not willing to go pick it up, then I'm not ordering it out, I'm cooking at home" she says. "To me, it's creating some parameters around, 'Is this reasonable?'" Even today, Allocca rarely allows herself to pay for convenience, and only in "extenuating circumstances," she says — like paying for delivered groceries after coming home from a long trip. By consistently avoiding most convenience costs, from rides to delivery fees, she says she's freed up around $200 per month. When paired with her low rent, that money "made a big difference" in her ability to save in her 20s, she says. And while she sacrificed some comfort in her 20s, "when I look back at all of these things, I don't have any regrets," she says.
Newsweek
25 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Texas Republicans Announce Next Move in Redistricting Fight
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Texas Republican leaders said Tuesday they are prepared to end their current stalemated special session and immediately start another, prolonging their confrontation with Democrats over the GOP's effort to redraw congressional maps at the direction of President Donald Trump. The announcement marks the latest sign that Trump's push to reconfigure congressional districts ahead of the 2026 midterm elections is set to become a prolonged fight, potentially unfolding in multiple statehouses under both Republican and Democratic control. Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows confirmed the plan during a brief session Tuesday morning that again failed to meet the quorum required for official business. Dozens of Democratic lawmakers have left the state in an effort to block what they call a partisan gerrymander aimed at cementing GOP power before the next election cycle. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott speaks as President Donald Trump listens during a roundtable discussion with first responders and local officials at Hill Country Youth Event Center in Kerrville, Texas, during a tour to observe flood... Texas Gov. Greg Abbott speaks as President Donald Trump listens during a roundtable discussion with first responders and local officials at Hill Country Youth Event Center in Kerrville, Texas, during a tour to observe flood damage, Friday, July 11, 2025. More Associated Press Burrows told members from the House floor that lawmakers would not attempt to reconvene until Friday. If Democrats are still absent — and they have given no indication they plan to return — Republicans will end the current session, and Gov. Greg Abbott will immediately call another. Abbott, a close Trump ally, confirmed his intentions in a written statement. "The Special Session #2 agenda will have the exact same agenda, with the potential to add more items critical to Texans," Abbott wrote. "There will be no reprieve for the derelict Democrats who fled the state and abandoned their duty to the people who elected them. I will continue to call special session after special session until we get this Texas first agenda passed." Abbott had convened the current session with a wide-ranging agenda that included disaster relief for recent floods that killed more than 130 people. Democrats walked out after Abbott added Trump's redistricting proposal to the list. While Burrows did not mention redistricting on Tuesday, he criticized Democrats for skipping debate on the flood relief package. The proposed redistricting plan would reshape Texas' congressional map to add five Republican-leaning districts, part of Trump's broader effort to strengthen the party's narrow U.S. House majority. Nationally, Democrats are within three seats of reclaiming control, with only several dozen competitive districts among the 435 total. Texas Republicans have issued civil warrants for the absent Democrats, but because they are out of state, they remain beyond the reach of Texas law enforcement. Burrows said Tuesday those lawmakers should bear the full cost of efforts to locate them, noting that "state troopers and others have run up six figures in overtime costs" trying to bring them back. This article includes reporting by the Associated Press.
