logo
California Faces Housing Crisis: 'No One Is Buying Homes'

California Faces Housing Crisis: 'No One Is Buying Homes'

Newsweek19 hours ago

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
After four consecutive months of year-over-year inventory increases, California is now solidly a buyer's market, which means the supply of homes is greater than the demand for properties in the state.
That is happening in part because, as real estate analyst Nick Gerli put it, "no one is buying homes in California." Home sales in the Golden State are hovering just below the lows of the Great Recession, according to a recent report by Realtor.com, as sky-high prices and elevated mortgage rates keep buyers on the sidelines of the market.
Why It Matters
The California housing market experienced great changes during the pandemic, when the rise of remote work allowed many homeowners to relocate from metropolises—such as San Francisco and Los Angeles—to smaller nearby towns or leave the state entirely. While the state saw a slight dip in home prices in early to mid-2020 compared to a year earlier, home prices quickly rebounded and have continued rising steadily until now.
Historically high home prices are now playing a crucial role in keeping demand low in the state, together with mortgage rates still hovering just below the 7 percent mark and growing economic uncertainty linked to the effects of President Donald Trump's tariffs.
A general view of a home for sale in a residential neighborhood in San Jose, California, on August 15, 2024.
A general view of a home for sale in a residential neighborhood in San Jose, California, on August 15, 2024.What To Know
According to data from Realtor.com, there were 73,160 active listings in California in May, the highest number since October 2019—before the pandemic homebuying frenzy further shrunk supply in the state.
"The rate that housing inventory has been rising for the state is on par with that of the nation. At the national level, inventory of homes for sale rose more than 30 percent year over year in May, which is in line with the double-digit increase for the state of California," Oscar Wei, the deputy chief economist at the California Association of Realtors, told Newsweek.
"Active listings typically increase during this time of the year as the period from April to August is considered the spring homebuying season. Homes are being bought during this time frame as many buyers want to settle down before schools start. As such, active listings usually increase month over month from March to April and from April to May," he said. "The growth pace in active listings is slowing down, however, and the level of supply could reach a plateau sometime in June."
Several California cities were also among the 50 most populous metropolitan areas in the U.S. with the biggest imbalances between sellers and buyers in April, according to a recent Redfin study. These included Riverside (61.3 percent difference), Sacramento (44.9 percent), Los Angeles (44.8 percent), Anaheim (38.7 percent) and Oakland (36.2 percent).
This should be great news for prospective homebuyers in the state who, as in the rest of the country, have been struggling with limited inventory for the past few years. But according to the data, buyers aren't showing up for these listings.
The state reported about 25,100 home sales in April—up 1.6 percent from a year earlier but "down 20 percent from the long-term average and 40 percent below the pandemic peak," according to Gerli, the CEO and founder of the real estate platform Reventure App.
"Economic uncertainty and elevated mortgage rates, which make costs of borrowing high, are primary factors that keep housing demand/home sales at low levels in recent months," Wei said, adding, "Insurance availability and affordability are also having a negative effect on home sales."
Gerli wrote on X, "This crisis in homebuyer demand is now causing home prices to drop."
Last month, according to data from Reventure App, home values in California fell by 0.42 percent from March, the fourth biggest decline in the U.S. "It was the fourth straight month where values declined," Gerli said.
"The reason prices are now dropping is because the low demand is being combined with a rise in listings," the real estate analyst added. "Inventory had been low in California for much of the last couple years, but now it's spiking."
Despite the recent downward pressure on prices in California, the cost of buying a home remains high—much more than many can afford. Home values might be dropping on a monthly basis, but they are still rising year over year. In April, the average home value of a typical California home was $796,255, according to Realtor.com, up 1.3 percent from a year earlier.
The median sale price of a California home was $854,700 in the same month, up 0.2 percent from a year earlier, according to Redfin. Five years earlier, in April 2020, a typical California home could still be bought for $571,000.
The numbers of homes sold with a price cut—at 34.8 percent of all sales—are on the rise, up 10.2 from a year earlier. However, the numbers of homes sold above list price, at 40.3 percent, is decreasing and was down by 9.7 percent in April year over year.
What People Are Saying
Oscar Wei, the deputy chief economist at the California Association of Realtors, told Newsweek: "Buyers are waiting for the costs of homeownership to come down. That could mean lower mortgage rates or lower home prices. Mortgage rates should slowly decline and will likely moderate slightly by the end of the year."
He added: "The market may have already seen the peak price for the year and could soften in the next few months. Buyers could also be waiting for some clarity on the market direction, as consumers remain concerned about how tariffs and the ongoing trade tensions could affect the economy and their personal finances."
Hannah Jones, a senior economic research analyst at Realtor.com, said in a recent report: "Home price growth accelerated in California during the early days of the [COVID-19] pandemic, driving the state's median listing price to new heights. High home prices and rising mortgage rates put homeownership out of reach for many would-be buyers."
Real estate analyst Wolf Richter wrote in a recent report: "The problem is demand in California. It has essentially collapsed. New listings aren't that high. But because the inventory of homes for sale doesn't sell, and new listings are added to it, the total piled up."
Real estate analyst Lance Lambert wrote in a recent report: "More California housing markets are climbing out of that inventory deficit. And if the current trajectory holds, California could soon be out of its Pandemic Housing Boom era inventory hole."
Redfin Senior Economist Asad Khan said in a recent news release: "The balance of power in the U.S. housing market has shifted toward buyers, but a lot of sellers have yet to see or accept the writing on the wall. Many are still holding out hope that their home is the exception and will fetch top dollar.
"But as sellers see their homes sit longer on the market and notice fewer buyers coming through on tour, more of them will realize that the market has adjusted and reset their expectations accordingly."
What Happens Next
Experts now expect home prices to dip slightly across the country by the end of the year, including in parts of California. Zillow expects prices to fall in 31 cities in the state, including San Francisco (projected -5.2 percent), San Jose (-3.8 percent), Sacramento (-3 percent), Los Angeles (-1.2 percent) and San Diego (-0.7 percent).
According to Wei, home prices should begin to come down from the record high set in April as we enter the second half of the year.
"Seasonality will play a role in the price moderation, and an increase in housing supply will also relieve some upward price pressure," he said. "We expect price crops across the state to be mild but the changes between months could appear volatile in some areas because of their low number of observations. In general, we still expect a mild single-digit year-over-year increase for the year as a whole for the state and most regions."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cantor Downgrades Joby Aviation Stock (JOBY) Due to Lack of Near-Term Upside
Cantor Downgrades Joby Aviation Stock (JOBY) Due to Lack of Near-Term Upside

Business Insider

timean hour ago

  • Business Insider

Cantor Downgrades Joby Aviation Stock (JOBY) Due to Lack of Near-Term Upside

Cantor Fitzgerald downgraded electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) aircraft maker Joby Aviation (JOBY) to Hold from Buy with a price target of $9 due to a lack of near-term upside in the stock. While JOBY stock plunged about 8% on Thursday due to the rating downgrade, it has rallied 26.5% over the past month. As a result, the stock is up 9.1% year-to-date, thanks to a favorable executive order signed by U.S. President Donald Trump and the announcement of new deals. Confident Investing Starts Here: Indeed, the executive order would direct the Transportation Department to develop a program to accelerate eVTOL operations in the U.S., which is expected to benefit players like Joby Aviation and Archer Aviation (ACHR). This comes after Joby Aviation signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) earlier this month with Abdul Latif Jameel to explore establishing a distribution agreement in Saudi Arabia for the company's electric aircraft. The agreement involves the potential delivery of up to 200 Joby aircraft and related services that are valued at about $1 billion. Cantor Moves to the Sidelines on JOBY Stock Interestingly, Cantor analyst Andres Sheppard admitted that Joby Aviation remains one of the best-positioned companies in the eVTOL sector, given its partnerships with Toyota (TM), Delta Air Lines (DAL), and the U.S. Department of Defense. However, the 4-star analyst finds JOBY stocks' valuation to be stretched, following a 60% rally over the past three months and an almost 90% gain in the past year. 'We don't see current levels as a good entry point for investors,' said Sheppard. The analyst noted that while Joby Aviation has solid liquidity, it also has one of the highest cash burn rates in the sector. In fact, the company ended Q1 2025 with about $1.3 billion in total liquidity, including Toyota's $250 million funding, but expects to spend between $500 million and $540 million in 2025. Additionally, Sheppard cautioned about delays in U.S. certification and doesn't expect Joby Aviation to secure full FAA Type Certification until at least the second half of 2026. Finally, Sheppard pointed out persistent uncertainty around the company's unit economics, such as pricing and deployment costs of its air taxi service. Is Joby Stock a Good Buy? Wall Street has a Moderate Buy consensus rating on Joby Aviation stock based on three Buys, three Holds, and one Sell recommendation. Furthermore, the average JOBY stock price target of $8.86 indicates that the stock is trading close to fair value.

Trump urges EchoStar, FCC Chairman to resolve license dispute, Bloomberg says
Trump urges EchoStar, FCC Chairman to resolve license dispute, Bloomberg says

Business Insider

timean hour ago

  • Business Insider

Trump urges EchoStar, FCC Chairman to resolve license dispute, Bloomberg says

President Donald Trump has intervened to urge EchoStar (SATS) and Federal Communications Commission Chairman Brendan Carr to resolve a dispute over the company's valuable spectrum licenses, Bloomberg's Kelcee Griffis and Stephanie Lai report. Confident Investing Starts Here: Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter Published first on TheFly – the ultimate source for real-time, market-moving breaking financial news. Try Now>>

Column: Will Tesla suffer if Musk alienates both political wings?
Column: Will Tesla suffer if Musk alienates both political wings?

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Column: Will Tesla suffer if Musk alienates both political wings?

Donald Trump and Elon Musk — two epic disrupters of U.S. politics and the automotive industry, respectively and vice versa. Over the past year, they united over the election and efforts to cut government spending. They parted ways amicably … and then started trashing each other. It escalated quickly with Musk suggesting that the president be impeached and that he is implicated in the Jeffrey Epstein child-prostitution scandal. Musk later reportedly called the president before posting that he regretted some of his words: 'They went too far.' It was a remarkable breakup — incredible drama between the world's most powerful man and the world's richest man, who had been the closest of allies for hundreds of days of campaigning and governing. To the extent that it was a reality TV train wreck, I'd just as soon leave it be. But since the primary business in Musk's remarkable portfolio is nominally an automaker, it actually matters in this industry we cover. Sign up for Automotive Views, Automotive News' weekly showcase of opinions, insights, ideas and thought leadership. Love it or hate it, this disruptive era in which we live is providing us all with some real-life experiments in economics — the likes of which we probably thought we would never see. For decades, basically everyone who went to college was taught in an economics or history class that widespread tariffs would do more harm than good. Trump argues for a different approach, and he's pursuing it. Or he's pursuing it to negotiate for something else. In either case, we're now seeing how that works: So far, there's been a lot of paralysis, especially among suppliers and foreign automakers, but also a big investment announced recently by General Motors. His political strategy has been unorthodox, yet he's won two electoral colleges and one popular vote. He's only the 21st president to win two elections. So he's had success, whether some people like it or not. Same for Musk, of course: He approached the auto industry unlike anyone else — with an expensive electric car — had a couple of near-total collapses, and came out as the world's richest man and CEO of the world's most valuable automaker. That success helped propel his rocket business SpaceX and other ventures such as Starlink satellites and Twitter, which he bought and renamed X. But the disruptive move I'm watching was his decision to be an automaker CEO who got personally and financially involved in partisan politics. While new-vehicle sales skew to the affluent, when you sell something in the millions or tens of millions, a brand or model has to connect with a broad swath of people. And while there can be success with, say, a polarizing design, mass-market brands generally try to avoid alienating large chunks of their potential customer base. I've cited here before the story about Michael Jordan saying he didn't speak out on politics because 'Republicans buy sneakers, too.' In retrospect, he said it was just a funny line among friends. But the thing is that he wasn't wrong, and every business school graduate knows it. Musk, however, is not your typical MBA type. So out of his frustration with former President Joe Biden — who habitually sided with the UAW and its automakers against the U.S.-based global leader in EVs, even as he advocated for a carbon-neutral future — Musk threw an estimated quarter of a billion dollars behind the Trump campaign. That's an unbelievable sum of money to many of us, but when Trump won, it looked like the greatest bet ever. From late October to late December, Tesla stock more than doubled and its market cap approached $1.5 trillion. While Musk's political activism may have upset many of his loyal, environmentally motivated customers, there were a lot of reasons to be bullish on Tesla under Trump. It seemed likely that NHTSA and the SEC would take a more sympathetic view of the company's issues. Beyond that, Musk has refocused the company's future on artificial intelligence, humanoid robots and robotaxis. (Tesla said it plans to launch its service in Austin, Texas, on June 22.) A new administration with a deregulatory inclination toward self-driving cars was a significant tailwind. Now, those advantages for Tesla are gone or at least seemingly diminished. Structures that have legacy automakers paying to buy Tesla's credits for selling emission-free, fuel-efficient vehicles could be eliminated. (And let's not forget that Trump hinted at ending federal contracts with other Musk-affiliated companies.) Turning back to the auto business: The conventional wisdom is that Musk has now alienated all but the most apolitical consumers. Environmentally minded liberals might like EVs, but Musk's support of Trump (and the far-right Alternative for Deutschland party in Germany) has them seeking out other brands' offerings. There might have been an opportunity to become the preferred electric brand of the president's Make America Great Again movement — especially the tech-forward, high-income types and those motivated by the president's endorsement of the brand on the White House grounds. But after this month's blowup — with longtime Trump adviser Steve Bannon arguing to deport Musk — that notion seemed ever more remote. No fans on the left, no fans on the right. Is Elon out in deep water in an electric boat surrounded by sharks with no friends to bail him out? Maybe not. There is significant animus against Musk on the EV-inclined left, especially in the wake of his DOGE team's deep and sometimes chaotic cuts to government entities and programs. Certainly, protests at auto retail outlets are rare. The damage to stores is not acceptable, but it shows the intensity of the situation. But I still have to wonder how far consumers will follow those kinds of feelings. Michiganders, for instance, often assume that Americans prefer to buy American cars made by American (union) workers. But I've been to America, and most of them don't care. They want the best car for their money, whether it's American, German, Japanese or Korean. Some are clamoring for cheap Chinese cars: If Xi Jinping wants to pay for half of their EV, they ask, why not let him? So maybe they won't care about Elon's politics. Tesla sales are down a little this year, but some of that might be attributable to production hiccups. If the Model Y — the bestselling model in the world last year — provides a great value, they'll probably buy it regardless of what they think of the CEO. And now we get to find out. Have an opinion about this story? Tell us about it and we may publish it in print. Click here to submit a letter to the editor. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store