logo
California Faces Housing Crisis: 'No One Is Buying Homes'

California Faces Housing Crisis: 'No One Is Buying Homes'

Newsweek13-06-2025
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
After four consecutive months of year-over-year inventory increases, California is now solidly a buyer's market, which means the supply of homes is greater than the demand for properties in the state.
That is happening in part because, as real estate analyst Nick Gerli put it, "no one is buying homes in California." Home sales in the Golden State are hovering just below the lows of the Great Recession, according to a recent report by Realtor.com, as sky-high prices and elevated mortgage rates keep buyers on the sidelines of the market.
Why It Matters
The California housing market experienced great changes during the pandemic, when the rise of remote work allowed many homeowners to relocate from metropolises—such as San Francisco and Los Angeles—to smaller nearby towns or leave the state entirely. While the state saw a slight dip in home prices in early to mid-2020 compared to a year earlier, home prices quickly rebounded and have continued rising steadily until now.
Historically high home prices are now playing a crucial role in keeping demand low in the state, together with mortgage rates still hovering just below the 7 percent mark and growing economic uncertainty linked to the effects of President Donald Trump's tariffs.
A general view of a home for sale in a residential neighborhood in San Jose, California, on August 15, 2024.
A general view of a home for sale in a residential neighborhood in San Jose, California, on August 15, 2024.What To Know
According to data from Realtor.com, there were 73,160 active listings in California in May, the highest number since October 2019—before the pandemic homebuying frenzy further shrunk supply in the state.
"The rate that housing inventory has been rising for the state is on par with that of the nation. At the national level, inventory of homes for sale rose more than 30 percent year over year in May, which is in line with the double-digit increase for the state of California," Oscar Wei, the deputy chief economist at the California Association of Realtors, told Newsweek.
"Active listings typically increase during this time of the year as the period from April to August is considered the spring homebuying season. Homes are being bought during this time frame as many buyers want to settle down before schools start. As such, active listings usually increase month over month from March to April and from April to May," he said. "The growth pace in active listings is slowing down, however, and the level of supply could reach a plateau sometime in June."
Several California cities were also among the 50 most populous metropolitan areas in the U.S. with the biggest imbalances between sellers and buyers in April, according to a recent Redfin study. These included Riverside (61.3 percent difference), Sacramento (44.9 percent), Los Angeles (44.8 percent), Anaheim (38.7 percent) and Oakland (36.2 percent).
This should be great news for prospective homebuyers in the state who, as in the rest of the country, have been struggling with limited inventory for the past few years. But according to the data, buyers aren't showing up for these listings.
The state reported about 25,100 home sales in April—up 1.6 percent from a year earlier but "down 20 percent from the long-term average and 40 percent below the pandemic peak," according to Gerli, the CEO and founder of the real estate platform Reventure App.
"Economic uncertainty and elevated mortgage rates, which make costs of borrowing high, are primary factors that keep housing demand/home sales at low levels in recent months," Wei said, adding, "Insurance availability and affordability are also having a negative effect on home sales."
Gerli wrote on X, "This crisis in homebuyer demand is now causing home prices to drop."
Last month, according to data from Reventure App, home values in California fell by 0.42 percent from March, the fourth biggest decline in the U.S. "It was the fourth straight month where values declined," Gerli said.
"The reason prices are now dropping is because the low demand is being combined with a rise in listings," the real estate analyst added. "Inventory had been low in California for much of the last couple years, but now it's spiking."
Despite the recent downward pressure on prices in California, the cost of buying a home remains high—much more than many can afford. Home values might be dropping on a monthly basis, but they are still rising year over year. In April, the average home value of a typical California home was $796,255, according to Realtor.com, up 1.3 percent from a year earlier.
The median sale price of a California home was $854,700 in the same month, up 0.2 percent from a year earlier, according to Redfin. Five years earlier, in April 2020, a typical California home could still be bought for $571,000.
The numbers of homes sold with a price cut—at 34.8 percent of all sales—are on the rise, up 10.2 from a year earlier. However, the numbers of homes sold above list price, at 40.3 percent, is decreasing and was down by 9.7 percent in April year over year.
What People Are Saying
Oscar Wei, the deputy chief economist at the California Association of Realtors, told Newsweek: "Buyers are waiting for the costs of homeownership to come down. That could mean lower mortgage rates or lower home prices. Mortgage rates should slowly decline and will likely moderate slightly by the end of the year."
He added: "The market may have already seen the peak price for the year and could soften in the next few months. Buyers could also be waiting for some clarity on the market direction, as consumers remain concerned about how tariffs and the ongoing trade tensions could affect the economy and their personal finances."
Hannah Jones, a senior economic research analyst at Realtor.com, said in a recent report: "Home price growth accelerated in California during the early days of the [COVID-19] pandemic, driving the state's median listing price to new heights. High home prices and rising mortgage rates put homeownership out of reach for many would-be buyers."
Real estate analyst Wolf Richter wrote in a recent report: "The problem is demand in California. It has essentially collapsed. New listings aren't that high. But because the inventory of homes for sale doesn't sell, and new listings are added to it, the total piled up."
Real estate analyst Lance Lambert wrote in a recent report: "More California housing markets are climbing out of that inventory deficit. And if the current trajectory holds, California could soon be out of its Pandemic Housing Boom era inventory hole."
Redfin Senior Economist Asad Khan said in a recent news release: "The balance of power in the U.S. housing market has shifted toward buyers, but a lot of sellers have yet to see or accept the writing on the wall. Many are still holding out hope that their home is the exception and will fetch top dollar.
"But as sellers see their homes sit longer on the market and notice fewer buyers coming through on tour, more of them will realize that the market has adjusted and reset their expectations accordingly."
What Happens Next
Experts now expect home prices to dip slightly across the country by the end of the year, including in parts of California. Zillow expects prices to fall in 31 cities in the state, including San Francisco (projected -5.2 percent), San Jose (-3.8 percent), Sacramento (-3 percent), Los Angeles (-1.2 percent) and San Diego (-0.7 percent).
According to Wei, home prices should begin to come down from the record high set in April as we enter the second half of the year.
"Seasonality will play a role in the price moderation, and an increase in housing supply will also relieve some upward price pressure," he said. "We expect price crops across the state to be mild but the changes between months could appear volatile in some areas because of their low number of observations. In general, we still expect a mild single-digit year-over-year increase for the year as a whole for the state and most regions."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump fires a senior official over jobs numbers
Trump fires a senior official over jobs numbers

CNN

time2 hours ago

  • CNN

Trump fires a senior official over jobs numbers

Donald Trump Job market EconomyFacebookTweetLink Follow President Donald Trump has fired Dr. Erika McEntarfer, the commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, whom he accused, without evidence, of manipulating the monthly jobs reports for 'political purposes.' The BLS' monthly labor report Friday showed that the US economy added only 73,000 jobs in July, far below expectations. It also sharply revised down the employment growth that had been previously reported in May and June – by a combined 258,000 jobs. After the revisions, the jobs report showed the weakest pace of hiring for any three-month period since the pandemic recession in 2020. 'In my opinion, today's Jobs Numbers were RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad,' Trump said in a Truth Social post. Although the May and June jobs numbers were worse than initially believed, revisions are normal in this process. The BLS' initial monthly jobs estimates are often based on incomplete data, so they are revised twice after the initial report — followed by an annual revision every February. Additionally, BLS economists use a formula to smooth out jobs numbers for seasonal variations and that can exacerbate revisions when they fall outside economists' expectations. Trump on Friday incorrectly called the revisions a 'mistake.' 'McEntarfer said there were only 73,000 Jobs added (a shock!) but, more importantly, that a major mistake was made by them, 258,000 Jobs downward, in the prior two months,' Trump said on Truth Social. 'Similar things happened in the first part of the year, always to the negative. The Economy is BOOMING under 'TRUMP.'' Trump said McEntarfer 'faked' the jobs numbers before the election to try to boost former Vice President Kamala Harris' chances in the 2024 presidential election. 'We're doing so well. I believe the numbers were phony, just like they were before the election, and there were other times. So, you know what I did? I fired her, and you know what? I did the right thing,' Trump told reporters Friday on the South Lawn. McEntarfer was confirmed by the Senate 86-8 in January 2024 for a term of four years. CNN has reached out to McEntarfer for comment. Until Trump replaces McEntarfer, Deputy Commissioner William Wiatrowski will serve as Acting Commissioner, the administration said. Trump has previously criticized the BLS for its jobs data and revisions, and he told reporters Friday evening he's 'always had a problem with these numbers.' In 2016, during his first presidential campaign, Trump claimed that the unemployment rate was significantly higher than the BLS let on. In 2024, he accused former President Joe Biden's administration of orchestrating a cover-up, after the BLS reported that it had overcounted jobs by 818,000 over the previous 12 months. 'I was thinking about it this morning, before the numbers that came out. I said, 'Who is the person that does these numbers?' And then they gave me stats about before the election,' Trump said Friday. 'We need people that we can trust,' he added. But Trump and his administration have also praised the BLS data when it has been favorable to them. During Trump's first term, former White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer said in March 2017 that the jobs data was no longer 'phony' after the BLS issued a strong jobs report. And a month ago, current White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt posted on social media that the economy had beat expectations for jobs in four straight BLS labor reports. The BLS is nonpartisan, and businesses and government officials rely on the accuracy of its data to make determinations about investment, hiring, spending and all sorts of key decisions. 'It's outrageous for anyone in government to question the integrity of the BLS,' said Jason Furman, a Harvard professor and former Obama economic adviser. 'Accurate statistics are essential to the economy.' Furman doubted that replacing McEntarfer would compromise the BLS, but he said even the possibility or appearance of that notion 'would be bad.' 'Countries that have tried to fake those statistics have often ended up with economic crises as a result,' Furman said. Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics, said the BLS' data is at the 'highest standard,' and 'as accurate as it can be.' 'Anything that undermines that or even the perception of that high standard is deeply worrisome,' Zandi said. 'I've never seen anything even close to this.' At Moody's, Zandi said he has hired a number of former BLS economists whom he called 'fantastic.' 'They do great work,' Zandi said. 'They are critical to a well-functioning economy.' Democratic Virginia Senator Mark Warner accused Trump of working the referees. 'Firing the ump doesn't change the score,' Warner said in a statement. 'Americans deserve to know the truth about the state of the Trump economy.' But Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer said in a post on social media that she supports replacing McEntarfer. 'A recent string of major revisions have come to light and raised concerns about decisions being made by the Biden-appointed Labor Commissioner,' Chavez-DeRemer said on X. 'I support the President's decision to replace Biden's Commissioner and ensure the American People can trust the important and influential data coming from BLS.' The BLS jobs survey is widely considered by economists to be robust. It samples more than 100,000 businesses and government agencies each month, representing roughly 629,000 individual worksites. But, as part of larger cost-cutting taking place around practically every part of Trump's government, the BLS is laying off staff — and, as a result, reducing the scope of its work. For example, the BLS posted a notice in June stating it stopped collecting data for its Consumer Price Index in three cities (Lincoln, Nebraska; Buffalo, New York; and Provo, Utah) and increased 'imputations' for certain items (a statistical technique that, when boiled down to very rough terms, essentially means more educated guesses). That worried Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell. In testimony before Congress in June, Powell said he believed the BLS data to be accurate, but he was upset about what could become a trend. 'I wouldn't say that I'm concerned about the data today, although there has been a very mild degradation of the scope of the surveys,' Powell said at the time, in response to a question about survey data quality. 'But I would say the direction of travel is something I'm concerned about.' This story has been updated with additional developments and context.

Are US tariffs starting to bite? Trump, in denial over rising prices, targets Fed chief Powell
Are US tariffs starting to bite? Trump, in denial over rising prices, targets Fed chief Powell

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Are US tariffs starting to bite? Trump, in denial over rising prices, targets Fed chief Powell

Memo from the White House: inflation is 'right on track', it declared this week, citing the latest official data. Price growth is now 'very low', according to Donald Trump. The actual statistics paint a markedly different picture. Just six months after he regained power, in part by promising to rapidly reduce prices, Trump has presided over the chaotic rollout of tariffs on an array of overseas products that many have argued risk having the exact opposite effect. After a lull, the consumer price index (CPI) is back on the rise. In June, everything from fruit and washing machines to dresses and toys became more expensive. Businesses in the US and around the world have struggled to keep up with the Trump administration's erratic rollout of its aggressive trade strategy: the daily White House soap opera of warnings, threats, confusion, deadlines, delays and drama. Related: Can Trump fire Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell? Putting to one side the steady stream of twists, cliffhangers and all-caps declarations, each episode has pushed US tariffs higher. The overall average effective tariff rate is now set to hit 20.6%, according to the non-partisan The Budget Lab at Yale, its highest level since 1910. Eventually, someone has to foot the bill. Interactive By Trump's telling, the countries he targets will be forced to pay up. But in reality, tariffs are paid by the importer – US-based companies, in this case – and often passed on. Tariffs are a burden. One way or another, the impact typically is felt along each link of the supply chain, from the initial manufacturer to the customer who buys the finished product. 'All through that chain, people will be trying not to be the ones who pick up the cost,' noted Jerome Powell, the Federal Reserve chair, at a recent press conference. 'But ultimately, the cost of the tariff has to be paid and some of it will fall on the end consumer,' added Powell. 'We know that. That's what businesses say. That's what the data says from past evidence. So we know that's coming.' The effect is not immediate, though. It might take Trump a matter of minutes to announce a tariff on Truth Social, but the full effects can take months to work their way through the economy. Interactive And so Powell, and the Fed, has waited. For seven months now, at four consecutive meetings, the US central bank's policymakers have sat on their hands and kept interest rates on hold. After dramatically raising rates to combat inflation, they want to see how prices respond to Trump's tariffs before cutting them back. It's early days. Prices are still rising, and by more than the Fed's target of 2% each year. Officials want to know if Trump's plan will make them rise faster. The evidence has so far been mixed. While consumer price growth accelerated slightly between May and June, the annual rate of wholesale price growth slipped. The Fed's latest 'beige book', a semi-quarterly report of anecdotal economic insights from across the US, also released this week, described a relatively calm business landscape, despite persisting uncertainty. Assuming Trump's announced tariffs are enforced, they will dent US economic growth by 0.1 percentage point this year and 0.3 percentage points next, according to modeling by Oxford Economics. 'The drag on the economy is predominantly tied to core inflation, which will temporarily be 0.2bps [basis points] higher than in the current baseline,' said its chief US economist, Ryan Sweet. 'Though the boost to consumer prices is modest, it still reduces growth in real disposable income and, by extension, consumer spending.' Inside the Fed's headquarters in Washington DC, Powell and his officials are patiently monitoring the data while deciding their next steps. But less than a mile away, one man is not prepared to wait. In a series of increasingly bitter attacks, Trump has publicly lambasted Powell for being 'too late' to cut rates, and claimed the Fed's inaction is costing the US economy. He has called on Powell (whom he first tapped to be Fed chair in 2017) to quit, and unnerved Wall Street by raising the prospect of firing him. Bharat Ramamurti, former deputy director of the national economic council under Joe Biden, said: 'If you replace Jay Powell with someone who is clearly doing whatever Donald Trump wants them to do, expectations about what inflation is going to do in the long run are going to spike and that's going to create a real problem for the Fed in the long term.' The supreme court signaled it views the Fed chair as legally shielded from presidential removal, describing the central bank as a 'uniquely structured, quasi-private entity' in a May ruling about two of Trump's other firings. Trump is 'highly unlikely' to fire Powell, he has asserted, before floating one reason he might have to go: a $2.5bn renovation of the Fed's buildings. 'I mean, it's possible there's fraud involved,' the president claimed. Powell has reportedly asked the central bank's inspector general to review the project. Powell is due to finish his term in May, and has stressed he will remain in post until then. Advocates of the Fed's independence insist the more important question is not whether the president can remove him before then, but if he should. 'Once you no longer have the check of the central bank, which can raise interest rates as needed to curb inflation, you really start to raise the specter of runaway costs, runaway inflation, and it makes the US economy less attractive for investors domestically and abroad,' said Ramamurti. Inflation is 'right on track', according to his administration. Economists are already concerned it is tilting off course – and Trump won't rule out taking action that critics warn would shunt it off the rails altogether.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store