Does a HELOC for debt consolidation make sense now? Here's what to know.
inflation issues
that have been looming and the rising costs of goods and services that have come with it have driven many Americans toward credit cards recently. In fact, the
total credit card debt nationwide
is now sitting at over $1.2 trillion — a $45 billion jump from just one year earlier.
If you're a homeowner and have
racked up credit card debt
of your own, you might be able to tackle it by tapping
your home equity
. In many cases, options like
home equity lines of credit (HELOCs)
offer significantly lower rates than credit cards, allowing you to use your equity to pay off credit card balances with lower monthly payments and fewer long-term interest costs.
Still, the strategy isn't right for everyone — or every situation. Are you thinking of
using a HELOC to pay off debts
right now? Here's when it might make sense (and when it wouldn't).
Compare your home equity borrowing options and lock in a top HELOC rate now
.
From an interest rate standpoint, using a home equity line of credit to
consolidate debt
can be a smart choice right now, as
HELOC rates
tend to be quite a bit lower than most other financial products.
Credit cards, for instance, are carrying
average rates above 22%
and personal loan interest rates are
averaging over 12%
. The typical HELOC, on the other hand, carried about an 8% interest rate in March 2025.
"Most people are going to save a substantial amount of money," says Dre Torres, a loan officer at Cornerstone First Mortgage.
There are other
benefits to consolidating debts with a HELOC
, too. For one, you get a longer repayment term compared to other options. For example, most personal loans have very short terms (a few years, at most), and if you don't pay off your credit cards quickly, the debt can easily snowball.
"Most people at some time in their adult life end up with a pile of debt that just seems to have appeared and at some point, you have to stop the snowball effect of fighting higher interest loans or credit cards," says Steve Wilbourn, a financial advisor at True North Advisors. "If you are at the point where you are not going to be able to pay the credit card bill, a HELOC can give you more time to spread out the payments and often a much lower interest rate which equals a lower payment."
Consolidating your debts will also streamline your payments. Instead of paying several debts down each month, you'll have just a single HELOC payment to make — and often,
it will be interest-only payments
for the first 10 years of the loan, making them even more manageable.
"Any time you are going to pay off debt and roll it into a loan that has one payment, that will put you in a better financial position," Torres says. "It can help with being cash flow positive every month, being able to apply that savings to other debt to pay down, or being able to take that monthly savings and float it into the market so that it becomes an asset to you."
Find out how affordable home equity borrowing could be today
.
Using a HELOC to consolidate debt likely wouldn't be a good idea if
your credit score
is particularly low, as it would likely mean you'd get a higher interest rate on your HELOC — eating into
the potential savings
the move would have to offer.
It would also not be wise if you
don't have much equity
in your home.
"It may be ill-advised to use a HELOC if it takes all of your home's equity off the table, especially if you haven't owned your home for very long," Wilbourn says. "There is always the chance of your home losing value and you are now upside down on your mortgage."
When you're upside down on your mortgage, you owe more than the home is worth. And if you find yourself needing to sell? The proceeds won't be enough to pay off your loan, leaving you to make up the difference out of pocket.
Taking out a HELOC to pay off debt is also a bad idea if you don't have the funds to actively pay down the balance, as it could result in more long-term debt. It could also mean higher rates the longer you keep the line open.
"Right now, with rates still relatively high and potentially volatile, a variable-rate HELOC can be risky since your payments can rise if rates go up," says Stephan Shipe, a flat-fee financial advisor and owner of Scholar Financial Advising. "It's better suited if you plan to pay it off quickly or if you expect rates to drop. "
If your spending habits aren't in check, a HELOC isn't going to be much help either. It could even mean
losing your home to foreclosure
if you can't make your payments.
"It's a major red flag if you are consolidating debt into a HELOC without addressing the root problem that caused the initial build-up in debt," Shipe says. "Without addressing the initial issue, you risk losing your home and also freeing up credit card limits to build up the problem again, creating an endless debt cycle."
Debt consolidation
isn't your only option if you're dealing with debt.
Debt settlement
, debt negotiation and
other debt relief services
can help, too. And if you're not sure what the right move is, talk to a financial professional. They can walk you through all your options, as well as their benefits and costs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Are we getting a $5000 DOGE dividend or $600 rebate? Fourth stimulus check eligibility
If you're wondering about a fourth stimulus check in 2025 from President Donald Trump or the IRS, here's what to know about eligibility and the reality of it happening. On July 25, Trump floated the idea of a tariff rebate check for American taxpayers in response to questions about all the new tariff revenue being generated, "We have so much money coming in, we're thinking about a little rebate. But the big thing we want to do is pay down debt. But we're thinking about a rebate." A few days after the president's tariff rebate comments, Missouri Republican Sen. Josh Hawley announced the American Worker Rebate Act of 2025 aimed at sending checks to Americans. Note that a few months back, in February, Trump also said he would consider a plan to pay out a portion of the savings identified by the Department of Government Efficiency in the form of a $5000 dividend check as payback to taxpayers. The DOGE dividend proposal, authored by Azoria investment firm CEO James Fishback, was meant to give back or refund taxpayers a savings from Elon Musk's DOGE related cuts and reductions in government spending. Here's what to know about Trump's two proposals this year, what the amounts would be, qualifications and status. Are we getting a fourth stimulus check in 2025? While speculation about a of $2,000 has surfaced on social media and unverified websites, there has been no official confirmation of any additional economic relief package in 2025 from Congress or the IRS to support this claim. Any such news should be taken with caution as it could be misinformation or attempted fraud. Either of Trump's ideas for a tariff rebate or DOGE dividend this year would be similar to a fourth stimulus check, if approved. Albeit, there are differences between a stimulus check versus a dividend, refund or rebate. By definition, a dividend is a distribution of profits by a corporation to its shareholders and refund is a payment made back to a user that previously paid for something. While a rebate is a partial refund of the purchase price that a consumer paid, often upon meeting certain conditions — more like a discount that is refunded after the purchase versus a discount that is applied at the point of sale. A stimulus check on the other hand, is a direct payment to encourage spending and stimulate the economy by putting money directly into the consumers' hand. Also similar to the stimulus checks sent during the pandemic, these proposals would require congressional approval. What is the American Worker Rebate Act of 2025? Hawley's bill, called the American Worker Rebate Act of 2025, would provide a minimum of $600 per adult and dependent child, or $2,400 for a family of four, according to news officials. The benefit would be reduced by 5% for joint filers with an adusted gross income above $150,000 or single filers earning more than $75,000 individually. According to an analysis from the Budget Lab at Yale released July 28, Trump's tariffs could cost U.S. households an average of $2,400 in 2025 through higher prices passed on from companies paying higher tariff taxes. The Treasury Department said on July 25 that the U.S. government posted a $27 billion surplus in June, following a $316 billion deficit in May. Customs duties totaled approximately $27 billion for the month, up from $23 billion in May and 301% higher than in June 2024. On an annual basis, tariff collections have totaled $113 billion, or 86% more than a year ago. The bill would allow for a larger rebate if the tariff revenue exceeds projections. What is the status of the DOGE dividend check proposal? Fishback announced that he was stepping away from the DOGE dividend check movement after Musk lashed out at the president in June, although he also said he would continue working with the administration "to return savings to taxpayers." The latest update on DOGE dividend came from Fishbacks tweet on June 6, "I believed in Elon Musk's vision to shrink government and make it work better for Americans. I'm proud of the DOGE Dividend proposal I developed and will keep working with the administration to return savings to taxpayers." He added, "The truth is that Elon set expectations that he relayed to the President, me, and the country that he did not come close to fulfilling. That's disappointing, but okay." According to Fishback's proposal, the DOGE dividend check was described as tax refund check to be sent to every taxpaying household, funded exclusively with a portion of the total savings delivered by DOGE. The potential refund would be sent only to households that are net-income taxpayers — people who pay more in taxes than they get back — with lower-income Americans not qualifying for the return, according to news reports. The Pew Research Center cites most Americans who have an adjusted gross income of under $40,000 pay effectively no federal income tax. According to the DOGE website, it cites an estimated $205 billion — approximately $1,273 per individual federal taxpayer — in savings and proof in their "Wall of Receipts." Albeit, only half the amount is itemized thus far, raising doubts about accuracy. Amy Gleason is the acting administrator and head of DOGE. Musk's departure from the federal government will likely do little to change DOGE's work carrying out Trump's vision of downsizing the federal government or eliminating the 'fraud and waste.' Maria Francis is a Pennsylvania-based journalist with the Mid-Atlantic Connect Team. This article originally appeared on Asbury Park Press: How to check your stimulus check status? Trump $600 - $2400 rebate Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Here's why an alarming number of workers cash out 401(k) plans
A 401(k) retirement account is supposed to be hands-off. It's not your money, in theory, but savings for the future you. And yet, when Americans leave jobs, one-third of them cash out their 401(k) accounts. That's called 401(k) 'leakage,' and it costs workers untold billions of dollars in lost retirement savings. In a recent paper, Vanguard ponders why so many Americans liquidate retirement accounts when they exit jobs – about 33%, by their estimate -- and what employers and employees can do about it. The 401(k) was designed to help American workers build retirement savings, using tax breaks as an incentive. Nearly $9 trillion sits in 401(k) accounts nationwide, according to the Investment Company Institute. Half of all private-sector workers now participate in the plans, a record high. But 401(k) dollars don't always end up funding someone's retirement. At least $1.7 trillion sits in lost or forgotten 401(k) accounts, according to research by Capitalize, a financial services firm. A new Vanguard research note focuses on another problem: Workers cashing out retirement accounts when they leave jobs. Cashing out a 401(k) is often the worst option When you depart a job, you have several options with a 401(k). You can do nothing, keeping the money in the account. You can execute a 'rollover,' transferring the funds to another 401(k) or Individual Retirement Account. Or, you can cash out. And if you're exiting a job, a cashout might sound alluring. You may not have another job lined up. Perhaps you're planning a move. Maybe a new child has arrived. 'It can be very tempting. You're having this big decision in your life,' said Rob Williams, managing director of financial planning at Charles Schwab. 'Especially if it's not a large amount, your first instinct is to take the money.' But cashing out a 401(k) is generally the worst option, at least in financial terms. If you liquidate a 401(k) before age 59 ½, you generally pay income taxes on the amount, plus a 10% penalty for early withdrawal. Moreover, you miss out on the chance to collect years of compounded returns on your 401(k) investments. If you cash out a $7,000 retirement account at age 40, you may net as little as $4,270 in actual cash to spend, after penalties and taxes, Fidelity estimates. But if you leave the same $7,000 invested for 20 more years, and the investments increase at an annual rate of 8%, the sum will grow to nearly $35,000, according to a NerdWallet calculator. 'You think it's a small amount of money. You take it out. But if it stayed invested, it could have grown to a much larger sum,' said Anqi Chen, associate director of savings and household finance at the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College. Why do departing workers cash out their 401(k)s? Exiting workers cash out 401(k) accounts for several reasons, retirement experts say. Vanguard researchers theorize that financial need, more than anything else, drives workers to liquidate retirement accounts. Hourly workers are more likely than salaried employees to cash out 401(k)s. The reason, Vanguard says, may be that hourly workers have more income fluctuations. Those ups and downs can leave them short of cash. Workers with lower incomes are more likely to cash out than those with higher incomes. That data point, too, suggests financial need. 'It's really short-term cashflow liquidity challenges that are explaining a lot of these early withdrawals,' said Aaron Goodman, an economist at Vanguard. Vanguard found that workers with emergency savings were much less likely to cash out a 401(k) when leaving a job. Thus, Vanguard urges workers to save for emergencies. Even $2,000 in rainy-day funds, researchers found, allowed workers to leave jobs without raiding retirement funds. Employees are also much more likely to cash out a 401(k) account with a small balance. The typical cashout involves 'a few thousand dollars,' Goodman said. Some workers, especially younger workers, cash out retirement accounts because the sum seems too small to bother with. 'It's easy for them to fall into this mindset, 'It's not a lot of money,'' said Mike Shamrell, vice president of thought leadership at Fidelity Investments. 'If you do that every other year in your 20s, that starts to add up.' Rolling over a 401(k) can be 'incredibly hard' Cashing out a 401(k) is relatively easy. Rolling it over into another retirement account, by contrast, can be 'incredibly hard,' said Chen of Boston College. That's another reason why many workers cash out retirement plans. In a rollover, you move your retirement savings to another 401(k) account at your new company, or into an IRA, a personal retirement savings account. Rollovers can get complicated, especially when the funds are going into a new 401(k) account managed by a different firm. Research by Capitalize, a retirement savings platform, found rollovers 'outdated and painful': Only 22% of savers managed to roll over an account without help, and 42% said the process took them at least two months to complete. In many cases, rollovers involve laborious forms and old-fashioned paper checks. Some employers encourage departing workers to cash out low-balance retirement accounts, "just because it's easier for them," said David John, a senior strategic policy advisor at the AARP Public Policy Institute. The ability to move a 401(k) from one employer to the next is called 'portability,' and the lack of it has thwarted workers from preserving retirements savings, according to Chen and others. When exiting employees contemplate rolling over a 401(k) account, 'they're just a little bit overwhelmed by the process,' said Shamrell of Fidelity. 'They feel it's going to be time-consuming and complex.' A recent initiative in the retirement-savings industry aims to solve the portability problem. In 2022, a consortium of private retirement-plan providers announced a collaboration to boost the portability of small retirement accounts. When someone leaves a job, the network of providers will make sure that retirement funds 'move seamlessly from one job to another,' said John of AARP. The auto-portability program applies to accounts valued at $7,000 or less, which are more likely to be cashed out or forgotten. Most big retirement-plan providers participate in the effort. 'I do think there's an evolution, as there should be, in terms of making this more of a point-and-click exercise,' said Williams of Schwab. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Workers cash out 401(k)s at an alarming rate. Why? Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Here's where the highest earning Americans making $1M+ a year live
The number of Americans earning at least $1 million a year has more than doubled in a decade — but these seven-figure households are far from evenly spread, with coastal states claiming the biggest share of the moneyed elites. Yahoo News recently examined the latest available income data from the Internal Revenue Service for the year 2022 to find out which states had the greatest concentration of households with adjusted gross incomes of at least $1 million. Advertisement That figure does not include home equity, stocks, bonds, 401(k) retirement savings plans, or other types of investments, which are part of a person's net worth as opposed to earned income. The analysis revealed that nationally, roughly 800,000 taxpayers had an annual income of $1 million or more, up from 470,000 in 2013. Notably, even that higher figure accounts for roughly 0.5% of the 153 million income tax returns filed in 2022, according to Coastal states top the list Among all 50 states, Connecticut had by far the biggest share of affluent earners, boasting close to 90 million-dollar tax returns per 10,000 filers. One of the original 13 British Colonies and a bastion of 'old money,' Connecticut has posted the slowest growth in millionaire earners since 2013—yet it still remained firmly in the lead. Advertisement 3 Connecticut had the highest share of millionaire earners in the whole country. kirkikis – Massachusetts had more than 76 million-dollar earners per 10,000 in 2022, while New York recorded over 71 seven-figure returns. senior economic research analyst Hannah Jones says the financial dominance of the three Northeastern states comes as no surprise, especially to those familiar with the region's ultraexpensive housing market. 'The concentration of very high-income households in New York, Massachusetts, and Connecticut underpins steady demand for luxury housing, even when broader market conditions soften,' she says. 'Strong financial and tech sectors feed upper-tier demand, keeping prices high in prime city and suburban markets like Manhattan, Boston, and Fairfield County.' Advertisement In July, Boston had the fifth-highest median list price across the top 50 US metros, approaching $842,000, followed by New York City, at $775,000, according to the latest monthly housing market trends report from 3 New York was among the east coast states leading the list. Tierney – Florida, home of the billionaire enclaves of Palm Beach and Manalapan, saw the fourth-highest share of seven-figure gross incomes, at nearly 70 per 10,000 filings, while California, which has some of the most high-priced metros in the US, led by San Jose, recorded over 69 returns of $1 million or higher per 10,000. Millionaire earners heading West But those figures do not tell the whole story. Advertisement Looking at the regions with the highest 10-year growth in millionaire earners, it is clear that the top earners are increasingly moving westward. Start your day with all you need to know Morning Report delivers the latest news, videos, photos and more. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Although Montana was home to just roughly 42 million-dollar earners per 10,000, it experienced a 254% increase in that income bracket compared with 2013—the highest growth of any state. Neighboring Idaho saw the second-fastest growth rate, at 209%. Jones says these states offer appealing features that make them top destinations for the affluent. 'Lower or no state income taxes, lifestyle amenities, and remote-work flexibility have drawn more wealthy buyers to these Mountain West states,' explains the analyst. 'In-migration of high earners has driven sharp home-price gains, often far above local income levels, especially in Montana and resort towns like Jackson Hole, WY, and Bozeman, MT.' As reported earlier this month, Montana stood out for having the nation's biggest affordability gap, meaning that the difference between how much the typical household in the state earned annually and how much it ought to have earned to comfortably afford a median-priced home was the highest among all 50 states and Washington, DC. As of July, the typical Montana household earned $72,066 annually—nearly $100,000 less than the minimum recommended income needed to purchase a $649,900 home, the median price for the month. Advertisement 'Limited supply in amenity-rich areas keeps prices elevated and affordability strained for locals,' confirms Jones. 'The result is a sustained luxury market alongside displacement pressures for middle-income households.' 10 states with the highest share of millionaire earners 1. Connecticut Million-dollar tax returns per 10,000 filers: 89.51 Total returns: 16,320 2. Massachusetts Million-dollar tax returns per 10,000 filers: 76.43 Advertisement Total returns: 27,270 3 Massachusetts came in second with over 76 million-dollar tax returns per 10,000 filers. SeanPavonePhoto – 3. New York Million-dollar tax returns per 10,000 filers: 71.44 Total returns: 69,780 4. Florida Advertisement Million-dollar tax returns per 10,000 filers: 69.78 Total returns: 77,670 Million-dollar tax returns per 10,000 filers: 69.72 Advertisement Total returns: 128,900 Million-dollar tax returns per 10,000 filers: 67.67 Total returns: 31,390 Million-dollar tax returns per 10,000 filers: 62.69 Total returns: 1,760 Million-dollar tax returns per 10,000 filers: 57.30 Total returns: 21,530 Million-dollar tax returns per 10,000 filers: 54.21 Total returns: 8,420 Million-dollar tax returns per 10,000 filers: 54.20 Total returns: 73,930
