Bill to ban homeless people from street camping comes from think-tank hundreds of miles away
Bill to ban homeless people from street camping comes from think-tank hundreds of miles away
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Founder of Safe Park Indy stresses importance of helping the community
Safe Park Indy partnered with a church in Indianapolis to give homeless people a safe place to park and sleep at night.
Indiana lawmakers are considering a bill that advocates say would criminalize homelessness across the state.
The bill's language mirrors model legislation from the Cicero Institute, a conservative Texas-based think tank that has pitched similar legislation around the country to combat rising homelessness numbers. In Indianapolis, the city's homeless population rose 5% from 2023 to 2024, according to an annual count held last year.
It's also just the latest bill that taps into the state vs. local government control fight that happens every legislative session.
House Bill 1662 would prohibit camping or sleeping on state or local government-owned property. A person found sleeping or camping on streets or public property would receive an initial warning and then a Class C misdemeanor for their next violation.
The bill also says local governments cannot direct law enforcement or prosecuting attorneys to ignore enforcing the street camping ban and would allow Hoosiers or the attorney general to bring civil lawsuits against municipalities they believe are not following the law.
Subscribe to our politics newsletter
The House Committee on Government and Regulatory Reform only heard testimony on the bill on Monday. Whether the committee will vote on the bill is unclear at this point, as lawmakers face a looming deadline to get bills out of committees by next Monday. State Rep. Doug Miller, R-Elkhart, who chairs the committee, said lawmakers would continue to have discussions this week before making a decision on whether to vote on the bill.
But advocates for expanding homeless services and Democratic lawmakers on Tuesday questioned the purpose of the bill and whether the state or local governments should control a municipality's homelessness policies.
'This is for a local government to decide how to handle,' said Thomas Lopez, the Center Township Trustee from Hancock County. 'Not a bill that is not addressing the real issues with homelessness, but rather give an okay to clean up the streets.'
Cicero Institute policies spreading
State Rep. Michelle Davis, R-Whiteland, who authored the bill confirmed Monday that the language came from The Cicero Institute. The organization, founded by tech entrepreneur and investor Joe Lonsdale, points to states like Georgia and Florida that have passed legislation based on Cicero policies that ban homeless encampments.
The Cicero Institute's position has been affirmed in the last year from a 2024 U.S. Supreme Court decision that ruled cities can ban people from sleeping and camping in public spaces and past comments from President Donald Trump about supporting the removal of homeless people from public streets.
Lonsdale, who founded software company Palantir, wrote in 2023 for an urban policy magazine that homelessness policies are often 'controlled by a national activist movement' that has not made progress on solving problems across the country.
'Made up of thousands of service providers, this movement has become unaccountable and has failed to make meaningful improvements in conditions for the homeless, all while docking taxpayers more and more money,' Lonsdale wrote.
More: Indy's homeless count rose in 2024, reversing downward trend in wake of pandemic
Devon Kurtz, the Cicero Institute's policy director, emphasized at the House committee on Monday that the country's current approach to address homelessness is not working.
"Indiana and the country as a whole, is not experiencing a homelessness crisis as much as experiencing an unsheltered humanitarian disaster,' Kurtz said. 'More must be done helping people leave the streets.'
But some lawmakers and people who testified Monday questioned whether language from a Texas-based organization would improve homelessness in Indiana, hundreds of miles away. Homelessness is a 'local, sometimes hyperlocal issue that needs resources,' said Rabbi Aaron Spiegel, with the Greater Indianapolis Multifaith Alliance.
'Texas-based interest groups telling us what to do doesn't help,' Spiegel said.
Davis told committee members that she had not communicated with local governments about how the bill would conflict with local ordinances. She said she did not view the bill as state overreach when a Democratic committee member asked if lawmakers were overstepping with Davis' proposal.
Advocates say more services needed
Representatives of various advocacy and religious organizations from Indiana United Ways to the Marion County Reentry Coalition said what Indiana's homeless population needs is more investment in services rather than adding criminal misdemeanors to someone who is already struggling.
'House Bill 1662 will burden individuals with fines and arrest records and significantly burden taxpayers,' said Lori Phillips-Steele, the Indiana director of the Corporation for Supportive Housing. 'It relies on expensive crisis response systems like policing, court systems, emergency medical services and jails, and individuals are often discharged right back into homelessness, perpetuating the cycle of homelessness and incarceration without actually reducing homelessness.'
Doris Jones, who co-founded Hope Packages in Indianapolis, asked lawmakers to focus on ways to help homeless populations around the state.
'Come up with a solution of more shelters on the streets instead of harassing people who only need housing,' Jones said. 'That's the issue, more affordable housing, more shelters.'
Contact IndyStar state government and politics reporter Brittany Carloni at brittany.carloni@indystar.com or 317-779-4468. Follow her on Twitter/X@CarloniBrittany.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Why two conservative justices want courts to reconsider disability discrimination suits
Why two conservative justices want courts to reconsider disability discrimination suits The high court unanimously said courts can't use a higher standard to block suits for damages for some disability discrimination claims and not others. But they declined to set the standard. Show Caption Hide Caption Supreme Court sides with straight woman in 'reverse discrimination' case The Supreme Court made a unanimous decision after siding with a woman who claims she didn't get a job and then was demoted because she is straight. Scripps News WASHINGTON – Disability rights advocates breathed a sigh of relief when the Supreme Court on June 12 made it easier for students with disabilities to sue schools for damages. Not only did all the justices agree that some courts were using too tough a standard to block lawsuits like one brought by a Minnesota teenager with a rare form of epilepsy, but they also rejected her school's argument that the real issue is the standard is too lax for other types of disability discrimination claims. 'The very foundation of disability civil rights was on the line,' Shira Wakschlag, an attorney with The Arc of the United States, said in a statement after the decision. But the court didn't settle the larger issue of what the standard should be in all cases. The justices only said there shouldn't be different standards for discrimination claims involving educational instruction. And two of the court's six conservatives – Justices Clarence Thomas and Brett Kavanaugh – said the school raised 'serious arguments' that courts are getting that standard wrong. In a concurring opinion, Thomas wrote that he hopes 'lower courts will carefully consider whether the existing standards comport with the Constitution and the underlying statutory text.' Two of the court's three liberals – Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson – pushed back, saying the school's argument that a person with a disability must prove there was an intent to discriminate is clearly wrong. 'The statutes' text and history, as well as this Court's precedent, foreclose any such purpose requirement,' Sotomayor wrote in a concurring opinion. More: In unanimous decision, Supreme Court makes it easier for students with disabilities to sue schools How the case got to the Supreme Court The issue in the Minnesota case was whether the school failed to accommodate the special needs of Ava Tharpe, whose rare form of epilepsy makes it difficult to attend school in the morning. Federal courts agreed with the family that the school hadn't done enough and needed to provide evening instruction. But the courts said the Tharpes couldn't use the Americans with Disabilities Act to try to get the school to pay for outside teachers and other expenses incurred before they won their case. And they said the Tharpes couldn't use the Rehabilitation Act to seek a court order binding the school to teach Ava after regular school hours. Judges on the St. Louis-based 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said their hands were tied because of a 1982 circuit decision – Monahan v. Nebraska − that said school officials need to have acted with 'bad faith or gross misjudgment' for suits to go forward involving educational services for children with disabilities. That's a tougher standard than the 'deliberate indifference' rule often used when weighing other types of disability discrimination claims. The school argued that 'deliberate indifference' is too lax. Their lawyers said the plain text of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act prohibit only intentional discrimination. What the Supreme Court decided The Supreme Court said they couldn't consider that argument because they'd only been asked to decide whether the lower courts were correct to apply a 'uniquely stringent' standard for cases like Ava's – not to decide what the standard should be in all cases. 'We will not entertain the (school) District's invitation to inject into this case significant issues that have not been fully presented,' Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the court. Thomas said he agreed that it wouldn't have been right for the court to take on the larger issue with its significant ramifications for disability rights. But in his concurring opinion that Kavanaugh joined, Thomas said he'd be willing to do so in an 'appropriate case.' 'Whether federal courts are applying the correct legal standard under two widely utilized federal statutes is an issue of national importance,' he wrote, 'and the (school) District has raised serious arguments that the prevailing standards are incorrect.'

an hour ago
Manhunt continues for Minnesota shooting suspect Vance Boelter
Around 24 hours after police say a gunman killed a Minnesota state lawmaker and her husband, plus wounded another lawmaker and his wife, suspect Vance Boelter remains on the run, authorities have said. The shootings began around 2 a.m. Saturday, when Minnesota State Sen. John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette, were both shot multiple times at their home in Champlin, Minnesota, authorities said. Soon after, State Rep. Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark, were shot and killed at their home in Brooklyn Park. Police encountered the gunman leaving Hortman's house at around 3:35 a.m., the officers heading there to check on the lawmaker after responding to the earlier shooting at Hoffman's home. The suspect exchanged gunfire with police and was able to escape and flee on foot, authorities said. The FBI is "using every available resource to locate Vance Boelter," FBI Minneapolis Special Agent in Charge Alvin M. Winston Sr. said in a statement. The FBI is offering a $50,000 reward for information leading to Boelter's arrest. The 57-year-old suspect is alleged to have gained access to the victim's homes while posing as a police officer. Police believe that when the shooter opened fire, he was wearing a latex mask that looked realistic, sources said. Boelter -- a husband and father, according to an online biography -- has touted an extensive background in security and military training, according to an ABC News review of his online presence and professional history. Boelter helped lead the private security firm Praetorian Guard Security Services, which is based in the Twin Cities area, according to the company website. Dozens of Minnesota Democrats were on a target list written by the gunman, according to law enforcement sources. Those on the list included Gov. Tim Walz, U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar, U.S. Sen. Tina Smith and state Attorney General Keith Ellison, according to law enforcement sources familiar with the matter. Police said the list -- which was retrieved from the suspect's vehicle, which looked like a police vehicle and had police lights -- also named Hortman and Hoffman. Both victims are Democrats and Hortman was formerly the Speaker of the Minnesota House of Representatives. The shooter's list of potential targets also included the names of abortion providers and pro-choice activists, several sources told ABC News. Many of the Democratic lawmakers on the list have been outspoken about pro-choice policy positions, two sources said.


New York Post
3 hours ago
- New York Post
Wife of Minnesota State Sen. John Hoffman used her body as a ‘shield' to protect daughter during shooting: family
The wife of the wounded Minnesota state senator targeted during an overnight assassination attempt shielded the couple's daughter as the masked gunman opened fire on the family, missing the couple's vital organs by inches, family and reports said. Yvette Hoffman jumped on top of her adult daughter, Hope, while alleged assassin Vance Luther Boetler fired multiple shots at her and State Sen. John Hoffman inside their Minneapolis suburb home early Saturday morning, according to Hoffman's nephew. 'Early this morning, an absolute vile piece of s–t dressed as a cop broke into my aunt and uncle's house and shot him 6 times and my aunt 5 times in a political act of terrorism. My aunt threw herself on her daughter, using her body as a shield to save her life,' Mat Ollig wrote on Facebook. Advertisement One of the bullets narrowly missed the Democratic senator's heart, KARE11 reported. 7 Yvette and Sen. John Hoffman were wounded in a shooting at their Minnesota home on June 14, 2025. Mat Ollig/Facebook Police responded to a 911 call at the residence in Champlin, Minn. just after 2 a.m. and discovered the Hoffmans wounded, rushing them to a hospital where they underwent surgery. Advertisement Ollig revealed his aunt and uncle were out of surgery and in stable condition. Yvette Hoffman was awake and alert in the hospital as of Saturday night, KMSP reported. Hope Hoffman, who is in her 20s, was not hit in the shooting. Bullet holes riddled the front of the Champlin home, the first house he allegedly targeted in his rampage before driving to Minnesota House Speaker Emerita Rep. Melissa Hortman's home in Brooklyn Park. Boelter is accused of fatally shooting Hortman and her husband, Mark, inside their home at around 3:30 a.m. Advertisement 7 The Hoffmans were shot multiple time and underwent surgery. Both are listed as stable. John Hoffman/Facebook 7 Security cameras captured Vance Boelter wanted by the FBI for the shootings. FBI The gunman allegedly posed as a police officer and appeared at the front doorsteps of the Hortman residence and opened fire on the couple, officials announced Rep. Hortman, 55, was pronounced dead at the scene and her husband died at a nearby hospital. Advertisement Brooklyn Park police were notified of the shooting in Champlin and did a check on the Hortmans when they found the masked gunman, wearing a uniform and badge, exiting the home. Officers fired at the gunman, who took cover back inside the home, before he managed to escape. 7 A Champlin police car blocks the road to the Hoffmans' home after the shooting on June 14, 2025. FOX 9 7 The gunman wore a mask and a police uniform and vest during the shootings. FBI Police opened up an urgent search for Boelter, setting up a 3-mile perimeter Saturday morning. A lockdown of homes near the Brooklyn Park shooting was lifted late Saturday, but police urged residents to be alert and not confront any suspicious individuals, and not open doors to solo officers. Boetler's wife, Jenny Boetler, was detained by police for questioning Saturday after being pulled over with several relatives near Onamia, Minn, local KTSP reported. 7 Minnesota Rep. Melissa Hortman was assassinated alongside her husband at their home in Brooklyn Park, Minn. Melissa Hortman/Facebook Advertisement Boelter was appointed to the non-partisan Workforce Development Council in 2016 by former Minnesota Gov. Mark Dayton. Gov. Tim Walz appointed Boelter to the Workforce Development Board in 2019. His term ran out in 2023. Walz called the shootings on both Hortman and Hoffman a 'politically motivated assassination.' 7 Boelter was appointed to the non-partisan Workforce Development Council in 2016 by former Minnesota Gov. Mark Dayton. HANDOUT/MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY HANDOUT/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock Advertisement Boelter left behind a 'manifesto' listing the names of 70 politicians, including Walz and his Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan, and a stack of papers stating 'No Kings' in reference to the nationwide anti-Trump protests, according to police. The apparent hit list included abortion providers, clinics and Planned Parenthood, sources told The Post. Both of the Democrats he targeted were pro-choice. Police are weighing whether Boetler held extreme anti-abortion views, the sources said. Hortman was staunchly pro-choice and led the Minnesota House in passing the PRO Act in 2023, which codified the legality of abortion and other forms of reproductive health care. She also boosted funding for abortion clinics and passed protections for providers.