Ballard announces leadership transition
"It has been a true privilege to lead Ballard for the past 11 years during a dynamic period for the company and hydrogen industry," said Randy MacEwen. "We have built a strong foundation that has positioned the company as an industry leader. Given changing industry dynamics, including a focus on product cost reduction, it is the right time for a new leader with a strong operational background to guide Ballard into the future."
The Board of Directors has appointed Marty Neese as President & CEO following a succession planning process. A seasoned executive with a deep background in operations, Mr. Neese has extensive experience in product standardization, product cost reduction, volume production, and gross margin optimization. Mr. Neese has served on Ballard's Board of Directors over the past 10 years, and as the CEO of Verdagy, an innovative electrolysis and green hydrogen company, over the past four years. Earlier in his career, he served as the chief operating officer of SunPower and Flex. With his background and experience, Mr. Neese is uniquely qualified to drive the company's next phase of growth and operational efficiency.
"Marty is the right leader for Ballard as the fuel cell industry undergoes a period of rationalization and competitive realignment," said Jim Roche, Chair of the Board of Directors. "His proven track record in operational excellence, product innovation and commercialization, and cost management will ensure Ballard not only adapts to this new environment but thrives in it."
"The fuel cell industry is entering a new phase, and Ballard is taking decisive steps to position itself for long-term sustainable success," said Mr. Neese. "I am honored to step into this role at a company with such a strong brand, and a leading track record for safety, technology, and proven field performance in our target markets. We have a fortress balance sheet with no requirements for near-term or mid-term financings. Working alongside our talented team, I look forward to building on this solid foundation, optimizing our operations, accelerating innovation, and unlocking long-term value for our stakeholders."
The leadership transition has been carefully planned to ensure a seamless and orderly handover. Mr. MacEwen will continue to serve as the CEO until Marty's start date and then will remain available in an advisory capacity through September 30, 2025.
About Ballard Power Systems
Ballard Power Systems' (NASDAQ: BLDP; TSX: BLDP) vision is to deliver fuel cell power for a sustainable planet. Ballard zero-emission PEM fuel cells enable electrification of mobility, including buses, commercial trucks, trains, marine vessels, and stationary power. To learn more about Ballard, please visit www.ballard.com.
This release contains forward-looking statements concerning anticipated impacts of the announced leadership change. These forward-looking statements reflect Ballard's current expectations as contemplated under section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Any such forward-looking statements are based on Ballard's assumptions relating to its financial forecasts and expectations regarding its product development efforts, manufacturing capacity, and market demand.
These statements involve risks and uncertainties that may cause Ballard's actual results to be materially different, including general economic and regulatory changes, detrimental reliance on third parties, successfully achieving our business plans and achieving and sustaining profitability. For a detailed discussion of these and other risk factors that could affect Ballard's future performance, please refer to Ballard's most recent Annual Information Form. Readers should not place undue reliance on Ballard's forward-looking statements and Ballard assumes no obligation to update or release any revisions to these forward-looking statements, other than as required under applicable legislation.
Further Information
Ballard Power Systems: Sumit Kundu – Investor Relations, +1.604.453.3517 or investors@ballard.com
View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/ballard-announces-leadership-transition-302482980.html
SOURCE Ballard Power Systems Inc.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
23 minutes ago
- Forbes
The New Talent Playbook: From Build And Buy To Bridge, Borrow, And AI
Most organizations believe they have a leadership talent pipeline. What they actually have is an illusion of readiness. Roles are being reshaped in months, not years. Succession plans expire before they're tested. And the leaders needed for tomorrow—tech fluent, adaptive and globally minded—are the very ones companies don't know how to grow. The numbers reveal the gap. The World Economic Forum reports that on average, workers can expect that two-fifths (39%) of their existing skill sets will be transformed or become outdated over the 2025–2030 period. Gallup finds fewer than a third of employees believe they have real opportunities to learn and grow and less than half received any training last year. Only one in three employees aiming for a new role feels equipped to succeed. The cost isn't abstract. Unfilled leadership roles slow growth, drain revenue, stifle innovation and erode confidence. Consider a division head retiring unexpectedly. The successor identified on paper isn't ready, and six months pass before the team regains direction—while competitors move ahead. To understand how organizations should respond, I spoke with Lynda Gratton, Professor of Management Practice at London Business School, a global advisor to Fortune 500 companies and the author of best-selling books including The 100-Year Life, Living Strategy and Redesigning Work. For more than three decades, Gratton's research has reframed how organizations think about leadership, skills and the future of work. She has watched the scaffolding of old systems loosen, and her conclusion is direct: the playbook must expand. 'For years there were two stable strategies,' Gratton explained. 'One was build—you bring people in as graduates, you move them around, they become embedded in the culture and ready for the top jobs. The other was buy—when the pipeline isn't enough, you go to the market. Those worked pretty well.' Gratton describes build and buy as cultural anchors—steady, predictable, tied to values. But, as she emphasizes, 'while they remain the core, they are no longer sufficient on their own.' What's needed now is a repertoire that preserves continuity and also builds adaptability. Build and Buy: The Anchors of Continuity From a strategic standpoint, build and buy remain the foundation of leadership systems. They preserve culture, protect institutional memory and provide a stable core for succession. But in a world where work is shifting faster than careers can keep pace, they must be complemented by approaches that reach across boundaries. Bridge: Unlocking Talent Across Boundaries 'One adaptive strategy is bridge,' Gratton said. 'There is talent within the organization, but it's not doing the job we need it to be doing in the future. So we bridge across jobs. Conversations about skills are what matter, so people can use their abilities to move into different sorts of roles.' Bridging is a response to the mismatch between current capability and future demand. A compliance leader moving into sustainability governance or a facilities manager leading an IoT rollout are not one-off shifts. They're deliberate investments in cross-boundary capacity that keep organizations competitive. But bridging fails if development remains bolted on instead of built in. Gallup reports that time away from responsibilities is the top barrier to growth, according to 89% of CHROs, 37% of managers and 41% of employees. The obsession with conventional career ladders continues. While nearly 70% of employees are looking for a new role within their organization, only 28% would consider a lateral one. Career growth inside companies still follows a narrow script—progress often defined by vertical movement alone. Borrow: Bringing in Talent Without Owning It 'The other adaptive strategy is borrow—you borrow from the external labor market for a short period of time,' Gratton explained. 'The article Diane Gerson and I wrote in Harvard Business Review about freelancers was important: 'I want your job, but not your work.'' Borrowing is a way to build agility. Contractors, consultants, gig specialists and even fractional executives give companies access to capabilities at exactly the moment they're needed. But there are risks. 'If you outsource too much, you weaken the very culture you're trying to sustain,' Gratton cautioned. 'Even the most freelance-heavy organizations have a small center that defines identity and strategy.' Fractional leadership shows the point. CFOs, CMOs and even CEOs are now hired on fractional terms. These roles can stabilize organizations in transition but don't provide continuity. Without translating that know-how into durable capability inside, companies risk dependency instead of growth. Borrowing works best when paired with bridging—capturing the practices and knowledge from external experts and embedding them into internal teams. AI: The Fifth Force in Workforce Strategy 'AI changes the way we think about talent pipelines,' Gratton told me. 'It shrinks the half-life of skills, and it lets you anticipate talent needs much faster than before.' AI is no longer just an efficiency tool. It can act as a sensor, spotting succession risks, forecasting gaps and aligning leaders to emerging priorities. 'When you use AI in succession planning,' Gratton added, 'you can see that someone is about to retire and quickly identify who could step in—with their development tailored to the job they're moving into.' That makes AI one strategy in its own right. It can augment talent management by providing sharper analytics, uncovering hidden skills and dynamically matching people to opportunities. But the debate runs deeper: what happens when AI begins to take on the critical tasks of talent itself? Some outsourcing may make sense. AI can run financial forecasts, write code, draft legal documents, generate marketing copy, simulate supply chain risks or even triage customer service inquiries. It can screen applications, model workforce needs and build learning simulations faster than humans ever could. Done well, this can unburden leaders and free people to spend more time on judgment, relationships and strategy. But there are lines AI cannot cross. Discernment, empathy, strategic choice—these are the core of leadership. No machine can substitute for an executive weighing the trade-offs of a merger, deciding whether to enter a new market or leading people through crisis. If organizations push too far in outsourcing these calls, they risk hollowing out the very capabilities they claim to be developing. The open question is impact. Will AI strip away valuable developmental experiences by taking on tasks that once helped grow future leaders? Or will it elevate human talent by removing low-value burdens and giving leaders more space to focus on what matters most? The jury is still out. As AI evolves, the question is not just how it supports talent strategy, but whether it will become part of the talent pool itself. For now, it remains a tool—powerful, indispensable, but not a substitute for human leadership. Which Moves Work Best? At this point, a fair question for any leader is: which of these strategies—build, buy, bridge, borrow or AI—will actually work in the future? The answer is not straightforward. One could argue you need all of them, or at least systems that allow each to be deployed when the moment demands it. The deeper point is that talent strategies need to be adaptable. They should be guided by business strategy and context, not by rigid ideas about roles. When companies typecast roles—assuming, for example, that senior executives must always be built internally or that technical specialists must always be bought externally—they limit how talent can be leveraged. A more powerful approach is to treat the five strategies as a variable system. That means in talent reviews, the conversation should not presuppose a single strategy. Instead, each leadership need should be examined through all five possibilities. Could this role be bridged across functions? Could it be borrowed in the short term? Could it be rebuilt through AI-driven development insights? The value lies in calibrating across strategies rather than defaulting to one. Gratton, in her work, emphasizes this danger: when talent strategies are tied too tightly to roles, organizations miss the chance to see capability in different contexts. That's where companies get stuck. The Disruptor's Advantage 'The disruptors—new entrants—build from a different model,' Gratton said. 'They use AI, operate with freelance groups and design for agility from the start. Change won't come from inside incumbents—it will be driven from outside.' Talent markets are shifting as quickly as work expectations themselves. The Great Resignation has given way to what Gallup calls the Great Detachment—fewer people moving but more disconnecting from the meaning of corporate careers. Gratton's research confirms the trend: new talent ecosystems are emerging, built for speed and flexibility. In that environment, Gratton believes the edge belongs to future-fluent leaders—those who combine technological fluency with distinctly human strengths like discernment, critical thinking and the ability to catalyze change. Companies that cling to outdated tools—nine-box grids, tenure as a proxy for readiness, succession indicators that miss real potential—risk being overtaken entirely. Disruptors hold the advantage because they aren't tied to legacy systems. Incumbents need to unlearn quickly if they want to withstand the shocks ahead. Keeping the Cultural Core Intact Moves may multiply, but culture depends on anchor leaders. 'You couldn't anticipate a culture where every single person's a freelancer,' Gratton warned. 'Because… what is this place, and how does it work?' A clear framework emerged from our conversation: The danger is not years away—it's here. Pipelines are thinning now. Successors are unready when the call comes. Promising leaders are leaving before their potential is realized. Organizations that keep postponing decisions will see their cultures wear down under the strain. As Gratton put it: 'If you're not shaping the future, you're being shaped by it.' Shaping the future of talent isn't abstract. It happens in every vacancy left open, every leader not developed, every skill gap ignored until it fractures the system. Readiness is only real when leaders build it as they go.
CBS News
23 minutes ago
- CBS News
Air Canada delays plans to resume operations after flight attendants refuse to end strike
Air Canada is delaying its plans to resume services on Sunday after its 10,000 striking flight attendants defied the Canadian government's return-to-work order to remain on the picket lines. The strike, which began on Saturday morning, stranded more than 100,000 travelers around the world during the peak summer travel season. The Canada Industrial Relations Board ordered airline staff back to work by 2 p.m. Sunday after the Canadian government intervened and Air Canada said it planned to resume flights Sunday evening. However, the Canadian Union of Public Employees, which represents the flight attendants, said the demonstrations will keep going around the country, despite the airline's statement. "We invite Air Canada back to the table to negotiate a fair deal, rather than relying on the federal government to do their dirty work for them when bargaining gets a little bit tough," the union said. "We remain on strike. We demand a fair, negotiated contract and to be compensated for all hours worked." The airline said in a statement Sunday afternoon that it plans to resume flights on Monday evening. Fewer than 12 hours after workers walked off the job, Federal Jobs Minister Patty Hajdu ordered the 10,000 flight attendants back to work, saying now is not the time to take risks with the economy and noting the unprecedented tariffs the U.S. has imposed on Canada. Hajdu referred the work stoppage to the Canada Industrial Relations Board. The shutdown of Canada's largest airline early Saturday was impacting about 130,000 people a day. Air Canada operates around 700 flights per day. According to numbers from aviation analytics provider Cirium, Air Canada had canceled a total of 671 flights by Saturday afternoon, following 199 on Friday. And another 96 flights scheduled for Sunday were already suspended. The bitter contract fight escalated Friday as the union turned down Air Canada's prior request to enter into government-directed arbitration, which allows a third-party mediator to decide the terms of a new contract. Flight attendants walked off the job around 1 a.m. EDT on Saturday. Around the same time, Air Canada said it would begin locking flight attendants out of airports. Last year, the government forced the country's two major railroads into arbitration with their labor union during a work stoppage. The union for the rail workers is suing, arguing the government is removing a union's leverage in negotiations. The Business Council of Canada had urged the government to impose binding arbitration in this case, too. And the Canadian Chamber of Commerce welcomed the intervention. Hajdu maintained that her Liberal government is not anti-union, saying it is clear the two sides are at an impasse. Passengers whose flights are impacted will be eligible to request a full refund on the airline's website or mobile app, according to Air Canada. The airline said it would also offer alternative travel options through other Canadian and foreign airlines when possible. Still, it warned that it could not guarantee immediate rebooking because flights on other airlines are already full "due to the summer travel peak." Air Canada and the Canadian Union of Public Employees have been in contract talks for about eight months, but they have yet to reach a tentative deal. Both sides have said they remain far apart on the issue of pay and the unpaid work flight attendants do when planes aren't in the air. The airline's latest offer included a 38% increase in total compensation, including benefits and pensions, over four years, that it said "would have made our flight attendants the best compensated in Canada." But the union pushed back, saying the proposed 8% raise in the first year didn't go far enough because of inflation.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Air Canada passengers still scrambling to rebook as labour dispute grounds flights
Air passengers are still scrambling to rebook their flights home as a labour dispute between Air Canada and its flight attendants continues to ground planes around the world. James Hart and Zahara Virani came to Toronto from Calgary for what they thought would be a fun weekend. But now they're having to miss work and pay $2,600 to fly with another airline after their Air Canada flight was cancelled amid the strike and lockout that began Saturday. Virani says she doesn't blame the flight attendants, and is disappointed in Air Canada for not reaching a deal with its workers. The union representing more than 10,000 flight attendants says the workers plan to remain on strike even after the Canada Industrial Relations Board ordered both parties back to work by 2 p.m. ET today. Air Canada had said it would restart flights later today, but it is unclear how the latest news from the union will impact that plan. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 17, 2025. The Canadian Press
