
Radical Islamists, the biggest threat to Islam and its followers
The radical culture that has come to dominate Islamic thought has divided Muslim societies into disparate, warring, and mutually antagonistic groups and sects.
In times of peace, these groups serve as the scapegoat for dictatorial rulers. The ruler uses the existence of these groups as a justification to close off democratic avenues and postpone the idea of power transfer, under the guise of protecting his nation from them.
This is despite the fact that these groups tend to operate under the ruler's consent, serving as his best excuse – both domestically and internationally – to remain in power indefinitely.
He suggests to both internal and external audiences that the alternative to his rule is these extremist, backward, and violent groups, thereby forcing them to accept the status quo.
On another front, we have seen these groups responsible for the failure of Arab revolutions, as happened in Libya, Syria, and Yemen.
However, Egypt and Tunisia's revolutions succeeded because the people rejected these groups.
For instance, had the Syrian people fully fought as one, as citizens united against their ruler, that ruler would not have remained in power. Instead, the people are divided into sects and groups: there are Sunnis, Alawites, Druze, Christians, and Kurds.
Furthermore, Islamist groups have been justified to spread the cause for Israel's brutal occupation, as they have divided the Palestinian people in how they can confront their occupier. We seethe likes of Hamas, Fatah, Islamic Jihad, Al-Quds Brigades, Al-Nasser Salah al-Din Brigades, and many other factions, instead of unity under one national banner regardless of religion.
There should be no difference between a Palestinian Sunni, Shiite, Druze, or Christian Muslim, or others.
Why don't we learn from others? The Ukrainian nation is resisting the Russian occupation with one heart, united fully. We don't find independent Ukrainian groups separate from the leadership saying, 'We are the Christian group' or 'Christian Jihad' or anything of that sort. For this, the world respected them and stood by them.
Meanwhile, we ask ourselves: Why doesn't the world stand by the Palestinian people?
The answer is because we haven't presented a unified image, with agreed on goals and principles, to the world.
Instead, the world only sees hostility between Palestinian factions and sects – the time when Hamas once fought Fatah members in Gaza isn't a distant memory. If something similar happened among the Ukrainian people resisting their occupier, the world would have stop supporting the Ukrainian people. In other words, if we respect ourselves, the world would respect us.
When will our people understand this?
This is what gave an American the opportunity to say on a TV channel, 'We support Israel in protecting its security by killing the commander of Islamic Jihad's northern region, Tayseer al-Ajroudi.'
The presenter interrupted him, stating that Israel attacked peaceful people in their homes.
The American replied, 'And why didn't Israel do that to Fatah members?' justifying it by saying Israel is targeting terrorists.
Therefore, we argue that unifying the Palestinian people under one national banner, without color or sectarianism, is essential for the protection of all Palestinians and has become an urgent necessity.
Otherwise, the conflict will persist, and we will witness this painful, recurring scene of innocent lives lost due to a failure to listen to reason.
Radical groups must understand they have erred; historical experience has constantly proven this.
Without unity, the world will not stand with us, nor will Arab or Islamic nations support radical groups.
Islamic governments, like other nations, now fear radical groups that might turn against them at any time, declare them infidels, and carry out terrorist operations against them, as Hamas did to Egypt.
Thus, we must realize that the disunity and division caused by radical extremist Islamic groups will lead us to lose our cause, as has happened repeatedly in the past.
About the author:
Mostafa Rashed is an Al-Azhar scholar and a professor of Sharia and Law and Comparative Religions of Egyptian nationality.
He serves as a Global Peace Ambassador for the United Nations and is a member of the Afro-Asian Writers' Union, the Arab Organization for Human Rights, the International Federation of Journalists, and the International Union of Lawyers.
Rashed is the head of the Global Conscience Organization for Human Rights, headquartered in Sydney, Australia. He also presides over the Arab Enlightenment Organization, affiliated with the United Nations, and is the head of the International Union of Muslim Scholars for Peace, also affiliated with the United Nations.
He has authored 30 books and two collections of poetry.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al-Ahram Weekly
an hour ago
- Al-Ahram Weekly
Cairo hosting trilateral talks on Gaza humanitarian aid, ceasefire - Foreign Affairs
Cairo is hosting delegations from Egypt, Qatar, and Israel for discussions on humanitarian aid for Gaza and efforts to secure a ceasefire, the Egyptian news channel Al-Qahera News reported on Tuesday. The tripartite talks are addressing the delivery of aid, the evacuation of patients, and the return of stranded individuals. The discussions are part of Egypt's ongoing efforts to broker a ceasefire in the Gaza Strip. Informed sources told the channel that the meetings have witnessed notable progress, with consensus reached on several humanitarian-related provisions within the proposed ceasefire agreement. The talks are scheduled to continue over two days. These consultations reflect Egypt's commitment to overcoming the obstacles hindering a comprehensive ceasefire and its determination to ensure the entry of sufficient and appropriate humanitarian assistance to residents of the strip, the sources added. On Monday, Al-Qahera News reported that Hassan Rashad, head of Egypt's General Intelligence Service, held talks on a Gaza ceasefire with Qatari Prime Minister Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani, alongside Palestinian and Israeli delegations. Over the past week, indirect negotiations between Israel and Hamas resumed in the Qatari capital. Despite international momentum, the two sides remain at odds over key terms. A Palestinian source told AFP that Israel's insistence on maintaining a military presence in Gaza has stalled a proposed 60-day pause in fighting. On the other hand, an Israeli official, speaking to AFP, accused Hamas of deliberately blocking a deal, as the group rejected new Israeli demands to retain forces in over 40 percent of Gaza. Hamas accused Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of being the main obstacle. Since October 2023, Israel's war on Gaza has killed 57,680 Palestinians — the majority women and children — and injured 137,409 others, according to the strip's health ministry. Egypt, alongside Qatar and the United States, has been a key mediator in efforts to end the war, now entering its 21st month. Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link:


Al-Ahram Weekly
an hour ago
- Al-Ahram Weekly
What is happening in Syria's Druze-majority Sweida? - Region
The Syrian government deployed its forces in the Druze-majority city of Sweida, in a bid by the Islamist authorities to extend their power to the area controlled by local armed groups. Why did authorities take this major step, and what could follow? - How did it begin? - Clashes began on Sunday between factions from the Druze religious minority and Bedouin tribes, who are Sunni Muslim, killing more than 100 people. The two sides have a longstanding feud in Sweida. Syrian government forces sent reinforcements to the region, in the country's south, saying they want to reestablish security. But according to witnesses, Druze armed groups and the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights monitor, government forces and allied groups including Bedouins took control on Monday of several villages near Sweida that were previously run by Druze fighters. On Tuesday, following contacts between Damascus authorities and notables from Sweida, the Syrian defence ministry announced a ceasefire after government forces had entered the city. Before then, Sweida, home to around 150,000 people, was controlled by various Druze factions. Syria's three main Druze spiritual leaders, who sometimes hold differing views on political issues, called on local fighters on Tuesday to lay down their arms. However, Hikmat al-Hijri, one of the leaders, then accused Damascus of failing to uphold its commitment to enter Sweida peacefully and called for "resisting this brutal campaign by all available means". Terrified residents of Sweida have reported numerous abuses since the entry of government troops and their allies, including executions, looting and burning houses. - What future awaits the Druze factions? - The new Islamist authorities, who seized power after overthrowing longtime ruler Bashar al-Assad in December, had demanded the dissolution of all armed groups and their integration into the forces of the defence ministry. During Syria's 14-year civil war, which started after Assad's violent repression of peaceful protests in 2011, the Druze formed their own armed groups to protect their heartland in Sweida away from major battles. In January, the two largest groups, the Men of Dignity movement and the Mountain Brigade, said they were ready to join the new national army. "The state has been stalling the implementation of this agreement," Men of Dignity spokesperson Bassem Fakhr told AFP. Aside from the Druze, the Kurds, who control vast territories in the country's northeast, have a powerful armed wing, the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), and are negotiating with Damascus for their integration into the armed forces. Prior to the war, the Druze in Syria numbered around 700,000, or three percent of the population. The Druze are followers of an esoteric religion that split from Shiite Islam, and are mainly found in Syria, Lebanon and Israel. - Why is Israel intervening? - Since the fall of Assad, Israel expanded its overture to Syria's Druze through notable Israeli coreligionists. It sent humanitarian parcels and allowed delegations of religious dignitaries to go to Israel on pilgrimage, despite an official state of war with Syria. In March, Israel expressed its intention to defend the Druze following skirmishes in the suburbs of Damascus, but these remarks were immediately rejected by Druze dignitaries, who reaffirmed their commitment to the unity of Syria. Israel has bombed several Syrian military positions in Sweida since Monday. "We will not allow harm to the Druze in Syria," Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz said, adding his country will "not stand idly by". On Tuesday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu along with Katz said they "are acting to prevent the Syrian regime from harming them and to ensure the demilitarisation of the area adjacent to our border with Syria". Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link:


Daily News Egypt
an hour ago
- Daily News Egypt
The Complicity of Major US Corporations in Sustaining the War on Gaza
As the war on Gaza rages on, leaving in its wake a trail of unspeakable devastation, shattered families, and erased futures, it is no longer possible—nor ethically tolerable—to speak only of military strategies and political calculations. A far more unsettling dimension of this protracted tragedy is now emerging: the role of powerful multinational corporations in not merely profiting from the conflict, but actively sustaining and enabling it. In a world where the language of human rights is too often weaponized and selectively invoked, the recent report presented by Francesca Albanese, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territories, demands our collective attention. Her findings, meticulously documented and courageously articulated before the UN Human Rights Council on 3 July 2025, lay bare an economic machinery behind the violence—one in which major American tech and defense companies play a central, deeply troubling role. Albanese's report, aptly titled 'From the Economy of Occupation to the Economy of Genocide,' moves beyond the well-worn diplomatic euphemisms and legal technicalities. It asserts, with formidable evidence, that the systematic targeting of Gaza's civilian population—through relentless aerial bombardments, mass displacement, and the destruction of vital infrastructure—constitutes not just a military campaign but a profitable enterprise. Among the entities named in the report are Microsoft, Amazon, Google's parent company Alphabet, IBM, and Palantir Technologies. These corporations are accused of providing advanced surveillance technologies, cloud computing services, AI-driven military systems, and digital infrastructure that facilitate Israel's military operations and the maintenance of its illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem. For example, Palantir—a data analytics firm with longstanding contracts with US intelligence agencies—is alleged to supply the Israeli military with predictive policing tools and battlefield analytics. Microsoft and Amazon Web Services reportedly host vast data centers and cloud services for Israeli security institutions, enabling real-time intelligence sharing and operational coordination. Alphabet's AI and mapping technologies have similarly been implicated in aiding precision targeting systems—a deeply sinister irony given their public declarations of ethical AI commitments. Albanese argues that these corporations, far from being neutral service providers, are complicit in what she terms an 'economy of genocide'—a structure where violence against civilians not only occurs with impunity but generates financial dividends for global stakeholders. Unsurprisingly, the report provoked immediate outrage from both the Israeli government and its allies, particularly the United States. On 9 July 2025, the US government imposed unprecedented sanctions on Francesca Albanese, accusing her of antisemitism and alleged support for terrorism—a familiar tactic employed against those who challenge entrenched power structures. The move was widely condemned by human rights organizations and legal experts as a blatant assault on the independence of UN mandate holders. The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Volker Türk, denounced the sanctions as 'politically motivated and legally baseless,' while organizations like Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch characterized them as a dangerous precedent for silencing international accountability mechanisms. But perhaps the most revealing aspect of this episode lies in the very ferocity of the backlash. If Albanese's claims were groundless—if her report lacked substance—it would have been easily discredited through facts and legal argument. Instead, her detractors resorted to personal vilification and punitive sanctions—a response that, in its very excess, affirms the threat her report poses to vested interests. History teaches us that those who dare to unmask the nexus between profit and atrocity often pay a steep price. Francesca Albanese now joins a long lineage of whistleblowers, dissidents, and principled international figures targeted for refusing to remain silent in the face of state violence. The sanctions imposed upon her are not merely punitive; they are a tacit admission of the uncomfortable truths her report exposes. The involvement of Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, IBM, and Palantir in sustaining a brutal war against an occupied people demands urgent scrutiny—not only within the walls of international courts but in the court of global public opinion. The real question is whether we, as a global community, will have the moral clarity and political will to confront these corporate enablers, or whether we will allow the machinery of war to continue enriching the few at the catastrophic expense of the many. For in the end, the silence of the world will echo far longer than the sound of the bombs. Dr. Hatem Sadek – Professor at Helwan University