Does US continue to be the most preferred destination in the long haul? BlacRock's Vivek Paul answers
, Global Head of Portfolio Research and UK Chief Investment Strategist,
BlackRock Investment
,
says fueled by the dominance of AI and its leading companies, the US assets are currently favored in a 6 to 12 month tactical view. While the US is expected to maintain a significant role in investor portfolios due to its current economic strength, long-term macro anchors are being challenged. The range of uncertainty in the long run is unprecedentedly high.
History tells us that wars do happen and the markets climb the wall of worry. Is it any different this time?
Vivek Paul:
It is always impossible to guess the near-term news in an environment such as this. But the thing to watch is around energy prices, oil prices, and that has moved 10-15% in the course of the last week. Whether or not that has a longer-lasting impact on the global economy will depend on the longevity of the conflict and the spillover effects. But oil has to be watched.
On the flip side, do you think the tariff uncertainty has abated or are the markets still a little bit on tenterhooks about that?
Vivek Paul:
I do not think it is debated, and we should anticipate this to be the new normal. We are in an environment where macro uncertainty is structurally higher and it is impossible to guess the next blow-by-blow in the tariff dynamic. What we should consider is a broader impact around this. Markets have played a stabilising role in the course of the last couple of months.
Whenever we have seen extreme moves, we have seen market forces dictate a shift. For instance, the US has been very reliant on foreigners for the funding of its debt. Think about the interconnected nature of global supply chains. Whenever we push extremes in market pricing, that automatically leads to some element of a shift in that policy stance. I do not think it is behind us. What I would say is that the macro data is yet to fully reflect the impact.
Even in an environment where we have certainty from now on, we are yet to see that come through in the macro data. Recent macro data in the United States points to some of the growth impacts playing out. We are seeing some element of small contraction in terms of the quarterly figures. We have seen some element of a slowdown in CPI, it does not yet reflect the full impact because companies are yet to make decisions. They are holding off on account of uncertainty.
Live Events
You Might Also Like:
US stocks rally over 1% as investors hope for de-escalation of Israel-Iran conflict
Given that the world is in so much flux on not just geopolitics, but the repercussions and bearing of it all on the economics as well. What happens to longer-term money? Would you say the US is not the most preferred destination in the long haul or does that view not change?
Vivek Paul:
We have got an overweight to US assets in our 6 to 12 month horizon tactical views and it is led by the idea that AI as a structural mega force will continue to dominate the global environment for a period of time and the US has many of the best companies in that space and is really well placed to take advantage of that.
When I look further, when I look at the longer term, we need to start from the current environment that we are in. The US is the dominant economic player and it is hard. We have seen this in recent months. It is hard to massively change the shape of the global economy in a short space of time. We would anticipate US assets to continue to play up the bulk of investor portfolios. But in the long run, no one can have certainty here. There is a much wider range of potential outcomes than there ever has been before.
Long-term macro anchors that we have built asset allocations around for the last 30-40 years are being more challenged. So, the idea is we should start by thinking US assets will play a sizable role and continue to do that. But we need to acknowledge that the range of uncertainty in the long run is just unprecedentedly high.
You Might Also Like:
How will escalating Israel-Iran conflict, zooming oil price impact global inflation? Anurag Singh answers
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Barnaby Joyce warns Australians: AI is coming and it will wipe out…
Nationals MP Barnaby Joyce has delivered a stark warning to Australians, cautioning that artificial intelligence (AI) could soon displace large sections of the workforce. Speaking on national television, the former Deputy Prime Minister stressed that while many workers are fighting for flexibility through remote work, they may be inadvertently making it easier for employers to replace them with machines. His remarks come as AI adoption accelerates across industries and unions push for stronger workplace rights in a changing environment. Joyce emphasized that clerical and administrative roles are likely to be the first wiped out, followed by a broader wave of job losses across multiple sectors. He argued that without urgent policy responses and education reforms, Australia risks creating a generation left behind by rapid technological change. Barnaby Joyce says clerical jobs are most at risk from AI In his interview, Joyce doubled down on the threat posed by artificial intelligence to so-called 'keyboard jobs.' He painted a grim picture in which data entry clerks, administrative assistants, and bookkeepers could see their livelihoods vanish almost overnight. 'AI is not a myth. It is already here,' he said, stressing that automation could eliminate thousands of back-office roles with ruthless efficiency. Joyce noted that while white-collar workers are often seen as more secure, AI flips that assumption on its head. Unlike trades that require physical presence and hands-on skills, office tasks are highly replicable in digital form. He said Australians must be proactive in safeguarding their future: 'Don't assume your job is safe just because you're educated. AI is clever enough to rewrite reports, organise spreadsheets, and even draft legal documents. If employers realise you can do all this from your living room, they'll just ask, why not let the algorithm handle it?' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Study Reveals The Best Protein For Ageing Muscles Muscle Health Secrets Undo Barnaby Joyce criticises work-from-home demands The Australian Services Union recently announced plans to petition the Fair Work Commission to strengthen the rights of employees who prefer to work from home. Their submission argues that remote work is now a 'permanent feature' of modern employment and should not diminish the value of an employee's contributions. The union has gone as far as calling for a mandatory six-month notice period before any employer can force staff back into the office. Joyce, however, dismissed this demand as unrealistic and dangerous. He argued that while work-from-home arrangements might feel convenient, they open the door for companies to realise that clerical roles can be easily digitised or outsourced. 'If your job is essentially you, a keyboard, and a computer, then you're on thin ice,' he warned. 'Employers will quickly learn that AI can do the same work without sick leave, without holidays, and without the risk of industrial disputes.' Trades and hands-on work remain secure Despite his dire predictions for clerical staff, Joyce offered a glimmer of reassurance for workers in manual trades. He emphasised that electricians, plumbers, carpenters, and mechanics remain largely shielded from the coming wave of AI disruption. 'Robots can crunch numbers, but they cannot crawl under your sink or rewire a fuse box,' he remarked. 'AI does not have hands or feet. Trades will remain the backbone of stable employment in this country.' By contrasting desk jobs with skilled manual labour, Joyce suggested that young Australians should seriously consider vocational training. He argued that as society becomes more reliant on technology, those who can physically build, repair, and install infrastructure will only become more valuable. Experts echo and challenge Joyce's warning Joyce is not alone in raising concerns. Social Services Minister Tanya Plibersek has also acknowledged the threat AI poses to repetitive jobs, although she urged Australians not to lose sight of the opportunities in emerging industries. She argued that the key lies in steering innovation to create jobs rather than destroy them, pointing to the potential for Australia to become a developer of AI technologies rather than just a consumer. Meanwhile, research backs up Joyce's fears to an extent. Studies by Roy Morgan show that more than 6.7 million Australians, or around 46 percent of the workforce, now work from home at least some of the time. A separate analysis by Victoria University and the International Labour Organization suggests that nearly one-third of Australian jobs could theoretically be automated by AI. Clerical roles top the list of vulnerable occupations, while cleaning, hospitality, and the trades appear more resistant. AI's impact on all industries Jobs and Skills Australia commissioner Barney Glover has tried to balance the debate, noting that while sweeping job losses are not inevitable, no sector will escape unscathed. 'The overarching message is that almost all occupations will be augmented by AI,' he said. 'From law firms to retail, from health care to logistics, AI will change the way every professional works. It is not a matter of if, it is a matter of how fast.' This evolving reality will be a central theme at the federal government's productivity roundtable in Canberra this week. Policymakers, union leaders, and industry representatives are expected to debate how best to adapt to AI's rise while protecting Australian workers. For now, Joyce's blunt message cuts through the noise: jobs tied to keyboards and screens are in the crosshairs, and only those prepared to adapt will thrive.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
18 arrested as Microsoft staff protest Israel military tech ties review
Police officers arrested 18 people at worker-led protests at Microsoft headquarters Wednesday as the tech company promises an urgent review of the Israeli military's use of its technology during the ongoing war in Gaza. Two consecutive days of protest at the Microsoft campus in Redmond, Washington called for the tech giant to immediately cut its business ties with Israel. But unlike Tuesday, when about 35 protesters occupying a plaza between office buildings left after Microsoft asked them to leave, the protesters on Wednesday resisted and became aggressive after the company told police they were trespassing, according to the Redmond Police Department. The protesters also splattered red paint resembling the colour of blood over a landmark sign that bears the company logo and spells Microsoft in big gray letters. We said, Please leave or you will be arrested,' and they chose not to leave so they were detained, said police spokesperson Jill Green. Microsoft late last week said it was tapping a law firm to investigate allegations reported by British newspaper The Guardian that the Israeli Defense Forces used Microsoft's Azure cloud computing platform to store phone call data obtained through the mass surveillance of Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank. Microsoft's standard terms of service prohibit this type of usage," the company said in a statement posted Friday, adding that the report raises precise allegations that merit a full and urgent review. In February, The Associated Press revealed previously unreported details about the tech giant's close partnership with the Israeli Ministry of Defence, with military use of commercial artificial intelligence products skyrocketing by nearly 200 times after the deadly Oct 7, 2023, Hamas attack. The AP reported that the Israeli military uses Azure to transcribe, translate and process intelligence gathered through mass surveillance, which can then be cross-checked with Israel's in-house AI-enabled targeting systems. Following The AP's report, Microsoft acknowledged the military applications but said a review it commissioned found no evidence that its Azure platform and artificial intelligence technologies were used to target or harm people in Gaza. Microsoft did not share a copy of that review or say who conducted it. Microsoft said it will share the latest review's findings after it's completed by law firm Covington & Burling. The promise of a second review was insufficient for the employee-led No Azure for Apartheid group, which for months has protested Microsoft's supplying the Israeli military with technology used for its war against Hamas in Gaza. The group said Wednesday the technology is being used to surveil, starve and kill Palestinians. Microsoft in May fired an employee who interrupted a speech by CEO Satya Nadella to protest the contracts, and in April, fired two others who interrupted the company's 50th anniversary celebration. On Tuesday, the protesters posted online a call for what they called a worker intifada, using language evoking the Palestinian uprisings against Israeli military occupation that began in 1987. On Wednesday, the police department said it took 18 people into custody for multiple charges, including trespassing, malicious mischief, resisting arrest, and obstruction. It wasn't clear how many were Microsoft employees. No injuries were reported. Microsoft said in a statement after the arrests that it "will continue to do the hard work needed to uphold its human rights standards in the Middle East, while supporting and taking clear steps to address unlawful actions that damage property, disrupt business or that threaten and harm others.
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
U.S. tech-stock stumble shows vulnerability in AI trade
U.S. technology shares are showing signs of vulnerability after a massive run, which has some investors pointing to overdone AI-driven gains while funds have taken steps to position away from the high-flying sector. Investors are looking to de-risk portfolios or lock in profits during a seasonally difficult period for stocks. Friday's looming speech by Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell at the annual Jackson Hole symposium is creating caution, investors said, with the potential for volatility if his comments fail to meet growing market expectations that the central bank is poised to cut interest rates. "When you have overcrowding and you have had such strong performance, it doesn't take much to see an unwind of that," said Keith Lerner, co-chief investment officer at Truist Advisory Services. "At the same time this week, everyone is waiting for the Fed, and there is repositioning ahead of that." The heavyweight S&P 500 tech sector fell sharply for a second consecutive session on Wednesday, putting its decline on the week at about 2.5%, while the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite was off about 2% for the week. Shares of some highflyers, including Nvidia Corp and Palantir Technologies, were getting hit particularly hard. The pullback comes after a huge rally in which the tech sector soared over 50% through last week since the market's low for the year in April. That easily topped the 29% gain of the broader S&P 500 during that period and drove up valuations of tech stocks to lofty levels. Investors cited wariness about the artificial intelligence trade, which has been a key driver of tech stocks and the broader market as indexes have soared to record highs this year. Shares of Nvidia, the semiconductor giant that has symbolized the AI trade, have gained about 30% this year while shares of AI-focused data and analytics firm Palantir have roughly doubled year-to-date. Indeed, the tech sector's price-to-earnings ratio recently reached about 30 times expected earnings for the next 12 months, its highest level in a year, according to LSEG Datastream, while tech's share of the overall S&P 500's market value is nearly its highest since 2000. Recent cautionary signs included a study from researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology that found that 95% of organizations are getting no return on AI investments, as well as comments by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, who told tech news website the Verge last week that investors may be getting overexcited about AI. Since last week, some AI-linked shares have pulled back sharply: Nvidia has dropped about 5% while shares of Palantir have slumped some 16%. In Europe, stocks of so-called AI adopters have been under pressure over concerns over how powerful new AI models could disrupt the software sector. Still, some investors said, the caution is unlikely to be a sign that enthusiasm over AI is fizzling. 'These are price corrections," said Andrew Almeida, director of investments at financial planning network XYPN. "But if you look at the big picture, it's clear that more people will be investing more dollars in AI infrastructure. This is certainly not a 'reckoning' with the AI theme." JACKSON HOLE SEEN AS CRITICAL Investors also could be paring back their stock exposure during a traditionally rocky period for equities. August and September rank as the worst-performing months on average for the S&P 500 over the past 35 years, according to the Stock Trader's Almanac. "Valuations were stretched, these names have not taken a breather, and we're going into a tougher season for stocks," said King Lip, chief strategist at Baker Avenue Wealth Management. Other sectors such as consumer staples, healthcare and financials were up on the week, while relative strength for the equal-weight S&P 500 signaled to some investors a possible start of broadening of gains beyond the massive tech stocks that have led indexes higher. Powell's upcoming speech comes as Fed fund futures on Wednesday were indicating an 84% chance that the central bank will cut rates at its next meeting on September 16-17. Investors will be watching to see if Powell gives any indication that the central bank is on track for such a move or if he pushes back on the market's expectation for easing, which could spark volatility. Tech stocks tend to carry higher valuations which could make them sensitive to higher-than-expected interest rates going forward. "There are a lot of people who have overweighted tech, and it has worked for them," said Chuck Carlson, chief executive officer at Horizon Investment Services. "They don't want to get caught on the wrong side of that if in fact, the Fed doesn't do anything in September. So I think that is also causing (investors) to maybe not necessarily get out of tech, but to reduce the overweight a little bit."
