Sudbury city council rejects tiny homes, backs new transitional housing for youth and Indigenous people
However, a majority voted down Ward 11 Coun. Bill Leduc's proposal to explore a tiny homes pilot project as a temporary housing solution.
The decisions come as part of Sudbury's Roadmap to End Homelessness by 2030, which seeks to make homelessness "rare, brief, and non-recurring" in the city in the next five years.
Ward 9 Coun. Deb McIntosh led a motion to develop a 40-unit, Indigenous-led transitional housing complex with wraparound supports.
The business case will be prepared in collaboration with Indigenous community partners and is expected during the 2026–2027 budget cycle.
"There are currently 304 unhoused individuals in Greater Sudbury, of which 77 per cent identify as high acuity, requiring wraparound supports," reads the motion.
McIntosh compared the plan to council's previous support for the Lorraine Street transitional housing project, which is expected to welcome its first tenants next week.
"I believe that just like in November of 2020 when Council requested a business case for what was to become our 40 unit Lorraine street transitional housing project, that we need to be proactive and shovel ready for federal and provincial grants that will hopefully be coming to meet this growing need for supportive housing," she said.
Youth housing a growing concern
A second motion, introduced by Mayor Paul Lefebvre focuses on creating a 24-hour transitional housing program and emergency shelter beds for those aged 16 to 24. The city's latest homelessness report lists 14 youth in this age group without housing.
Lefebvre, who chairs the community safety and well-being panel, said the motion was informed by local agencies reporting a rising number of homeless youth.
"The challenges of our youth that are precariously housed, or sometimes they're couch surfing because unfortunately they don't have a home to go back to, and it's becoming a major issue," he said.
The most debated item was a motion by Coun. Bill Leduc to explore a tiny homes project as a fast, temporary housing option for people currently living in homeless encampments.
Leduc called tiny homes a "stepping stone" for those sleeping outside, noting that "when you're homeless, it's life and death."
But city staff expressed concerns. Tyler Campbell, general manager of community wellbeing, told council that tiny homes are not part of the city's long-term housing roadmap.
Campbell explained that the annual operating costs for tiny homes would be similar to other supportive housing programs. Specifically, tiny home wrap-around services would cost around $2 million annually. By comparison, the Lorraine Street 40-unit transitional housing project provides similar services at a slightly lower cost.
"The durability is not a long term capital infrastructure project, as opposed to, you know, multi-residential, transitional or supportive housing that we would be looking at a 40-, 5-0, 60-year return on," he said.
He also noted that cities like Hamilton are phasing out tiny homes, and that no provincial or federal funding is currently available for such projects.
City council ended up rejecting the tiny homes motion by a vote of 8 to 5.
Mayor calls for more federal, provincial support
Mayor Lefebvre said Sudbury faces ongoing challenges in addressing homelessness and urged more support from provincial and federal governments.
He warned that without help for neighbouring communities, Sudbury risks being overwhelmed with people seeking housing it cannot provide.
"Where my concern lies is that other communities that applied did not receive the funding, and so I'm very supportive, certainly of Timmins and North Bay getting that type of support as well. If not, people think, well, we'll just send our most acute cases to Sudbury," he said.
"We cannot accommodate them at all, like we are already completely maxed out. So that's why we need to have a government of the province and the feds helping out these municipalities in these areas, to help these folks in their regions to stay there."
He said that getting staff working on these businesses cases now is to ensure Greater Sudbury is prepared to apply for federal housing funds expected to open this fall.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
13 minutes ago
- CTV News
‘Need more boots on the ground': Saskatchewan calls for more resources to fight wildfires
Volunteer firefighters from Davidson, Sask., load up their truck at the Provincial Wildfire Center in Prince Albert, Sask., Wednesday, June 4, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Liam Richards The Saskatchewan Public Safety Agency (SPSA) says additional firefighting resources are required as the province battles 51 active wildfires. 'We need more boots on the ground,' vice president of operations for SPSA Steve Roberts said in a media briefing Friday afternoon. 'We have a lot of fire on the landscape, and our crews have been working for over six weeks now, almost non-stop.' Saskatchewan NDP Athabasca MLA Leroy Laliberte is demanding the province immediately seek federal help to fight fires. 'The Sask. Party either doesn't know how to fight these fires or doesn't care,' Laliberte said. 'Either way, the people I've been talking to for a week now aren't getting the resources and relief firefighters they need.' Roberts says they've reached out to federal counterparts and are requesting specific resources, including values protection teams and additional helicopters. He added that the province has already secured permission to use a fire camp from the Department of National Defense if needed, though current camp resources remain sufficient. According to Roberts, international reinforcements have also begun arriving, including 40 firefighters from Australia, 40 from Mexico, and crews from Quebec, Ontario, Nova Scotia, and New Brunswick. 'Having more resources is definitely a benefit, it allows our staff to get a little bit of reprieve from the stressful, long hours in harsh conditions,' he said. On Friday, eight communities have been partially or fully evacuated, affecting about 1,700 people. The evacuated communities include Canoe Lake/Cole Bay/ Canoe Narrows, Jans Bay, La Plonge Indian Reserve, Montreal Lake Cree Nation, Northern Village of Beauval, Northern Village of Pinehouse, Patuanak/ English River First Nation and Resort Subdivision of Lac la Plonge. According to the SPSA's website, as of Friday afternoon, 11 wildfires are uncontained, including the Muskeg Fire near Beauval and the Buhl Fire at the northern edge of Prince Albert National Park. The Shoe Fire is the largest uncontained wildfire with 539,248.18 hectares burned, followed by Pisew Fire with a current size of 197,263.0 hectares, according to the SPSA. Saskatchewan has seen 378 wildfires this year which is above the five-year average of 289.
CBC
14 minutes ago
- CBC
Judge halts non-binary person's deportation to the U.S. as Trump dismantles trans rights
Social Sharing When Angel Jenkel first came to Canada from the U.S. three years ago, the world was a different place. Their Canadian boyfriend, who they were visiting, was in good health. And back home, the U.S. was making progress on transgender rights under president Joe Biden. Now, their financé is ill and requires regular care. And back home, U.S. President Donald Trump is rapidly scaling back the rights of trans people, which could put Jenkel, who is non-binary, in the crosshairs. So Jenkel overstayed their visa. "It was just really stressful for me to think of going back to such an environment that was changing and escalating constantly," they told CBC. Jenkel was scheduled to be deported from Canada this month. But a Federal Court judge issued a stay of removal, arguing the immigration officer who examined their case failed to take into account their role in caring for their fiancé, or the "current conditions for LGBTQ, non-binary and transgender persons" in the U.S. Advocates for 2SLGBTQ+ migrants say this could set a precedent for other cases like Jenkel's, and help change the way Canada's immigration system deals with applications from the U.S. Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRRC) declined to comment on Jenkel's case, citing privacy concerns. Trump's anti-trans executive orders Jenkel, a 24-year-old artist from Minnesota, came to Canada on a visa in August 2022 to visit their then-boyfriend, now fiancé, a social media influencer and Door Dash driver in Thunder Bay, Ont. At first, Jenkel says they planned to stay for six months. But their fiancé epilepsy took a sudden turn for the worst, and Jenkel has become his primary source of at-home care. The couple is now living in London, Ont., so he can be closer to the medical care he needs for his frequent seizures. Meanwhile, the political climate for transgender people in the U.S. has dramatically changed under Trump's second presidency. The Republican president has issued a series of executive orders declaring the U.S. will only recognize "two sexes, male and female," halting gender-affirming care for minors, restricting transgender women and girls from participating in sports, and banning transgender people from serving in the military. As Jenkel watched this unfold from afar, their loved ones in the U.S. warned them to stay in Canada. "What is weird is hearing my grandma telling me that she's scared for me to come back and, like, people that I would have, in the past, thought of as hardcore America-lovers," Jenkel said. "They are terrified of me coming back to the country." Deportation order 'failed to reflect the current reality' Jenkel was ordered to be deported on July 3 after an initial risk assessment determined they didn't face a credible threat in the U.S. But Justice Julie Blackhawk halted that deportation, pending review. In her ruling, she wrote Jenkel's risk assessment was "flawed and unreasonable." That's because the immigration officer conducting the review used outdated information — a government dossier on the United States that was last updated in January 2024, says Jenkel's lawyer. "It's a marked recognition that the conditions have deteriorated ... since the Biden administration has left office," Sarah Mikhail, of Smith Immigration Law in Toronto, told As It Happens host Nil Kӧksal. "These changes are significant enough that, when assessing trans and non-binary individuals' circumstances in Canada, this is something that needs to be taken into consideration." Devon Matthews, head of programs at Rainbow Railroad, hailed the ruling. The non-profit organization, which helps 2SLGBTQ+ refugees, stopped resettling people in the U.S. earlier this year. "We've seen firsthand the deteriorating conditions for LGBTQI+ people in the U.S., from the escalation of anti-trans legislation to targeted violence and growing legal uncertainty," Matthews said in an emailed statement. Rainbow Railroad is one of several organizations that asked the Canadian government to re-think how it assesses asylum seekers and immigrants who come to Canada from, or through, the U.S. It called on Canada to repeal or exempt 2SLGBTQ+ applicants from the Safe Third Country Act (STCA), which prevents refugees from claiming asylum in Canada if they come through the U.S. "This case could set an important precedent in acknowledging that countries traditionally seen as 'safe' cannot be treated as such without scrutiny, especially for marginalized communities," Matthews said. In an emailed statement, IRCC called the STCA an "important tool for our two countries to work together on the orderly management of asylum claims along our shared border." The STCA does not apply to U.S. citizens like Jenkel. What's next? Mikhail says she's hopeful Blackhawk's ruling will set a precedent, but cautioned that immigration claims are handled on a case-by-case basis. "At this point, we're not advising people to file for asylum claims, necessarily," she said. The ruling gives Jenkel a temporary reprieve pending a judicial review of their case, and carves out some time for them to apply for permanent residency, with their fiancé as a sponsor. They're hopeful they can get on the path to Canadian citizenship, but remain worried about their friends back home. "Things are actually getting scary," they said. "We thought we were seeing progress and now we're seeing all that progress wiped away."
CTV News
27 minutes ago
- CTV News
Task Force: Big pay raise for councillors, no pay raise for mayor, and maybe severance pay
The Council Resourcing Review Task Force (CRRTF) is leaning towards a substantial increase to councillors' base pay, but making no change to the model used to compensate the mayor. And the four-member task force remains divided over the issue of providing severance pay to a politician when they exit their seat on council following an election loss or choosing not to run again. The task force is awaiting data from Statistics Canada about full-time income in London, which will form the basis of their recommendation about council compensation, resourcing, and expenses. Currently, councillors receive the median (50th percentile) full-time income in London as measured by Statistics Canada. In 2025 that's equal to $67,420. On Friday, task force members discussed paying councillors somewhere between the 65th and 75th percentile— an amount that could be in the ballpark of $90,000. They'd receive an additional 4 per cent for chairing a standing committee, or an extra eight per cent if chosen to be the deputy mayor or budget chair. 'It's not a typical job, and so it probably shouldn't have a typical salary,' explained Task Force Chair Martin Horak after the meeting. 'A councillor in this city, with its $1 billion-plus budget, is a major responsibility. It's a complex, very demanding job. Councillors who do this job well are often working way over 40 hours a week.' 'With respect to mayoral pay, we think it's already there,' Horak added about the task force's decision not to discuss changing the mayor's compensation model. The mayor's base pay in 2025 is $163,188. The province added Strong Mayor Powers to the mayor's role this term. Those additional responsibilities include preparing a draft municipal budget, propose by-laws, and appoint or dismiss the City Manager and other senior managers. 'In some ways, [Strong Mayor Powers] can lessen their workload because it makes them more able to make quick decisions,' argued Horak. 'There's less of that need when you're using your strong mayor powers to spend all the time working behind the scenes building coalitions.' The question of compensating council members leaving their seat on council divided the task force. Horak told colleagues that many similar cities offer severance pay, averaging about one month of pay for every year of service on council. It's intended to smooth the transition back to regular employment after a period of public service. Horak argued against the practice. 'I don't really think it's appropriate,' he told colleagues on the task force. 'It sort of smacks of paying you if you lose.' He argued that London should continue to view a seat on council as a full-time role, not full-time employment, so traditional expectations of severance wouldn't apply. Horak added he wouldn't be comfortable with former politicians, 'remaining on the public dime when you are not elected.' In January 2024, council boosted the deputy mayor and budget chair positions by 12.5 per cent to recognize the additional workload. Those positions each earn $75,847 this year. Total benefits collected by each councillor add more than $20,000 annually to each member's compensation, including the option of receiving a vehicle allowance/reimbursement (up to $2,124). Councillors were also reimbursed for eligible expenses up to a maximum $13,500 in 2025. Fees to attend certain municipal conferences were also paid by city hall. The task force expects to have the StatsCan data in time for its next meeting in September.
