
Experts, school leaders excited about Presidential Fitness Test but urge reforms
Advocates say the test, which hasn't been used since 2012, will need a makeover to shift its focus away from competition and more toward sustaining healthy lifestyles for youth.
The move comes amid Trump's increased interest in the sports world during his second term and is propelled by the 'Make America Healthy Again' movement led by the Department of Health and Human Services.
Trump appointed professional athletes to the President's Council on Sports, Fitness, and Nutrition, which will be guiding and working on standards for the revived test. Experts are urging the council to ensure the goals of the test are updated as well.
Kayce Solari Williams, past president of the American School Health Association and a professor at Purdue University, hopes the council will go from the old standard to really considering 'overall health and performance' and linking expectations to certain age groups.
Williams stressed she has to see 'what the format' and 'requirements' will be as we 'know more about taking better care of the body and doing some prevention, along with strengthening and increasing endurance and flexibility' than we did in the past.
The prior test had five core activities: a 1-mile run; pullups or pushups; situps; a shuttle run; and the sit-and-reach. It was originally created to compare with Europeans students in physical strength, and the top 15 percent of U.S. students who completed the test would get a presidential award.
The physical exam was ended during the Obama administration over concerns it focused more on competition than healthy lifestyles.
'The good news is that we are going to be looking, I hope, at curriculum to enhance how much activity is happening at schools. As for the testing itself, I mean, it's just a number … I'm hoping that a team or expert is really going to look at: How do we help improve baseline data?' said Laura Richardson, a kinesiology professor at the University of Michigan.
'My hope is that the Presidential Fitness testing is going to evolve, maybe rewards to them, where it's going to incentivize students individually and not based on groups,' Richardson added.
The test was previously taken by middle and high schoolers across the country, but only 10 to 17-year-olds were eligible for the presidential award.
School leaders are ecstatic over the change, pointing to concerns about sedentary lifestyles among their students.
Tori Snitker, principal of Rolla Junior High School in Missouri, said her district has worked to create more room for physical activity for all students, including those with disabilities.
'I am seeing students have a more sedentary lifestyle due to technology,' Snitker said. 'We have to focus on the physical health of our students.'
Other principals are so concerned about this phenomenon they suggested school fitness standards tied to a national goal or even military service.
'I'm hoping for some standards that are maybe even aligned with what military service is required because I think as a country, we need to be able to be prepared, and our young people need to be able to have a standard of fitness,' said Pierre Orbe, principal of DeWitt Clinton High School in New York, adding there is a difference between students who are medically unable to do certain tasks versus those who are 'not fulfilling their current potential.'
Orbe believes some national standard is needed because physical education teachers feel 'hamstrung' by an 'enabling society' where there are more notes 'to say that my child can't do things' than can.
Concerns about reliance on technology among students have mounted as many states and districts have started to ban cell phones in schools.
Steven Kelder, an epidemiologist at the University of Texas, Houston, and co-director of Coordinated Approach to Child Health, stressed that just one test will not help the situation, unlike a 'combination of programs' that focus on physical fitness for a variety of individuals, not just those good at particular sports.
According to 2024 data from the Centers for Control and Disease Prevention (CDC), one in five U.S. children are affected by obesity.
'There is an obesity crisis in America. It's not getting a whole lot better, and now, over time last 25 years, it's resulting in a diabetes crisis amongst kids. And I think that partly was the result of video games and what I call indoor electronic entertainment,' Kelder said.
Schools and states also worry about students' mental health with the increased use of technology, though the Trump administration recently cut $1 billion to mental health programs for schools due to concerns the money was going to diversity, equity and inclusion programs.
Leaders also stress the need for federal resources, especially if the presidential council creates awards and inventive structures for students in the revived test.
'We would love to see some resources to come our way to help with the motivation, with the rewards,' said Dennis Willingham, superintendent at the Walker County Board of Education in Alabama. 'We do have creative people who work with our children.'
'We're thankful for that, and we know that they provide rewards and motivation on their own, but to have resources to come from the national level and to make this a big deal for everyone nationwide, it makes it even bigger and even more appealing to our children,' he added.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
5 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump touts ruling upholding ID number check for Texas mail-in ballots
President Trump early Tuesday touted an appeals court ruling upholding Texas's requirement that voters to provide a driver's license or other identification number for their mail ballot to be counted. 'THIS IS GREAT NEWS!!! Should be Nationwide!!! President DJT' Trump wrote on Truth Social. A three-judge panel on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit unanimously ruled on Monday the requirement does not violate a provision of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prevents states from denying a person's right to vote over paperwork errors that are not 'material.' 'The number-matching requirements are obviously designed to confirm that every mail-in voter is indeed who he claims he is. And that is plainly material to determining whether an individual is qualified to vote,' wrote U.S. Circuit Judge James Ho, rejecting the argument. Ho was joined on the panel by U.S. Circuit Judge Don Willett, both Trump appointees, and U.S. Circuit Judge Patrick Higginbotham, an appointee of former President Reagan. In Texas, voters can vote by mail if they meet certain criteria, like being disabled or age 65 or older. The state's Republican-controlled legislature passed the new check in 2021 as part of a broader election integrity bill, S.B. 1. It requires voters to provide a state identification number or the last four digits of their Social Security number on their mail-in ballot application and ballot envelope. Clerks reject ballots that don't comply. The Biden administration and several civil rights groups filed lawsuits soon after the law's enactment. Texas and the Republican National Committee appealed to the 5th Circuit after U.S. District Judge Xavier Rodriguez Jr. blocked Texas from enforcing the requirement. An appointee of the second former President Bush, Rodriguez ruled that the number-matching requirement violates the Civil Rights Act because it is not material to a voter's eligibility. The 5th Circuit's decision reverses that finding, ruling that the materiality provision only covers voter eligibility determinations and not mail-in ballots. 'The 2021 Act easily complies with the materiality provision in any event,' Ho wrote.


The Hill
5 minutes ago
- The Hill
Switzerland's president rushes to Washington in effort to avert steep US tariffs
GENEVA (AP) — Switzerland's president and other top officials were traveling to Washington on Tuesday in a hastily arranged trip aimed at striking a deal with the Trump administration over steep tariffs that have cast a pall over Swiss industries like chocolates and watchmaking. President Karin Keller-Sutter was leading a delegation to the United States capital after last week's announcement that exports of Swiss goods to the U.S. will face a whopping 39% percent tariff starting Thursday. That is over 2 1/2 times higher than the rate on European Union goods exported to the U.S. and nearly four times higher than on British exports to the U.S. Many Swiss companies in industries including watchmaking and chocolates have expressed concern about the issue. The Swiss government said the trip was 'to facilitate meetings with the U.S. authorities at short notice and hold talks with a view to improving the tariff situation for Switzerland.' Keller-Sutter, who also serves as Switzerland's finance minister, has faced criticism in Swiss media over a last-ditch call with President Donald Trump before a U.S. deadline on tariffs expired Aug. 1. She was leading a team that includes Economy Minister Guy Parmelin. The trip comes a day after Switzerland's executive branch held an extraordinary meeting Monday during which it was 'keen to pursue talks with the United States on the tariff situation,' the government statement Tuesday said.


Newsweek
6 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Trump Hails Major Court Win in Texas: 'Should be Nationwide'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump has welcomed a federal appeals court decision allowing Texas to enforce its 2021 law requiring voters to include an identification number with mail-in ballots, and called for similar measures across the United States. A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on Monday unanimously reversed a lower court ruling that had blocked the law. The panel concluded that the statute did not violate federal voting protections under the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Trump wrote on his social media platform Truth Social: "THIS IS GREAT NEWS!!! Should be Nationwide!!!" A 95-year-old World War II veteran stated that he had two of his mail-in ballots denied because of incomplete voter registration. However, he is unable to register online in his home state of Texas, and... A 95-year-old World War II veteran stated that he had two of his mail-in ballots denied because of incomplete voter registration. However, he is unable to register online in his home state of Texas, and as a result, may miss out on voting in the upcoming election for the first time in his life. More iStock/Getty Why It Matters The court's decision marks a significant win for Texas Republicans and could influence how elections are conducted in multiple states. Supporters, including Texas officials and Trump, argue that requiring ID numbers is a practical measure to prevent voter fraud and strengthen election security. Civil rights organizations counter that the law risks disqualifying legitimate ballots, particularly from elderly, disabled and minority voters who rely more heavily on mail-in ballots. Legal experts say the ruling could shape national debates on voting rights and regulations ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. What To Know The Fifth Circuit's decision overturns a 2023 ruling by U.S. District Judge Xavier Rodriguez, who had blocked the law, finding that ID numbers were not relevant to determining voter eligibility under Texas law. Monday's ruling allows the state to enforce the 2021 law requiring voters submitting mail-in ballots to provide either their driver's license number, state identification number, or the last four digits of their Social Security number. Ballots missing this information or containing mismatched numbers can be rejected by election officials. Civil rights groups including OCA-Greater Houston, the League of Women Voters of Texas and REVUP-Texas plus the Biden administration had challenged the law, saying that the requirements could cause legitimate ballots to be discarded due to minor administrative errors. Newsweek has contacted the OCA-Greater Houston, the League of Women Voters of Texas and REVUP-Texas for comment. The plaintiffs argued that rejecting ballots for missing or mismatched ID numbers violated the "materiality provision" of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which states that no one can be denied the right to vote due to an error or omission that is not material to determining voter eligibility. The published opinion was authored by Trump appointees Judge James Ho and Judge Don Willett and Reagan appointee Judge Patrick Higginbotham. Judge Ho noted that requiring only names and addresses left the mail-in ballot system vulnerable to fraud because that information is publicly available, and stated that requiring ID numbers is material to confirming a voter's identity and eligibility. At the time Senate Bill 1 was signed into law, supporters—including Republican lawmakers and Texas Governor Greg Abbott—said the measure was essential to ensuring election security. Abbott said it "ensures trust and confidence in our elections system—and most importantly, it makes it easier to vote and harder to cheat." However, multiple fact-checking and academic studies suggest that documented incidents of mail-in ballot fraud are extremely rare. According to data from the Brennan Center for Justice, only 491 cases of absentee ballot fraud were identified between 2000 and 2012 out of billions of votes cast. What People Are Saying Judge James Ho wrote in the opinion: "The number-matching requirements are obviously designed to confirm that every mail-in voter is who he claims he is. And that is plainly material to determining whether an individual is qualified to vote." He added: "That information is easily available to anyone who simply requests it.... As a result, any person can request and receive that information about a registered voter, use that information to apply for a mail-in ballot, and then cast the ballot, with minimal risk of detection." What Happens Next Texas has some of the nation's strictest voting rules, allowing mail-in voting only for those over 65, individuals with disabilities, people in jail, or residents temporarily out of state. The 2021 identification number requirement adds another layer of verification for these ballots. The U.S. Department of Justice, which joined the lawsuit challenging the law, has not announced whether it will seek further review of the case.