Once named world's ugliest animal, blobfish wins New Zealand's fish of the year
The winning species of blobfish, Psychrolutes marcidus, lives in the highly pressurised depths off the coasts of New Zealand and Australia and has developed a unique anatomy to exist. Blobfish do not have a swim bladder, a full skeleton, muscles or scales. Instead, their bodies are made up of blobby tissue with a lower density than water that allows them to float above the seafloor.
The species is believed to be able to live to 130 years old, is slow growing and slow moving, says Konrad Kurta, a spokesperson from the Mountains to Sea Conservation Trust that runs the annual competition.
'It sort of sits there and waits for prey to come very close and practically walk into its mouth before it eats them,' he says. It is also a 'dedicated parent' with females laying up to 100,000 eggs in a single nest, which they protect until they hatch.
The fish found fame over a decade ago after a crew member on a New Zealand research vessel snapped a photograph of the rarely seen animal. Its distinctive appearance was quickly adopted into meme culture.
The pressure of the water forces their shape into that of a regular – albeit bulbous – fish but out of the depths they can resemble 'a failed medical experiment', Kurta said.
'Regrettably, when it is pulled up … that sudden decompression causes it to become all disfigured,' Kurta says.
Little is known about their conservation status due to a lack of research, but their populations and habitat are considered vulnerable to deep-sea trawling.
'Blobfish are fairly frequently pulled up from the bottom-trawling of orange roughy,' Kurta said.
The Mountains to Sea Conservation Trust launched the Fish of the Year competition in 2020, inspired by the highly popular Bird of the Year. This year saw the highest number of votes cast in its competition – 5,583 in 2025, compared with 1,021 last year.
The blobfish won on 1,286 votes, pipping the orange roughy by 300 votes, despite the latter having powerful backers including Greenpeace, Forest & Bird and the Environmental Law Initiative.
'We are very pleased for the blobfish,' said Aaron Packard, a spokesperson for Environmental Law Initiative. 'From an ecosystem perspective, a win for blobfish is a win for orange roughy.'
New Zealand is responsible for about 80% of the global orange roughy catch. Environmental watchdogs regularly call for a halt on fishing the species due to the destructive effects of bottom trawling on ecosystems and vulnerabilities in fish populations.
Other contenders in the competition included the mysterious longfin eel – known as tuna in Māori language – a pygmy pipehorse, a critically endangered mud-fish, sharks and rays.
'We have a dizzying variety of native marine and freshwater fish,' Kurta says, adding roughly 85% are considered vulnerable.
'That [these fish] exist is often the first step to getting people invested and interested in what's happening below the waterline.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
06-08-2025
- Daily Mail
Inside the world's biggest 'carbon-sucking' machine
Developed by Zurich-based firm Climeworks, the 'direct air capture' (DAC) site uses huge steel fans to draw in CO2, dissolve the gas in water, and pump it deep underground. Scientists at Climeworks say the multi-million dollar system removes up to 36,000 tons of carbon per year – equivalent to taking 8,000 cars off the road. And the UK government is so impressed with the technology, it's planning a carbon-British carbon-sucking machine based in the north-west. However, critics warn that the expensive tech does not tackle a root cause of global warming – the release of CO2 from burning of fossil fuels. Environmental organization Greenpeace has called carbon capture a 'scam' that relies on money from 'the public purse'. About 10 times bigger than its predecessor plant Orca , Mammoth began construction in June 2022 and operations commenced in May last year. Mammoth consists of stacks of metal 'air scrubbers' that draw in surrounding ambient air with fans, using energy from a nearby geothermal power plant. Solid filter material separates the CO2, which is then transported by jets of high-pressure blasts of water to a location deep underground. Over a few years, the CO2 turns into a solid mineral called carbonate when it touches certain rocks that are rich in metals like iron, calcium and magnesium. Climeworks said the technology can easily be replicated at different locations worldwide and on ever larger scales, to scale up the amount of CO2 being captured. At its maximum capacity of 36,000 tonnes of CO2 per year, it could reduce global emissions by the equivalent of 7,800 petrol-powered cars. However, that impressive figure is only equivalent to 30 seconds of the world's annual CO2 emissions – which is why they're being considered elsewhere around the world. Inspired by Mammoth, the UK government has begun negotiations with Climeworks based in Zurich to set up an equivalent machine, called Silver Birch. The device, to be constructed in Stanlow near Liverpool, would suck carbon from the surrounding air and store it under the Irish Sea. The plans, being developed by the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero, come under the HyNet North West project to reduce carbon emissions and help the UK hit its net zero target. Aside from the cost, carbon capture and storage (CCS) has been criticized for encouraging continued use of carbon-belching fossil fuels rather than switching to renewable sources of energy. Mike Childs, head of policy at environmental organization Friends of the Earth, said the government is just 'championing more costly and dirty fossil fuels'. 'Even if it ever worked, which is unlikely in the near term, CCS won't capture all the climate pollution caused by burning fossil fuels or address the significant emissions that are created when gas and oil is extracted.' Stuart Haszeldine, a professor of carbon capture and storage at the University of Edinburgh, called CCS projects 'a deal with the devil'. 'Storage of 2 or 5 million tonnes CO2 per year should not become a policy excuse to release additional 10s or 100s million tonnes CO2 from development of new oil and gas extraction through many tens of new licences,' Professor Haszeldine said. Others point out that the process itself is very energy intensive and so could drive up energy prices. The technology also has safety concerns – after being stored underground, some experts fear that CO2 could leak and taint nearby water supplies or create tremors caused by the build-up of pressure underground.
Daily Mail
06-08-2025
- Daily Mail
Inside the world's biggest 'carbon-sucking' machine: Enormous device in Iceland dubbed 'Mammoth' captures up to 36,000 TONS of CO2 per year - and could help 'reverse climate change'
It has been billed as an ingenious solution in the battle against climate change. And from photos alone, the true purpose of the 'Mammoth' machine stationed in Iceland may deceive you. The 360ft contraption, located at Hellisheidi, about 15 miles from capital Reykjavik, is literally sucking carbon dioxide (CO2) from the air. Developed by Zurich-based firm Climeworks, the 'direct air capture' (DAC) site uses huge steel fans to draw in CO2, dissolve the gas in water, and pump it deep underground. Scientists at Climeworks say the multi-million dollar system removes up to 36,000 tons of carbon per year – equivalent to taking 8,000 cars off the road. And the UK government is so impressed with the technology, it's planning a carbon-British carbon-sucking machine based in the north-west. However, critics warn that the expensive tech does not tackle a root cause of global warming – the release of CO2 from burning of fossil fuels. Environmental organisation Greenpeace has called carbon capture a 'scam' that relies on money from 'the public purse'. Swiss firm Climeworks unveiled its second plant in Iceland sucking carbon dioxide from the air and stocking it underground, scaling up its capacity tenfold with the aim of eliminating millions of tonnes of CO2 by 2030 About 10 times bigger than its predecessor plant Orca, Mammoth began construction in June 2022 and operations commenced in May last year. Mammoth consists of stacks of metal 'air scrubbers' that draw in surrounding ambient air with fans, using energy from a nearby geothermal power plant. Solid filter material separates the CO2, which is then transported by jets of high-pressure blasts of water to a location deep underground. Over a few years, the CO2 turns into a solid mineral called carbonate when it touches certain rocks that are rich in metals like iron, calcium and magnesium. It therefore stores it safely as a solid underground, reducing the amount of the greenhouse gas that reaches the atmosphere. Climeworks explains: 'Through natural mineralisation, the CO2 reacts with the basalt rock and turns into stone within a few years. 'The CO2 is thus removed from the air and returned to Earth permanently and safely.' Climeworks said the technology can easily be replicated at different locations worldwide and on ever larger scales, to scale up the amount of CO2 being captured. The resulting mixture of CO2 and water is injected into the volcanic basalt beneath the plant where it slowly turns into rock What is direct air capture? Direct air capture (DAC) technology works almost exactly like it sounds. Giant fans draw ambient air into contact with an aqueous solution that picks out and traps carbon dioxide. Through heating and a handful of familiar chemical reactions, that same carbon dioxide is re-extracted and ready for further use -as a carbon source for making valuable chemicals like fuels, or for storage via a sequestration strategy of choice. The resulting fuels, including gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel, are compatible with existing fuel distribution and transportation infrastructure. At its maximum capacity of 36,000 tonnes of CO2 per year, it could reduce global emissions by the equivalent of 7,800 petrol-powered cars. However, that impressive figure is only equivalent to 30 seconds of the world's annual CO2 emissions – which is why they're being considered elsewhere around the world. Inspired by Mammoth, the UK government has begun negotiations with Climeworks based in Zurich to set up an equivalent machine, called Silver Birch. The device, to be constructed in Stanlow near Liverpool, would suck carbon from the surrounding air and store it under the Irish Sea. The plans, being developed by the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero, come under the HyNet North West project to reduce carbon emissions and help the UK hit its net zero target. But for now, the two HyNet projects being prioritised are a new new gas-fired power station with carbon capture technology in Wales, and a biomass plant in Cheshire that will generate low-carbon energy from waste wood. The exact cost of building a plant like Mammoth is unclear, although Iceland's impressive store of natural resources mean it can afford such ambitious climate projects. Douglas Chan, COO of Climeworks, told The Chemical Engineer that the cost to build was 'in the order of low triple digit millions'. Climeworks did not detail the cost per ton of removal at Mammoth, but said it is seeking to reduce it to $400-600 per ton by 2030 and $200-350 per ton by 2040. Aside from the cost, carbon capture and storage (CCS) has been criticised for encouraging continued use of carbon-belching fossil fuels rather than switching to renewable sources of energy. Mike Childs, head of policy at environmental organisation Friends of the Earth, said the government is just 'championing more costly and dirty fossil fuels'. 'Even if it ever worked, which is unlikely in the near term, CCS won't capture all the climate pollution caused by burning fossil fuels or address the significant emissions that are created when gas and oil is extracted.' Stuart Haszeldine, a professor of carbon capture and storage at the University of Edinburgh, called CCS projects 'a deal with the devil'. 'Storage of 2 or 5 million tonnes CO2 per year should not become a policy excuse to release additional 10s or 100s million tonnes CO2 from development of new oil and gas extraction through many tens of new licences,' Professor Haszeldine said. Others point out that the process itself is very energy intensive and so could drive up energy prices. The technology also has safety concerns – after being stored underground, some experts fear that CO2 could leak and taint nearby water supplies or create tremors caused by the build-up of pressure underground. WHAT IS CARBON CAPTURING AND HOW DOES IT WORK? Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) captures emissions produced from the use of fossil fuels in electricity generation and industrial processes. It aims to prevent the carbon dioxide from entering the atmosphere and is able to capture up to 90 per cent of the carbon dioxide (CO2) they emit. The use of CCS with renewable biomass is one of the few carbon abatement technologies that can be used in a 'carbon-negative' mode – actually taking carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere. The process consists of three parts - capturing the carbon dioxide; transporting the carbon dioxide; and securely storing the carbon dioxide emissions. These can be stored underground in depleted oil and gas fields or deep saline aquifer formations. Carbon capture technologies allow the separation of carbon dioxide from gases produced in electricity generation and industrial processes by one of three methods: pre-combustion capture; post-combustion capture; and oxyfuel combustion. Carbon dioxide is then transported by pipeline or by ship for safe storage. Millions of tonnes of carbon dioxide are already transported annually for commercial purposes by road tanker, ship and pipelines. The carbon dioxide is then stored in carefully selected geological rock formation that are typically located several miles below the earth's surface.
Daily Mail
09-07-2025
- Daily Mail
Company attempting to bring back woolly mammoth turn their sights to the giant moa - a 3.6 metre-tall bird that weighed 230kg
The company attempting to bring back the woolly mammoth has now set its sights on a new extinct species. Colossal Biosciences has announced it will attempt to 'de-extinct' a group of birds called the moa, which once lived in New Zealand. These extraordinary animals included nine species, the largest being the South Island Giant Moa, which stood at 3.6 metres (11.8ft) tall and weighed 230 kg (507 lbs). Colossal Biosciences will use genes extracted from moa bones to engineer modern birds until they very closely resemble the extinct moa. This is the same technique that was used to transform grey wolves into animals closely resembling dire wolves last year. This project will be done in collaboration with the Ngāi Tahu Research Centre at the University of Canterbury and backed by $15 million in funding from Lord of the Rings director Sir Peter Jackson. Jackson, who has one of the largest private collections of moa bones, says: 'With the recent resurrection of the dire wolf, Colossal Biosciences has also made real the possibility of bringing back lost species. 'There's a lot of science still to be done – but we can start looking forward to the day when birds like the moa or the huia are rescued from the darkness of extinction.' The nine species of moa were found widely across New Zealand until the arrival of the first Polynesian settlers around 1300 AD. Within just 200 years, the people who became the Māori had pushed all moa species into extinction through a combination of hunting and forest clearing. The disappearance of the moa also led to a cascade of changes across New Zealand's isolated island ecosystem. Less than 100 years after the moa became extinct their main predator, the enormous Haast's eagle, also died out. But now, advances in genome editing techniques mean Colossal Biosciences may be able to reintroduce the lost moa back to its natural habitat. The first step is to recreate the genomes of all nine moa species using ancient DNA stored in preserved moa bones. Colossal Biosciences has already begun this process with visits to caves containing moa deposits within the tribal area of the Ngāi Tahu and hopes to complete all genomes by 2026. These genomes will then be compared to those of the moa's closest living relatives, the emu and tinamou, to see which genes gave the moa their unique traits. How will the moa be brought back? DNA is extracted from moa bones to sequence the moa genome. The genome is compared to modern species to see which genes make the moa distinct. CRISPR is used to alter the genome of modern birds to express these target genes. Edited embryos are placed in a surrogate emu egg to develop. A bird closely resembling the moa hatches. A selection of these genes are then inserted into stem cells called Primordial Germ Cell Culture, cells that turn into eggs and sperm, taken from an emu. Those engineered cells are allowed to develop into male and female gametes and used to create an embryo, which will be raised inside a surrogate emu egg. Colossal Biosciences has already used these techniques to create mice with the hair of woolly mammoths and wolves very closely resembling extinct dire wolves. Scientists used the gene editing tool CRISPR to modify the DNA in blood cells from a living grey wolf in 20 places, creating a wolf with long white hair and muscular jaws. However, recreating this process in bird species poses much greater technical challenges. Colossal Biosciences admits that creating Primordial Germ Cell Culture for bird species has been a challenge that has eluded scientists for decades. Likewise, since bird embryos develop inside eggs, the process of transferring an embryo into a surrogate will be completely different from that used for mammals. Scientists have also raised questions about whether restoring the moa is something that should be pursued at all. Conservationists say that money would be better spent looking after the endangered species that are already alive. Others point out that introducing a species which has been gone for over 600 years could have unintended consequences for the ecosystem. Professor Stuart Pimm, an ecologist at Duke University who was not involved in the study, told AP: 'Can you put a species back into the wild once you've exterminated it there? 'I think it's exceedingly unlikely that they could do this in any meaningful way.' Professor Pimm adds: 'This will be an extremely dangerous animal.' However, Colossal Biosciences maintains that their plan to 'rewild' the moa is beneficial for both the environment and the Māori people. As grazing herbivores, the moa's browsing habits shaped the distribution and evolution of plants over millions of years. These effects led to significant changes in New Zealand's ecosystems, which Colossal Biosciences argues would be more stable with the moa once again introduced. Ngāi Tahu archaeologist Kyle Davis, who is working with Colossal Biosciences on the project, says that the project has a deeper ancestral meaning. During the 14th century, the moa were a vital source of meat for sustenance as well as bones and feathers, which became part of traditional jewellery. The moa came to have a large role in Māori mythology, symbolising strength and resilience. Mr Davis says: 'Our earliest ancestors in this place lived alongside moa and our records, both archaeological and oral, contain knowledge about these birds and their environs. 'We relish the prospect of bringing that into dialogue with Colossal's cutting-edge science as part of a bold vision for ecological restoration.' WHAT DO WE KNOW ABOUT ANCIENT MEGAFAUNA? Earth was once inhabited by a variety of giant forms of animals that would be recognisable to us today in the smaller forms taken by their successors. They were very large, usually over 88 pounds (40kg) in weight and generally at least 30 per cent bigger than any of their still-living relatives. There are several theories to explain this relatively sudden extinction. The leading explanation of around was that this was due to environmental and ecological factors. It was almost completed by the end of the last ice age. It is believed that megafauna initially came into existence in response to glacial conditions and became extinct with the onset of warmer climates. In temperate Eurasia and North America, megafauna extinction concluded simultaneously with the replacement of the vast periglacial tundra by an immense area of forest. Glacial species, such as mammoths and woolly rhinoceros, were replaced by animals better adapted to forests, such as elk, deer and pigs. Reindeer and Caribou retreated north, while horses moved south to the central Asian steppe. This all happened about 10,000 years ago, despite the fact that humans colonised North America less than 15,000 years ago and non-tropical Eurasia nearly one million years ago. Worldwide, there is no evidence of Indigenous peoples systematically hunting nor over-killing megafauna. The largest regularly hunted animal was bison in North America and Eurasia, yet it survived for about 10,000 years until the early 20th century.
