Brazil's Bolsonaro supporters protest against Supreme Court, President Lula
(Reuters) -Supporters of Brazil's former President Jair Bolsonaro, accused of plotting a coup after he lost the 2022 general election, gathered on the streets of several Brazilian cities on Sunday to protest against Supreme Federal Court (STF) Justice Alexandre de Moraes and President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva.
The protesters called for "amnesty" for those involved in the alleged coup attempt days after Lula's inauguration in January 2023.
Far-right leader Bolsonaro did not personally attend the demonstrations, but was put on the telephone by his son, Senator Flávio Bolsonaro, during the protest in Rio de Janeiro. The former president, who is on house arrest, wears an electronic ankle bracelet and cannot leave his home on weekends and holidays, as per an order from Justice Moraes.
In March, a five-judge STF panel decided unanimously to put Bolsonaro on trial for allegedly conspiring to overthrow Lula. If found guilty in the court proceedings expected later this year, Bolsonaro could face a long prison sentence.
Last month, Moraes imposed precautionary measures against Bolsonaro because he believed he and his son, Eduardo, an elected lawmaker who is now living in the U.S., had collaborated with U.S. authorities to try to interfere in Brazilian affairs.
Last week, the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump imposed a 50% tariff on most Brazilian goods, citing a "witch hunt" against Bolsonaro.
It also imposed financial sanctions against Moraes under the Magnitsky Act, which allows the U.S. to impose economic penalties against foreigners it considers to have a record of corruption or human rights abuses.
Moraes is the reporting justice in the case in which Jair Bolsonaro is a defendant.
In Sunday's protests, Bolsonaro supporters, wearing Brazilian national team jerseys, chanted "Magnitsky" and insulted Moraes and Lula.
American flags and signs supporting Trump were also seen.
© Thomson Reuters 2025.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Asahi Shimbun
8 hours ago
- Asahi Shimbun
Documents show secret pact if U.S. troops sent to Korea conflict
A copy of a cable sent in November 1959 regarding the revision of the Japan-U.S. Security Treaty (Provided by Takashi Nobuo) Declassified U.S. documents show that Prime Minister Nobusuke Kishi agreed in the late 1950s to allow the United States to deploy its forces based in Japan in the event of a contingency on the Korean Peninsula without consulting Tokyo. The documents were U.S. diplomatic cables sent between 1958 and 1960 regarding negotiations for the revision of the Japan-U.S. Security Treaty between Foreign Minister Aiichiro Fujiyama and U.S. Ambassador to Japan Douglas MacArthur II. After becoming prime minister in 1957, Kishi called for a more equal relationship with the United States and in revising the security treaty he wanted a prior consultation before U.S. troops based in Japan that could be deployed for missions other than the defense of Japan. But in July 1959, MacArthur made it clear that the United States could not have a prior consultation with Japan if troops had to be sent immediately in support of U.N. troops if the Korean War resumed. Kishi faced a dilemma because if Washington was allowed to send troops to the Korean Peninsula without prior notification, it would demonstrate that the two nations were far from the equal status that Kishi argued for. The Asahi Shimbun was shown copies of the documents found by Takashi Shinobu, a professor emeritus at Nihon University in Tokyo and an expert on the history of Japan-U.S. diplomacy, at the U.S. National Archives and Records Administration. A document from August 1959 had Fujiyama explaining that he "had very carefully considered' the matter with Kishi. Fujiyama proposed that a military conflict on the Korean Peninsula be made the sole exception to the prior consultation system under the revised security treaty. Fujiyama pointed out that the notification system would be the most important characteristic that showed the revised security treaty placed the two nations on a more equal footing. But as negotiations were continuing between Fujiyama and MacArthur, protests broke out in Japan by those who opposed a revision of the security treaty on the grounds it would drag Japan into an American war. The documents show that in November 1959, Kishi met with MacArthur and expressed fear that the treaty itself would be threatened and his own administration would fall if the issue was handled in the wrong manner. Kishi had Fujiyama propose an agreement between the two sides on the Korean Peninsula deployment issue in the form of confidential minutes for the first meeting of the security consultative body under the revised security treaty. Fujiyama and MacArthur reached such an agreement prior to the January 1960 visit by Kishi to the United States to sign the revised security treaty. The existence of the secret pact came to light after the then Democratic Party of Japan took control of the government in 2009. A panel of experts determined the agreement on no prior consultation for the deploying of U.S. troops to the Korean Peninsula was the only secret pact clearly agreed to by the two sides. But although a draft of that pact was uncovered, few documents related to the negotiations that led to that agreement were found in the Foreign Ministry archives. Nobuo said the lack of documents on the Japanese side was a reflection of the inward-looking stance of Japanese diplomacy that relied on secret pacts to protect the government of that time.
Asahi Shimbun
10 hours ago
- Asahi Shimbun
EDITORIAL: Trump must not be allowed to insert ideology into AI responses
U.S. President Donald Trump at this year's Group of Seven summit (Asahi Shimbun file photo) U.S. President Donald Trump has announced an AI Action Plan with the goal of making the United States the world leader in development of artificial intelligence. It is a major change of direction from the Biden administration, which emphasized control of the risks associated with AI. The Trump administration wants to accelerate technology and infrastructure development through deregulation and increased investment. The action plan will encourage the export of AI technology to friendly nations in a bid for supremacy in competition with an emerging China. A surprising aspect of the plan is the level of intervention it envisages into the output from generative AI technology such as ChatGPT. National guidelines for AI risk control were revised to eliminate from answers references to diversity, equity and inclusion, widely known as DEI, and climate change. The federal government is supposed to sign contracts only with companies whose AI technology is objective and does not contain ideological bias. While the Trump administration says such measures are needed to protect freedom of speech and American values, the action plan conversely carries the risk of gagging free speech. To begin with, it is very difficult to establish neutral standards to help determine ideological bias. The bias could be defined according to the intent of the administration in power. DEI initially sought to counter discrimination based on gender, race, nationality or disability and to ensure fair opportunity for those who had been treated unfavorably in the past. Trump has long been negative about measures related to DEI and global warming. Since the start of his second term, he has implemented various steps reflecting that thinking. We cannot ignore the attempt to interfere with generative AI, which is spreading rapidly in society and people's daily lives. It is possible that the federal government's procurement conditions will become the standards regarding generative AI. That would have a major impact on Japan as it depends on the United States for much of its generative AI technology. Citing an example of bias in generative AI, Trump pointed to white male figures from American history who were transformed in AI answers into women or members of other races. Generative AI undertakes deep learning using a massive amount of data and subsequently goes through repeated tuning to produce answers. If there is bias in the data used for deep learning, the answers will reflect such bias and the tuning process could generate the wrong answer. Put another way, if the learning data is selected arbitrarily and certain algorithms are intentionally chosen during the tuning process, it would be possible to produce answers that reflected a certain bias. This is one characteristic of generative AI that we must always keep in mind. It could be used by iron-fisted regimes to gag free speech. It was pointed out that the generative AI technology released this year by the Chinese startup DeepSeek avoided or rejected answers that were inconvenient to Beijing, such as regarding the Tiananmen Square incident. Trump's version of intervention that seeks to delete certain references is fundamentally no different. --The Asahi Shimbun, Aug. 4
Yomiuri Shimbun
12 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Deep in the Amazon, a Bold Question: Can the Forest Save Itself?
ALTAMIRA, Brazil – If much of the Amazon forest is to wither away, this is the town where that end was foretold. During its campaign to develop the region, Brazil's former military dictatorship chose this distant outpost in 1970 to inaugurate its signature infrastructure project, the Trans-Amazonia Highway. The road, which carved a path across the belly of the forest, heralded an epoch of large-scale devastation that remade the Amazon. In local media, Altamira became known as the 'champion of deforestation.' Now Brazilian officials think this expansive municipality – which extends over a territory twice the size of Portugal – can also be the site of the forest's rebirth. This year, the Pará state government set out to test a question that until now has largely been left to researchers: If left alone, can the Amazon forest restore itself? To test the hypothesis, officials cordoned off a degraded parcel of land here twice the size of Manhattan and, in March, leased it to a private carbon credit company to safeguard and restore. Some of the task will be done by planting trees and natural flora. But most of the restoration job will be left to Mother Nature. It's called 'passive restoration.' 'This is opening a new model that we think can serve as a beacon for Brazil,' said Helder Barbalho, the governor of Pará. 'This is an important strategy that can replicated across the state.' The search for solutions in the Amazon couldn't be more urgent. Rates of deforestation have been dropping since President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva made combating environmental crime a priority of his government, but the destruction hasn't stopped. Nearly 6,300 square kilometers were lost last year, according to the last official count, bringing the biome closer to what scientists warn is a tipping point, when the forest is no longer able to maintain its own rainy ecosystem and large swaths are transformed into degraded savannah. Signs of its arrival are already in abundance: dried riverbeds, forest fires, punishing droughts, increased tree mortality. Scientists have predicted the forest could experience a broad ecological collapse by 2050, when between 10 and 47 percent of the forest will 'be exposed to compounding disturbances' that could 'trigger unexpected ecosystem transitions,' according to a February 2024 study in Nature. But other research has also provided cause for hope. Despite the delicate nature of the Amazon's ecosystem, the forest has also shown a robust capacity for regrowth. A recent study showed that roughly 72,000 square kilometers of the biome lost to deforestation are already in an advanced stage of natural regeneration. Much of the regenerated forest is in areas not threatened by agricultural production, a principal driver of deforestation, additional research found this year. 'The forest can come back,' said Andreia Pinto an environmental researcher who has written several of the studies. 'The scar of deforestation can be healed.' Whether the wound reopens again is another question. Roughly 60 percent of regenerated forest is later deforested, according to a study last year by Brazil's National Institute for Space Research. The matter will now be put to the test in a town synonymous with the Amazon's destruction. 'This is a really important symbol,' Barbalho said. The area where the pilot project will unfold, Triunfo do Xingu, has lost more than a third of its original forest since its creation as a government-protected area in 2006. During the administration of then-President Jair Bolsonaro, who inveighed against environmental law enforcement as an impediment to economic growth, the devastation widened. But it was the freshness of the destruction that made the protected area an interesting candidate for this restoration model. The chance for natural regeneration, researchers say, is far greater in recently deforested areas. For state officials, the first step was reclaiming the land. In 2022, authorities arrested a notorious cattleman whom they accused of being one of the Amazon's most prolific deforesters. They cleared out his farm and renamed the 100 square-kilometer plot a 'unit of restoration' – a new jurisdictional definition. Then in March, hoping to create a new local economy based on environmentalism, the state put the parcel on the auction block for a carbon credit company to restore. The plan is not without risk. Brazil's carbon credit industry, which seeks to protect the forest in exchange for credits that can be sold on international markets, has been beset by scandal. Past projects have been accused of exaggerating environmental impact, improperly using government lands and creating divisions within Indigenous communities. This project should sidestep many of those issues, said Raoni Rajão, a former senior official in Brazil's Environment Ministry, because it has government buy-in. And the land, which doesn't have any local inhabitants, will be patrolled by a private company paid to protect it. 'This is a good idea,' Rajão said. 'It could and should be repeated in other areas.' The initiative will be run by Systemica, a Brazilian carbon credit company that operates in the Amazon. In an interview, chief executive Munir Soares expressed optimism. He said deforesters often look for unprotected lands they can sell off with fraudulent paperwork. But the designation of this area as a restoration reserve, as well as the project itself – which he estimated would employ hundreds of locals – will reduce the criminal incentive. 'We're going to be present, day in and day out,' Soares said. If the land gets a chance to rest, locals said, they expect the forest to be reborn. Raiumundo Freire, who harvests a mixture of forest products including açaí and cacau, said he's witnessed the process himself. He first moved to the Triunfo do Xingu territory in 1986, when it was nothing but 'dense forest.' Much of it has been razed, he said, but he never lost hope it could be restored. Years ago, he said, he bought a small parcel of land, just 37 hectares. It was totally deforested. He'd long put it to use planting corn and other vegetables. 'Then five years ago, I let it recover, didn't do anything,' he said. And now? 'It's just forest,' he said.
