
Documents show secret pact if U.S. troops sent to Korea conflict
Declassified U.S. documents show that Prime Minister Nobusuke Kishi agreed in the late 1950s to allow the United States to deploy its forces based in Japan in the event of a contingency on the Korean Peninsula without consulting Tokyo.
The documents were U.S. diplomatic cables sent between 1958 and 1960 regarding negotiations for the revision of the Japan-U.S. Security Treaty between Foreign Minister Aiichiro Fujiyama and U.S. Ambassador to Japan Douglas MacArthur II.
After becoming prime minister in 1957, Kishi called for a more equal relationship with the United States and in revising the security treaty he wanted a prior consultation before U.S. troops based in Japan that could be deployed for missions other than the defense of Japan.
But in July 1959, MacArthur made it clear that the United States could not have a prior consultation with Japan if troops had to be sent immediately in support of U.N. troops if the Korean War resumed.
Kishi faced a dilemma because if Washington was allowed to send troops to the Korean Peninsula without prior notification, it would demonstrate that the two nations were far from the equal status that Kishi argued for.
The Asahi Shimbun was shown copies of the documents found by Takashi Shinobu, a professor emeritus at Nihon University in Tokyo and an expert on the history of Japan-U.S. diplomacy, at the U.S. National Archives and Records Administration.
A document from August 1959 had Fujiyama explaining that he "had very carefully considered' the matter with Kishi. Fujiyama proposed that a military conflict on the Korean Peninsula be made the sole exception to the prior consultation system under the revised security treaty.
Fujiyama pointed out that the notification system would be the most important characteristic that showed the revised security treaty placed the two nations on a more equal footing.
But as negotiations were continuing between Fujiyama and MacArthur, protests broke out in Japan by those who opposed a revision of the security treaty on the grounds it would drag Japan into an American war.
The documents show that in November 1959, Kishi met with MacArthur and expressed fear that the treaty itself would be threatened and his own administration would fall if the issue was handled in the wrong manner.
Kishi had Fujiyama propose an agreement between the two sides on the Korean Peninsula deployment issue in the form of confidential minutes for the first meeting of the security consultative body under the revised security treaty.
Fujiyama and MacArthur reached such an agreement prior to the January 1960 visit by Kishi to the United States to sign the revised security treaty.
The existence of the secret pact came to light after the then Democratic Party of Japan took control of the government in 2009.
A panel of experts determined the agreement on no prior consultation for the deploying of U.S. troops to the Korean Peninsula was the only secret pact clearly agreed to by the two sides.
But although a draft of that pact was uncovered, few documents related to the negotiations that led to that agreement were found in the Foreign Ministry archives.
Nobuo said the lack of documents on the Japanese side was a reflection of the inward-looking stance of Japanese diplomacy that relied on secret pacts to protect the government of that time.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Asahi Shimbun
an hour ago
- Asahi Shimbun
U.S. denies tariff exemption for Japan, at odds with Tokyo
U.S. President Donald Trump, left, signs a cap for Ryosei Akazawa, the minister of economic revitalization, in a meeting at the White House on April 16. (Provided by the White House) WASHINGTON—The Trump administration imposed an additional 15 percent tariff on all Japanese imports on Aug. 7, denying an exemption that the Japanese government has said would apply to certain products. In a federal register dated Aug. 6, Washington listed what it calls modified reciprocal tariff rates for U.S. trading partners, showing that a 15-percent levy will be tacked onto existing tariff rates on all items from Japan. A White House official told The Asahi Shimbun on Aug. 6 that the deal that was agreed to with Japan is a 15-percent reciprocal tariff. 'That is on top of any pre-existing MFNs,' the official said, referring to the most favored nation tariff rates, or normal non-discriminatory tariff rates charged on imports from other World Trade Organization members. Japan has explained that its trade deal with the United States will exempt Japanese goods from the new reciprocal tariff if the existing tariff rates are 15 percent or higher. The uniform 15-percent reciprocal tariff will apply to all other goods that are subject to tariffs under 15 percent, officials said. The federal register showed that the exemption for goods with the existing tariff rates of 15 percent or higher will be granted only to the European Union. The new reciprocal tariffs took effect at 1:01 p.m. on Aug. 7 Japan time. Until now, the United States has levied a 10-percent reciprocal tariff on almost all trading partners, including Japan. Ryosei Akazawa, Japan's chief trade negotiator, met with U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, one of his U.S. counterparts, for 90 minutes on Aug. 6 in the United States. Akazawa, minister in charge of economic revitalization, called on Lutnick to confirm the terms of the Japan-U.S. agreement on the reciprocal tariff again and implement them immediately, according to the Japanese government. It was unclear how Lutnick responded.


Japan Times
an hour ago
- Japan Times
The United States imposes 15% 'reciprocal' tariff on most Japanese goods
A 15% 'reciprocal' tariff is now in effect on most Japanese goods entering the United States, following a shaky 11th-hour compromise reached two weeks ago to avoid the worst-case scenario. The new rate kicks in as the two countries remain at loggerheads over Japan's $550 billion investment pledge made as a part of the trade deal, when and if auto tariffs will be lowered, and even the terms and conditions of the reciprocal tariff. Some analysts wonder if the agreement could collapse altogether. The new reciprocal rate on Japanese goods — which is lower than the 25% that the U.S. threatened to impose but still five percentage points higher than the 10% in place since April — might be charged in addition to the existing duties, contrary to Japan's interpretation of the agreement. U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order to modify the reciprocal tariff rates on over 60 countries and territories on July 31, with Syria getting hit with the highest rate — 41% — and a number of countries, including the United Kingdom, having the rate set at 10%, the lowest on the list. About half of the jurisdictions listed received a 15% rate. The new rates took effect at 12:01 a.m. Thursday in Washington, 1:01 p.m. in Tokyo. "IT'S MIDNIGHT!!! BILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN TARIFFS ARE NOW FLOWING INTO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!" Trump wrote on Truth Social. Discrepancies on how to implement the agreement — which was not put in writing — leaves some of the tariff measures still unclear. Japan insists it secured a U.S. commitment that, for items with an existing tariff rate below 15%, the total duty including the reciprocal tariff will be capped at 15%. For items with an existing tariff above 15%, no additional tariff will be imposed. That promise was absent from an executive order signed by the president on July 31, which shows only the European Union enjoying this more favorable calculation. White House officials confirmed to Japanese media on Wednesday that the Japanese rate will be determined as published and not by using the EU method that caps some rates at 15%. 'We have confirmed with the U.S. side that there are no discrepancies between Japan and the United States,' Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi said of the new reciprocal tariff rate at a news conference in Tokyo on Thursday morning. Also under the terms of the July 22 handshake agreement, Trump's tariffs on automobiles are to be cut in half from 25%, with the new total being 15% when a 2.5% levy independent of the Trump tariffs is included. The White House has yet to announce when it will lower the duties on automobiles from the current 25%, and this has led to considerable concern in Tokyo. Ryosei Akazawa, Japan's chief negotiator, flew to the U.S. on Tuesday for a ninth round of trade talks. He urged the U.S. administration to promptly lower the auto tariffs during a 90-minute meeting with U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. Regarding the contradictory stances on how to implement the new reciprocal tariff, Akazawa told reporters before departing from Tokyo that the two sides share the understanding that the new rate on Japan is 'non-stacking,' in that the 15% won't just be added to existing rates. The difference might be due to a clerical error and might not warrant further negotiations, he said. The U.S. president has said in recent days that he will put new tariffs on a variety of foreign goods, including up to 250% on pharmaceutical products and 100% on semiconductors. A 50% duty on some copper products was put in place on Aug. 1. Currently, Trump tariffs on Japan include a 25% duty on its vehicles and auto parts, 50% on steel and aluminum, and 15% reciprocal tariff on most of its other products.


Asahi Shimbun
2 hours ago
- Asahi Shimbun
VOX POPULI: Abrupt swerve in the government's rice policy is unnerving
Most passengers must have felt something was wrong when their bus started slowing down, running behind schedule. But the bus driver maintained that he was 'going fast enough' and didn't want to exceed the speed limit. He even braked repeatedly. And now, the driver says he is going to step on the gas. Huh? On Aug. 5, Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba announced a major change in the nation's rice policy—from 'don't produce (rice)' to 'produce (rice).' His call for increased rice production signified a de facto switch from the government's long-established policy of curtailing rice production. Since last summer, the farm ministry has repeatedly insisted that there was 'enough rice.' However, an inspection reportedly revealed that rice was in short supply. Until the price of white rice doubled, the government remained unable to assess the volume of rice in circulation and estimate the demand. What a surprise. To return to the bus analogy, I suppose that the speed displayed on the driver's speedometer differed from the actual speed of the bus. In the first place, the government's traditional rice production curtailment policy always benefited rice farmers who minimized their output. And this served, without a doubt, to 'distort' their relationship with the free market. And now, the government is suddenly telling them to produce more rice. Things could certainly get a bit difficult in the days ahead. An old Chinese saying goes to the effect, 'For the emperor, the people are everything; for the people, food is everything.' It is probably a timeless and universal truism that the people will turn their backs on the rulers who fail to solve food-related issues. Where is our bus going? A fight has already begun over who is going to sit in the driver's seat, making the journey quite precarious. Is the bus going straight ahead, or will it swerve to the right or the left? We, the passengers, are growing really anxious. —The Asahi Shimbun, Aug. 7 * * * Vox Populi, Vox Dei is a popular daily column that takes up a wide range of topics, including culture, arts and social trends and developments. Written by veteran Asahi Shimbun writers, the column provides useful perspectives on and insights into contemporary Japan and its culture.