Brit couple kicked out of Corfu hotel & barred from flight after ‘complaining about food' & moaning rice was ‘inedible'
Paul Bell, 64, and wife Ellie, 65, swear they have "washed their hands" of travel firm TUI after a nightmare week-long, half-board holiday at the Terezas Hotel in Sidari,
5
Paul Bell from near Newcastle had a nightmare TUI holiday in Corfu
Credit: NCJMedia
5
He said the food at the Terezas Hotel in Sidari, Corfu was subpar
Credit: NCJMedia
5
Paul and wife Ellie said they have 'washed their hands' of TUI after the experience
Credit: NCJMedia
The couple had enjoyed a previous stay there, but this trip ended in sparks.
TUI ejected them from their hotel and barred them from flying home - despite the couple having booked a package deal - leaving them hundreds of pounds down.
Have you been disappointed by hotel food abroad? Email
They were forced to arrange an alternative flight home with Jet2, take a taxi to the airport instead of a transfer, and book into another hotel for the rest of the stay.
read more in world news
Paul says he cannot understand why the couple were booted out.
TUI said they had been disruptive throughout their stay.
But Paul disputes this, and claims TUI never even asked him or Ellie for their version of events.
Trouble began when Ellie complained to the manager about the quality of the food - which Paul described as "tepid" and "not very
nice
".
Most read in The Sun
He told the Newcastle Chronicle: "Some of the things you would get were rice with sprouts, or another time you'd have rice with a slice of beetroot in it.
"My wife spoke to the manager twice, she complained about the food being inedible and he didn't seem interested.
Moment Brit passenger hauled off Ryanair flight heading to Corfu after mid-air brawl as plane forced to divert to Italy
"She asked him to join us for breakfast the
next
day so we could show him what we meant, but he never turned up."
The couple went out for the day and "had a word" with the rep when they returned.
The next day, the couple were hit with a letter telling them to get out of the hotel while waiting for a day trip to Corfu town.
It explained they were barred from staying in the hotel for the rest of the trip.
The letter, dated Tuesday May 20, said: "You caused a serious disturbance by shouting inside the hotel restaurant in front of other guests, resulting in significant distress and disruption to the peaceful environment of the hotel."
It added: "You directed aggressive and disrespectful language towards both hotel staff, the hotel owners, and TUI representatives on site."
5
Corfu is loved by Brits for its stunning coastline
Credit: Getty
5
Susan Edwards also had a subpar experience in a Corfu hotel
Credit: NCJ MEDIA
Paul said: "I don't remember anybody shouting," and claims they were evicted without any conversations beforehand.
He said: "We only spoke to the rep on the day she was at the hotel and there was nothing disrespectful shown to her.
"They've never come and spoke to us to find out what happened, they've decided off what the manager has told them.
"But surely there are always two sides to a story? I was furious, because it spoiled the day we had planned."
Paul and Ellie were allegedly denied any chance to appeal the decision and simply told to contact the UK consulate if they needed further help.
On the Wednesday, the couple got another letter saying that Ellie was barred from flying home at the end of the week.
Yet another correspondence came through 12 hours later blacklisting Paul from the plane as well.
TUI said that this decision was based on their terms and conditions and driven by the pair's "conduct and behaviour".
Paul promptly booked flights back from Corfu with Jet2 on Thursday, May 22, - at a cost of €330.
Brit gran moans: No English food at Corfu hotel
By Patrick Harrington
A BRITISH gran's dream holiday to Corfu fell flat because her all-inclusive resort "didn't have any English food" on offer.
Susan Edwards, 69, from Westerhope, Newcastle upon Tyne, vowed she'll never book with TUI again after being less than impressed with the grub on offer.
Susan jetted off in May with three cousins and her daughter for a seven-night stay at the Lido Corfu Sun Hotel on the Greek island.
They were looking forwards to a week of relaxation, but the ordeal was "horrendous from the minute they got there," Susan said.
After paying £750 each for the week, the sun-seekers were expecting slap-up meals and drinks on tap.
But Susan told
The family discovered there was "no English food" on offer whatsoever.
Instead, Susan said: "On a morning you could have toast, a hard-boiled egg, or something in sauce.
"For breakfast there was mozzarella and sliced tomatoes. There was no hot bacon or sausage."
Read more about
After they got home, TUI then revoked the ban - meaning they could have caught the Friday flights after all.
Paul said: "That doesn't help us now, because we were told we have to make our own travel arrangements and we came home.
"We had to pay €60 for a taxi to the airport as well, because we weren't allowed on the transfers."
TUI said the couple would be refunded for the extra flights they bought.
Reflecting on the whole experience, Paul said: "When we go on holiday, we try to go somewhere nice and quiet, sit and chill, try the local stuff, go to the towns and see the scenery and to have food like we did (in the hotel) was really disappointing.
"We got no back-up whatsoever from TUI.
"They took whatever the manager said as gospel and came to a decision just like that.
"Had we been drunk and disorderly, fine, but we weren't - we've never had any bother on any
holidays
before, until this time with TUI."
The Sun has reached out to TUI for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Irish Sun
8 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
Why British behaviour in Spain is getting locals backs up – even if you think you're being polite
Ordering drinks can result in some Brits sounding like Shakespeare SPAIN PAIN Why British behaviour in Spain is getting locals backs up – even if you think you're being polite WHILE little can go wrong with a friendly "¡Hola!" to a waiter or "mañana" to a maid in Spain some Brit tourists are making paella of a mess of the Spanish language. That's according to a language expert who has revealed his golden rules to spare the blushes of Brits abroad. 1 Don't try to be too polite or too posh when talking to the locals, says a language expert Though most tourists from the UK think themselves the epitome of politeness on holiday their well-intentioned manners could well backfire on them. Advertisement One of the biggest blunders is Brits trying to sound too polite – or too posh. Language guru James Smith has spent more than a decade teaching Spanish and living across Spain, Argentina and Costa Rica. He said the issue stems from a fundamental cultural misunderstanding. 'British tourists think they're being respectful by using elaborate politeness, but Spanish culture values directness,' he said. Advertisement 'What we consider courteous can actually make Spanish speakers uncomfortable because it sounds unnatural and forced.' Here are James' golden rules for getting along with the locals: Politeness doesn't translate Never say "I'm terribly sorry to bother you" – it's too abstract in Spanish. Be direct. 'I've watched British tourists tie themselves in knots trying to be polite, and the Spanish person just looks bewildered,' said James. Advertisement 'They're wondering why this person is apologising so much for a simple request.' Brits vow to defy anti-tourism zealots after 1000s of sunbeds across Majorca were scrapped Don't sound like Shakespeare Too often people try to sound posh. Don't. 'The phrase 'would you mind' doesn't really exist in Spanish the way we use it," said James, of Learn Spanish with James. 'You end up with these clunky translations that make you sound like you're performing Shakespeare in a café.' With these points in mind, here are some everyday phrases James suggested Brits can try out on the streets of Spain. Advertisement Ordering a drink British way: 'Would it be possible to have a coffee, if that's not too much trouble?' Spanish way: 'Un café, por favour' (A coffee, please) Getting someone's attention British way: 'Excuse me, I'm terribly sorry to interrupt…' Spanish way: 'Disculpe' (Excuse me) Making requests in shops British way: 'Would you mind if I had a look at that, please?' Spanish way: 'Ese, por favour' (That one, please) - while pointing to the item. 'Even asking 'Can I see that?' sounds overly formal in Spanish,' James explained. 'Just point to what you want and say 'that one, please' - it's perfectly polite and completely natural.' 'The beauty of Spanish communication is its simplicity,' James added. 'You're not being rude by being direct. You're being clear. That's actually more respectful than making someone decode your overly complex politeness.'
The Irish Sun
8 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
The dangerous reason you should never wear leggings or jeans on a flight
Read on to find out what you should wear on a flight instead TAKE OFF The dangerous reason you should never wear leggings or jeans on a flight EXPERTS have warned of the two items you should never wear on a flight - even if it means sacrificing comfort. Despite being a popular item of clothing, leggings are said to be one of the most dangerous items you could be wearing during an emergency onboard your flight. 4 Brits shouldn't wear certain clothes when flying, including leggings Credit: Getty Win one of 8 incredible holidays to the Caribbean, Mexico and Greece by voting in The Sun's Travel Awards - enter to win here Author Christine Negroni, whose book delves into the most mysterious air disasters, shared with Sun Travel that when it comes to fires onboard a flight, leggings could leave you with terrible scars. She said: "Everyone is wearing yoga pants on planes now, but I avoid all artificial fibres because they are more likely to burn and stick to you if there is a fire. "I'd advise wearing cotton clothes or anything made of natural fibres." Read more on travel tips HOLS HACK My little-known tricks for cheap tickets that top UK attractions DON'T advertise While the staple wardrobe item might be the most comfortable choice, leggings are tight-fitting, which can restrict blood flow as well. For the same reason, this rules out jeans, says Dr. Hugh Pabarue. The vein specialist at Metro Vein Centers told the Huffington Post: "Wearing leggings and other restrictive garments such as skinny jeans that are too tight reduces blood's ability to flow into and out of the legs." And when this is combined with sitting for long periods of time, blood can pool in the legs, increasing the chances of thrombosis - a serious condition where a blood clot forms in a deep vein of the leg. Fashion items to avoid don't just stop at leggings and jeans – flipflops are also a no no. Former cabin crew member Tony Kuna commented on Quora: "During an emergency, all sorts of debris and unpleasant ground surfaces will block your way towards the exit, as well as outside the aircraft." The Sun's Travel Editor Lisa Minot shares her top tips when flying "If your feet [aren't] properly covered, you'll have a hard time making your way to safety." And this is why Christine also says passengers shouldn't take off their shoes when flying - no matter how tempting. She said: "The riskiest time on a flight is during landing and I think it should be a rule to have shoes on during this time. "If you escape an aircraft, the floor could be very hot or cold, it might be covered in oil or on fire, or in a cornfield – you won't want to be barefoot." Whilst not a clothing item per say, travellers should make sure to not wear headphones during take-off and landing either as you need to know if the flight attendants are saying something important. It also isn't great news for contact lens users, as according to London Vision Clinic, plane cabins are an "inhospitable environment" for lenses. 4 Leggings have synthetic fibres that can stick to your skin in a fire Credit: Getty London Vision Clinic states on its website: "With the average humidity on planes coming in as low as 20 per cent, our skin and eyes can dry out pretty quickly. "Combine this with the moisture-sapping effects of contact lenses, and you can have a real recipe for disaster on your hands. "You can expect to experience itchy, irritated eyes and even distorted vision as your peepers dry out!" So perhaps, just opt for your glasses instead. So, what is the ultimate outfit to wear on a flight? Rather than wearing leggings or jeans, passengers should opt for drawstring trousers, according to Conde Nast Traveller. Loose trousers prevent a waistband cutting into you and causing blood flow issues. And following Christine's advice, make sure to opt for a pair with natural fibres to help prevent serious burns if there is a fire. 4 Jeans are also not a great choice for a flight, as they are tight fitting Credit: Getty Dr. Peter J. Pappas, a vascular surgeon with the Center for Vein Restoration, also told the that passengers should opt for medical-grade compression stockings, which can help with preventing swelling and pain in calf muscles. Regarding footwear, Christine advises to opt for trainers over high heels as well. For kids, make sure they have layers as it can often get cold in the cabin, says blog Travelled So Far. Comfortable trousers are also key for little ones - especially if you want them to sleep on the flight. Just make sure to steer clear of synthetic fibres and leggings for their outfit choices as well. A flight attendant has also revealed the row you should always book if you want it to yourself… but it comes with a downside. Plus, there is an 'emergency pants' rule that flight attendants always follow on holiday.
Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
Ryanair: ‘We don't have time to waste with stupid follow-up questions from your readers'
A few weeks back we highlighted how a change in Ryanair 's policies on minors flying with the airline had seen the plans of two separate travelling parties left up in the air. In times past, in many cases, children over the age of 16 were able to accompany a child under the age of 16 on Ryanair flights across Europe without any fuss. However, unknown to a couple of readers who contacted us, the rules changed – and now under-16s need to be accompanied by an adult, or they will not be able to fly with Ryanair. The airline told us the change was implemented last September and was a result of rules in Spain and other countries mandating that children under the age of 16 had to be accompanied by someone over the age of 18. READ MORE And that was that. [ Two Ryanair passengers complain to Pricewatch. The airline is having none of it Opens in new window ] At least, that was that until other readers started contacting us questioning what we had been told. 'This summer we went to Portugal , but my 14-year old went to Biarritz the week before for a French language camp,' wrote a reader called Paul. 'The option of me waiting in Dublin for him to return and then follow the family wasn't a good one, so he flew out of Bilbao to Lisbon and then on a connecting flight to Faro. He was going to fly with TAP, so my wife rang them in advance to see what their minors policy was. Once you turn 12 you are not a minor with TAP, so he flew out of Spain and into Portugal on his own, and without any issue.' We also heard from a reader called Brid who had a similar experience to the readers who contacted us to say unaccompanied under-16s were not allowed travel with Ryanair this summer. 'The same issue also happened to my son and his friend, travelling to France in June this year,' she said. 'I hadn't yet gotten around to making a complaint, but your article has saved me some time and likely fruitless effort.' She says a 'question though that wasn't answered, and which they might more readily answer for you rather than us mere customers, was why their systems weren't updated for the change in policy. The Ryanair booking systems will not allow a child under the age of 16 to be booked on their own, whereas they will allow them to be booked with an over-16 (which is still how their booking system defines an adult, and they don't specify they must be over 18),' she writes. 'Furthermore, they allow (or at least, when my son and his friend travelled in June) an under-16 to be checked in with an over-16 but under-18. Surely resorting to 't's and c's' [terms and conditions] defence is insufficient from a consumer perspective for such clear inconsistency between their policies and consumer systems. At best, it is completely misleading.' We also heard from another reader, Aoibhe, who questioned what Ryanair told us about the timing of the policy change. 'Our policy is that under-16s must be accompanied by over-18s. We previously allowed them to be accompanied by over-16s, but we suffered some cases where such U18s were denied entry into EU airports. We have to ensure that we avoid this risk' — Ryanair statement 'I would question whether it's accurate for Ryanair to maintain they changed their minor's policy last September. We had a 15-year-old and a 17-year-old travel with Ryanair from Spain to Dublin on October 27th, 2024, and back on November 1st, 2024. It was all perfectly acceptable then. I can't see Ryanair not rigidly enforcing any policy they conjure up.' She said the 'same two teenagers – who have not changed in age since then – could not fly to Dublin together this month due to the policy change. Thankfully, their mother was aware of the policy change,' she writes, asking how, in an AI age, 'can a system let you make a booking that does not adhere to their policy?' She also points out that Vueling Airlines 'has no problem with a 15-year-old and 17-year-old travelling together, [and] I would question the accuracy of Ryanair saying that Spain is one of the countries where under-16s must be accompanied by an adult, as our friends have just come from Spain". She points out that her son travelled with Aer Lingus to Spain when he was 15 in the company of a 14-year-old in August 2023 and she 'had to fill out a 'Form Of Indemnity' to absolve Aer Lingus of any liability. The form is for 12- to 15-year-olds. Are Ryanair maintaining that Vueling and Aer Lingus are breaking EU law?' [ A letter from Michael O'Leary: 'MetroLink is a mad, bad project' Opens in new window ] We put these reader stories to Ryanair – and the response we received was typically robust. 'Our very sensible 'minors' policy was clearly set out in our July letter, and we don't have time to waste dealing with stupid follow-up questions from your handful of readers,' the mail begins. 'Our policy is that under-16s must be accompanied by over-18s. We previously allowed them to be accompanied by over-16s, but we suffered some cases where such U18s were denied entry into EU airports. We have to ensure that we avoid this risk, which is the only reason we changed this policy. If your readers don't accept this policy, then they should please feel free to fly with other airlines, who may operate a more lax minors travel policy.' There was more. 'This policy affects tiny numbers of our 206m pax [passengers], since most parents go to great lengths to ensure that U16 children are accompanied by over-18s – usually their parents! We don't block such bookings since many families book air travel on different bookings but on the same flight, and we don't want to prevent such families travelling together.' The email adds that this 'minors policy was changed in September last year. [Aoibhe's booking] was made on Sept 17th, before the policy change was made. Still, they should not have been allowed to travel on the Santander-to-Dublin flight. We cannot always catch all pax who break our rules, but if they are denied entry at an EU airport, it becomes their responsibility, not ours.' The statement concludes by saying that 'instead of whinging about our very sensible 'minors' travel policy, perhaps your handful of readers would simply ensure that an U16 child is accompanied by an over 18yo adult, or otherwise fly with another airline, who may operate a less sensible 'minors' travel policy, then we won't have to waste our time, or yours, replying to such stupid follow-on queries'. For the record – and for the avoidance of all doubt – we entirely accept Ryanair's position on minors travelling, and it is entirely within its rights to set its own policies irrespective of what other airlines do. We entirely disagree, however, with its claim that the follow-up queries from our 'handful of readers' were 'stupid'. We don't consider the queries a waste of time either.
