
More than half of young people have considered leaving UK under Labour
Adults between 18-30 years old said they had 'serious concerns' about housing, personal finances and their future in the UK, leaving them 'overtaxed, underhoused and undervalued'.
According to The Adam Smith Institute poll, 28 per cent of young Britons are either actively planning (8 per cent) or have seriously considered (20 per cent) emigrating.
Meanwhile, a further 30 per cent have briefly considered it. Only 35 per cent of young people said they have never thought about leaving the UK.
The polling, which was part of the think-tank's Anxious Generation series, was carried out between July 8-10.
The research team concluded: 'With young people feeling increasingly disenchanted, it is clear that meaningful change is needed to prevent them from joining the UK's ongoing wealth exodus.'
Majority fear housing crisis will get worse
Responding to the data, Nigel Farage, leader of Reform UK, said: 'It's sad but not a surprise that ambitious young Brits are increasingly looking overseas for opportunities.
'High taxes and stagnant wages have crushed aspiration and punished hard work.
'This can't go on. We must give the next generation the freedom to thrive, raise families, and build a bright future here in the UK.'
Researchers found that 65 per cent believe it will become 'more difficult' to find affordable housing in the next five years, with a further 38 per cent saying it will become 'much more difficult' and 27 per cent saying it will become 'somewhat more difficult'.
In contrast, just 21 per cent think the housing situation will get easier.
Furthermore, these concerns cut across political divides. Voters from all major parties expressed similar fears about housing and financial insecurity, signalling a generation-wide erosion of confidence in the UK's economic future.
The think tank found that 63 per cent of young Conservatives, 65 per cent of Labour, and 68 per cent of Reform UK voters say housing access will worsen.
Emma Schubart, Data & Insights Manager at the Adam Smith Institute, added: 'The youngest generation of British workers are sending a clear message. They feel overtaxed, underhoused and undervalued. If our political class continues to ignore these warning signs, we risk exporting our talent at precisely the moment when it is most needed.
'The dead hand of the state'
'With the country already facing a wealth exodus thanks, in large part, to its reckless decision to scrap the non-dom tax regime, the Treasury can hardly afford to lose an entire generation of ambitious young people as well.
'Addressing these challenges is not just a matter of fairness – it is essential to securing Britain's long-term economic and social future.
'Young Britons urgently need evidence that ambition and hard work still translate into security and success in this country.'
Jack Rankin, Tory MP for Windsor, added: 'The Government's dismal failure to deliver growth, accessible and cheap housing, and record high taxation is not just crushing Britain, but it's driving our future away.'
He described the research as 'devastating' and said that it shows that 'Britain needs to be freed from the dead hand of the state'.
'Freedom should be the order of the day, so young people feel confident enough to stay in our country and reverse the fraying intergenerational social contract,' he added.
The think tank research comes after separate data from the British Council was published in December, claiming that as many as three-quarters of young people would consider moving abroad.
In its survey of more than 3,000 young people aged 18-30, 75 per cent would consider living and working abroad in the short or long-term future.
The researchers found that Australia, the USA, Canada and Italy were the most popular destinations for young people considering emigrating.
Two-thirds of respondents said their standard of living is worse than it was for their parents' generation, while more than half cited low wages as the biggest challenge.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Spectator
6 minutes ago
- Spectator
Why I left the Conservatives
There comes a moment for many soldiers – and most politicians – when you realise the battle you think you're fighting isn't the one your leaders are waging. That moment came for me watching Kemi Badenoch tell Sky News's Trevor Phillips there are real differences between Reform UK and the Conservatives. She was right. The difference is the Reform leadership – voters grasp the scale of our national peril and back a party serious about addressing it. Many in Britain feel we may already have passed the point of no return. Our cities grow less cohesive, the country effectively bankrupt. For over a year, Conservative colleagues have insisted Reform was just a noisy protest vehicle. 'We're all saying the same things,' they claimed. But we're not. Kemi was correct: the differences are real – and it's those differences that brought me, with regret but clarity, to conclude I am no longer a Conservative. I remain a conservative – as do millions of voters – but our values now align more with Reform. This isn't hard when the government I supported presided over the arrival of well over four million mostly unskilled migrants and their dependents. You can't blame people for wanting better for their families – but you can blame a government, my government, for allowing 728,000 net arrivals in a single year. The army has 33 infantry battalions; since 2018, we've let in nearly 250 battalions' worth of undocumented young men of military age. And it was the Conservatives who launched the well-meant but job-exporting Net Zero agenda, pushing UK energy prices to four times those in the US. Now the Conservatives offer cautious reform: modest tax cuts, a managed Net Zero transition, an inquiry into the ECHR (European Convention on Human Rights). Reform offers a sharper reset: immediate tax cuts, hard borders, and a clear-out of ideologically captured institutions. One wants course correction. The other believes only bold change can restore public trust. The Conservative party I thought I joined believed in sovereignty, secure borders, low taxes, personal responsibility, and cultural confidence. That party is no longer in government – and no longer deserves to be. It wasn't just defeated at the ballot box – it was hollowed out by careerists masquerading as conservatives. They got there thanks to CCHQ's obsession with the divisive dogma of 'diversity, equality, and inclusion' (DEI) over merit and sense. A government elected on promises of control and competence delivered drift, disillusionment, and denial. Reform's policies are not extreme. Some of my former media colleagues smear them as such. They should look to themselves. As a Sikh friend said: Reform is refreshingly colour-blind. Its platform is what the Conservative manifesto should have been: tax and regulatory reform, full border control, energy sovereignty, making Brexit work, restoring national pride, and the first duty of government – protecting the public. When I talk to people in Gravesham in Kent, the seat I served for 19 years, they don't bring up DEI or Net Zero. They talk about the boats. About crime, housing, doctors, bills, and broken services. And the quiet anger at seeing economic migrants in hotels seemingly prioritised over British citizens — including homeless veterans. They see a system that punishes effort and rewards dependency. This is not ideology. It is betrayal. A former cabinet minister friend recently said: 'Reform may win many more seats — and just split the vote again.' But that misses the point. The vote is already split. For millions, the Conservative party stopped being a conservative vehicle long before it was thrown out of office. Reform has taken up that mantle – and wears it with pride. 'They're the only party speaking common sense,' a local Reform supporter told me. 'The Tories became Labour-lite.' He's not wrong: think Chagos, woke policy drift, tax hikes, and the slow purge of the wealth creators who fund the system. From the refusal to cut migration, to cowardice in confronting public-sector radicals, to the erosion of free speech, the Conservatives chose to manage decline, not resist it. Labour, of course, is worse – not just timid but dangerous. Their instinct is always for more state, more spending, more control. The Conservatives at least hesitated before doing harm. Labour doesn't even pause. We cannot hand them another blank cheque in 2029 because the so-called Right remains divided. This is no time for technocrats or those who simply fancy being Prime Minister. It requires conviction. Kemi is a fighter – but she's surrounded by too many who'd be Lib Dems if the Lib Dems were winning. She can't charge from a trench full of MPs who won't follow her. I joined the Army to serve the country, not the institution. The same applies now. If we want to rescue Britain, we must be honest about who's still willing to fight for her. Reform is not perfect – but it is serious. I didn't leave the Conservative party, it left me. It used good people's votes to govern as Labour-lite and squabble over promotions. In doing so, it handed Britain to an ignorant and disastrous Labour government. Some may say I've moved to Reform because it may win my old seat. Of course, that's a consideration. But it's not the reason. I know the road from protest to power is long. Reform may flare bright and fade. It must grow beyond its extraordinary founder, lose some of its more combative edges, continue to attract serious talent, further professionalise, and develop to become a credible government-in-waiting. That will require discipline, time, and luck to challenge the deep vested interests in Parliament, the civil service, the unions, and the wider public sector. No: I've made this choice not because it's easy or inevitable, but because right-thinking people need to come together. As Ronald Reagan said, 'You gotta dance with the one that brung ya.' The Conservative party forgot to dance with the people who brought it to power. The challenge for Reform – and any future allies – is to become fully fit and credible for the rescue mission of 2029, which may well be the United Kingdom's last best chance.


Spectator
6 minutes ago
- Spectator
Exclusive: Ex-Tory MP defects to Reform
Reform UK has today unveiled its latest defector. Adam Holloway served as the Conservative MP for Gravesham in Kent from 2005 until 2024. A former soldier, he focused heavily on military matters in the Commons and served in the Whips' Office in the governments of Boris Johnson and Liz Truss. His decision to switch parties follows a number of other ex-Tory MPs defecting including Jake Berry, Anne Marie Morris and Ross Thomson. More defections are expected in the coming weeks. In a statement, Nigel Farage told The Spectator that 'Adam's parliamentary and military experience will be vital as we look forward to the next general election.' He added that Holloway's 'bold move shows that we are the only serious option in Kent and is testament to the fantastic work our councillors are delivering across the region.' In May, Reform UK won 57 on Kent County Council, with the Conservatives reduced to just five wards overall. Holloway told The Spectator that he had decided to quit the party as he now believed that it was beyond salvation. He said that 'Kemi is a fighter but she's surrounded by too many who'd be Lib Dems if the Lib Dems were winning. She can't charge from a trench full of MPs who won't follow her.' With his experience in the Armed Servives, he is expected to lead heavily on Reform UK's campaigns to grant immunity from prosecution for former British soldiers.


The Independent
6 minutes ago
- The Independent
Reform UK unveils ex-Tory MP Adam Holloway as latest defector
Nigel Farage has secured his latest defection from the Conservative Party, with ex-Tory MP Adam Holloway announcing he has become a member of Reform UK. The Reform leader will welcome Mr Holloway, a 60-year-old ex-army officer who was MP for Gravesham until July last year when he lost his seat to Labour, as the latest in a line of defectors from the Tories. He follows ex-Tory colleagues in parliament Dame Andrea Jenkyns Lee Anderson, Marco Longhi and Sir Jake Berry to jump ship to Mr Farage's party. Speaking as his defection was announced, Mr Holloway said: 'There comes a moment for many soldiers — and most politicians — when you realise the battle you think you're fighting isn't the one your leaders are waging. Many in Britain feel we may already have passed the point of no return. Our cities grow less cohesive, the country effectively bankrupt. 'That moment came for me watching Kemi Badenoch tell Trevor Phillips there are real differences between Reform UK and the Conservatives. She was right. The difference is the Reform leadership and voters grasp the scale of our national peril and back a party serious about addressing it. "I joined the Army to serve the country, not the institution. The same applies now. If we want to rescue Britain, we must be honest about who's still willing to fight for her." Mr Holloway was the Conservative MP for Gravesham from 2005 until last year's general election. He was briefly an assistant government whip in 2022 and held roles on the Home Affairs Committee and European Scrutiny Committee. He was replaced by Labour's Dr Lauren Sullivan at the election, losing his seat by 2,712 votes. During his time as a Tory MP, Mr Holloway was a vocal backer of his ex-colleagues Charlie Elphicke and Imran Khan, both of whom were convicted of sexual offences. Mr Holloway was found by the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards to have attempted to improperly influence judicial proceedings in attempting to have a judge block pre-sentencing character testimonies. Previously Mr Holloway was found by the sleaze watchdog to have breached MPs' rules by failing to register two rental properties and not declaring a payment and the source of a trip he took. Mr Holloway has also been asked to repay £1,000 after he tried to claim council tax on his parliamentary expenses twice. Mr Farage told The Spectator: 'Adam's parliamentary and military experience will be vital as we look forward to the next general election'. The Reform leader added that Mr Holloway's 'bold move shows that we are the only serious option in Kent and is testament to the fantastic work our councillors are delivering across the region'. The ex-MP's defection to Reform comes as Mr Farage seeks to show his insurgent right-wing party is not running out of steam after a recent surge in the polls. There have been no defections of sitting MPs to Reform since Lee Anderson joined the party in March 2024. Those who have defected have typically done so after losing their seats fighting as Conservatives in the general election. In parliament, Mr Holloway voted against conducting air strikes on ISIS in 2014 after visiting the border with the Islamic State, and abstained on a vote for air strikes in 2015. In 2008, Adam Holloway accepted a trip to Syria and Lebanon from an organisation that described its aim as to engage with terrorist groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah in order to 'facilitate dialogue between political Islam and the West'. The Conservative Party declined to comment on the defection.