Lanarkshire Labour councillor deliberately drove his car at man filming school bus cuts protest
Raging Pat Patton, of Bellshill, then got out of his Hyundai Santa Fe and told the victim to put his camera away.
A Lanarkshire Labour councillor shocked onlookers when he drove his car deliberately at a man filming a protest over school bus cuts.
Raging Pat Patton then got out of his Hyundai Santa Fe and told the victim to put his camera away.
Patton, of Bellshill, was fined £420 at Airdrie Sheriff Court this week after being found guilty of assault.
The incident happened outside Kirklands Credit Union in Woodside Street, Coatbridge, on June 26 last year, Patton's 59th birthday.
A small group of parents and around 10 children had gathered to voice anger at North Lanarkshire Council making changes to school bus services.
The protest took place outside the general election campaign HQ of Frank McNally, who was a Labour councillor and the party's candidate for Coatbridge and Bellshill.
Mr McNally went on to win the seat.
Patton, councillor for Bellshill, left the building and emerged from the car park in his Hyundai.
The victim told the court he was filming the protest and walked past the front of the councillor's car while it was not moving.
He said: "His car had been stopped for approximately five seconds. He then looked at me and accelerated towards me, striking my knees.
"This caused me to move back and then jerk forward.
"I wasn't injured but I was shocked, taken aback that someone would do that.
"Councillor Patton then got out of his car and tried to grab my phone."
The victim's phone footage was shown in court. He could be heard telling Patton he had "no right to run me down".
The councillor replied: "You have no right to record me."
Asked if Patton's car could have hit him by accident, the man told prosecutor Fergus Warner: "If it had been an accident he would have got out and apologised, but that didn't happen.
"He was aggressive, clearly enraged and unapologetic."
The victim's wife said she was standing behind Patton's car and didn't see it hit her husband.
But she told the court: "It moved quite fast and I saw him [the victim] lurch forward. I was really alarmed. Pat Patton was aggressive and angry."
Patton, who was elected as a councillor in 2022, said in evidence that he stopped his car when he saw the victim walk towards him.
He added: "The car never came into contact with him because I stopped.
"I got out and put up my hand to stop him filming. I had no intention of taking his phone from him."
Fellow Labour councillor Maureen Devlin said she was only a few feet away and insisted Patton's car didn't strike the victim.
She told defence lawyer Stephen MacBride: "If it had I would have seen it."
Sheriff Walter Mercer said he wasn't convinced that Patton's car had struck the victim but concluded: "It's beyond reasonable doubt that he assaulted the victim by accelerating and driving the vehicle towards him."
The sheriff said he considered the councillor's conduct "towards the lower end of the scale".
Patton appeared in court as a first offender.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Yvette Cooper ‘on resignation watch' after spending row with Reeves
Yvette Cooper's rows with the Treasury over spending have been so heated that officials fear she will resign. The Home Secretary is understood to have warned Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, that Labour election promises were at risk from a lack of investment in policing. In one meeting last week, Ms Reeves is said to have abruptly brought talks with Ms Cooper to a close. There are also claims a senior Home Office official stopped taking calls from the Treasury. Sir Keir Starmer has had to directly intervene to end the stand-off over the spending review. Downing Street on Monday said Ms Cooper had agreed to accept the Treasury offer, which includes a real-terms increase in policing budgets. Multiple well-placed government insiders told The Telegraph that the negotiations between Ms Cooper and the Treasury became so fraught that there was discussion about whether she would quit. An ally of Ms Cooper on Monday evening denied that she might resign, noting she had been talking to aides about her diary engagements for the rest of the month earlier in the day. But the fact that some figures in Downing Street and the Treasury have considered her departure a distinct possibility underscores how tense the talks became. Labour promised in its 2024 general election manifesto to halve violence against women and girls, reduce knife crime and establish 13,000 more community police officers. As Home Secretary, Ms Cooper is responsible for delivering those promises but it is the Treasury that decides how much money can go into policing. Treasury insiders are framing the police as a winner in Wednesday's spending review, which sets departmental spending for the next three years, as the policing budget will rise in real terms. But the degree to which police chiefs have launched into a public lobbying campaign against the Treasury – one still running over the weekend – suggests they fear it will not be enough. The Tories believe that, even with real-term police spending rises, it is likely that total officer headcount in England and Wales will fall from its peak of 149,000 in 2024 in the years ahead. Ms Cooper was the last cabinet minister left standing when Angela Rayner, the Communities Secretary, who has also battled with the Treasury, settled her budget on Sunday evening. The Home Secretary finally agreed a deal with less than 48 hours to go until Ms Reeves announces her spending plans. One ally of Ms Cooper said of her tough negotiating approach: 'Yvette's been chief secretary of the Treasury. She knows all the best ideas in the book.' A senior Whitehall figure acknowledged that the talks between Ms Cooper and No 11 had been fraught and prompted discussion among aides and officials that she could resign. However any decision to go would likely mean the end of Ms Cooper's front-line political career, since she would not be expected to be welcomed back into the cabinet under Sir Keir. The details of the policing budget, when they are published on Wednesday, will be closely scrutinised for their impact on officer numbers and the delivery of flagship pledges. In a series of interventions in the last few weeks, police chiefs and associations representing officers have been publicly challenging Ms Reeves to go further on police pay. In an article for The Telegraph on Monday, the heads of the Police Superintendents' Association and Police Federation of England and Wales warned that police forces were 'broken' and had been forced to shed officers because of cuts. As an unprotected department, the Home Office has been in Treasury cross-hairs as spending is squeezed from an annual real-term increase of 2.5 per cent to 1.2 per cent. Above-inflation rises for the NHS, extra money for schools and a marked increase in defence spending means other Whitehall budgets have been facing real-term cuts. On Monday, Ms Reeves announced that nine million pensioners will now get the winter fuel payments – a major reversal in policy after all but the poorest lost them last summer. Now pensioners in England and Wales with an income of £35,000 or less will get the annual payment of between £200 and £300 per household. Around two million pensioners whose incomes are above that threshold will get the money but then have it clawed back through the tax system, meaning they will lose out.
The Herald Scotland
10 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Fair Work is still a distant dream for some of Scotland's arts sector
That's a lot. More than people realise and it is high time they were treated fairly. Our latest STUC report, Freelance and Forgotten, crashes open the stage door and draws back the curtain on Scotland's arts & culture sector. It paints a very different picture that the reality we dare to dream whilst getting lost in the dazzling performances of our favourite artists. It's a sector of exploitation, insecurity and systemic neglect. The voices of over 800 workers from across the sector were unequivocal: Fair Work is still a distant dream for most creative freelancers in Scotland. Read More It's cheap of Labour to pin the blame on migrants in dinghies It's time to offer hope - but we can't do it alone This is not a just war, it's terrorism and psychological warfare We have power to nationalise Scotland's bus services - so let's use it Fair Work is capitalised for a reason. I refer to the Scottish Government's Fair Work agenda whereby they – and unions too – hoped Scotland would become a leading Fair Work nation by 2025. Needless to say, we haven't. Not through lack of trying. Trade unions, including our creative unions like Equity, BECTU, the Musicians' Union and others, wholeheartedly support the Fair Work agenda. We want what every worker deserves: decent pay, secure contracts, safe workplaces and a voice on the job. But in the arts sector, this vision is being undermined by structural exploitation and a culture that too often ignores the basic rights and dignity of workers. Let's be clear: the creative industries in Scotland are not short of talent or value; they're just short of fairness. Our report reveals that 69% of freelance creatives have faced late payments with one third not being paid at all for work already completed. One respondent described waiting 10 months to be paid by a 'prestigious' university. Others described stolen artwork, ghosting by clients who don't respond to their requests for payment, and having to fight tooth and nail for basic compensation. In any other industry, this would be deemed unacceptable and the culprits named and shamed. In the arts, where word of mouth is often the best way to get your next gig, it's a by-product of a sector that's allowed exploitation to run rampant. It doesn't stop at pay. Oh no – this sorry chapter has many acts. Nearly 75% of freelance creatives told us they rarely or never have access to a clear and accessible complaints process. More than 50% have experienced bullying, harassment or sexual harassment. Shockingly, 46% reported losing work or income due to illness, bereavement, or maternity leave. Further, more shockingly, we've seen testimony of workers being offered work in exchange for sexual favours or being throttled and yelled at. This is the reality for many workers in our creative industries. Yet these conditions are a direct contradiction of the Scottish Government's commitment to Fair Work. The principle that everyone should have access to work that is secure, respectful and pays fairly is being flouted in a sector largely supported by public funding. The Scottish Government supports culture and the arts to the tune of £280m a year. Creative Scotland, our national funding body, disperses tens of millions of pounds each year. Yet our report makes clear that the oversight, monitoring and enforcement of Fair Work standards is virtually non-existent for freelance workers. Too often, freelancers are treated as disposable and expected to deliver world-class work under poverty conditions, without contracts, sick pay, or any of the employment rights unions fight for day in and day out. These are skilled professionals, not cheap labour. They are lighting designers, playwrights, actors, musicians, choreographers, technicians and more. Without them, the spotlights will dim, the orchestra will fall silent and, despite the adage, the show literally cannot go on. So let's raise the standards as we raise the curtain. We need funding conditions that are tied explicitly to Fair Work standards for freelancers. This means organisations receiving public money must adopt the STUC's Fair Work for Freelancers Checklist, recognise unions as the legitimate voice of workers and work with unions to create binding Fair Work Agreements. Our report also calls for Creative Scotland to be given a specific remit to support workers and monitor fair practice within funded organisations. We need to end the culture of silence and fear. A third of workers surveyed had signed non-disclosure agreements that silenced them about their work. One respondent described being forced to sign a non-disclosure agreement just to be paid, only to discover the contract banned them from even showing their work in their portfolio. Another told us of being harassed while an entire crew looked on and said nothing. In any other industry, there would be uproar. In the arts, too many are afraid to speak out for fear of being blacklisted. That is the personification of a power imbalance. Powerful producers, directors, showrunners and more keep workers in a state of silence and fear for worrying about where they may get their next gig. That must end. As should the awful, derisory levels of pay. More than 80% of respondents reported a real terms fall in earnings, with many struggling to earn even £10,000 a year despite years of experience. Equal pay remains a fiction, with women and marginalised groups consistently paid less than male counterparts for the same work. These issues don't only impact on the workers themselves. They impact on what we see on our screens, on the stage and in our galleries. Working class artists are being driven out of the industry. If Scotland's art and culture is left to those with income and wealth to fall back on, then it won't reflect who we are as a nation. As we turn up the lights on this sorry saga of exploitation, let's do so in the hope that our freelancers and our creatives can secure decent levels of funding to support their aspirations and realise their creative vision. Fair pay is central to that and the Scottish Government has rightly set high expectations around Fair Work. Now is the time to deliver on those promises. Roz Foyer is general secretary of the STUC
Edinburgh Live
13 hours ago
- Edinburgh Live
Edinburgh's bitter gangland feud linked back to a decades-old £20k drug heist
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info A gangland feud broke out in Edinburgh earlier this year, though tensions have been brewing for decades. The 'wars', which saw homes firebombed and gunshots fired, began in the capital back in March - since spreading across the central belt. According to the Daily Record, the feud dates back to 2001. Just as Tony Blair won his second term for Labour, and the first Harry Potter movie was due for release, a different kind of plot was unfolding at Milton housing scheme in Glasgow. A large stash of cocaine worth about £20,000 belonging to the feared Daniel crime family had been stolen from a safe house on the estate that summer. It had gone missing at a house party at the address. The drugs -unsurprisingly - were not returned or paid for. The Daniel family then learned the drugs had either been sold to or -appropriated by a rival organised crime group, the Lyons. At the time both were battling for control of the drugs trade on the north side of the city. Head of the Daniel family was the formidable Jamie Daniel, one of four brothers from the city's Possilpark. On the other side the Lyons were led by Eddie Lyons snr. He ran a community centre called Chirnsyde in Milton. It was claimed a group based there called the Club Boys - which included his son Steven - had orchestrated the theft. In the organised crime world a drugs debt, no matter how small, must be paid. Failure to do so can result in a loss of face. Jamie Daniel knew that. A wave of attacks by the Daniels followed as they fought to maintain their control of the area's drugs trade. The response was orchestrated by 24-year-old Kevin "Gerbil" Carroll - an up-and-coming figure in the Daniel clan close to Jamie Daniel and in a relationship with his daughter Kelly. First, the Daniel crew tried to shoot Steven Lyons outside a pub in -Lambhill, Glasgow, in September 2001 - but the gunman missed. They then turned their -attention to the Chirnsyde centre. It was torched causing £30,000 of damage and had its minibus trashed. Carroll was in turn blasted twice in the leg with a sawn-off shotgun outside his mum's house in Milton in January 2003 but survived. Just 11 days later, Eddie Lyons's brother Johnny, 49, was shot outside his home in nearby Stornoway Street. The wallet in his back pocket took the impact and the doctors think that may have saved him. Sign up for Edinburgh Live newsletters for more headlines straight to your inbox In April 2006, as the feud continued, Carroll drove to Cumbernauld where he blasted another of Lyons's sons, Eddie Lyons jnr, at his door but failed to kill him. Then in November that year, Carroll allegedly used a tow rope to topple the headstone of Eddie snr's late son Garry, who was only eight when he died of leukaemia in 1991. The desecration of his grave marked a new low in the escalating conflict. Carroll had crossed a line but was still not satisfied. Two days later he ambushed and attempted to shoot Eddie Lyons jnr for a second time, in Bellshill, Lanarkshire. Lyons suffered minor injuries when his own car rolled over him. A henchman was hit with at least one round but survived. Eight days later the Lyons struck back when Carroll was shot along with a close associate Ross Sherlock in Clelland Avenue, a residential street in Bishopbriggs, near Glasgow. Carroll suffered serious injuries as he was hit in the stomach from close range. Sherlock was hit in the legs. The violence culminated in one of the most brazen murders the city had ever seen. On Wednesday, December 6, 2006, a blue Mazda car drew up outside Applerow Motors in Balmore Road, Lambhill, shortly after 2pm. The garage was owned by David Lyons, brother of Eddie snr, and was operated by both him and his nephew Mark. Two men in black overcoats and "old men" face masks and brandishing handguns got out and opened fire in what was later described in court as being like a scene from The Godfather. Eleven shots were fired, leaving mechanic Michael Lyons dead, and his cousin Steven Lyons and Lyons -associate Robert Pickett, 41, seriously injured. Lyons was in plaster for up to 12 weeks with a broken leg and required part of a bullet to be removed from his back. Robert Pickett, who had served time for attempted murder, was left in a coma for a month and lost a kidney after being shot in the stomach. A bloody gangland feud which had largely been conducted in the shadows was now headline news. Two Daniel associates - Raymond Anderson, 46, and James McDonald, 34 - stood trial at the High Court in Glasgow in March 2008. The court heard David Lyons received a "ransom note" at his home after the murder demanding £25,000 - the current value of the allegedly stolen cocaine. It read: "The boys owe me £25,000 and I want what's owed to me. It's for drugs. They all know what it's about. The money doesn't matter to me as it's got to be paid to the piper." Lyons didn't pay the money and handed the letter to the police. The multiple shooting which lasted only a few minutes had taken place yards from a special needs school. (Image: Daily Record) Ironically the school was to be the venue for a public meeting for people to air their growing fears about rising crime and gangland violence in the area. Already concerns had been raised about the role of the Lyons in the running of Chirnsyde and the £1.4million in taxpayers' cash it had received over the years. The murderous events would lead to the closure of the centre and funding finally being withdrawn. High levels of security were put in place throughout the trial which finished in May 2008. The case was heard in court No3 - which has been designed for terrorist accused - and people entering had to pass through a metal detector and police checks. Both Anderson and McDonald were convicted of illegal possession of guns and ammunition, the attempted murder of Steven Lyons and Robert Pickett, and Michael Lyons's murder. They had been heard in secret conversations taped by police talking about the "piper" mentioned in the letter sent to David Lyons. At the time Campbell Corrigan was a detective superintendent with Strathclyde Police and was in charge of the Applerow murder investigation. He became aware of the Daniel clan influence as far back as the 80s when he was a young detective in Govan, Glasgow and saw their rise to power in the city as he built his own career. Campbell retired in 2013. He was the force's last chief constable before Police Scotland was formed. Join Edinburgh Live's Whatsapp Community here and get the latest news sent straight to your messages. He told the Record: "The victim Michael Lyons was an innocent member of the family who just got caught in the Crossfire. "I was aware of the connection with Gerbil to Jamie Daniel's daughter and he directed a lot of the violence that had occurred. When you think of the Lyons on one side and the Daniels on the other side, it is a pretty long-running Glasgow feud." He also described how his team had to overcome "fear in the community" over speaking out about both the Lyons and Daniel families. He added: "These were guys not to be trifled with. It will take a very concerted effort before you are able to undermine them." After the jury's verdict, judge Lord Hardie branded MichaelLyons's murder a "a cold-blooded, premeditated assassination". Lord Hardie ordered the men to serve 35 years each before they could be considered for parole, the highest tariff ever set by a Scottish court. The terms were reduced on appeal to 30. However if the judge thought the tough sentences would stop the carnage, he was mistaken. Less than two years later. Scotland would be shocked by a murder that took the long-running feud to -terrifying new levels.
