Program Director in Cambria Co. honored as PA Blue Ribbon Champion
JOHNSTOWN, Pa. (WTAJ) — April is recognized as Child Abuse Prevention Month. Every year in April, the PA Family Support Alliance (PFSA) honors individuals from across the Commonwealth who go above and beyond the call to protect kids from abuse and neglect.
A program director who works in Johnstown is one of four people in Pennsylvania who will receive an award.
'It's honestly, it's pretty surreal. And it's kind of like a weird, full-circle moment for me. You know, I wrote the nomination for one of our CASA volunteers here back in 2019, and he won. So I've already been to the ceremony, but now I guess I get to sit up front and stand on the stairs and get an award,' Tyler Smay, Program Director of CASA of the Laurel Highlands said.
CASA stands for Court Appointed Special Advocate. It's part of a nationwide non-profit network. Smay said that CASA is everywhere in America except for North Dakota. He also said that Pennsylvania has just over 20 CASA programs.
CASA volunteers are usually appointed by judges to advocate for children's best interests.
'I like to say it's not your standard show up on a Saturday morning and get a t-shirt, and I do tons of that too. And that's just as important. But it's a different opportunity. You know, these volunteers are making really great connections with children and youth and families and providers,' Smay said.
Proposed bill would improve transparency, protect Pennsylvania seniors
Smay has around eight years of experience as Program Director. This year, for his work in child advocacy, he'll receive a Blue Ribbon Champion Award next Wednesday in Harrisburg.
'In Tyler's case, you know, he really, is kind of set apart from all the remarkable people who work in CASA statewide. His program alone had, 95% of all the volunteers stay for five years or longer. That's almost unheard of,' Angela Liddle, President and CEO of PA Family Support Alliance said.
Being a CASA volunteer isn't as easy as it sounds. The workload can be challenging.
'The number of substantiated abuse cases in 2023 was 4,720 cases. That's a lot of families. That's a lot of children. And then, as I said, 57 fatalities. So what we know is that without folks like Tyler, and all the Blue Ribbon champs, our numbers would be much higher,' Liddle said.
According to the PA Family Support Alliance, PFSA staff, board of directors, statewide and local advocates, officials, and corporate supporters will plant 4,720 blue flags to represent the number of substantiated child abuse cases and 57 black flags to represent the number of child deaths due to child abuse in the state in 2023.
'There are tougher days. You read some stories. And I think about it sometimes in court because sometimes I'm in court when, you know maybe, children are being removed from their parents temporarily for their own safety and realizing I'm probably here witnessing the worst day of someone's life. But ultimately, the impact of having that early childhood intervention and providing services to a youth when they're young; I think is incredibly valuable,' Smay said.
Flag planting will begin at 9 a.m. at the corner of 3rd & State Street in Harrisburg.
If you suspect abuse, report it to ChildLine, the state's 24/7 reporting hotline at (800)-932-0313.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Neighbour's court battle over tree
A long-running tussle between neighbours over a pine tree and a crumbling retaining wall has finally ended, with a court ordering both parties to share costs for the fix-up. The brouhaha between Vince and Natalie Battiato of 20 Kanangra Ave and Faye Clifton of 22 Kanangra Ave in the coastal NSW town of Corlette escalated into a legal stoush because of the dilapidated wall that splits the two properties. The wall needed to be fixed and the neighbours could not agree on who should pay. The Battiatos contended that the roots of an old pine tree, which has since been removed, on Ms Clifton's property was the main contributor to the damage to the wall. But Ms Clifton shot back and argued the age of the wall was the central factor underpinning its dilapidation. In their application to the NSW Land and Environment Court, the Battiatos said Ms Clifton should remove all remaining trees on her property to facilitate the reconstruction of the wall and then pay for the fix-up. They also wanted her to bear all court costs. In her submission, Ms Clifton pushed for a 'just and fair outcome to a lengthy ongoing dispute', court documents show. She asked for costs to be shared between the parties for the reconstruction job. Acting Commissioner Peter Nichols AC, settling the dispute, visited the site and concluded age was the primary cause of the wall's dilapidation. But he added the tree had also likely caused some damage. 'The tree has been shown to have exacerbated damage to the section of the retaining wall, thus engaging the court's jurisdiction, however orders made for any compensation are a matter of discretion,' he said. 'Given the nature of the retaining wall, it appears that, in the main, the dilapidation was a function of the age and inappropriate design and construction materials of the retaining wall.' In his decision, handed down this week, Dr Nichols upheld the application from the Battiatos but only 'in part'. He ordered Ms Clifton to remove seven trees from her property, including tree stumps, trunks and roots 'with a diameter of greater than 100mm located within 200mm of the shared property boundary between 20 and 22 Kanangra Ave'. The trees are camellia, lemon and pine trees. But he ordered for the wall reconstruction costs to be split '50-50'. 'Within 365 days of the date of these orders the applicants (Battiatos) and respondent (Ms Clifton) are to arrange and pay for the design and construction of the replacement retaining wall, including obtaining all necessary approvals from Port Stephens Council … sharing the costs 50-50,' he said. The neighbours were ordered to swap quotes beforehand to find the cheapest option from 'suitably qualified and experienced building contractors'. Further, Dr Nichols ordered the parties to construct a new boundary fence on the top of the new retaining wall on the shared property boundary, splitting the costs 50-50. Legislation within the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours Act) from 2006 and the Dividing Fences Act from 1991 covered the dispute. Port Stephens Council sits north of Newcastle in NSW's Hunter Valley region. Corlette lies next to famous Nelson Bay, a popular tourist destination in the region.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Rogers County raises most money for CASA through Paper Doll Project
For the second consecutive year, Rogers County raised the most money in a six-county drive to benefit Court Appointed Special Advocates of Northeast Oklahoma. CASA, an organization of volunteers who advocate in court for kids in difficult situations, gathers donations each spring from its Paper Doll Project. Individuals or groups in Rogers, Craig, Delaware, Mayes, Ottawa and Washington counties give anywhere from $100 to $1,000 to receive child-sized wooden dolls to dress, name and display. Marketing Coordinator Mark Ogle came to the Rogers County Commissioners' meeting Monday to present a trophy to Rogers County for financing the most dolls. Ogle said in addition to funding CASA's operations, the dolls help foster kids because the kids will now receive the clothes donors bought for their dolls to wear. "It is a collaboration among the communities and all the counties," Ogle said. "It does get competitive, so you all won and for a second year over, so that's quite an accomplishment, and a lot of credit to Rogers County and all the businesses and organizations that joined in." Donors funded about 200 dolls this year, Ogle said. Also at Monday's meeting, the commissioners put out to bid a project to build a storage facility for Rogers County Emergency Management. District 2 Commissioner and Chairman Steve Hendrix said the project is part of an American Rescue Plan Act award that also funded a command center trailer for Emergency Management. Bid documents call for a 5,500-square-foot, one-story structure adjacent to the Rogers County 911 Center on State Highway 88. "Finally," Hendrix said after the commissioners voted to approve letting the bid. "Emergency Management has equipment strung out everywhere. We're going to finally get a place to put it." Anyone interested in submitting a bid should contact Samantha Sherman, purchasing clerk for the Rogers County Clerk's Office, at 918-923-4429 or purchasing@ Developers may purchase or view a set of the building plans at the Rogers County Clerk's office, 200 S. Lynn Riggs Blvd. in Claremore. The commissioners also chose Burgess Co. to replace a malfunctioning accordion fire door on the fourth floor of the Rogers County Courthouse. The county had previously let this project but received no bid offers. Doug Presley, director of the Rogers County Maintenance Department, instead sought phone bids and received three. Burgess' $49,412 offer was the low bid.
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
In Our View: Supreme Court is right
On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court made the correct decision not to accept a Maryland case that banned AR-15 semiautomatic assault weapons. These are the types of guns used in high-profile mass killings. The Court also declined to accept a Rhode Island case that banned high-capacity magazines. This means the laws in both states will take effect. Similar legislation and litigation has been going on around the country due to recent high-profile shootings. The Firearms Policy Coalition, a gun rights group against the two laws, issued a statement saying 'they are disappointed members of the Supreme Court did not have the judicial courage to do their most important job and enforce the Constitution.' We disagree. The Supreme Court did do its job. The Court declined hearing either of these cases. The Supreme Court is not bound to hear every case. In fact, it overwhelmingly rejects most cases which allows lower court decisions stand. It takes four members to vote to accept a case for a hearing. Currently, the U.S. Supreme Court operates on a 6-3 conservative majority. The court indicated it is likely to take up similar legislation in the future. The court has been reluctant to tamper with what many view as gun rights. Justice Kavanaugh wrote in a separate statement that the ruling upholding the Maryland ban is 'questionable.' In 2022, the Supreme Court made a major ruling that, for the first time, the right to bear arms is expanded outside the home. Justice Thomas, Justice Alito and Justice Gorsuch wanted to hear the Maryland case. The Maryland law bans what it calls 'weapons of war,' outlawing guns like the M16 and AR-15. It became law in 2013. That was after the Sandy Hook school massacre that killed 20 children and six adults. The Rhode Island law prohibits people from owning magazines that contain more than 10 bullets. In a case this year, the Supreme Court upheld a Biden-era ruling that banned 'ghost gun' kits that can be assembled to make firearms. In July of last year, the Supreme Court upheld a ban on persons owning firearms that have domestic restraining orders against them. To be sure, these gun-related issues will continue to come before the court. We are surprised such a conservative court ruled the way they did in this matter. Or, could it be the Supreme Court is just doing its job?
