Republicans and Democrats both didn't want to talk about Sittenfeld's political future
If he wanted to, of course.
Sittenfeld didn't say anything publicly on Thursday about his future plans now that his federal corruption case is behind him. Those close to him also weren't talking.
Does the man who people once saw as the frontrunner for Cincinnati mayor and one of the region's rising Democratic stars now have a political future again?
Republicans and Democrats in Cincinnati seemed united in not wanting to say much about Sittenfeld or his political future, if there is any.
The pardon by a Republican president of a Democratic politician has put both parties in an awkward position.
As for Sittenfeld himself, he did not respond to messages from The Enquirer seeking comment.
In a letter he wrote to the judge in 2023 before he was sentenced to 16 months in federal prison, Sittenfeld said his focus was no longer on his personal ambition but "now about my family life, my faith and about helping others who are enduring life's crucibles.'
He still had $850,493 in his campaign committee's coffers as of his last filing in January 2025, according to records with the Hamilton County Board of Elections.
His past conviction and Trump endorsement doesn't disqualify him from a future run a public office, even in a city where Trump lost by a three-to-one margin, said David Niven, the University of Cincinnati political professor. But Niven doesn't think you'll see Sittenfeld campaign signs anytime soon based on his past statements and the fact that his previous political life almost cost him everything.
"I think he could if he wanted it," Niven said. "People love a redemption story. He obviously demonstrated a capacity to connect with people. But I don't see him on the comeback trail."
Cincinnati Vice Mayor Jan-Michele Lemon Kearney, who served with Sittenfeld on city council for less than a year in 2020 before Sittenfeld was suspended from council, had more to say than most.
In a texted statement to The Enquirer, she saw some future for Sittenfeld in the city but didn't specify what.
"There is more work to do, and with his legal matters behind him, P.G is now able to get back to work in some way for the people of Cincinnati," Kearney said.
She praised Sittenfeld's past contributions including to the "underserved communities" and pushing for affordable housing. She said Sittenfeld was working to establish a civil rights commission when he resigned from city council.
Many people who knew Sittenfeld and worked alongside him didn't publicly celebrate or condemn the pardon. Democratic Rep. Greg Landsman, who served on Cincinnati City Council with Sittenfeld, released a statement saying he didn't know much about the pardon.
"I know what you all know, which is what I'm reading," Landsman said. "I'll wait to learn more, and may have more to say then. In the meantime, I don't know much, other than what I'm reading in the news."
One of the region's more prominent Democratic funders and Sittenfeld supporter, philanthropist Richard Rosenthal, told The Enquirer it was better not to say anything.
"There's stuff that I'm thinking about, but I don't think that it would be helpful to your readers, or to P.G. or to my family for me to comment on the pardon," Rosenthal said.
Republicans who were not sympathetic to Sittenfeld during his political career were reticent to say much about Trump's decision to pardon Sittenfeld. Hamilton County GOP Chairman Russ Mock sent a statement to The Enquirer that gave Trump credit but also expressed concerns about the pardon.
"President Trump certainly knows about how federal and state corruption prosecutions can be wielded as political weapons, but it could undermine anti-corruption efforts locally, especially as the original conviction was based on a jury trial with substantial evidence," Mock said.
When asked for an interview to elaborate, Mock said he didn't have time. Ohio Republican Party Chairman Alex Triantafilou, who was the Hamilton County chair when Sittenfeld was on city council, did not respond to a message seeking comment.
Few of the all-Democratic, nine-member Cincinnati City Council had much to say. The nine members were elected with the pledge of rebuilding public trust in the wake of the corruption scandals that led to the arrest of Sittenfeld and two others Democratic members, Jeff Pastor and Tamaya Dennard.
"There's no upside to commenting on that thing," said Cincinnati Councilman Mark Jeffreys, one of nine Democratic city council members.
City council members Scotty Johnson, Anna Albi, Meeka Owens and Cincinnati's Democratic Mayor Aftab Pureval declined to comment when asked by The Enquirer on Thursday about Sittenfeld.
Councilman Seth Walsh wouldn't speculate on Sittenfeld's future.
"The corruption scandal that happened is an incredible black mark that happened on Cincinnati, period," Walsh said. "Whether he has a political future, whether any of the individuals that are involved in it have any future with Cincinnati, is less relevant to me than the work that needs to happen to rebuild the public trust."
This article originally appeared on Cincinnati Enquirer: PG Sittenfeld's political future uncertain with Trump's pardon
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
26 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Gavin Newsom, Kathy Hochul Issue Warnings After Texas Redistricting Vote
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Democratic Governors Gavin Newsom and Kathy Hochul of California and New York, respectively, issued brief warnings to Texas after the Republican-led state legislature voted Wednesday evening to advance a controversial congressional redistricting plan. Newsweek reached out to GOP Texas Governor Greg Abbott's office via email for comment. Why It Matters The vote occurred after weeks of partisan standoffs in Austin, including a Democratic walkout, as it heightened concerns that states could spark a mid‑decade redistricting "arms race" ahead of the 2026 midterms. Texas Republicans said the map could produce as many as five additional GOP‑leaning seats; Democrats said they would mount legal challenges and urged broader pushback from governors and allies. The Lone Star State's GOP also felt partisan pressure and backing from President Donald Trump to press the plan further along and approve it. What To Know Posting to X after the vote passed, Newsom said, "It's on, Texas." Hochul also said in a post to X, "Game on." The Texas House approved the proposed congressional map by an 88-52 party‑line vote, advancing the legislation to the state Senate, where passage is expected. It's on, Texas. — Gavin Newsom (@GavinNewsom) August 20, 2025 What People Are Saying Trump on Truth Social Tuesday: "CONGRATULATIONS TEXAS! The July Border Statistics are in and, once again, they are the LOWEST RECORDED NUMBERS IN UNITED STATES HISTORY. The U.S. Border Patrol reported ZERO releases of Illegal Aliens into the Country. Texas' Border is Safe and Secure, and the entire World knows it. All we need to do is keep it this way, which is exactly why Texas Republicans need to help us WIN the 2026 Midterm Elections, and pass their new Bill, AS IS, for the ONE BIG, BEAUTIFUL CONGRESSIONAL MAP! "With the Texas House now in Quorum, thanks to GREAT Speaker Dustin Burrows, I call on all of my Republican friends in the Legislature to work as fast as they can to get THIS MAP to Governor Greg Abbott's desk, ASAP. Thank you for your attention to this matter!" This is a developing story that will be updated with additional information.


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Miranda Devine: Childish Rhode Island prosecutor is latest example of entitled Dems thinking they are above the law
Democrats love saying: 'No one is above the law.' But that is psychological projection, because we keep seeing entitled Democrats behaving as if they are above the law, pulling rank on cops and generally behaving like entitled brats who think the rules apply to everyone except their precious selves. Exhibit A this week is Rhode Island Assistant Attorney General Devon Flanagan Hogan, whose drunken antics while resisting arrest outside the upscale Clarke Cooke House in Newport is the latest example of a new genre of viral content: brats resisting arrest. Advertisement Police bodycam videos go viral because we all love seeing these people get their comeuppance. The incident unfolded at around 9:51 p.m. last Thursday, Aug. 14, when Flanagan, 34, her friend from college, Veronica Hannan, who's a senior manager at PepsiCo, and Veronica's poor husband, financial advisor Dan Hannan, were asked to leave Clarke Cooke House for unknown reasons. Judging by the belligerence of the women, it's not hard to guess why. The bodycam begins as police arrive to find the women out in front of the restaurant. Flanagan, wearing a short red jumpsuit, is wagging her finger and demanding that the officer stop the bodycam: 'Protocol is you turn it off if a citizen requests you turn it off.' Advertisement The cop tries to be reasonable: 'So they want you guys to leave. Let's just leave. Let's make it easy.' But Flanagan is determined to pull rank. Veronica, in a yellow body hugging satin dress, keeps telling the cop Flanagan is a lawyer. Poor Dan implores: 'Can we all talk?' He is nattily dressed in a brown suit, because Clarke Cooke House, judged by Food & Wine Magazine as 'by far the most sophisticated restaurant in Newport,' has a dress protocol: 'Gentlemen, please, jackets required.' Rule-breakers But despite his sartorial compliance, the women are in no mood to comply with any rules. Advertisement The cop approaches an outdoor host table, where three worried-looking restaurant staffers are watching. Bodycam footage shows Flanagan placed into a police cruiser during her tirade. AP 'Do you guys just want them out?' he asks. 'Do you want them trespassed?' 'Anything we can do,' says a staffer, placing his hands together in a prayerful gesture. 'I just need them out. Cuff them. Please. It's the only way.' Advertisement The cop returns to the two women and Flanagan keeps barking at him about 'protocol.' 'OK, so you're trespassing so we gotta leave now, unless you want to be in handcuffs,' the cop says. 'We're not trespassing,' Flanagan responds sternly, as if she is lecturing a witness in court. 'You haven't notified us that we're trespassing, number one.' 'What did I just tell you,' says the cop. 'You're trespassing. Let's go. I don't want to arrest you guys.' At this stage they could just turn around and go home. But no, Flanagan was going to teach this cop some respect. 'You're not going to arrest us. Number two, the protocol is . . .' She keeps lecturing him. Veronica wags her finger in his face. Poor Dan is squirming in the background. Advertisement 'Your protocol is if I ask you to turn off the bodycam you have to turn it off and that's your protocol,' Flanagan insists, infuriated that this cop isn't obeying her instruction 'She's a f–king lawyer so she knows,' says Veronica. The cop's patience is wearing thin. 'Well, that's bulls–t lawyer stuff so that's not true. We gotta go.' Advertisement Flanagan lets rip with her trump card: 'I'm an AG. I'm an AG.' 'Good for you,' says the cop. 'I don't give a s–t.' And here is the moment in the video where all rational Americans let out an almighty cheer. Amen, bravo, attaboy! Advertisement The bodycam ends minutes later after unseemly scenes of both women screaming as they are handcuffed and thrown in the back of cruisers. Full meltdown Veronica then has a full meltdown, kicking and running away and refusing to get into the car while screaming 'No! No! Babe! Babe,' at poor Dan. But he is sensible enough to obey the cop's direction to stand back. All you hear from him is a calm voice: 'I'm right here. I'm right here,' as his wife thrashes around like a madwoman. A little earlier, poor Dan had tried to defend the honor of the ladies, when the cop turned to him and said in exasperation: 'Can you get your children out of here? What are you doing?' 'Excuse me,' snapped a very offended Veronica, while Dan stammered: 'They're two full grown women and mothers.' Advertisement But honestly, they were behaving like children having a tantrum, only with an extra dose of narcissism, condescension, arrogance and a grandiose sense of privilege. The last we see of Flanagan is in the back of the cruiser shrieking: 'Buddy, you're going to regret this. You're going to regret it. I'm an A . . .' The door slamming in her face before she gets out the 12th 'I'm an AG' is one of the most satisfying moments in bodycam history. That cop is all of us, fed up with Democrats pulling rank, acting superior while behaving irrationally. We don't want to live in their world anymore. But unlike the rest of us, the cop could do something about it. All we can do is vote, or move out of the blue cities they've trashed. Flanagan and Hannan were charged with willful trespass, disorderly conduct and resisting arrest, according to Newport police. First thing the next morning, Flanagan's boss, Rhode Island Attorney General Peter Neronha, made her come into his office and watch the bodycam footage of her arrest. Oh, to have been a fly on the wall. 'Look, she's put me in a bad position,' he said in an interview with WPRO radio Tuesday. 'She's embarrassed herself, humiliated herself, treated the Newport Police Department horribly.' He wouldn't be drawn on whether she would be fired, saying only: 'There will be a suspension without pay, if I retain her, for sure. So she's not going to continue as if nothing happened . . . 'I think it's alcohol-related,' he added. No kidding. But alcohol is not an excuse. It simply acts as a truth serum, amplifying character traits like the pervasive sense of entitlement that seems to afflict Democrats like Flanagan, or the pink-shirted DOJ official, Sean Charles Dunn, who threw a Subway sandwich at an ICE agent in DC in a fit of foul-mouthed rage. All they're doing is losing hearts and minds, as shown by the fact that, for the first time since 2018, more new voters nationwide chose to be Republicans than Democrats last year, according to a mournful story in The New York Times. These people need to grow up and stop thinking the world revolves around them. America is tired of their tantrums.


CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
Colorado lawmakers to consider suspending the reintroduction of gray wolves in the state
Since voters approved the reintroduction of gray wolves in Colorado in 2023, it's led to a firestorm of controversy. In addition to wolves killing livestock, the program itself has cost taxpayers $3.5 million -- nearly four times what voters were told it would cost. Democratic state Sen. Dylan Roberts says it's time to temporarily put the brakes on the program. "Bringing in new wolves will only make those costs continue to grow because new wolves mean more resources needed for conflict minimization, more payments to ranchers for losing livestock," Roberts told CBS Colorado. Roberts -- whose district has been especially impacted by wolves -- is among a bipartisan group of lawmakers sponsoring a bill that would prevent the state from bringing any new wolves to Colorado for one year to give Colorado Parks and Wildlife time to work out some of the problems with reintroduction. "And let some of the programs by CPW get in place to make the program successful in the long run," Roberts said. Ryan Sedgeley with the Endangered Species Coalition says the program is already successful. "The program, altogether, is going well," Sedgeley asserted. "We seem to only ever hear about the negative things that are happening, but, if you look at it, we have wolves on the ground. We have pups this year." Sedgely says the bill is about advancing a personal grievance and is an affront to voters. "It is a ultimately a delay tactic, where it seems like [Roberts] is just waiting to try get to a new governor to try to kill the program completely,: Sedgley said. "We see right through that and don't want see that happen." Roberts denies trying to kill the program. "I'm doing my job as a legislator," Roberts said. "This is not personal. This is based in very sound policy and financial consideration." The bill would save the state about $264,000 that would go to help offset the cost of health insurance, especially in mountain communities like Roberts' district. There, rates on the state exchange are expected to rise by up to 38% when federal subsidies expire at the end of 2025. Sedgeley supports more funding for health care, just not from the wolf program. He believes there are better places to look for that money. The office of Gov. Jared Polis says he also opposes suspending the program saying. In a statement, the governor's office said, "This backdoor effort to prevent the will of the voters to establish a self-sustaining wolf population in Colorado from being implemented won't save money; it just moves a small amount of money for wolf reintroduction to an unrelated issue without decreasing the deficit." The bill is one of more than two dozen that will be debated during a special legislative session that starts Thursday, Aug 21. Most of the other bills address the state's budget shortfall by eliminating tax breaks for businesses. There are also several bills that repeal and replace a controversial artificial intelligence law that was passed in 2024. State Sen. Roberts says the bill accomplishes several goals. "We can still honor the voters' desire but be responsible with our money and have an impact on human Coloradans who need help right now," Roberts said.