logo
Trump urges NFL's Commanders, MLB's Guardians to revert to original names

Trump urges NFL's Commanders, MLB's Guardians to revert to original names

Kuwait Timesa day ago
US President threatens to block Washington's new stadium deal
WASHINGTON: The NFL's Washington Commanders and MLB's Cleveland Guardians are just a few years into their respective team rebrandings, but President Donald Trump is ready for the two franchises to return to their original names.
In a post to Truth Social on Sunday, Trump said that 'a big clamoring' exists for the 'Washington 'Whatever's'' to change back to the Redskins. Similarly, he added, Cleveland should bring back the Indians moniker, claiming it's something that '(o)ur great Indian people, in massive numbers,' want to happen. 'Their heritage and prestige is systematically being taken away from them,' Trump wrote. He added: 'GET IT DONE!!!'
The president then threatened to block the Commanders' deal for a new stadium if the team did not revert to its old name. 'I won't make a deal for them to build a stadium in Washington,' Trump wrote. 'The Team would be much more valuable, and the Deal would be exciting for everyone.'
2030 return
The team moved from Washington to suburban Landover, Maryland, in 1997, but earlier this year reached an agreement with the local District of Columbia government to return to the city with a new stadium expected to open in 2030.
Trump also suggested that Matt Dolan, brother of Guardians primary owner Paul Dolan, lost in the last two Senate Republican primary elections in Ohio - including in 2022, won by Trump's vice president, JD Vance - because the team changed its name.
The Commanders became the Washington Football Team in July 2020 before adopting the team's current nickname two years later. Cleveland rebranded as the Guardians in July 2021. Both moves were made in the wake of widespread protests over racial injustice following the death of George Floyd. In February, new Commanders owner Josh Harris said that the new name was 'being embraced by our team, by our culture, by our coaching staff. So, we're going with that.'
Cleveland, a charter member of the American League in 1901, ditched the Chief Wahoo logo in 2019 - 104 years after the team first became the Indians. The Athletic reported that Guardians team president Chris Antonetti is not focused on the team going back to its previous name.
'Not something I'm tracking or paying a lot of attention to,' Antonetti said Sunday, 'but I would say generally, I understand there are very different perspectives on the decision we made a few years ago ... But it's a decision we made and we've gotten the opportunity to build the brand as the Guardians over the last four years and we're excited about the future that's in front of us.'
Indigenous population's genocide
The Commanders reportedly did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Some fans have advocated readopting the name Redskins out of tradition, but leading Indigenous rights organizations have opposed the name, including the National Congress of American Indians, the Association on American Indian Affairs, and Cultural Survival.
At least one group, the Native American Guardians Association, has supported the name Redskins and the 'respectful use of Native American names and imagery in sports, education and public life.'
The treatment of the Indigenous population after the arrival of European settlers to the US remains a matter of fierce debate. Some historians describe it as genocide, while others prefer the term ethnic cleansing. — Reuters
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump confident US to reach trade deal with the Philippines
Trump confident US to reach trade deal with the Philippines

Kuwait Times

time2 hours ago

  • Kuwait Times

Trump confident US to reach trade deal with the Philippines

WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump voiced confidence Tuesday at reaching a trade deal with the Philippines to ease his threatened tariffs as he welcomed his counterpart Ferdinand Marcos to the White House. 'We're very close to finishing a trade deal. A big trade deal, actually,' Trump said as he met Marcos in the Oval Office. 'He's a very tough negotiator. So far we're not there because he's negotiating too tough,' Trump said. But Trump, in response to questions, said he believed the two countries would ultimately reach an agreement. 'We'll probably agree on something,' Trump said in an appearance in which he spent much of his time attacking predecessors Joe Biden and Barack Obama. The Philippines, a former US colony and longtime ally, was among countries confronted by Trump with letters this month warning of 20 percent tariffs on all their goods coming into the United States as of Aug 1 – up from a previous threat of 17 percent. The trade rift comes despite increasingly close defense relations between the United States and the Philippines, which has seen high tensions with China. The United States last year under Biden deployed ground-launched missiles in the Philippines. Washington has also eyed ammunition manufacturing in the Philippines, despite the closure in 1992 of the US naval base at Subic Bay due to heavy public pressure. 'All of what we consider part of the modernization of the Philippine military is really a response to the circumstances that surround the situation in the South China Sea,' Marcos said. 'We are essentially concerned with the defense of our territory and the exercise of our sovereign rights,' he said. 'Our strongest, closest, most reliable ally has always been the United States.' China and the Philippines have engaged in a series of confrontations in the contested waters, which Beijing claims almost entirely, despite an international ruling that the assertion has no legal basis. Trump has frequently questioned Western allies over their military spending, pondering why the United States should defend them in the NATO alliance. He has voiced fewer doubts about the Philippines. Both Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio in meetings with Marcos on Monday vowed to honor the 1951 Mutual Defense Treaty with the Southeast Asian nation. The Trump administration has identified China as the top US adversary but Trump himself has also boasted of his relationship with Chinese President Xi Jinping. Speaking alongside Marcos, Trump said he would 'probably' visit China at Xi's invitation 'in the not-too-distant future'. He said of Marcos, 'I don't mind if he gets along with China very well, because we're getting along with China very well.' Trump at the same time said the Philippines had been 'maybe tilting toward China' and 'we untilted it very, very quickly'. 'I just don't think that would have been good for you,' Trump said of the former tilt. Trump credited his own efforts and faulted Biden, although he appeared to be referring to a shift in the Philippines since the 2022 election of Marcos, who also worked closely with the Biden administration. Marcos's predecessor Rodrigo Duterte had flirted with closer relations with China and bristled at US criticism over human rights under Biden and Obama. Duterte is facing charges of crimes against humanity at the International Criminal Court over a sweeping campaign against drug users and dealers that rights groups say killed thousands. – AFP

EU to ramp up retaliation plans as US tariff deal prospects dim
EU to ramp up retaliation plans as US tariff deal prospects dim

Kuwait Times

time3 hours ago

  • Kuwait Times

EU to ramp up retaliation plans as US tariff deal prospects dim

Diplomats say EU members considering anti-coercion powers BRUSSELS: The European Union is exploring a broader set of possible counter-measures against the United States as prospects for an acceptable trade agreement with Washington fade, according to EU diplomats. An increasing number of EU members, including Germany, are now considering using wide-ranging 'anti-coercion' measures which would let the bloc target US services and other sectors in the absence of a deal, diplomats say. The European Commission, which negotiates trade agreements on behalf of the 27-member bloc, had appeared on course for a agreement in which the EU would still have faced a 10 percent US tariff on most of its exports, with some concessions. Such hopes now seem dashed after President Donald Trump's threat to impose a 30 percent tariff by August 1, and following talks between EU Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic and US counterparts in Washington last week. Sefcovic, who has said a 30 percent tariff would 'practically prohibit' transatlantic trade, delivered a sober report on the current state of play to EU envoys on Friday, diplomats told Reuters. US counterparts had come up with diverging solutions during his meetings, including a baseline rate that could be well above 10 percent, the EU diplomats added. BRUSSELS: President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen (left), European Council President Antonio Costa (righr) and Canada's Prime Minister Justin Trudeau (left) walk before their talks at the European Council Headquarters in Brussels, on February 12, 2025. -- AFP NEW YORK: Pedestrians pass by a sandwich board outside of a pub advertising it as a 'tariff free zone' in New York.-- AFP 'Each interlocutor seemed to have different ideas. No one can tell (Sefcovic) what would actually fly with Trump,' one diplomat said. Prospects of easing or removing 50 percent US tariffs on steel and aluminum and 25 percent on cars and car parts appear limited. Washington has also rejected the EU's demand for a 'standstill' arrangement, whereby no further tariffs would be imposed after a deal is struck. The rationale, according to diplomats, is that Trump's hands cannot be tied on national security, the basis of Section 232 trade investigations into pharmaceuticals, semiconductors and timber. Accordingly, the mood has pivoted among EU countries, EU diplomats say, and they are more ready to react, even though a negotiated solution is their preferred option. The EU has one package of tariffs on 21 billion euros ($24.5 billion) of US goods that is currently suspended until August 6. The bloc must still decide on a further set of countermeasures on 72 billion euros of US exports. Discussions have also increased on using the EU's wide-ranging 'anti-coercion' instrument (ACI) that allows the bloc to retaliate against third countries that put economic pressure on member states to change their policies. Brought in more with China in mind, it would allow the bloc to target US services, limit US companies' access to public procurement or financial services markets or restrict US investment. France has consistently advocated using the ACI, but others have baulked at what some see as a nuclear option. Trump has warned he will retaliate if other countries take action against the United States. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said a week ago that the ACI was created for extraordinary situations, adding: 'We are not there yet.' The Commission would need a qualified majority of 15 countries making up 65 percent of the EU population to invoke it. It would not do so unless it was confident of passing it, but there are now growing signs of support building, with Germany among the countries saying it should be considered, EU diplomats say. – Reuters

Trump's Golden Dome looks for alternatives to Musk's SpaceX
Trump's Golden Dome looks for alternatives to Musk's SpaceX

Kuwait Times

time9 hours ago

  • Kuwait Times

Trump's Golden Dome looks for alternatives to Musk's SpaceX

Trump's Golden Dome looks for alternatives to Musk's SpaceX WASHINGTON: The Trump administration is expanding its search for partners to build the Golden Dome missile defense system, courting Project Kuiper and big defense contractors as tensions with Elon Musk threaten SpaceX's dominance in the program, according to three sources familiar with the matter. The shift marks a strategic pivot away from reliance on Musk's SpaceX, whose Starlink and Starshield satellite networks have become central to US military communications. It comes amid a deteriorating relationship between Trump and Musk, which culminated in a public falling-out on June 5. Even before the spat, officials at the Pentagon and White House had begun exploring alternatives to SpaceX, wary of over-reliance on a single partner for huge portions of the ambitious, $175 billion space-based defense shield, two of the sources said. Musk and SpaceX did not respond to requests for comment. After Reuters reported initially that SpaceX was a frontrunner to build parts of Golden Dome, Musk said on X that the company had 'not tried to bid for any contract in this regard. Our strong preference would be to stay focused on taking humanity to Mars.' Due to its size, track record of launching more than 9,000 of its own Starlink satellites, and experience in government procurement, SpaceX still has the inside track to assist with major portions of the Golden Dome, especially launch contracts, sources say. Project Kuiper, which has launched just 78 of a planned constellation of 3,000 low-earth orbit satellites, has been approached by the Pentagon to join the effort, signaling the administration's openness to integrating commercial tech firms into national defense infrastructure and going beyond traditional defense players. Jeff Bezos, Amazon's executive chairman, told Reuters in January that Kuiper would be 'primarily commercial,' but acknowledged 'there will be defense uses for these [low-earth orbit] constellations, no doubt.' A spokesperson for Project Kuiper declined to comment for this story. The Pentagon declined to comment. The White House did not respond to requests for comment. Golden Dome's ambitions mirror those of the Zionist entity's Iron Dome - a homeland missile defense shield - but a larger, more complex layered defense system requires a vast network of orbiting satellites covering more territory. In the search for more vendors for the satellite layers of Golden Dome, 'Kuiper is a big one,' a US official said. While SpaceX remains a frontrunner due to its unmatched launch capabilities, its share of the program could shrink, two of the people said. Officials have reached out to new entrants like rocket companies Stoke Space and Rocket Lab are gaining traction and will be able to bid on individual launches as the program matures, according to the US official. Later in the development of Golden Dome 'each individual launch is going to get bid, and we have to actually give bids to other people,' besides SpaceX, the official said. There is an urgent need for more satellite production. Last year Congress gave Space Force a $13 billion mandate - up from $900 million - to buy satellite-based communication services in what was widely seen as one of many efforts to stimulate private sector satellite production. Amazon's Project Kuiper, a $10 billion initiative led by former Starlink managers dismissed by Musk for slow progress, Reuters has reported, has lagged behind SpaceX in deployment. But its potential defense applications - such as communications that could aid missile tracking - have drawn renewed interest as the administration prepares to allocate the first $25 billion tranche of funding authorized under Trump's sweeping tax and spending bill. Traditional defense giants Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin, and L3Harris are also in talks to support Golden Dome. L3Harris CFO Kenneth Bedingfield told Reuters in an interview the company has seen a surge in interest in its missile warning and tracking technologies, which are expected to play a key role in the system. Northrop, meanwhile, is pursuing several efforts including a space-based interceptor, a component that would enable missile strikes from orbit, Robert Flemming, the head of the company's space business, told Reuters in an interview. 'Lockheed Martin is ready to support Golden Dome for America as a proven mission partner,' Robert Lightfoot, president of Lockheed Martin Space, said in a statement. Golden Dome's initial outreach this spring invited smaller, newer Silicon Valley firms seen as nimbler, more sophisticated and potentially less expensive alternatives to the big defense firms to the table - but that was before the Musk-Trump feud upended that calculus. Several with close ties to Trump aside from SpaceX, including Palantir and Anduril - were considered early frontrunners to win big pieces of the $175 billion project. But the Musk-Trump feud has reshaped the competitive landscape. Musk recently launched the 'America Party,' a tech-centric, centrist political movement aimed at defeating Republicans who backed Trump's tax-and-spend agenda. Trump launched the Golden Dome initiative just a week into his second term, pushing for rapid deployment. Space Force General Michael Guetlein, confirmed by the Senate on July 17, is set to lead the program with sweeping authority. Under a previously unreported directive from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Guetlein has 30 days from confirmation to build a team, 60 days to deliver an initial system design, and 120 days to present a full implementation plan, including satellite and ground station details, two people briefed on the memo said. The inclusion of commercial platforms like Kuiper raises security concerns. Its satellites would need to be hardened against cyberattacks and electronic warfare, a challenge that has plagued even SpaceX's Starlink network. In May 2024, Elon Musk said SpaceX was spending 'significant resources combating Russian jamming efforts. This is a tough problem.' Beyond the technical and political challenges, Golden Dome could reshape global security dynamics. A fully operational space-based missile shield may prompt adversaries to develop new offensive capabilities or accelerate the militarization of space. — Reuters

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store