logo
Visa schemes in UK leave Ukraine's war refugees in limbo

Visa schemes in UK leave Ukraine's war refugees in limbo

Independent16-06-2025
Lidiia, a 36-year-old Ukrainian refugee, is facing the daunting prospect of returning to her war-torn homeland after rebuilding her life in Britain. Fleeing Ukraine in 2022 with her newborn and toddler, she now fears that the lack of a clear path to permanent residency will force her back next year.
"Even if they say there's a ceasefire ... I will have in my mind that in five, six years, (the Russians) are going to be back," she said. "And then my son will have to be a soldier. My daughter might be killed or raped."
Lidiia, who requested anonymity to protect her privacy, is among the 218,000 Ukrainians who sought refuge in Britain under special visas since 2022.
As her initial visa nears expiration, and with only an 18-month extension on offer, her future remains uncertain.
According to a 2024 Office for National Statistics (ONS) survey, nearly 70 per cent of Ukrainians in Britain wish to remain, but without a clear legal status, many may be compelled to seek refuge elsewhere or return to their homeland.
With Ukraine urging citizens to come back - it created the Ministry of National Unity last December to facilitate the return of nearly 7 million citizens - and Britain offering no permanent resettlement process, Lidiia feels trapped.
She says her children feel more British than Ukrainian and have close bonds with their community in northern England.
"I want to stay in the UK, 100 per cent. If the UK doesn't want us to stay, I will go back to Ukraine and just hope that we'll survive. There is no other choice," said the charity worker.
'Give people a choice'
Britain has two visa schemes for Ukrainian refugees: one for those with family already in the UK - a route that has now closed - and the Homes for Ukraine sponsorship scheme that allowed Britons to offer accommodation to those fleeing the war.
In February this year, the government opened an 18-month Ukrainian Protection Extension visa to those whose initial three-year visas were due to expire this year.
But none of these schemes offer the option of staying permanently and the Home Office, or interior ministry, has yet to propose further visa extensions.
"Our offer of temporary sanctuary is in line with the Ukrainian government's strong desire for the future return of its citizens, and does not lead to settlement," a Home Office spokesperson said in emailed comments.
Ukrainian support charity Opora said Ukrainians should have the choice to resettle in Britain and could help rebuild Ukraine from afar by, for example, sending back remittances.
"Ukraine will need people going back to rebuild, of course, but closing off options and thereby forcing people to go back will not build a happy cohort of returnees. So give people a choice," said managing director Stan Beneš.
Route to resettlement?
In early June, the European Commission proposed extending temporary protection for around 4.26 million Ukrainian refugees in the European Union until March 2027.
It also recommended member states start transitioning those who want to stay to other legal statuses, for instance by offering work permits and student visas.
Settled, a charity that supports EU citizens and Ukrainians in Britain, urged London to follow suit and increase the duration of the extension visa to 36 months from 18, and also offer resettlement possibilities, as is the case for Afghans and Hong Kongers.
"Ukrainians should be given a path to settlement. We have children who have been born and are growing up in the UK. English is their first language," said Yuliia Ismail, an immigration adviser at Settled.
She said she had seen an increase in Ukrainians wanting to apply for asylum, despite a record backlog, because if they were successful they would be able to stay indefinitely.
In the first quarter of 2025, there were nearly 380 asylum claims by Ukrainians, compared to 570 in all of 2024 and around 100 the year before, according to official data.
"This uncertainty pushes people to the asylum system," Ismail said.
Stuck in limbo
Even with an 18-month visa extension, many Ukrainians are unable secure rental accommodation or work contracts because of uncertainty over their ultimate status, charities say.
More than a third of Ukrainians surveyed by the ONS in 2024 said they were looking for work, and only a third said they were working in the same sector as they did in Ukraine.
A February report by the British Red Cross said without jobs, many Ukrainians were unable to rent properties and were more than twice as likely to be homeless than the general population.
Maria, a 40-year-old single mother from Kyiv living in Scotland, said she could not find teaching work despite retraining to get local qualifications and applying for around 100 jobs.
Maria, who also used a pseudonym for privacy, said employers were not interested in hiring Ukrainians for longer-term jobs.
"It really distresses me. We cannot buy anything new for our home like a wardrobe, even an extra spoon. What will we do if we need to leave? Everyday life is just unstable. I cannot think about what tomorrow will be," she said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump says he is reducing 50 day deadline for Russia deadline
Trump says he is reducing 50 day deadline for Russia deadline

Reuters

time15 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Trump says he is reducing 50 day deadline for Russia deadline

TURNBERRY, Scotland, July 28 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump on Monday said he was reducing the 50 day deadline he gave Russia over its war in Ukraine, saying he was disappointed in Russian President Vladimir Putin. "I'm disappointed in President Putin," he said, speaking alongside British Prime Minister Keir Starmer ahead of their meeting in Scotland. "I'm going to reduce that 50 days that I gave him to a lesser number." He did not give a new deadline.

Furious Trump says he'll CUT Putin's 50-day peace deadline and says he's ‘disappointed' after latest ruthless Kyiv blitz
Furious Trump says he'll CUT Putin's 50-day peace deadline and says he's ‘disappointed' after latest ruthless Kyiv blitz

The Sun

time17 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Furious Trump says he'll CUT Putin's 50-day peace deadline and says he's ‘disappointed' after latest ruthless Kyiv blitz

DONALD Trump has said he will cut the 50-day deadline he has set Russian President Vladimir Putin to end the war in Ukraine. Trump also slammed the tyrant saying he was "very disappointed" with him as he kept up his recent criticism of Putin. 1 The US President made the comments while meeting Sir Keir Starmer at his luxury golf course in Turnberry in western Scotland today. He said: "I'm disappointed in President Putin, very disappointed in him. "So we're going to have to look and I'm going to reduce that 50 days that I gave him to a lesser number." The deadline was set to end on September 2, but now could set to end some time in August.

How do we lead moral lives in an age of bullies?
How do we lead moral lives in an age of bullies?

The Guardian

time17 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

How do we lead moral lives in an age of bullies?

We are living in an age of bullies. Those with power are less constrained today than they have been in my lifetime, since the end of the second world war. The question is: how do we lead moral lives in this era? Vladimir Putin launches a horrendous war on Ukraine. After Hamas's atrocity, Benjamin Netanyahu bombs Gaza to smithereens and is now starving to death its remaining occupants. Trump abducts thousands of hardworking people within the US and puts them into detention camps – splitting their families, spreading fear. His immigration agents are accused of targeting people with brown skin. He usurps the powers of Congress, defies the courts, and prosecutes his enemies. He and his Republican lackeys cut Medicaid and food stamps – lifelines for poor people, including millions of children – so the wealthy can get a tax cut. Hate-mongers on rightwing television and social media fuel bigotry against transgender people, immigrants, Muslims, people of color, and LGBTQ+ people. Powerful men abuse women. Some of the abused are children. Powerful male politicians make it impossible for women to obtain safe abortions. CEOs rake in record profits and compensation while giving workers meager wages and firing them for unionizing. Billionaires make large campaign donations – legalized bribes – so lawmakers will cut their taxes and repeal regulations. Each such abuse of power encourages other abuses. Each undermines norms of civility. Every time the stronger bully the weaker, the social fabric is tested. If bullying is not contained, the fabric unwinds. Those who are bullied – who feel powerless, vulnerable, bitter, and desperate – become fodder for 'strongmen', demagogues who lead them into violence, war and tyranny. This is hardly new. Throughout history, the central struggle of civilization has been against brutality by the powerful. Civilization is the opposite of brutality. A civil society doesn't allow the strong to brutally treat the weak. Yet in my lifetime, I've witnessed a breakdown. I've seen a change occur – from support of decency and constraints on brutality, to tolerance of indecency and support for unconstrained cruelty. Trump is not the cause. He's the culmination. So how do we lead moral lives in this age of bullies? We do everything we can to stop the brutality, to hold the powerful accountable, and to protect the vulnerable. Putin and Netanyahu are war criminals whose criminality must be stopped. Trump is a dictator who must be deposed. Rightwing politicians who encourage white Christian nationalism must be condemned and voted out of office. Pundits who amplify racism and xenophobia must lose their megaphones. Powerful men who sexually harass or abuse women or children must be prosecuted. Women must have full control over their bodies, including access to safe abortions. Police who kill innocent people of color must be brought to justice. Immigration agents must be prohibited from abducting people off the street or from their homes or court houses or places of work. CEOs who treat their employees like manure must be exposed and penalized. Billionaires who bribe lawmakers to cut their taxes or exempt them from regulations must be sanctioned, as should lawmakers who accept such bribes. This isn't a matter of 'left' or 'right'. It's a matter of what's right. Living a moral life in an age of bullies requires collective action; it cannot be done alone. Each of us must organize and participate in a vast network of moral resistance. This is what civilization demands. It's what the struggle for social justice requires. It's why that struggle is so critical today, and why we all must be part of it. Robert Reich, a former US secretary of labor, is a professor of public policy emeritus at the University of California, Berkeley. He is a Guardian US columnist. His newsletter is at His next book, Coming Up Short: A Memoir of My America, will be out on 5 August

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store