10 Best Cars for First-Time Buyers in 2025
How We Chose These Cars
Affordability & Ownership Cost
We focused on vehicles under $25K— best beginner cars under $25k —with low upkeep. Think fuel savings, modest insurance, and minimal depreciation. These rides are meant to be as easy on your wallet as they are fun to drive.
Safety Ratings & Reliability
Your first ride should be trustworthy. Every pick earned top safety scores and comes with a reputation for long-term reliability. That means peace of mind every time you hit the road.
City-Friendly Tech & Style
From 2025 compact hatchback first car options to city-friendly compact SUVs, these models offer easy parking, modern infotainment, and features tailored for urban life—all while looking sharp.
2025 Top 10 First-Time Buyer Cars
1. Toyota Corolla
A classic choice, the Corolla delivers excellent mileage (up to 40 mpg), standard safety tech, and minimal maintenance. It's a fuel-efficient new driver car and a go-to for affordability.
2. Honda Civic
The Civic blends sporty styling with reliability. It's fuel efficient and boasts high resale value—ideal for those seeking a dependable best used car for first timer.
3. Hyundai Kona
This city-friendly compact SUV offers both gas and EV options, bold looks, and advanced safety features. It's a top choice for urban dwellers looking for a crossover feel.
4. Kia Seltos
With roomy interiors and tech-rich trim, the Seltos is a practical, stylish, and affordable SUV—great for first-timers wanting space without hefty costs.
5. Mazda CX-30
The CX-30 brings premium cabin quality and agile handling to the table. It's a compact crossover that feels upscale without the upsized price tag.
6. Volkswagen Polo
A 2025 compact hatchback first car, the Polo offers efficiency, solid safety, and a classy, minimalist interior—perfect for city streets.
7. Nissan Kicks
The lively Kicks serves up personality, good fuel economy, and a crossover stance—ideal for those who want something fun yet functional.
8. Ford Puma
9. Skoda Fabia
Flat-out practical, the Fabia is simple, spacious, and reliable. It's understated but effective—a solid pick for sensible drivers.
10. Suzuki Swift
The Swift is light, nimble, and extremely fuel-efficient—perfect for zipping through tight city streets and parking with ease.
Comparison Table & Specs
Model MSRP MPG / Range Safety Rating Insurance Tier Body Type
Corolla ~$24K Up to 40 mpg 5-star Low Compact Sedan
Civic ~$25K 32–36 mpg 5-star Medium Sedan/Hatchback
Kona ~$23K 30 mpg / 200 mi EV 5-star Low–Medium Subcompact SUV
Seltos ~$24K 28–32 mpg 5-star Medium Compact SUV
CX‑30 ~$25K 28–32 mpg 5-star Medium Crossover
Polo ~$20K 35–40 mpg 5-star Low–Medium Hatchback
Kicks ~$22K 28–32 mpg 4–5 star Low–Medium Subcompact SUV
Puma ~$23K 30–36 mpg 5-star Medium Compact SUV
Fabia ~$19K 35–40 mpg 5-star Low Hatchback
Swift ~$18K 35–40 mpg 4-star Low Hatchback
First-Time Buyer Tips
Insurance Expectations
Expect rates 15–25% higher as a young driver. Stick with low insurance cars for teens like Swift, Polo, or Corolla to keep costs down.
Avoiding Depreciation Traps
Choose models with steady resale—Civic, Corolla, and compact SUVs hold value well compared to trendier but fast-depreciating alternatives.
When to Consider Certified Pre-Owned
A cheap reliable new car 2025 may sound ideal, but a certified pre-owned car under $25K offers added warranties and inspection checks without a full new-car premium.
Financing & Budgeting Advice
Plan beyond the sticker price—factor in insurance, fuel, maintenance, and parking. Whether financing or leasing, a good down payment and low APR are key. For first-timers, consider entry level hybrid cars to offset fuel costs and get eco perks.
Quick Takeaways
Under $25K, high value and low-cost ownership
Top safety scores, ideal for safe new driver cars
Compact hatchbacks and SUVs perfect for urban life
EV and hybrid picks offer long-term savings
Watch insurance rates and depreciation
CPO options add peace of mind
Choose the ride that matches your style and city needs
Stepping into your first car in 2025? Go for a ride that balances affordability, safety, and city-readiness. Whether you choose a top beginner car 2025 like Corolla or Civic, or cruise in a compact SUV, you'll have a reliable and stylish companion. Don't forget to test drive, calculate total costs, and explore CPO deals. Drive smart—your journey starts now.
FAQs
Which are the cheapest reliable cars 2025 for newbies?
Models like Swift, Fabia, and Corolla offer dependable performance without the hefty price tag.
Is the Kona EV a good first car?
Yes—it's a strong entry level hybrid for city drivers with great range and lower fuel costs.
Are compact SUVs better than hatchbacks for city use?
Yes— city-friendly compact SUVs like Seltos and Kona offer visibility and cargo space while still fitting tight spaces.
How much higher is insurance for teen drivers?
Typically 15–25% higher—choosing low insurance cars for teens helps you save significantly.
Is certified pre-owned worth it for first-timers?
Absolutely—CPO offers warranty protection and vetting, giving you a cheap reliable new car 2025 feel without full price.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tahawul Tech
21 hours ago
- Tahawul Tech
Tesla found partly liable for fatal 2019 Autopilot crash
A Florida jury has found automotive company Tesla partly liable for a 2019 crash in which a Model S sedan using self-driving software killed a pedestrian and severely injured another. Plaintiffs had argued the assistance software, called Autopilot, should have alerted the driver and activated the brakes before the crash. Tesla had maintained the driver, George McGee, was at fault and called the verdict 'wrong' in a statement to the BBC, while vowing to appeal. The result means the company will have to pay as much as $243m (£189m) in punitive and compensatory damages. The verdict marks a setback for Tesla and CEO Elon Musk, who has touted self-driving technology as critical to the company's future. Shares of Tesla dipped following the news and were nearly 2% lower when US markets closed. Following the verdict, plaintiffs attorneys said Mr Musk had misrepresented the capabilities of the company's Autopilot driver assistance software. 'Tesla designed Autopilot only for controlled-access highways yet deliberately chose not to restrict drivers from using it elsewhere, alongside Elon Musk telling the world Autopilot drove better than humans', said attorney Brett Schreiber in a statement to the BBC. Mr Schreiber said Tesla and Mr Musk had long propped up the company's valuation with 'self-driving hype at the expense of human lives.' 'Tesla's lies turned our roads into test tracks for their fundamentally flawed technology,' he added. The company was sued by the family of Naibel Benavides Leon, 22, who was killed when she was struck by the Model S at a T-intersection in the Florida Keys in 2019. Her boyfriend Dillon Angulo suffered life-long injuries and was also involved in the suit. The court heard the driver, Mr McGee, lost sight of the road when he dropped his phone as he was approaching the intersection, causing his car to continue through it and crash into an SUV parked on the other side. The two victims were standing nearby. Neither Mr McGee, nor the Autopilot software, hit the brakes in time to prevent the crash. After a three-week trial, the jury awarded $329m in total damages, including $129m in compensatory damages and $200m in punitive damages aimed at deterring Tesla from harmful behaviour in the future. Tesla will be responsible for paying one-third of compensatory damages – $42.5m – and the entirety of the $200m in punitive damages, but according to the company, punitive damages are likely to be capped at a lesser amount. 'Today's verdict is wrong and only works to set back automotive safety and jeopardise Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement life-saving technology', Tesla said in a statement. Tesla said evidence at the trial showed the driver was solely at fault because he was speeding with his foot on the accelerator, which overrode Autopilot, while looking for his phone and not at the road. 'To be clear, no car in 2019, and none today, would have prevented this crash,' Tesla said. 'This was never about Autopilot; it was a fiction concocted by plaintiffs' lawyers blaming the car when the driver – from day one – admitted and accepted responsibility.' While there have been other federal lawsuits involving Autopilot during fatal crashes, the Florida case that culminated on Friday was the first federal one to go to a jury. Last year, Tesla settled a lawsuit over a 2018 crash that killed an Apple engineer after his Model X collided with a highway barrier while operating the company's Autopilot software. In 2023, a California state jury found Tesla was not at fault in a case in which it was alleged that Autopilot had led to a death. At trial, Mr McGee said his concept of Tesla's Autopilot was that 'it would assist me should I have a failure' or 'make a mistake,' and that he felt the software had failed him. Mr McGee has settled a separate lawsuit with the plaintiffs for an undisclosed sum. Tesla has long faced scrutiny over its Autopilot and self-driving technology, and critics hailed the jury's decision. 'Tesla is finally being held accountable for its defective designs and grossly negligent engineering practices,' said Missy Cummings, a robotics professor at George Mason University. The verdict comes as Tesla is battling weakening sales stemming in part from Mr Musk's political activities. Source: BBC News Image Credit: Tesla
Zawya
a day ago
- Zawya
Autopilot verdict deals Tesla a 'black eye', threatens Musk's robotaxi ambitions
SAN FRANCISCO - A court verdict against Tesla last week, stemming from a fatal 2019 crash of an Autopilot-equipped Model S, could hurt its plans to expand its nascent robotaxi network and intensify concerns over the safety of its autonomous vehicle technology. A Florida jury ordered Musk's electric vehicle company on Friday to pay about $243 million to victims of the crash, finding its Autopilot driver-assistance software defective. Tesla said the driver was solely at fault and vowed to appeal. The verdict follows years of federal investigations and recalls related to collisions involving Tesla's autonomous-vehicle technology, and comes as CEO Elon Musk seeks regulatory approval to rapidly expand the robotaxi service across the U.S. "The public perception of this verdict or things like this are going to fuel pressure on regulators to say, 'We just can't let this stuff be launched without a lot more due diligence'," said Mike Nelson, founder of Nelson Law and an expert on legal issues in the mobility sector. Tesla could have a tough time convincing state regulators that its technology is road-ready, threatening Musk's goal of offering robotaxis to half the U.S. population by year end, legal experts and Tesla investors said. Expanding its robotaxi service is crucial for Tesla as demand for its aging lineup of EVs has cooled amid rising global competition and a backlash against Musk's far right political views. Much of Tesla's trillion-dollar market valuation hinges on his bets on robotics and artificial intelligence. Success in the self-driving realm will require winning the confidence of regulators and potential customers on the full-self driving (FSD) software that underpins Tesla's robotaxis, analysts said. "The timing (of the verdict) for Tesla in light of the FSD rollouts and robotaxis is awful," said Aaron Davis, co-managing partner at law firm Davis Goldman. "Now there's essentially an opinion that some aspect of Tesla's business is not safe and maybe the safety that the company advertises isn't what it's cracked up to be." The FSD is an advanced version of Autopilot. Autopilot, which was been updated since 2019, controls speed, distance and lane centering on highways, while the FSD can operate on city streets, helping the vehicle make automatic turns and change lanes. "This case does not have direct implications for Tesla's FSD roll-out," analysts at Piper Sandler said in a note on Sunday, citing the modern iterations of the software. A spokesperson on behalf of Tesla acknowledged the company had received a request for comment from Reuters but had not provided one by the time of publication. REGULATORY ROAD AHEAD Perfecting autonomous vehicles has been harder than expected. The high costs of hardware, years of trial and error, and regulatory hurdles have forced many players to close shop or pivot, including General Motors' Cruise unit. Musk, however, has pursued what he calls a simpler and cheaper path, relying only on cameras and AI instead of pricey sensors such as lidars and radars used by Alphabet's Waymo, Amazon's Zoox and others. After years of missed deadlines, Musk rolled out a small robotaxi trial in June with about a dozen Model Y crossover SUVs in Austin, Texas, each overseen by a human safety monitor in the front passenger seat. While Musk has said Tesla was being "super paranoid about safety", he has also pledged to expand the service fast and make it available for half of the U.S. population in the next five months - a stark contrast to Waymo's cautious years-long rollout. Until Tesla's entry, Waymo was the only U.S. firm to operate a paid, driverless robotaxi service. Tesla is currently awaiting approvals in several states, including California, Nevada, Arizona and Florida. California's department of motor vehicles declined to comment on the impact of the verdict on regulatory approval. Nevada said it held talks with Tesla about a robotaxi program several weeks ago, while Arizona said it was still considering Tesla's request for certification. Both did not comment on the verdict. Florida did not respond. Tesla has typically either won other Autopilot litigation or resolved the case with the plaintiffs out of court. The Florida verdict stands out. Several such cases are pending. The case involved a Model S sedan that went through an intersection and hit the victims' parked Chevrolet Tahoe as they were standing beside it. The driver had reached down to retrieve a dropped cellphone and allegedly received no alerts as he ran a stop sign before the crash. The jury found that Tesla's Autopilot had a defect and held the company partially responsible, despite the driver admitting fault. "It's going to take time to get regulators to move forward and time being more than the end of the year," said Gene Munster, managing partner at Deepwater Asset Management, a Tesla investor. "From an image standpoint, it's a black eye."
Zawya
2 days ago
- Zawya
Tesla, Musk sued by shareholders over Robotaxi claims
Elon Musk and Tesla were sued by shareholders who accused them of securities fraud for concealing the significant risk that the company's self-driving vehicles, including the Robotaxi, were dangerous. The proposed class action was filed on Monday night in Austin, Texas, federal court, after Tesla's first public test of its robotaxis in late June showed them speeding, exhibiting sudden braking, driving over a curb, entering the wrong lane, and dropping passengers off in the middle of multilane roads. Tesla's share price fell 6.1% over two trading days after the test began. Shareholders accused the electric vehicle maker of overstating the effectiveness of its autonomous driving technology, inflating its business prospects and stock price. The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages for shareholders between April 19, 2023 and June 22, 2025. Tesla did not immediately respond on Tuesday to a request for comment. (Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York, editing by Giles Elgood)
