‘Twiggy' Forrest-led business campaign demands Albanese go greener
Labor ducked a fight on emissions at the May election by delaying a decision on the interim target required by the Paris Agreement – the legally binding international treaty on climate change – but the government's Climate Change Authority is expected to force its hand when it delivers long-awaited advice within weeks.
Sources familiar with the authority's thinking expect it to urge a cut of 65 to 75 per cent by 2035, which could add weight to calls for the prime minister to use his large parliamentary majority to legislate an ambitious target, despite the United States turning away from climate action and withdrawing from the Paris Agreement.
The Paris Agreement signed by almost 200 parties including Australia commits countries to reducing their emissions via five year targets to avoid global average temperature increases of more than 2 degrees, and ideally 1.5.
The stoush over Australia's emissions comes amid a global reckoning on climate change agreements as many countries in Europe debate the merits of deep emissions reductions targets after years of sharp rises to the cost of living.
Big business is split on climate targets. The Business Council of Australia, which represents more than 100 of the country's largest companies, is divided between telecommunications firms and banks happier with steeper cuts and resources companies worried about a speedier transition.
As the council debates options, a new coalition of mostly left-leaning companies, called the Business for 75 campaign that includes mining giant Fortescue, has formed to call for larger cuts.
Fortescue, whose founder Forrest accompanied Albanese on his visit to China this month, said it would continue to push the government to have higher ambitions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
West Australian
21 minutes ago
- West Australian
Australian government's huge move on Queen Elizabeth II
Parliament has returned with big changes to the way the government conducts its business, including a new change to how it references the royals. The way that the parliament goes about its work in the House of Representatives is governed by 'standing orders'. Now, those orders have been amended to remove all references to Queen Elizabeth II – even though it's been almost three years since the Queen's death. As the British monarch is Australia's head of state, they are mentioned alongside their representative, the Governor-General, in the standing orders. Labor minister and leader of the House Tony Burke moved an amendment to the standing orders on Wednesday morning that would replace mentions of Queen Elizabeth II with King Charles III. The Queen was referenced at least 15 times in the standing orders, but all of those mentions will now be taken over by her successor. Queen Elizabeth II died on September 8, 2022, aged 96. Liberal Party manager of opposition business Alex Hawke accepted the change but said he was 'reluctant' to do so. 'I will say upfront as a lifelong constitutional monarchist and a great supporter of our constitutional monarchy and Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, we are still in my view in the official mourning period,' Mr Hawke said. 'We do accept, reluctantly, the changes to remove all references to the Queen from the standing orders and replace them with the sovereign.' He called it a 'reluctant but necessary change'. Other changes to standing orders include how long parliamentarians can be ejected from the house and how votes are recorded.
Sky News AU
21 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
‘Sneaky': Albanese government moves to strip questions from opposition during Question Time in display of supermajority muscle
The Albanese government has been accused of attempting to avoid scrutiny under new standing orders which could take questions away from the opposition during Question Time. During parliamentary sitting weeks, Question Time gives politicians the chance to ask questions of government ministers on matters of importance. However with the Labor Party's new supermajority, Leader of the House Tony Burke moved to change the rules on Wednesday, which may strip the opposition of questions. The revised order follows Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's blunt post-election message to his opponents to 'Get out of the way'. Manager of opposition business Alex Hawke has since warned that the Question Time Changes were 'anti-democratic'. 'On the veneer of increased transparency and democratic operation, we have some anti-democratic measures that the government is proposing,' he told the chamber. 'In its first term, this government under prime minister Anthony Albanese reduced the number of questions that we have in question time. 'The average number of questions asked by the opposition went from ten in the 46th parliament… to just seven in the 47th parliament. 'These changes that are proposed by the Leader of the House do something very sneaky.' Under sessional order 65a, the crossbench will be allowed to ask questions 5, 13, 17 and 21 while the opposition will receive 1, 3, 7, 9, 11, 15, 19, 23, 25, 27 and 29. However, because the average number of questions only reached 18 in the last term, this could mean the opposition will get just five questions in before the session ends. Mr Hawke said that the government re-ordering the numbers of question time would lead to less democratic scrutiny. 'When things are going badly for the government, the prime minister routinely guillotines Question Time, as is his right,' Mr Hawke said. 'So there will be less opposition questions in this parliament. As there was last parliament. And there will be less crossbench questions during Question Time. 'That in our view is a sneaky attempt to … reduce questions bit by bit by bit by bit.' With 94 seats of the 150-member House of Representatives, the Labor Party dominates the chamber and its members occupy three-quarters of the seating layout. 'We have a clear mandate,' Mr Albanese said at a press conference just days after the May 3 federal election. 'The message from Australians is to get on with it. If you want more housing, more jobs, more reform — then get out of the way and let us build it.' Opposition Leader Sussan Ley has rejected Mr Albanese's call to get out of the way and promised to hold the government to account. 'Now Mr Albanese is giving interviews, and he's suggesting that we should just get out of the way,' Ms Ley told her party room on Monday. 'Well, we won't be getting out of the way.' The first Question Time of the 48th Parliament of Australia begins at 2pm on Wednesday.
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
Third Melbourne council to hire private security guards as ‘safety issues at their worst level'
An inner-west Melbourne council has become the third municipality to take crime prevention into its own hands by hiring private security to patrol antisocial hotspots, prompting calls for more police resources and funds for support services. After an hour-long debate, Maribyrnong council voted on Tuesday night to support hiring guards to patrol central Footscray after a spate of violent incidents, including an alleged murder in the Nicholson Street mall and the fatal police shooting of a homeless man. The six-month trial is expected to begin in August and would cost ratepayers up to $100,000 for two security officers for 24 hours a week. The decision follows a similar move at Melbourne City Council, which last month made its CBD security guard scheme permanent after a three-month pilot. The scheme costs $2 million for 11 guards per year. Wyndham City Council, in the outer west, also voted last month to pay $372,000 for private security to patrol the streets of Truganina in a 12-month trial. Security guards' powers are limited to citizen's arrests as they are unable to use force, but councils argue that they create a passive safety presence while accompanying the council's local law officers, who enforce on-street behavioural issues such as public nuisance and alcohol consumption. Security guard patrols are also increasingly being paid for by private operators, such as at housing estates in Melbourne's outer suburbs to combat theft and violence and Jewish schools and communities fearing antisemitic attacks. Opposition Leader Brad Battin blamed the government for fuelling a trend of local councils turning to private security to help their communities feel safe, which is costing ratepayers. 'When local councils are forced to step in and fund private security to fill the gaps, it's a clear sign that the Labor government has failed to deliver on one of its most basic responsibilities: keeping Victorians safe,' Battin said.
