logo
PETER VAN ONSELEN: Single photo says it all about Albo's little-known past as a pro-Palestine activist - as he considers a history-making change

PETER VAN ONSELEN: Single photo says it all about Albo's little-known past as a pro-Palestine activist - as he considers a history-making change

Daily Mail​31-07-2025
Anthony Albanese didn't always speak like a diplomat.
As a young MP he led protests, co-founded the Parliamentary Friends of Palestine, visited Gaza camps and accused Israel in Parliament of overreacting to teenage stone-throwers with grenades, tanks and aerial firepower.
In 1998, he even sat down and met, with then-Liberal MP Joe Hockey, the Palestinian activist-turned-president Yasser Arafat.
Today, the Prime Minister operates in a different mode: measured, cautious and concerned with at least the appearance of balance.
He talks of 'humanitarian pauses', supports a two-state solution and frames discourse around Israel's security and Palestinian aspirations in the same sentence.
That shift was deliberate. By 2011 he was criticising council boycotts of Israel as counterproductive.
As he rose through Labor's ranks, his rhetoric softened, but only publicly.
Behind the scenes, colleagues know Albo remains a firebrand when it comes to Palestine and Israel's treatment of Palestinians.
But Albanese's past as an activist isn't without criticism, particularly when examined through a more mature and global lens.
At times, his early focus on Israel-Palestine appeared ideologically selective, condemning Israel fiercely while giving far worse human rights abuses around the world a leave pass.
China's repression of Uyghurs, Syria's war crimes, or Iran's theocratic brutality rarely drew the same passionate parliamentary speeches or solidarity tours.
There's also a question of political convenience. His alignment with the Palestinian cause dovetailed neatly with the values of Labor's inner-city progressive base, a cohort that helped consolidate Albo's factional power.
The line between moral conviction and political calculation was not always clear.
His speeches from the late 90s and early 2000s often lacked diplomatic nuance.
They presented the situation in Israel and Palestine in stark binaries, oppressed versus oppressor, with little acknowledgment of internal dysfunction within the Palestinian Authority, the regional threats facing Israel, or the moral complexity inherent in protracted conflict.
And while Albo's tone has since evolved, the legacy of his earlier rhetoric lingers. For many in the Jewish-Australian community, memories of his past statements still shape perceptions today, creating a deficit of trust that symbolic gestures alone can't repair.
Now, the old Albanese (hardline and outspoken) may be resurfacing in how he shapes national foreign policy towards Israel and Palestine.
Internationally, Western nations are starting to shift positions: France has recognised Palestine, the UK and Canada are preparing to do the same.
Labor's party platform endorses recognition. Jim Chalmers says it is a case of 'when, not if'.
Albo has tried to frame any recognition as conditional. But will he stick to that if time passes and conditions remain unmet?
The PM wants recognition to happen and may reach a point where he drops conditions in the name of expediency.
Crucially, the Trump administration has emphasised point blank that recognition can only be considered following the remaining hostages being released.
Under US policy, recognition before all hostages are freed would be seen as rewarding Hamas, and would complicate broader strategic diplomacy in the Middle East.
Albanese is ready to move, but there are few signs the remaining 50 hostages are about to be let go. A split with Washington appears increasingly on the cards.
Meanwhile, the PM has made symbolic gestures to reassure the Jewish community at home, increasing funding for Jewish school security.
But moving to recognise Palestine before all the hostages are freed could be politically risky at home.
Islamic and progressive communities would view recognition as overdue leadership, but Jewish-Australians overwhelmingly would not.
They are more likely to see it as premature, and the Opposition would certainly raise the political stakes in a bid to ensure the mainstream agrees.
Albanese's activist instincts once shaped his politics. Now they are hidden behind diplomatic wording.
The real question is: which version of Albo will prevail? The old political combatant who demanded justice?
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Labor says Hamas tries to ‘manipulate facts' after terrorist group welcomes Australia's Palestine recognition decision
Labor says Hamas tries to ‘manipulate facts' after terrorist group welcomes Australia's Palestine recognition decision

The Guardian

time38 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Labor says Hamas tries to ‘manipulate facts' after terrorist group welcomes Australia's Palestine recognition decision

The federal government has condemned Hamas for seeking to 'manipulate facts for their own propaganda' after it was reported the terrorist group had welcomed Australia's decision to recognise a Palestinian state. Anthony Albanese announced on Monday that Australia would recognise Palestine at the United Nations next month, joining more than 140 countries – about three-quarters of UN membership – who already recognise a Palestinian state. The prime minister has said Hamas 'will be excluded from the process' of a future Palestinian state. He also justified Australia's decision to recognise Palestine by saying Hamas would be opposed to the move and a two-state solution, and said one of his pre-conditions for recognition was for a Palestinian state to be demilitarised and grant no governance role to Hamas. Sign up: AU Breaking News email Nine newspapers reported on Wednesday that the Hamas co-founder and senior official Sheikh Hassan Yousef welcomed Australia's decision to recognise Palestine, praising Australia's 'political courage' and calling on other countries to 'follow Australia's example'. Nine also reported that Yousef rejected calls to demilitarise or for Hamas to be excluded from future elections. Responding to Nine's report, a government spokesperson urged caution in publicising the words of a listed terrorist group. 'What Australia has done is contribute international momentum towards a two-state solution, which Hamas opposes. We are supporting the Arab League's efforts to isolate Hamas,' the spokesperson said. 'Hamas always tries to manipulate facts for their own propaganda. Media have a responsibility to make professional judgments to not promote propaganda of terrorist organisations to get cynical headlines.' The shadow foreign minister, Michaelia Cash, accused the government of handing Hamas a 'massive propaganda victory' in joining the vast majority of global governments in recognising Palestine. Cash said Albanese should 'hang his head in shame after being praised today by the terrorist group Hamas for his decision to recognise a Palestinian state'. 'Mr Albanese has emboldened a terror group who murder civilians in cold blood and still hold 50 Israeli hostages in tunnels under Gaza. All Australians should be appalled at the massive propaganda victory Mr Albanese has handed Hamas on a platter,' she said. 'Mr Albanese should explain whether he'll still pursue recognition knowing it has the clear endorsement of terrorists.' The opposition leader, Sussan Ley, again pledged a future Coalition government would revoke recognition of a Palestinian state. 'The prime minister said that the reason for his decision was because Hamas would not support it. He used his interpretation of Hamas' position as justification for making a decision, and that is clearly turned completely upside down today, with the Hamas co-founder praising our prime minister for this decision,' she said. Greg Barton, a professor of Islamic politics at Deakin University, told Sky News that Hamas faced isolation by Arab leaders, but that the group was 'trying to spin that in a different way, you'd expect that'. 'It's now very clear, I think, that the recognition of Palestine is completely decoupled from any support for Hamas,' he said. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion '[Hamas] have excluded themselves from any future because of their actions in the terror attack on 7 October 2023 and the international community have made that very clear.' Albanese, speaking in Brisbane on Wednesday before the comments were reported, again strongly condemned Hamas. 'The Arab League, the countries around the region, as well as the international community have made it very clear Hamas has no role … The Arab League have made it very clear that Hamas must lay down its weapons,' he said. Asked about future elections, Albanese said: 'Hamas will be excluded from the process. We've made that very clear ... We exclude terrorists, we exclude Hamas. Very clearly.' Albanese said on Tuesday that the international community, including critics such as the Arab League, could block Hamas from future governance roles, but did not explain how. Shahram Akbarzadeh, a professor of Middle East politics at Deakin University, said Australian pre-conditions for recognising Palestine raise 'lots of challenges', chief among them how to deal with Hamas. He said barring Hamas from a future governing role is 'widely accepted' by Arab leaders, but the 'practicalities' are difficult. 'That's going to be a much harder proposition than disarming Hamas … it will involve a lengthy process of checks and balances,' Akbarzadeh said. The Israeli embassy in Australia has strongly condemned the government's move. A statement on X, attributed to the ambassador, Amir Maimon, read: 'Rewarding those who use terror as a political tool sends the dangerous message that violence brings political gain.'

New Zealand PM says Netanyahu has ‘lost the plot' after Palestine recognition debate sees MP ejected
New Zealand PM says Netanyahu has ‘lost the plot' after Palestine recognition debate sees MP ejected

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

New Zealand PM says Netanyahu has ‘lost the plot' after Palestine recognition debate sees MP ejected

As more of its allies make moves to recognise Palestinian statehood, the issue is dominating New Zealand's politics, with a prominent MP ejected from parliament on Tuesday and the prime minister describing his Israeli counterpart Benjamin Netanyahu as having 'lost the plot'. Speaking to local media on Wednesday, Christopher Luxon said what was happening in Gaza was 'utterly, utterly appalling'. 'I think Netanyahu has gone way too far, I think he has lost the plot and I think what we are seeing overnight, with the attack on Gaza City is utterly, utterly unacceptable.' Luxon said the Israeli prime minister was 'not listening to the international community'. The prime minister's comments are among the strongest words of condemnation he has used against Netanyahu but that will be cold comfort for opposition parties who say the government is lagging behind on recognising Palestinian statehood. On Tuesday, MP Chlöe Swarbrick was ordered to leave parliament during a heated debate, that was called after the centre-right government said it was weighing up its position on whether to recognise a Palestinian state. Close ally Australia on Monday joined Canada, the UK and France in announcing it would recognise a Palestinian state at a UN conference in September. Swarbrick, who is co-leader of the Green party, said New Zealand was a 'laggard' and an 'outlier' and the lack of decision was appalling, before calling on some government members to support a bill to 'sanction Israel for its war crimes'. The bill was proposed by her party in March and is supported by all opposition parties. 'If we find six of 68 government MPs with a spine, we can stand on the right side of history,' said Swarbrick. Speaker Gerry Brownlee said that statement was 'completely unacceptable' and that she had to withdraw it and apologise. When she refused, Swarbrick was ordered to leave parliament. Brownlee later clarified Swarbrick could return on Wednesday but if she still refused to apologise she would again be removed from parliament. Luxon's government has said it would make a decision in September about whether it would recognise Palestine as a state. Netanyahu has been strongly critical of growing international moves to recognise a Palestinian state. 'To have European countries and Australia march into that rabbit hole, just like that, fall right into it,' he said earlier this week. 'This canard is disappointing, and I think it's actually shameful. But it's not going to change our position.' Netanyahu went on to claim Israel was 'actually applying force judiciously, and they know it'. Foreign minister Winston Peters told parliament that over the next month the government would gather information and talk to partners, which would inform cabinet's decision. 'We'll be weighing this decision carefully rather than rushing to judgment,' Peters said. Along with the Green party, opposition parties Labour and Te Pati Māori support recognition of a Palestinian state. Labour parliamentarian Peeni Henare said New Zealand had a history of standing strong on its principles and values and in this case 'was being left behind'.

UN puts Israel 'on notice' over accusations its armed forces are using sexual violence against captives
UN puts Israel 'on notice' over accusations its armed forces are using sexual violence against captives

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

UN puts Israel 'on notice' over accusations its armed forces are using sexual violence against captives

The UN has put Israel 'on notice' over allegations the IDF subjects captives to sexual violence. The intergovernmental organisation's Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said he has significant concerns about patterns of certain forms of sexual violence by their armed and security forces. The alleged crimes included incidents of genital violence, prolonged forced nudity of captives, and abusive and degrading strip searches aimed at humiliation and interrogation. In his annual report to the Security Council on conflict-related sexual violence, Guterres put Israel 'on notice' that they could be listed next year among parties 'credibly suspected of committing or being responsible for patterns of rape or other forms of sexual violence.' The warning resulted from 'significant concerns regarding patterns of certain forms of sexual violence that have been consistently documented by the United Nations,' he wrote. Israel's UN Ambassador Danny Danon described the concerns as baseless accusations. 'The UN must focus on the shocking war crimes and sexual violence of Hamas and the release of all hostages. Israel will not shy away from protecting its citizens and will continue to act in accordance with international law,' Danon said in a statement. Palestinian militants Hamas - whose October 7, 2023, attack on Israel triggered the current war in Gaza - were also listed in Guterres' report on Tuesday as a group 'credibly suspected of committing or being responsible for patterns of rape or other forms of sexual violence' in armed conflict. 'We categorically reject all these allegations,' senior Hamas official Basem Naim told Reuters, adding in reference to Israeli remarks: 'These are certainly new attempts to use lies to divert attention from the ongoing brutal crimes committed by this fascist government and its army against our people in Gaza.' In his warning to Israel, Guterres said he was 'gravely concerned about credible information of violations by Israeli armed and security forces' against Palestinians in several prisons, a detention center and a military base. 'Cases documented by the United Nations indicate patterns of sexual violence such as genital violence, prolonged forced nudity and repeated strip searches conducted in an abusive and degrading manner,' he wrote in the report. While Israeli authorities had engaged with his special envoy on sexual violence in conflict over the past year, Guterres said 'limited information has been provided on accountability measures undertaken in relation to alleged incidents of sexual violence, despite witness testimony and digital evidence of Israeli soldiers committing such violations.' The UN also accused Russia of the same alleged crimes. Russia's mission to the U.N. in New York did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the report. Guterres said Russian authorities have not engaged with his special envoy. Guterres wrote that he was 'gravely concerned about credible information of violations by Russian armed and security forces and affiliated armed groups' primarily against Ukrainian prisoners of war, in 50 official and 22 unofficial detention facilities in Ukraine and Russia. 'These cases comprised a significant number of documented incidents of genital violence, including electrocution, beatings and burns to the genitals, and forced stripping and prolonged nudity, used to humiliate and elicit confessions or information,' he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store