U.S. says it is probing foreign donations at University of Pennsylvania
The U.S. Department of Education said on Thursday it opened an investigation into foreign donations at the University of Pennsylvania, alleging the Ivy League school made inaccurate and untimely foreign financial disclosures in the past.
The university did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
U.S. law requires universities to report donations from foreign sources exceeding $250,000 in a year.
Among information the Education Department is seeking within 30 days from the university were UPenn's tax records since 2017, details on any agreements with foreign governments and foreign entities, and information on university personnel affiliated with foreign governments.
President Donald Trump's administration has launched a widely condemned crackdown against top U.S. universities over a range of issues like pro-Palestinian campus protests against Israel's war in Gaza, transgender rights, climate initiatives and diversity, equity and inclusion programs.
The government has made federal funding threats against top schools. In March, the Trump administration suspended $175 million in funding to the University of Pennsylvania over its transgender sports policies.
The U.S. Education Department alleged late last month that the university's policy on transgender athletes violated federal law that prohibits discrimination based on sex in programs that receive federal funding.
The university, which made national headlines in 2022 when a transgender swimmer competed on its women's team, has previously said it 'has always followed NCAA and Ivy League policies regarding student participation on athletic teams,' and has remained in full compliance with regulations.
Following Trump's executive order to ban transgender athletes from participating in female-only school sports, the NCAA – the governing body for U.S. collegiate sports – updated its rules to limit competition in female-only competitions to athletes assigned female at birth.
Last month, the Trump administration sought Harvard University's records on foreign funding going back a decade and on some foreign ties.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Global News
18 minutes ago
- Global News
Trump's tariffs on Canada, world to stay in place during case, court rules
A federal appeals court agreed on Tuesday that U.S. President Donald Trump's sweeping global tariffs will remain in place while a case is heard — extending an emergency stay granted after a lower court found the devastating duties unlawful. The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found 'a stay is warranted under the circumstances.' It provides a temporary victory for the Trump administration as it hits its first legal barriers for realigning global trade. 'The Trump administration is legally using the powers granted to the executive branch by the Constitution and Congress to address our country's national emergencies of persistent goods trade deficits and drug trafficking,' said White House spokesman Kush Desai in an emailed statement Tuesday. 'The U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' stay order is a welcome development, and we look forward to ultimately prevailing in court.' Story continues below advertisement The U.S. Court of International Trade last month said Trump does not have the authority to wield tariffs on nearly every country through the use of the International Economic Emergency Powers Act of 1977. The act, usually referred to by the acronym IEEPA, is a national security statute that gives the U.S. president authority to control economic transactions after declaring an emergency. The ruling from the three-judge panel at the New York-based federal court in May said 'any interpretation of IEEPA that delegates unlimited tariff authority is unconstitutional.' It said 'the challenged tariff orders will be vacated,' representing a nationwide injunction against any further imposition of the duties. The Trump administration quickly was granted an emergency motion, essentially freezing the decision by the trade court that blocked the so-called 'Liberation Day' and fentanyl-related tariffs. The appeals court upheld that stay but noted the need for an expedited hearing, saying 'these cases present issues of exceptional importance warranting expedited en banc consideration.' A proposed schedule says arguments are expected in court by July 31. That means that countries will continue to be hit by those duties, for now. 5:32 Economist says counter-tariffs on the United States would hurt Canada George Mason University law professor Ilya Somin called it an 'unfortunate decision.' Somin, along with the Liberty Justice Center, represents five American small businesses pushing against the tariffs. Story continues below advertisement He noted that the court did go out of its way to indicate this is not a ruling on the merits, and ordered an expedited schedule for consideration of the case. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy 'We have a strong case, and I remain guardedly optimistic that the appellate court will ultimately see that the president's claim of virtually unlimited power to impose tariffs is blatantly illegal — which is what every court to have considered the issue so far has concluded,' Somin said in an email to The Canadian Press. Stock markets have been in turmoil and supply chains have been upended as Trump used unprecedented presidential power to enact his tariffs. Up until Trump's return to the White House, IEEPA had never been used by a president to impose tariffs. Trump hit Canada with economywide duties in March after he declared an emergency at the northern border related to the flow of fentanyl. He partially paused levies a few days later for imports that comply with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade. U.S. government data shows a minuscule volume of fentanyl is seized at the northern border. Trump took his trade war to the world in April with duties on nearly every country saying America's trade deficits amounted to a national emergency. The president walked back the most devastating duties a few hours later but left a 10 per cent universal tariff in place for most countries. Story continues below advertisement Trump said the 90-day pause would give countries time to negotiate a deal. The president said if countries didn't comply he would simply set tariff rates himself. 2:41 U.S. trade court 'brazenly abused' judicial powers to block Trump tariffs, WH says White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt has said that the Supreme Court should 'put an end to this' and called the lower court's decision 'judicial overreach.' The appeal ruling will consider two different cases that were pushing against Trump's tariffs. One included the five American small businesses against Trump's worldwide tariffs, and the other stemmed from 12 states arguing against both the 'Liberation Day' duties and the fentanyl-related tariffs. At least seven lawsuits are challenging the tariffs. Lawyers for the businesses say IEEPA does not mention tariffs and the U.S. Constitution gives power over taxes and tariffs to Congress. They say Trump is misusing the statute. Story continues below advertisement Lawyers for Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, Oregon and Vermont argued that tariffs make U.S. trade policy dependent on Trump's whims. Thirty-three senators also filed an amicus brief — a legal submission from a group that's not party to the action — in the case, saying the duties would cause harm to small- and medium-sized businesses while also grabbing powers that should be assigned to Congress. 'Small businesses do not have cash-on-hand or capital reserves to pay the increased tariffs, nor can they quickly adapt to them by modifying supply chains,' it said. 'If they cannot pass on the tariff costs to consumers — which would create additional harms for… constituents — many face letting employees go or filing for bankruptcy. Even a few weeks of additional tariffs means small businesses will suffer irreparable harm.' Canada is also being hit with tariffs on steel, aluminum and automobiles. Trump used different powers under the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 to enact those duties.
CBC
26 minutes ago
- CBC
Musk says he regrets some X posts he made about Trump
Social Sharing Billionaire businessman Elon Musk said on Wednesday he regretted some of the posts he made last week about U.S. President Donald Trump as they had gone "too far." Trump said on Saturday his relationship with Musk was over after they exchanged insults on social media, with the Tesla and SpaceX CEO describing the president's sweeping tax and spending bill as a "disgusting abomination." Musk has since deleted some posts critical of Trump, including one signalling support for impeaching the president. He also deleted a post in which he claimed without evidence that the government wasn't releasing more information regarding what it knows about Jeffrey Epstein because of Trump's past association with the infamous alleged sex trafficker who died in jail in 2019. "I regret some of my posts about President Donald Trump last week. They went too far," Musk wrote in a post on his social media platform X on Wednesday, without saying which specific posts he was talking about. Tesla shares rose 2.3 per cent in pre-market trading. Don't support Democrats, Trump warns Declaring his relationship with Musk over during interviews last weekend, Trump said there would be "serious consequences" if the billionaire decided to fund U.S. Democrats running against Republicans who vote for the tax and spending bill. Trump also said he had no intention of repairing ties with Musk. On Monday, Trump said he would not have a problem if Musk called and that he had no plans to discontinue the Starlink satellite internet provided to the White House by Musk's SpaceX but might move his Tesla off-site. "We had a good relationship, and I just wish him well," Trump said. Musk responded with a heart emoji to a video on X showing Trump's remarks. WATCH l A timeline of the relationship, and the rupture: Will Donald Trump and Elon Musk destroy each other? | About That 13 hours ago Duration 15:38 How did two of the most powerful men on the planet — Donald Trump and Elon Musk — go from friends to foes embroiled in a public meltdown? Andrew Chang explains what drove a wedge between them and why it may be in their best interests to reconcile sooner rather than later. Images provided by Getty Images, The Canadian Press and Reuters. (Additional credits: 4:35 - MSNBC/YouTube; 4:37 - CNN/YouTube; 4:29 - CBS News/YouTube) In 2018, Musk declared in a Twitter post that he was "not a conservative" and that "humanitarian issues are extremely important to me." But his political views changed, and in 2024 he bankrolled a large part of Trump's 2024 presidential campaign, spending nearly $300 million US in last year's U.S. elections, taking credit for Republicans retaining a majority of seats in the House and retaking a majority in the Senate. Musk led downsizing, foreign aid cut efforts Trump then named him to head an effort to downsize the federal workforce and slash spending, despite Musk's apparent conflicts of interest leading several companies subject to government regulation. Musk individually or with his companies had faced inquiries into alleged securities violations, questions over the safety of Tesla's Autopilot and Full Self-Driving (FSD) systems, potential animal welfare violations in Neuralink's brain-chip experiments and alleged hiring discrimination practices at SpaceX. Musk left the role late last month after criticizing Trump's marquee tax bill, calling it too expensive and a measure that would undermine his work at the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Musk's DOGE, not a Congress-approved department, took dramatic steps to reshape and shrink the federal government. Agencies were dismantled, and thousands of federal workers were fired, dismissed or reassigned, leading to a spate of lawsuits challenging the moves. As a result of the moves, significant foreign humanitarian aid from the U.S. government was scaled back, leading to concerns from global health organizations. Musk characterized much of that funding as fraudulent, though Democrats charged that Musk statements on specific agency initiatives have largely only highlighted actions he disagrees with politically, such as measures to provide condoms to prevent the spread of HIV/AIDS. Musk's activities led to protests at many Tesla dealerships across North America, with vandalism reported in some instances. "Elon Musk's Legacy Is Disease, Starvation and Death," New York Times columnist Michelle Goldberg wrote, citing the impacts around the world of cuts to the United States Agency for International Development, when Musk announced late last month he was returning to the private sector full-time. Democrats have expressed alarm at members of Musk's DOGE team, who were not confirmed by Congress, having access to sensitive governmental, personal and payment data related to the federal civil service.
National Post
an hour ago
- National Post
PGA Tour-LIV Golf war could be ready to explode with 2026 free-agent frenzy
OAKMONT, Pa. — Expect another big shakeup in the world of professional golf next year. Article content With numerous LIV Golf contracts set to expire at the end of next season, 2026 could be a seismic season for the future of the game. Article content Article content Between now and the end of the next LIV Golf season, players and the league's Saudi-backers will have some important decisions to make. And so will the PGA Tour. Article content Many of LIV's top golfers will have to decide whether they are happy where they are and whether they are ready to once again commit their future to a rival tour that made them unfathomably rich, but in many ways is still trying to gain traction with golf fans and sponsors. Article content On Tuesday at the U.S. Open in Oakmont, Bryson DeChambeau became the first top player to openly discuss this future. Article content 'Yeah, next year is when it ends,' DeChambeau said of his LIV contract. 'We're looking to negotiate end of this year and I'm very excited. They see the value in me. I see the value in what they can provide and I believe we'll come to some sort of resolution on that.' Article content Article content DeChambeau is unique among LIV players as he is likely the only one who has raised his profile and status in the game — largely through his wild success on YouTube — since leaving the PGA Tour. Article content 'Super excited for the future. I think that LIV is not going anywhere. (Yasir Al-Rumayyan) has been steadfast in his belief on team golf and whether everybody believes in it or not, I think it's a viable option,' DeChambeau said. Article content DeChambeau also said that his Crushers team is growing in the right direction financially and that some teams are now making money. Article content Article content 'How it all works with the game of golf, who knows, but I know my worth. I know what LIV brings to the table. And I'm excited for the future of what golf is going to be.' Article content Al-Rumayyan, the money man behind LIV Golf, will also have to decide whether the golf league he clearly has a passion for is accomplishing its goals, or is at least on the path to eventual success. And he'll also have to decide whether another billion dollars or so of athlete contracts (Bryson won't come cheap) is a bridge too far, for, what has so far been, very questionable returns. Article content If the goal was to shake up the game of golf, that has been accomplished. The real goal, however, always has been to get Saudi money and Saudi influence into the North American sports mega-complex, namely with PGA Tour's mega-sponsors and perhaps even NFL owners. Article content That goal seemed close to being achieved with the PGA Tour-LIV Golf framework deal and, with NFL owners such as Arthur Blank and Rob Walton cozying up to the sport and investing in golf's simulator league TGL.
