logo
What's next for North Korean troops fighting for Russia? A possible Ukraine deployment, experts, officials say

What's next for North Korean troops fighting for Russia? A possible Ukraine deployment, experts, officials say

Yahoo29-04-2025

North Korean troops fighting for Russia in Kursk Oblast could be redeployed to fight in Ukraine itself, experts and Ukrainian officials have told the Kyiv Independent, though there is still much uncertainty about the next steps Pyongyang's soldiers could take.
Such a move would have huge ramifications for Russia's full-scale invasion, and far-reaching implications for the international community.
"If the Kremlin sends North Korean troops to the territory of Ukraine it would mean that North Korea is in a state of all out war with Ukraine," Oleksandr Merezhko, chair of the parliament's foreign affairs committee, told the Kyiv Independent.
The lawmaker from the ruling Servant of the People explained that such a deployment would cause "serious legal, political, and military consequences for Russia and North Korea," prompting a stronger reaction from countries such as South Korea and the U.S.
"(Russian President Vladimir) Putin understands that if he does it (U.S. President Donald) Trump will have to react rather strongly," Merezhko said.
North Korean troops have been fighting alongside Moscow's forces against Ukrainian troops in Russia's Kursk Oblast since December 2024, after Kyiv launched an incursion into the region in August of the same year.
Moscow and Pyongyang only officially acknowledged the deployment this week, as Ukrainian troops were reportedly forced out of most of the oblast, though Kyiv has said some fighting is still ongoing.
Pyongyang has deployed some 14,000 troops to Russia, mostly consisting of its special operations unit — the figure includes 3,000 that North Korea sent this year to replenish the casualties taken on the battlefield, the New York Times reported on April 27, citing South Korean officials.
With the battle for Kursk Oblast winding down, concerns are mounting over what the North Korean troops — who have gained valuable experience of fighting on a modern battlefield — will do next.
Former Defense Minister Andriy Zagorodnyuk, chairman of the Kyiv-based Center for Defense Strategies, warned that Moscow likely plans to start deploying North Korean troops to the front line in Ukraine, and that Pyongyang could continue sending more soldiers to Russia as assault troops.
Ruslan Gorbenko, a lawmaker from the ruling Servant of the People who regularly travels to the war-torn east, agreed with Zagorodnyuk's assessment, saying that the North Korean troops' deployment to the front in Ukraine appears inevitable.
'In 2025, we will see North Korean troops as separate units in the assault on the territory of Ukraine,' Gorbenko told the Kyiv Independent, stressing that it is his personal opinion.
But there are other options — Rob Lee, a former U.S. marine infantry officer and senior fellow at the Foreign Policy Research Institute's Eurasia Program, said what Russia plans to do next is unclear, especially since "presumably they could also be used in Belgorod (Oblast)," referring to an adjacent Russian region where Ukraine conducted a limited incursion in March.
There is also a possibility that North Korea may send its troops back home now that Russia has thanked them for their participation in the battle for Kursk Oblast, which can be interpreted as "an air of finality," according to John Hardie, deputy director of the Russia Program at the Washington-based Foundation for Defense of Democracies.
Regardless of where they end up, the experience they have gained by fighting alongside Russian forces should not be underestimated.
Western military experts and Ukrainian soldiers on the ground have previously told the Kyiv Independent that while it took the fresh North Korean troops some time to adjust to drone warfare, they have since made changes to their assault tactics and improved their fighting capability.
"If they are sent elsewhere, they could pose some serious challenges because they have demonstrated they are very good infantry, particularly compared to most Russian infantry at this point,' Lee, who travels regularly to the Ukrainian front lines, told the Kyiv Independent.
'They are very physically fit, they are very ideologically motivated, and they have learned to adapt their tactics to a battlefield with (drones). In particular, if they are employed on different terrain, such as in a forest or city, they may prove to be even more effective."
This would clearly pose a problem for Ukraine if they were redeployed to fight on the front lines where Kyiv's forces are already stretched, and would bolster Moscow's manpower advantage in its already bogged-down spring offensive.
Pyongyang's official acknowledgement it is fighting alongside Russia could mean it is ready to "double down and allow its forces to fight inside Ukraine, on the territories that Russia has annexed and which North Korea recognizes as part of Russia," Hardie said.
They could be deployed to the front in Donetsk Oblast, in the Pokrovsk or Kostiantynivka areas, serving as light infantry, he added.
"It's not a decisive contribution to the war given the relatively small number of forces, but it does exacerbate Russia's advantage in manpower and adds pressure on the Ukrainian defense with North Korean troops, who by all accounts fight very hard," Hardie said, though the timeframe for such a move is unclear.
"Really, it could happen within days, although I think they would take time to figure out how to integrate them with the local Russian units, etc.," he said.
"So it would probably be a matter of weeks, at least."
The consequences of such a move could be immense — up until now North Korean troops have only been fighting on Russian territory, but crossing the border would constitute an act of aggression under international law and Pyongyang would be regarded as being in a state of war against Ukraine, something Gorbenko warned could escalate into "World War III."
Read also: Why Zelensky won't — and can't — sell out Ukraine for Trump's peace
We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cardano's ADA Finds 'Strong Support' After Dramatic Price Swings Amid Heightened Volatility
Cardano's ADA Finds 'Strong Support' After Dramatic Price Swings Amid Heightened Volatility

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Cardano's ADA Finds 'Strong Support' After Dramatic Price Swings Amid Heightened Volatility

The cryptocurrency market is experiencing heightened volatility amid an escalating feud between President Donald Trump and his former head of the Department of Government Efficiency, Elon Musk, over the state of the U.S. economy. Cardano's ADA ADA has also seen extreme price swings amid market uncertainties. After dropping from $0.688 to $0.621, ADA found strong support and rebounded, forming an ascending channel with resistance at $0.644, according to CoinDesk Research's technical analysis model. The technical indicators suggest a potential renewed bullish momentum as the cryptocurrency reclaims the $0.640 level with decreasing volatility. At press time, ADA is trading at $0.66, down about 1.8% over the past 24 hours, while the broader market gauge CoinDesk 20 Index fell 1%. Some recent news within the ADA ecosystem has provided the market with potential catalysts for the token. Institutional interest in the Cardano blockchain continues to grow, with Franklin Templeton, a $1.6 trillion asset manager, now running Cardano nodes. Additionally, Norway's NBX has recently partnered with Cardano to build Bitcoin-based DeFi, highlighting the blockchain's secure design for institutional adoption. The successful execution of the first Bitcoin-to-Cardano transaction involving Ordinals marks a significant milestone that could potentially unlock $1.5 trillion in cross-chain trading opportunities. Technical Analysis Highlights Sharp decline from $0.688 to $0.621 (10.29% drop) occurred on exceptionally high volume. Strong support zone established at $0.620-$0.623 where buyers aggressively stepped in. Recovery formed an ascending channel with resistance at $0.644. Overall range of $0.070 (10.29%) highlights the extreme market conditions. Potential renewed bullish momentum as ADA reclaimed the $0.640 level with decreasing volatility. Hourly price action showed a possible recovery pattern from $0.641 to $0.643. Short-term resistance level established at $0.643-$0.644. Disclaimer: Parts of this article were generated with the assistance from AI tools and reviewed by our editorial team to ensure accuracy and adherence to our standards. For more information, see CoinDesk's full AI Policy.

Trump-Musk feud turns ugly amid threats and insults
Trump-Musk feud turns ugly amid threats and insults

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump-Musk feud turns ugly amid threats and insults

Following President Trump and Elon Musk's social media spat, questions are mounting over how Musk may use his wealth to influence future elections. NBC News' Kelly O'Donnell, Ryan Nobles and Jonathan Allen report more. New York Times technology reporter Kate Conger and co-host of MSNBC's 'The Weekend: Primetime' Elise Jordan join Chris Jansing to examine how Musk 'uses X as a bully pulpit' and how Trump's close allies are actually a 'fragile coalition.'

The 5 Worst Green Energy Projects Funded by Biden
The 5 Worst Green Energy Projects Funded by Biden

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The 5 Worst Green Energy Projects Funded by Biden

Despite the Department of Government Efficiency's failures to cut spending and the president's support for a bill that will add $2.4 trillion to the federal deficit over the next 10 years, some wasteful government projects have been cut under the Trump administration. Energy Secretary Chris Wright recently canceled 24 grants approved by the Energy Department under former President Joe Biden. The action netted over $3 billion in savings. Earlier in May, Wright axed an additional $7 billion of green energy loans approved by Biden. Unfortunately for taxpayers, the savings that Wright has identified are only a drop in the bucket of the wasteful spending that the Biden Energy Department approved. Here are five of the most egregious examples: In December 2024, the Energy Department's Loan Programs Office (LPO) closed a $9.63 billion direct loan to BlueOval SK LLC, a joint venture between Ford and South Korean conglomerate SK On. The loan was approved to fund "the construction of three manufacturing plants, to produce batteries for Ford Motor Company's future Ford and Lincoln electric vehicles [E.V.s]," according to the award announcement. BlueOval has begun or completed construction for these facilities—one in western Tennessee called BlueOval City—and two in Hardin County, Kentucky, known as Kentucky 1 and 2. In addition to allocating millions of dollars in tax credits for the rights to house BlueOval City, the Tennessee Legislature also created the Megasite Authority of West Tennessee, reports Reason's Joe Lancaster. The board was granted the authority to execute contracts on behalf of development, which includes the power to seize private property through eminent domain. In most cases, the board lowballed local property owners, including Ray Jones, who was offered "a measly $8,165" for his acre of land, even though the going rate was $200,000 per acre. There is no set date for when the plant will open. Kentucky 1 has faced numerous occupational safety and health complaints from its workers. A review from The Courier-Journal found "dozens of workplace injuries; hospitalizations related to respiratory issues; unshakeable mold contamination; a bat-infested training facility; blocked emergency exit doors; and chemical exposure risks." The state has opened investigations into the plant, which is scheduled to begin production later this year. Kentucky 2's opening has been indefinitely delayed. Michael Adams, CEO of BlueOval SK, recently told WDRB, that the plant's opening date will be a market decision, but "the market is telling us that Kentucky 2 is not ready." The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law passed in 2021 created a new office within the Energy Department called the Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations (OCED), whose goal is to finance first-of-a-kind clean energy projects through private-public partnerships. One of the largest beneficiaries of the program has been Exxon Mobil. The oil major was awarded a $332 million grant from OCED to "enable the use of hydrogen in place of natural gas" at a textile and plastics facility in Baytown, Texas. At the time of the announcement, the Biden administration said the project would prevent 2.7 million metric tons of carbon emissions per year. While an interesting technology, the project did not need taxpayer support. In the same year that Exxon received this disbursement (2024), the company reported annual earnings of $33.7 billion. The project's funding was canceled on May 30 by Wright. No industry was spared from corporate welfare under the Biden administration, including condiments. In October 2024, Kraft Heinz was awarded a grant of up to $170.9 million from OCED. The award was intended to fund energy efficiency upgrades, the installation of heat pumps and electric boilers, and renewable energy technologies at 10 of the company's facilities. The grant was also rescinded on May 30. Kraft Heinz says it will continue to invest in upgrading 30 of its manufacturing facilities and will invest $3 billion over the next five years "to modernize" its domestic supply chain infrastructure. In October 2024, the LPO announced a $2.26 billion direct loan to Lithium Nevada Corp., a subsidiary of Lithium Americas Corp., to build facilities to produce lithium carbonate—a critical component of E.V. batteries. The facilities will be sited next to and get their lithium from Thacker Pass, a mine site in Nevada that is estimated to hold the largest lithium reserves in the world. The U.S. largely relies on imports to meet its lithium needs. These facilities could reduce this dependence, but that doesn't mean the loan isn't wasteful. The demand for lithium, and lithium-carbonate, is expected to significantly climb in the next few decades as the use of green technologies increases. In 2024 alone, demand for the metal grew by 30 percent. Lithium Americas expects the mine, which began construction in February, to generate $2.2 billion per year in annual earnings. Taxpayers don't need to spend billions of dollars to support a project that the market seems to think will be successful. One of the largest steel makers in the U.S. was another beneficiary of Biden-era federal funding. In 2024, Cleveland-Cliffs, which generated $19.2 billion in revenue that year, was awarded up to $575 million in grants (which are still active) from the Energy Department. One of these awards, worth up to $500 million, would implement hydrogen fuel into the steel making process and install two electric melting furnaces at the company's Middletown Works facility in Ohio. The project is expected to reduce greenhouse gas emissions at the plant by 1 million tons per year and received a $9.5 million disbursement in September 2024. A second grant worth up to $75 million would electrify Cleveland-Cliffs' facility in Butler, Pennsylvania, which produces steel for transforms, motors, and generators. This project got a $19 million disbursement in August 2024. The company says these projects are expected to be live before 2030. While Wright has canceled some of the most wasteful projects approved under Biden, federal backing for favored energy projects isn't going to end under the Trump administration. The Washington Free Beacon reports that the Energy Department is considering financing a $44 billion pipeline in Alaska. The post The 5 Worst Green Energy Projects Funded by Biden appeared first on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store