Public servants' housing allowance increased: new rates effective from last month
Image: Isipingo ratepayers
The Department of Public Service and Administration(DPSA) has officially announced an upward adjustment to the housing allowance for public servants.
According to Circular No. 15 of 2025, the revised allowance, implemented per the Public Service Coordinating Bargaining Council (PSCBC) Resolution 1 of 2025, took effect at the beginning of last month.
Effective from that date, the monthly housing allowance for qualifying public servants will increase from R1 784.55 to R1 900.00.
The housing allowance, as contained in the Public Service Coordinating Bargaining Council (PSCBC) Resolution 7 of 2015 (clause 4.6), provides that the amount of the housing allowance shall be adjusted annually based on the average Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the preceding financial year.
The policy on housing allowance also outlines specific conditions for employees who do not own a home, which include that tenants with legal rental agreements appointed before May 27, 2015, will continue to receive a direct R900 monthly allowance.
The remaining R1000 will be saved in the Government Employees Housing Scheme's (GEHS) Individual-Linked Savings Facility (ILSF), which is managed by the National Treasury.
For employees appointed on or after May 27, 2015, will have the full R1 900 housing allowance diverted into the ILSF, promoting savings towards future homeownership.
Earlier this year, Moses Moshi, the spokesperson for the DPSA, told this publication that every month, an average of R164 million of ILSF savings (Housing Allowance benefit) is processed, albeit not exclusively for homeownership.
He said this included employees who withdraw because of retirement, being medically boarded, end of contract, death or reversals.
Before 2015, when the ILSF was not yet in existence, the housing allowance benefit was being paid directly to employees irrespective of whether they are homeowners or tenants.
From March 2016 to the end of January this year, when employees who are not homeowners had their housing allowance benefit saved in the ILSF, the cumulative savings amounted to over R28 billion as at the end of January this year.
From 2015 to the end of January this year 555 892 housing allowance withdrawals were processed through the ILSF to the value of R11 billion.
The secular said that PERSAL has been directed to effect the adjustments on the system to ensure seamless implementation, while national and provincial departments are expected to fund these increases from their existing budget allocations.
The Government Employees Housing Scheme (GEHS), along with the annual subsidy adjustments, reflects the government's ongoing commitment to improving the living conditions of public servants and to encouraging responsible homeownership through structured savings mechanisms.
According to Moshi, before 2015, public servants received the housing allowance as part of the condition of service benefit for years.
However, he said this allowance was not being used by several employees to acquire homes. Hence, in 2015, the government (as the employer) and labour signed the Public Service Coordinating Bargaining Council (PSCBC) Resolution 7 of 2015, to establish a (GEHS).
According to the department, the challenges concerning the housing allowance benefit, which impact on homeownership by government employees, was that the majority of employees who receive the housing allowance benefit are those at levels 1 – 7 (as at 31 December 2024 equalling to 638 836) and mostly did not qualify for mortgage bonds at commercial banks and also, do not qualify for social housing programmes of government.
'The current finance products are too expensive for most government employees who fall within the gap market. As such, a market product needs to be developed for this segment of employees so that they can also become homeowners.
"This would require collaboration between government, government entities, development finance institutions and the commercial housing finance sector to develop such products that would accommodate these employees market.'
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad Loading
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
9 minutes ago
- The Citizen
‘It's about the court case with Minnie' says Sol Phenduka on the reason behind his suspension
Sol Phenduka said his suspension is linked to a R2.5M lawsuit, which was launched by media personality Minnie Dlamini. After speculation about the reason for his suspension by Kaya FM, broadcaster Sol Phenduka has broken his silence. 'You know what it's about; it's about the court case with Minnie,' said Phenduka, speaking on MacG's Podcast And Chill, of which he is the co-host, on Thursday. Earlier this month, media personality Minenhle 'Minnie' Dlamini launched a R2.5 million lawsuit against MacGyver 'MacG' Mukwevho and Phenduka. Dlamini accused the Podcast and Chill hosts of hate speech and harassment, and in submitted court papers, Dlamini seeks legal accountability. She is demanding R1 million for herself and an additional R1.5 million to be donated to a women's organisation. ALSO READ: Minnie Dlamini sues MacG and Sol Phenduka for R2.5 million over podcast remarks The suspension On Wednesday, Gauteng-based radio station Kaya FM announced that Phenduka was suspended with immediate effect, pending an investigation. 'Kaya 959 confirms that presenter Sol Phenduka has been placed on suspension with immediate effect. This step has been taken pending the outcome of an internal process currently underway,' read a statement shared with The Citizen by Ian Bredenkamp, who handles PR for the station. 'The station is committed to following due process, and no further details will be shared at this stage.' 'I did nothing, literally,' said Phenduka. 'A lot of people assume I did something… I didn't come to work, or I did something wrong at work, or I was unprofessional,' he said. Phenduka said he was suspended for seven days. 'It's a wrap,' MacG responded, adding that the issue with Dlamini was 'an old story'. 'But when the case happened, then they came through. Remember earlier on I said that guy I beat wrote to 5FM, cause obviously it was gonna be a matter of 'you brought the station into disrepute, etcetera, etcetera',' said Phenduka. ALSO READ: Kaya FM suspends Sol Phenduka pending an internal investigation Kaya's new partners He said he was surprised that Kaya FM released a statement on Wednesday. 'I'm surprised because they were like, 'Don't talk about it,' and they drop the statement. So now I'm like, 'Guys, I'm doing a podcast; I'll get asked.'' Co-host MacG said their podcast is always in hot water and asked what changed this time. 'Is there new management or something?' asked MacG. 'Oh yeah, there is new management,' Phenduka responded. He said that United Stations purchased Kaya FM. United Stations became a sales partner to Kaya FM in February this year. 'We are confident this partnership will be productive and impactful. Above all, we assure our stakeholders that this transition will be handled seamlessly,' said Kaya FM's Managing Director, Colleen Louw, after the announcement. United Stations is now responsible for selling Kaya FM's advertising space and airtime to potential clients. This involves marketing and securing advertisers who want to promote their brands on Kaya FM, connecting clients to the station's audience, and driving new commercial opportunities for both the advertisers and Kaya FM. United Stations took over from Multichannel sales house Mediamark, which had been a partner with the station since 2016. NOW READ: Kaya defends Dineo's 'toxic' work behaviour citing 'rank' as the reason
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
South Africa's building plans value falls 3% in first half of 2025: key insights and implications
The Hull Street housing project is earmarked to be completed in October this year. This is according to the Selected building statistics of the private sector as reported by local government institutions published by Statistics South Africa(Stats SA) on Thursday afternoon. The value of building plans passed (at current prices) decreased by 3.0% (-R1 445,6 million) during the first half of 2025 compared with the first half of 2024. It also showed that decreases were reported for residential buildings (-R1 546,0 million) and non-residential buildings (-R1 433,8 million). An increase was reported for additions and alterations (R1 534,2 million). This statistical release contains information derived from the building statistics survey covering a sample of local government institutions involved in the approval of building plans and in the final inspection of buildings completed for the private sector. The value of buildings reported as completed (at current prices) increased by 3.1% (R693,2 million) during the first half of 2025 compared with the first half of 2024. In this regard, increases were reported for residential buildings (R533,5 million) and non-residential buildings (R461,8 million). However, a decrease was reported for additions and alterations (-R302,2 million). The July 2025 Preferred Supplier and Competitor Survey (PSS) report released earlier this month highlighted delays due to late payments, political interference, community disruptions, and a shortage of skilled project managers, especially in provinces like KwaZulu-Natal, Limpopo, and the Free State. It provides insights into construction activity and material supplier dynamics across South Africa. It is based on a sample of 13 projects worth approximately R1.2 billion, mostly awarded late last year, with a focus on education, housing, and road infrastructure. The report tracks the Market Exposure Rate (MER) of construction material suppliers, gauging their participation based on project value. It showed that construction material prices remained relatively stable, with no major price hikes reported, though G1 stone remains in short supply. The use of imported cement (notably Simba Cement from Vietnam) is said to be increasing, particularly in KZN. Last month, Trading Economics said the value of building plans approved in South Africa dropped by 13.3% year-on-year to R 7,496 million in June 2025, following a 13.2% jump in the prior month. It said the decline was largely driven by the non-residential segment, which dropped 48.6% compared with a 4% fall previously. Additions and alterations had fallen slightly by 0.1% versus a 52.1% increase in May, while residential approvals rose 2.4%, down from 3.4% then. Last week, Industry Insight, which provides project lead information to the construction industry, said that in July, the local civil tender market showed its first significant recovery in over a year, with estimated values surging 53 percent year-on-year to R8.2 billion after 14 months of steep declines. It said Mpumalanga led with R1.6 billion, up 147 percent, followed by strong gains in Gauteng, Northern Cape, and Western Cape.
The Citizen
9 hours ago
- The Citizen
Vat-registered schools set for rude ‘wake-up call'
New proposal will force them to deregister, resulting in potentially huge Vat liabilities. A significant number of schools that are currently registered for Value-added tax (Vat) will be forced to deregister from next year. That's if a proposal in the draft Taxation Laws Amendment Bill (TLAB) is passed into legislation. This policy decision will have massive financial implications for schools in the short term, possibly depleting cash reserves and having substantial cash flow implications. It is likely to have a knock-on effect on school fees going forward. Educational services have always been exempt from Vat, but only if the services were supplied in return for school fees, tuition fees, or payment for lodging. However, services were never exempt if the consideration was not in the form of school fees, tuition fees, or payments for lodging. National Treasury announced that the proposed amendment will come into effect on 1 January 2026. The policy intent was 'always' to exclude schools from the Vat net, it says in its reason for the change. WTS Renmere's Vat specialist Duane Shipp says many schools with commercial activities registered for Vat if they were above the R1 million registration threshold. These commercial activities include, among others, the supply of school uniforms or making available the sports facilities, school hall, swimming pool, and hostels of the school to private clubs or individuals. The schools charged Vat on the supply of these offerings, but they were also able to deduct the Vat incurred as input tax on the cost incurred to purchase the school uniforms, treats for the tuck shop, or the construction of the sport facilities or swimming pool. ALSO READ: Huge rates shock could force Joburg schools to close down Vat Act changes However, the amendment proposes the removal of 'school' and 'school fees' from the wording of the relevant sections in the Vat Act. 'The implication is that all supplies of good or services by schools, regardless of whether it is in return for school fees or not, will be exempt under the Vat Act,' says Shipp. A significant number of schools have been registered for Vat and claiming their input tax on capital expansions for more than a decade, if not longer. ALSO READ: Gauteng schools urged to settle electricity and water bills Vat vendor schools Charles de Wet, tax executive at ENSafrica, says the school as a Vat vendor had to charge Vat when renting the school hall or sports facilities to private clubs or individuals. However, they had the advantage of claiming a percentage of their input Vat on capital projects, and they could also claim a percentage of the input Vat on the overhead costs of the assets on an apportionment basis. This includes a portion of the electricity bill for the floodlights, or a portion of the water used for the sport fields. But, once an entity deregisters as a Vat vendor it must repay the input tax claimed on its capital assets, says De Wet. That is the 'exit' tax, he adds. The effect with the forced deregistration is that all the input Vat claimed on capital assets since registration for Vat must be repaid. Treasury has made a concession, allowing schools that will find themselves in this cash flow predicament to repay the Vat liability in twelve monthly instalments, 'or in so many instalments as the commissioner [of the South African Revenue Service] may decide.' This liability may well run into millions for some of the country's private schools, boarding schools, or more affluent schools. 'There is a big wake-up call coming for some schools,' says Shipp. ALSO READ: Temporary rates reprieve for Joburg schools Second time coming A similar proposal was also introduced in the draft TLAB bill last year, but the amendment extended to schools, technikons, and universities. The proposal was abandoned following an extensive public pushback, particularly from universities. This year, the proposal is back, but only targeted at schools, notes both Shipp and De Wet. The proposal does not fit into the structure of the Vat Act, says De Wet. Typically, it is not entities that are exempt from Vat, but rather the nature of the supply – in this case, educational services. 'It is strange that they are deviating from the format of the act. Treasury is now exempting the entity [schools registered under the SA Schools Act] and not the supply,' says De Wet. Policy intent Shipp also has difficulty understanding the policy intent behind the proposal. 'If the policy intent was always to exclude schools, why has the wording of the act [until now] not reflected the intent,' he asks. He also questions the short notice given to schools. Many schools have probably already passed their budgets for the next calendar year. Accommodating this unforeseen Vat liability will create enormous stress on the school's finances. The knock-on effect is that any commercial endeavour in future will come at a 15% higher price tag. The school will be charged 15% for the school uniforms, the construction of a swimming pool, or the tuck shop treats, but it will no longer be able to deduct its input Vat. Interested parties have until 12 September to publicly comment on the proposed amendment. This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.
