
Hitler-inspired teen who planned mass murder at mosque jailed for ten years
He gained the trust of the imam at the Inverclyde Muslim Centre by pretending to convert to Islam
He filmed the layout of the mosque and planned to set it on fire while worshippers were inside
The attack was foiled by police intelligence and he was arrested outside the mosque with weapons and tactical gear
He pled guilty under the Terrorism Act and has been jailed for ten years
A teenager who was inspired by Hitler and far-right extremists to carry out a mass murder of Muslims at a mosque has been jailed for ten years.
The 17-year-old boy, who can't be identified for legal reasons, spoke online about how white people were at 'war' and that he would 'die for my land'.
Police intelligence led to officers finding the boy who was armed with weapons outside the Inverclyde Muslim Centre, Laird Street, Greenock, on Thursday, January 23. STV News Inverclyde Muslim Centre, Laird Street, Greenock.
This included an airgun, which he claimed would keep worshippers inside once he had set the building on fire.
The boy was able to plan his attack after he deceived the centre's imam into believing that he wanted to become a Muslim.
He was, at times, trusted to be left alone in the building which allowed him to make sketches and videos of the layout.
The boy also went as far as to join in with prayers in a bid to convince others of his lies.
He pled guilty to a charge under the Terrorism Act and possession of documents likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism.
On Thursday, August 21, the boy appeared for sentencing at the High Court in Glasgow.
The judge sentenced him to ten years in prison and followed by a further eight years on licence.
Lord Arthurson sentencing said: 'You were attracted to Holocaust denial and had sympathies with the Nazi party.
'You continue to describe yourself as a Nazi'.
The judge said that the attack the boy was planning was a 'diabolical atrocity'.
The crimes took place between December 15, 2024 and January 23, 2025.
The court heard how the boy – who has autism – had become 'radicalised' since the age of 13 by social media channels such as TikTok.
He believed that white people were in a 'war' and he 'developed sympathies' with the Nazi party.
The boy created his own 'manifesto' on his mobile phone in which he said he would 'die for my land'.
'It's good to infiltrate the target be it a mosque or synagogue as they think I'm one of them because I infiltrated the place' Message 17-year-old boy sent on Telegram
He listed a number of 'inspirations' which included Brevik, Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini and Irish fascist leader Eion O'Duffy.
The boy also created a list of dislikes which included Prime Minister Keir Starmer, the prophet Mohammed and Jihadi John – a British militant seen in videos produced by the extremist group Islamic State.
The boy initially had plans to carry out a terrorist attack at his school in Inverclyde.
He recorded himself walking through the school in which he stated he planned to 'liquidate' one of the offices.
The boy also claimed that he would plant bombs under the tables of the school canteen.
He said: 'That'll be funny, watch some reactions, that'll be hilarious.'
The boy planned to attack the Inverclyde Muslim Centre in December 2024.
Prosecutor Greg Farrell said: 'This involved the use of aerosols and lighters to set fire to the premises.'
The boy spoke to the centre's imam online and was later provided with reading materials.
'He was trusted to be left alone in the centre and he took several videos wandering the corridors of the building,' the prosecutor said.
'In one video, he enters a room and his own hand enters the shot, shaped like a gun.'
The boy then began searching images of the centre online as well as weapons and combat clothing.
He went on to speak to an acquaintance on the encrypted messaging app Telegram.
The boy said: 'It's good to infiltrate the target be it a mosque or synagogue as they think I'm one of them because I infiltrated the place.'
He claimed that he could have burned down the centre when left alone but there would have been 'zero kills'.
He told the other Telegram user that he had an airgun that people would believe was a real firearm, preventing them from leaving the building.
The boy also asked the acquaintance to live stream the burning down of the mosque which would be shared with his manifesto.
At the same time, he tried to obtain a rifle licence but was unable to as his local club was closed.
The boy prepared a 'final' manifesto in which he stated he would attack 'tomorrow' when 'the mosque will be at its fullest'.
On the morning of the planned attack, the boy left his home with a rucksack, which concerned his mother.
He messaged friends: 'Today, I choose what my life was and will be.'
The boy appeared at the Islamic Centre but was unable to enter as the door was locked.
Earlier that morning, the police had received intelligence about the boy and were waiting for him.
Officers found him dressed in black clothing and carrying a camouflage military rucksack.
When asked what was in the bag, the boy replied: 'Guns, I'll tell you what's in the bag so you don't get hurt. I don't want to hurt you.'
A German-manufactured air pistol – capable of firing BB pellets – was recovered as well as a magazine which was suitable for the gun.
He also had ball bearings, gas cartridges, four cans of aerosol spray and his mobile phone.
The boy was found to have notepads which contained sketches and right-wing symbols such as swastikas.
A search of his home recovered a copy of Hitler's book Mein Kampf, a copy of the Quran, knives, airsoft weapons and ingredients for explosive substances.
He also had a copy of The Anarchist Cookbook, an infamous instruction manual on how to produce weapons and explosives.
Tony Lenehan KC, the boy's defence counsel, told the court: 'He was a 16-year-old isolated vulnerable young man who had a wholesale world view of what was on the internet rather than personal experience.'
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Times
35 minutes ago
- Times
Wave of protests planned at migrant hotels this weekend
Asylum hotels across the country will be hit by a wave of anti-immigration protests this weekend, The Times understands. Dozens of demonstrations were being planned on Thursday as it emerged that a record 111,000 people had claimed asylum in the UK during Sir Keir Starmer's first year in office. At least 27 protests have been organised after a High Court judge ordered the removal of migrants from a hotel in Epping, Essex, on Tuesday, with many communities hoping to replicate the results of the landmark ruling in their own areas by taking to the streets. Anti-racism groups are also scrambling to co-ordinate counter-protests, claiming towns and cities could experience the most disruption since the riots last summer. The Times has found that at least eight demonstrations are set to take place on Friday in Cardiff, Chichester, Bournemouth, Portsmouth, Leeds, Orpington, Cheshunt and Altrincham. Some 14 more — in towns and cities including Hawley, Cannock, Nottingham, Bristol, Newcastle, Tamworth, Wakefield, Liverpool, Oldham, Exeter, Oxford, Perth and Aberdeen — are planned for Saturday. Another two are being organised in Manchester and Dudley on Sunday. Next week, hotels in Falkirk, Gloucester and Stockport have also been earmarked for action. The plans for protests came as: • New figures revealed that claims for refugee status hit a record high in the year to June, nearly doubling the level seen in 2021; • There was also an 8 per cent rise in the number of asylum seekers in hotels, from 29,585 to 32,059, during Labour's first year in power; • Ten Labour-controlled councils confirmed they were reviewing the implications of the High Court judgment, with some considering their own legal options; • Ministers planned to speed up attempts to move asylum seekers out of hotels and into disused tower blocks and former student accommodation which are closer to existing infrastructure. The High Court ruling was delivered after a resident of The Bell Hotel in Epping, which has been housing migrants for years, was charged with sexually assaulting a schoolgirl. The alleged assault triggered a series of protests, with up to 2,000 demonstrators descending on the building to demand its closure. Many gathered peacefully, but others reacted violently and 16 protesters were charged. Figures from the far-right group Homeland had helped to organise the demonstrations. Epping Forest district council was granted a temporary injunction to stop the hotel housing migrants, on the basis that its owners had not applied for planning permission for a change in its use. The council also argued that its closure was needed to keep local residents safe and remove 'the catalyst for violent protests in public places'. The ruling appears to have inspired people across the country to demonstrate in the hope that similar action can be taken to close hotels in their communities. Richard Tice, the deputy leader of Reform UK, encouraged more people to march on their local asylum hotels and 'express their genuine concerns in a peaceful, friendly way'. He said he condemned 'all violent, non-peaceful protests'. Nigel Farage, the leader of Reform, echoed his call to action saying residents should put pressure on their councils to 'go to court to try and get the illegal immigrants out'. Other Reform figures have been sharing partially-inaccurate lists on social media naming hundreds of hotels across the UK. Some of the hotels being targeted are understood to house families rather than single men. Ryan Coogan, previously the Reform candidate to be the mayor of Cambridgeshire and Peterborough, published a list of 262 hotels supposedly housing asylum seekers on his Facebook page earlier this month, which has been shared 1,000 times. The government is only using 210 hotels. 'This list is compiled by the public and my community of followers, may not be 100 per cent accurate … and should not be relied upon as a definitive record,' he said. Reform was contacted for comment. Local authorities across the country said the Epping ruling set a precedent for copycat litigation. As many as ten Labour-run councils have now joined other local authorities run by the Tories, Reform, the DUP and the Liberal Democrats in investigating the implications of the ruling. Denise Jeffery, the Labour leader of Wakefield council in West Yorkshire, said that the hotels had put 'significant strain' on local communities. She said the council had been raising concerns with the Home Office since 2023 and was 'carefully considering' the ruling. Matthew Tomlinson, the leader of South Ribble council in Lancashire, said the use of hotels for the housing of asylum seekers 'was imposed on us by government'. He added: 'We will now carefully examine the detail and circumstances surrounding the High Court injunction and explore all of our options.' Stevenage council in Hertfordshire said it was also 'actively investigating alleged breaches [of planning control] relating to the operation of hotels' but would gather all facts before deciding what action to take. Reform has already said that the councils it controls were exploring their own legal options and Kemi Badenoch urged all Conservative councils to 'take the same steps' as Epping if they could. Chris Whitbread, the leader of Epping Forest district council, successfully challenged the use of a hotel for asylum seekers VUK VALCIC/ALAMY Protesters, some of whom have been staging near-weekly protests outside hotels, said they were gearing up for 'big' demonstrations this weekend; however it was unclear on Thursday night how many were set to attend. Organisers of the 'Stand Up Leeds — No To Illegal Migrants' Facebook page said they had procured a 'shit load of placards' and a 'shipment of flags' for a protest on Friday. Other protest leaders urged demonstrators to follow the rules of 'no masks, no alcohol, no violence'. Richard Donaldson, the leader of The Great British National Protest group, has been sharing details of planned demonstrations on Facebook with the slogan 'For our children, for our future'. The former soldier has previously called on far-right figures including Tommy Robinson, Paul Golding and Nick Tenconi to 'unite' and 'lock this country down for weeks'. Lewis Nielsen of the pressure group Stand Up to Racism said: 'We're in a dangerous moment. This weekend is set to see the biggest number of far-right demonstrations since the riots last summer. 'It's been proven many of these are organised by known fascists and Hitler admirers. They are being openly called out on to the streets by Nigel Farage and the Tories. They are responsible if we see a repeat of last summer's far right riots.' A Greater Manchester police source said officers would be present at planned events in the area 'to facilitate peaceful protest' but that backup would be on hand 'in case of any criminality'.


Libya Herald
an hour ago
- Libya Herald
Dar al-Ifta pronounces that all meat imported from non-Islamic states is not deemed ‘‘halal''
Dar al-Iftaa, western Libya's highest religious authority, announced today that following a visit by its inspection committee to Brazil, it stated that meat imported from non-Muslim countries is not deemed halal and therefore not permissible to eat. It stated that in its view the use of the phrase 'halal, slaughtered according to the Islamic method' is merely a marketing ploy.


Powys County Times
2 hours ago
- Powys County Times
Noel Clarke set to learn outcome of libel claim against Guardian publisher
Actor Noel Clarke is set to discover whether he has been successful in his High Court libel claim against the publisher of the Guardian on Friday. Clarke, 49, is suing Guardian News and Media (GNM) over seven articles and a podcast, including an article in April 2021 that said 20 women who knew him professionally had come forward with allegations of misconduct. Clarke denies the allegations, while GNM is defending its reporting as being both true and in the public interest. A trial earlier this year heard from multiple witnesses who made accusations against Clarke, including that he had allegedly shared nude photographs of them without their consent, groped them, and asked them to look at him when he was exposed. Barristers for Clarke told the court that there is a conspiracy of people with financial and personal grudges against him who engineered his downfall because they could not bear to see him receive a Bafta award. Mrs Justice Steyn is set to hand down her ruling at 10.30am on Friday. The trial of the libel claim was held from early March to early April at the Royal Courts of Justice in London. Clarke, who has previously appeared in TV shows including Doctor Who, Auf Wiedersehen, Pet and Bulletproof, gave evidence over several days. At one stage, he appeared visibly emotional as he claimed the publisher had 'smashed my life'. He said: 'They have smashed my life for four years with this rubbish, this nonsense. Four years.' He continued: 'I did not do this, I would not do this. I have got children. This is not true.' He later said that while he was 'a flawed guy', he added: 'The reason I stand here four years later is I am not what they have branded me.' Philip Williams, representing the actor, said that his client was a 'casualty' of a media 'purge' following the emergence of the MeToo movement. He continued that Clarke was made a 'scapegoat' and was an 'easy target' because he was at the height of his success when the media industry 'zealously sought to correct itself'. The barrister also criticised the Guardian's investigation, saying the newspaper 'manifestly failed to do its job properly'.Mr Williams asked the court to find the claim successful, saying the Guardian's reporting has caused serious harm to Clarke's career, with 'continuing hostile reactions online and in public discourse'. Gavin Millar KC, for GNM, said there is 'not a shred of evidence' to support Clarke's claim of a conspiracy, describing it as 'nonsensical and rather desperate speculation'. He said Clarke has a 'very clear motive to lie' because he 'stands to lose a great deal'. In written submissions, Mr Millar said Clarke 'used his power to prey on and harass female colleagues' over a period of 15 years. He said: 'This was a careful and thorough investigation conducted conscientiously by Guardian journalists who were aware of the potential pitfalls. 'They received information from a wide range of sources with direct evidence of misconduct and in each case carefully considered and tested the information they were given, electing to publish only such information as they believed was credible.'