
Perhaps, This is Why The Innocent Men-Tourists Died in Pahalgam
Menu
हिंदी తెలుగు اردو
Home Politics Economy World Security Law Science Society Culture Editor's Pick Opinion
Support independent journalism. Donate Now
Opinion
Perhaps, This is Why The Innocent Men-Tourists Died in Pahalgam
Badri Raina
13 minutes ago
The historical-cultural point is unmistakable: it is the women who always spoil the broth, both within the kitchen and on the battlefield.
Illustration: Pariplab Chakraborty.
Real journalism holds power accountable
Since 2015, The Wire has done just that.
But we can continue only with your support.
Contribute now
Now, at last, we know why 26 innocent men, mostly tourists, died at the hands of terrorists in Pahalgam: it was not because there was an intelligence failure, nor because no policemen patrolled the fatal site. It was because their women did not fight to save them.
Had these women studied the life and work of Ahilyabai Holkar, they would have become Viranganas (warrior women).
Never mind that the cited Ahilyabai was not a warrior woman but an educationist and social reformer.
A spokesperson of the ruling BJP further illuminated us (Breaking With Agenda, News 24, 10 AM, May 25) as to how women warriors like the Rani of Jhansi had 'fought the Muslims' and the women visiting Pahalgam apparently lacked such motivation
Never mind that Rani of Jhansi actually did not fight against the Muslims, but alongside Muslims, against the British.
It would have helped, according to Ram Chander Jangra, the BJP member of parliament, if the men who were killed had taken some 'Agniveer' training; still, the fault lay primarily with the women who did not strike it hot against the gun-wielding terrorists.
It must be Jangra's view that women are far too strong to have needed 'Agniveer' training either.
The historical-cultural point of this is unmistakable: it is the women who always spoil the broth, both within the kitchen and on the battlefield.
This despite the fact that no country in the world worships as many goddesses as we do in India, which also we lovingly have christened 'Ma Bharti' too.
Yet, rue the failure of these women to rise to the appellation we bestow on the nation.
Despicably trashy as this read of the killings in Pahalgam is that India's mass mind has come to be so addled that there will be no dearth of men and women too, both among the populace and the electronic media who will know how to filibuster the gutter-speak of the parliamentarian away from the condemnation and chastisement it deserves.
Quite recently, India's dashing minister of external affairs stoutly defended democracy as a system of government, and then the great strengths of Indian democracy in particular.
What better proof of the strength of his thesis may be provided than that such voices like that of Jangra – along with Vijay Shah, who dubbed Colonel Sofia Qureshi as sister of Pakistani terrorists, and Jagdish Devda, who gloated how the Indian armed forces now bow at Modi ji's feet – are free to go berserk with criminal speak while voices that would curb their fulminations are reminded of limits on free speech.
Who knows the truth of that conundrum better than Ali Khan Mahamudabad, now gagged from sense and sensibility?
Badri Raina taught at Delhi University.
Make a contribution to Independent Journalism
Related News
BJP Leadership, Haryana Women's Commission Silent on MP Blaming Women for Not Fighting Back in Pahalgam
'Mastered the Art of Degrading Women': Outrage as BJP MP Blames Women for Not Fighting Back During Pahalgam Attack
Watch | Does the SC Have the Power to Gag Ali Khan Mahmudabad or Has it Overreached Itself?
Ali Khan Mahmudabad Presented Before Court, Sent to Judicial Custody Till May 27
Learning Against The Grain: Perspectives from Ali Khan Mahmudabad's Former Students
Ashoka Prof Arrested For 'Endangering Sovereignty' Over Post Criticising Jingoism, Sent to Custody Till May 20
Full Text | Ashoka University Professor Ali Mahmudabad's Posts that Haryana Police Calls 'Sedition'
The Sole Reason Behind Ali Khan Mahmudabad's Arrest Is That He Is a Muslim
The 'Statement of Objection' by Academics Against Mahmudabad Erodes India's Democratic Fabric
View in Desktop Mode
About Us
Contact Us
Support Us
© Copyright. All Rights Reserved.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
Operation Sindoor: Pakistan dossier 'reveals' 7 more targets India hit
NEW DELHI: Pakistan said India conducted strikes at seven more locations than the targets officially acknowledged by Indian armed forces between May 7 and 10 during Operation Sindoor . A Pakistan govt document on its Operation Bunyan al-Marsoos (Iron Wall) and India's "unprovoked aggression", shared with its media, lists out Indian drone strikes at Attock, Bahawalnagar, Gujrat and Jhang (Punjab province), Peshawar (Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa province), and Chhor and Hyderabad (Sindh province), which it claimed killed many civilians. None of these places were mentioned in the detailed briefings conducted by Indian foreign and military establishments. "We had disclosed the targets we hit in the briefings. This Pakistani document could be a propaganda attempt to show that India also targeted civilian sites," an Indian defence official said. After Pahalgam terror attack that killed 26 civilians, India on May 7 hit 4 terror hubs in Pakistan and five in POK, in calibrated strikes against terror infrastructure across the border, without targeting any Pakistani military base or civilian centre. The targets ranged from Sawai Nala camp in Muzaffarabad in north to Markaz Taiba in Muridke (Lashkar-e-Taiba HQ) and Markaz Subhan at Bahawalpur (Jaish-e-Muhammed HQ) in south. After Pakistan escalated the situation by targeting Indian military bases and civilian centres with missiles and waves of drone swarms, IAF struck at least nine Pakistani airbases and at least four military radar sites.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Pakistan aimed to crush India in 48 hours, but folded in 8 hours: CDS Chauhan
PUNE: Chief of Defence Staff General Anil Chauhan said that "on 10 May at about 1am, Pakistan aimed to bring India to its knees in 48 hours" but "their operation, which they thought would continue for 48 hours, folded up in about eight hours". Tired of too many ads? go ad free now "Then they picked up the phone and said they wanted to talk," Gen Chauhan said. He said was the first time India had engaged in non-contact warfare. "We didn't see each other. We saw it either through radar or at different ranges, except for what was happening on the LoC. It was a mixture of kinetic and non-kinetic war. When I say non-kinetic, that happened in the information domain and cyber domain. And, of course, there were kinetic operations where destruction was being caused. It was also nonlinear in nature. So there's something happening on the LoC and something happening as far back as Sargodha." He spoke about how India networked all its air defence architecture and was using AI for predictive analysis. CDS: India accepted Pak's call for de-escalation, but not immediately So better and faster information was available to our side. We also tried to kind of network our counter UAS system, which was countering drones. And in the 7-15 days, we were able to do that," Gen Chauhan said. The CDS, delivering a special lecture organised by Savitribai Phule Pune University's department of defence and strategic studies on the "Future of War and Warfare" on Tuesday, also touched upon data-centric warfare, which will be based on data analysis deciding cognitive or decision superiority. "Similar green shoots of that were visible in Op Sindoor," he said. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now He also explained how, through Op Sindoor, India raised the bar and redrew new lines for military operations in response to terror. Referring to his previous media statements about India suffering losses, Chauhan said, "You should be able to understand what went wrong, rectify your mistakes, and go out again despite the initial setbacks. That is a hallmark of a professional force. And that's the kind of thing we displayed. What I said in a couple of my interviews - that losses are not important, it's the outcome which is important." Chauhan likened it to Test cricket, where, when one side wins by an innings, there are no questions about how many balls or players played. Gen Chauhan said they would share data on the result of Indian strikes based on technical parameters like electronic intelligence and signal intelligence at some point. Stating that it was Pakistan's strategy to bleed India by a thousand cuts, Chauhan said Gen Asim Munir (now field marshal) had spewed similar venom against India and Hindus a few weeks before Pahalgam. "But these decisions can be retracted as Pakistan is faced with a different kind of prospect, that it faces military action in case we find terror happening against us. So we have kind of raised the bar. We have connected terror to water and we have drawn out new lines for military operations against terror." When Pakistan did ask for talks and de-escalation, Gen Chauhan said India accepted, but not immediately. According to the CDS, Pakistan's decision to talk stemmed from two facts: "They must have assumed that if they continued in this mode, they were likely to lose much more. And the second, since they struck us on multiple fronts, they still did not have the benefit of understanding what they struck and they wanted to talk. It is only after one or two days that they realised that all their attacks against us had failed." Revealing details of the night of the first airstrikes on May 7, the CDS said, "We did it from 11.05pm to about 1.30am, and five minutes later we rang the director general of military operations to say that we've done this, we hit only terror targets, that military establishments are out of the purview of the strikes, and we ensured that there was no collateral damage to civilians. We need to talk to each other." The CDS said war has expanded into space, cyberspace, the electromagnetic domain, etc. "A lot of activities took place between both of us for four days in the electromagnetic domain. Interactivity also took place in the cyber domain. We also had a lot of activity in the domain of perception management, information, or maybe you can call it cognitive warfare, in which shaping the mind of the people is more important than the landscape. "


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
3 Indians who went missing in Iran rescued, says embassy
Three Indian nationals who went missing in Iran last month have been rescued, the Iranian embassy in India said on Tuesday, quoting media reports in Tehran. Last week, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said it was in touch with the Iranian authorities over the missing Indians. "Three missing Indian citizens freed by Tehran police," the Iranian embassy said in a post on X. "Local media in Iran say police have found and released three Indian men who had gone missing in Iran," it said.