Boy told gardai he could hear friend screaming as star hurler Niall Gilligan hit him with a stick, court hears
In a videoed interview with specialist
The boy said his father later showed him a photo of Niall Gilligan and the boy confirmed that the man who attacked his friend was the accused.
Mr Gilligan, 48, of Rossroe, Kilmurry, Sixmilebridge,
The two 12-year-olds had been exploring an abandoned Jamaica Inn hostel after 5pm on October 5.
Mr Gilligan owned the Jamaica Inn hostel at the time and the jury has been told that in the days leading up to October 5, it had been broken into and vandalised.
Read more in News
In the video interview carried out on November 11 2023, the 12-year-old witness said that as the two boys left the building and came around a corner, they saw 'a tall, kind of strong looking' man holding a stick and they both ran.
He said that his friend slipped 'and he just started attacking him with the bat'.
The boy said: "I thought he was getting back up but then I just heard the screams out of him, getting attacked by the man and a bat hitting off of him and then I ran around the corner into this industrial estate and I hid."
Asked how he felt by the specialist Garda interviewer, the boy said 'terrified' and added 'but I just got out of there as fast as I could, all I could think was 'get out of there' and I did'.
Most read in Irish News
The boy described the man as 'fit looking like, gingerly brown kinda hair'.
He said: 'I seen him playing hurling with I was younger and he played for the Bridge and Clare.'
'I HEARD HIM SCREAMING'
The boy told gardai Mr Gilligan is an auctioneer in Sixmilebridge.
Asked about his friend's screaming, the boy said: 'I heard him shouting, like I heard him screaming like telling him to stop. My friend telling him to f*** off and to leave him alone, that was about it'.
The boy hid in a nearby industrial estate and he said that felt relatively safe 'but I was still very scared that somehow he could have seen me'.
A short time later, the boy said that he saw his friend come around the corner 'and he was limping like he was holding his arm, holding his hand, holding the wrist he broke and it was all swelling up'.
'VERY, VERY SCARED'
The boy said that his friend was 'looking in pain, he had lots of mud all over him'.
The boy told gardai that his friend 'was very shaky, obviously he felt very, very scared and in a lot of pain'.
He said: 'I was just supporting him to walk up, just like holding him up… I put my arm around his back so I could support him so he could have one of his legs off the ground so it would be easier for him to walk."
The boy said that his friend "said 'it just hurts everywhere' is all he said'.
The boy said that his friend told him 'go home because if he sees you, he is going to get you as well'.
The cross examination of the boy on his direct video evidence is taking place before a jury of seven men and five women and continues.
1
Former Clare hurler Niall Gilligan at Ennis Circuit Court
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
17 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Politicians come worst out of a row over An Post's finances
The axiom that the cover-up is often worse than the crime in politics is generally associated with the 1970s Watergate scandal, which saw the resignation of Richard Nixon as US president. Applying it to the brouhaha over the question of who trashed An Post at Cabinet this week is open to the accusation of being unsporting and using too much gun. But at the same time we have a Cabinet Minister accusing one of his colleagues of leaking details of a briefing he gave on An Post in a deliberately damaging way. The report in the Irish Daily Mail suggested Communications Minister Patrick O'Donovan told Cabinet that the company was on the brink of collapse, with cash reserves of less than €1 million. The paper said that, without the revenue generated by election-related mailing, the company would have made a loss last year. The report so annoyed An Post chief executive, David McRedmond, that he interrupted his holiday in Italy to go on Morning Ireland and paint a different picture : one of a company in rude good health. He said the accounts presented to Cabinet showed revenues of €1 billion for the first time and net profits of €10 million. READ MORE O'Donovan promptly followed him on to the Claire Byrne show on RTÉ radio and somehow managed to agree with McRedmond that the company was in good shape, without saying that the Irish Daily Mail story was wrong. Instead, he turned his ire on his Cabinet colleagues, accusing one of them of leaking a distorted version of his briefing. 'But how a nameless minister or alleged nameless minister or source or whatever, would conflate that [his briefing] into saying this, the situation is dire. I don't know how they will come up with that.' If we take O'Donovan at face value – and we have no reason not to – he has made a very serious allegation that one of his colleagues deliberately broke the law in order to damage a State-owned business that employs 10,000 people, and which is one of Ireland's most trusted brands. And the potential damage is significant, according to McRedmond, who warned it might cause big global customers to lose confidence in the business. As ever the question is: why would someone do this? It is no secret that there are different views on An Post in Government. The briefing document for the incoming Minister in the Department of Public Expenditure, which was released earlier this year, makes the following observation: 'An Post's financial position remains extremely challenging. Mail volumes continue to decline and new services such as parcels are more competitive and hence lower margin. Significant existing State support means there is some ability to address sustainability, but this is limited.' [ Ireland's economic plans threatened amid 'sobering' outlook Opens in new window ] There is no suggestion that the new minister, Jack Chambers , leaked the details of O'Donovan's briefing. His department's position is pretty much word for word the most recent assessment of An Post carried out by New Era, which provides financial and commercial advice to minsters and their department on semi-state company holdings. It is a somewhat different picture from the upbeat one pained by McRedmond, but it is not hard to reconcile them. McRedmond was brought in from the private sector to run An Post in 2016, having previously worked in TV3 (now Virgin Media) and Eir. The focus in the private sector is essentially short term. The future cannot be controlled, and the most important thing is this year's figures. If you were not optimistic you would not be in business. McRedmond said as much on Morning Ireland in connection with the once-off revenue associated with election mailings that flattered last year's figures. 'Yes, we got a big boost from the elections last year, but if it wasn't the elections, it would be something else,' he said. The public sector takes a longer-term and more conservative approach, as epitomised by New Era's assessment of An Post's prospects. McRedmond's sangfroid on its own is not going to cut it for New Era, when it comes to recommending that the Government accede to his request for more capital and higher borrowing limits. McRedmond wants this to further An Post's transformation into a delivery business competing with giants such as DHL and UPS. [ David McRedmond: 'An Post has been brilliant. I've never been remunerated less and enjoyed a job more' Opens in new window ] It is still somewhat baffling why leaking details of a Cabinet meeting would enhance anyone's position in this debate. It's possible, of course, that it's more cock-up than conspiracy. The story was really a nothing burger and only took off after McRedmond's performance on Morning Ireland, which was followed up by O'Donovan's accusations on Claire Byrne. It would not be the first time that the leaking of a titbit to a newspaper had spiralled out of control. But the situation remains that a Government Minister has publicly and emphatically accused an unidentified Cabinet colleague of breaching confidentiality and leaking confidential information in a nefarious manner. That is something that has to be taken seriously.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Sex abuse in schools: State accused of ignoring its liability for redress
The Government has been accused of refusing to acknowledge the O'Keeffe judgment, by claiming the State does not bear liability for historical child sex abuse in schools . The Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission (IHREC) and Louise O'Keeffe have both questioned Government guidance which appears to suggest it may not be the responsibility of the State to pay for redress. Ms O'Keeffe successfully took the State to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in 2014 for failing to protect her from sexual abuse in Dunderrow national school in Cork in the 1970s. The ECHR found that the State had an obligation to protect her from the abuse she had suffered from her then school principal Leo Hickey. Ms O'Keeffe was awarded redress, and since then has been campaigning for the same redress to be made available to other abuse survivors. READ MORE The Government has agreed to set up a commission of investigation into the handling of sexual abuse in schools, but officials are still considering the issues around the setting up of a redress scheme for survivors of such abuse. It is understood there are concerns within the Government about the demand for and costs of such a scheme, which would be likely to be the largest in the history of the State. [ Q&A: Will survivors of historical abuse in schools be compensated? And who will be liable? Opens in new window ] An interdepartmental report prepared by officials from the departments of the Taoiseach, education, justice, children and public expenditure and reform warned that setting up such a redress scheme was 'as complex' as setting up a commission of investigation. It said that guidance from the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform had warned against 'rushed approaches to redress, including the assumption of risk by the State when liability should more appropriately be borne by third parties'. The report also considered the question of who bears liability for the actions of school employees. 'It has been concluded in case law, at Supreme Court level, that the State does not have such liability,' it said. Liam Herrick, chair of IHREC, said that as recently as January 2024 the State had told the ECHR it was working to meet its legal obligation 'to abide by the final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights'. 'The report of the IDG indicates that Government departments adopt a different position in refusing to acknowledge the primacy of the O'Keeffe judgment,' Mr Herrick said. 'So, it must be asked, what is the State really saying to the victims and survivors who have been waiting so many years for the redress they are legally entitled to? Can the Government confirm that it does accept the ruling of the European court which found that the State does bear responsibility for abuse that occurred in schools?' Ms O'Keeffe told The Irish Times the Government was 'basically trying to avoid looking at the ECHR judgment'. 'They are particularly dwelling on the religious organisations as being responsible for paying redress, and seem to be avoiding their own responsibility,' she said. Prof Conor O'Mahony, director of the child law clinic at UCC, said the claim that the State does not bear liability in such cases was 'staggering'. He said the O'Keeffe judgment applied to 'every case of abuse that occurred in any Irish school prior to the adoption of State guidelines on the reporting of abuse in schools in 1992' . A spokesman for the Department of Education said 'domestic courts have ruled that the State is not vicariously liable for the acts of a teacher appointed by the manager of a national school'. 'The 2014 ECHR judgement in O'Keeffe v Ireland indicated that the State bore partial responsibility where a complaint had been made against an alleged abuser and no system was in place to act upon that complaint. Since that ruling, extensive measures have been put in place to improve child protection in schools, including detection and reporting mechanisms as well as vetting and greater overall awareness,' the spokesman said.
Sunday World
2 hours ago
- Sunday World
Teen who claims garda assaulted him attacked and robbed person at ATM days later, court told
LATEST | Lorcan Murphy (22) of Pearse Street Garda Station has pleaded not guilty to two counts of assault causing harm. Stock image Lorcan Murphy (22) of Pearse Street Garda Station has pleaded not guilty to two counts of assault causing harm under section 3 of the Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person Act, 1997. The assaults on the then 17-year-old are alleged to have taken place on Essex Street, Dublin 2 and Pearse Street Garda Station on June 1, 2021. During cross-examination, Justin McQuade BL, defending, put it to the complainant that he said he has no recollection of the incident. He asked if this was due to a head injury, to which the complainant agreed. Mr McQuade then asked him if there was anything else that might have contributed to his lack of memory, and the complainant said alcohol and cannabis. Stock image Today's News in 90 Seconds - July 18th Defence counsel asked the witness if he was someone who would obstruct the gardaí, and he said that 'sometimes if they came to me Ma's house'. He was then asked how he would obstruct the gardaí, and he said, 'just resist arrest, but I wasn't resisting arrest this time'. It was put to the witness that he was interviewed by GSOC two months after this incident, and they took a statement from him, which he agreed with. He disagreed with the defence counsel that he had lied in his GSOC interview. Mr McQuade asked if he had lied about alcohol in his statement to GSOC. The witness said, 'I had no recollection of it, I didn't really drink'. Mr McQuaid put it to the witness that 'you knew full well that you had drank and that you had drink on you and that your statement was misleading and a lie', once again, the alleged injured party said he had no recollection. Counsel then said, 'But you remember smoking 4-5 joints?' to which he replied, 'Ya'. The jury heard that the complainant in this case has 44 previous convictions, and ten days after the alleged assault by Mr Murphy, this alleged injured party kicked and beat a person after they had withdrawn money from an ATM on O'Connell Street, he then went through their pockets. A further two weeks later, the complainant carried out another assault on a member of staff who was standing outside a premises. The witness said, 'I'm not going to incriminate myself'. Mr McQuade asked the witness if he was a person who was respectful to other members of society, to which he said he was. He also asked him if he engaged in anti-social behaviour, and he said, 'not since I was 15'. It was then put to him that beating people up and robbing them in public is not respectful, to which he said, 'I'm paying for my mistakes'. After a breakdown of the previous convictions was read to the court, the witness stated that he 'had a difficult upbringing and was easily led'. Read more The jury heard that the complainant was first brought to the Mater Hospital from Pearse Street Garda Station, where he went on to discharge himself. He returned the following day as a result of headaches. He was then transferred to Beaumont Hospital. It was put to him that he was described as being 'aggressive, combative and exposed staff to potential violence', he said 'staff would not let me out for a smoke' and that 'I didn't use one bit of violence'. Mr McQuade told the witness that he was obliged to put his client's statement that he gave to GSOC to him. When reciting the statement, the complainant said he had no recollection of these events as they were been read out. Mr John Caird, a consultant neurosurgeon who works in both Beaumont and Temple Street Hospitals, gave evidence of his treatment of the complainant in this case. He said the complainant had a fracture to the skull and a contusion to the brain. Fluid was also seen coming from the ear of the complainant. He said he had a good level of consciousness and that his pupils were equal and reactive. He outlined that the complainant has made an excellent recovery. Defence counsel asked Mr Caird if the complainant had left the hospital against medical advice, to which he said yes, once from the Mater Hospital and once from Beaumont Hospital, but returned 20 minutes later. Mr Caird agreed that the complainant refused to answer questions relating to alcohol and drug consumption. A second doctor, Dr Haroon Khan, who is a GP and works closely with the gardaí, was called to Pearse Street Garda Station on the night in question. He noted that the complainant was intoxicated, and he was unable to wake him. He noted a laceration on his temple region and abrasions to both knees. Dr Khan had the complainant transferred to hospital. Under cross-examination, Dr Khan said he had tried to 'rouse' the complainant. Dr Khan stated that he did not speak with the man and confirmed that he appeared to be intoxicated. The trial continues before Judge Pauline Codd.
