
The 'Weapons' Ending, Explained
Weapons begins with that timely, 'ripped from the headlines' feel – quickly becoming Cregger's creative schtick – with a Pleasantville-esque community processing the disappearance of 17 children from a single classroom. Aside from a hallucinated AR-15 in the clouds about forty minutes into the movie, this is as far as the school shooting implications go.
Julia Garner plays a teacher who arrives at school to find only one student sitting in her classroom. The rest ran away at 2:17am, running out of their homes doing pilates arms. The parents immediately blame the teacher, 'burn the witch!' style; and from there we're taken through the timeline from the perspectives of the townspeople. Beyond Garner, Weapons' ensemble includes Josh Brolin, Alden Ehrenreich, Austin Abrams, Cary Christopher, Benedict Wong, and Amy Madigan.
Like Barbarian before it, Weapons is about the journey and not the destination. It doesn't totally hold water and not everything makes sense in the end, but it's a satisfying 2 hours and 8 minutes.
In seeing the timeline from all six – count 'em, six – key players, nothing really changes. The plot unfolds in a puzzle, with each POV adding more context to the tale of the missing children.
In the end, the nucleus of the story is Alex, the sole remaining student of the disappeared class. It was the arrival of his 'great-aunt,' a witchy old bag named Gladys, that emptied his classroom.
Armed with a bell and a talisman, some blood‑soaked branches and personal items, she transforms people into lifeless marionettes, siphoning life to renew herself. When she snaps the branch, the affected person becomes a human weapon with a specific target.
Upon her arrival to Maybrook, she started with Alex's parents, but quickly got the taste for his classmates. She instructs Alex to bring home an item from each of his classmates, activating them at 2:17am, and shepherding them into her basement to keep her young. Little Alex spends his days spoon-feeding soup into the mouths of his parents, friends, and bullies to keep them alive.
At the film's violent climax, Alex and his teacher are fighting off a horde of human weapons. Alex, the 4-foot hero, gets to Gladys's magic stash and uses what he's learned to turn his classmates (still in the basement) against her. The kids go absolutely buck wild and Gladys is killed. After they literally tear her apart, it's like the spell is broken and they are returned to reality – but not completely.
Weapons begins and ends with a child's narration, concluding that the children are home but braindead and mostly mute, except for a few. Alex's parents are hospitalized and he is sent to live with another aunt. Sequel when?
'Weapons' is playing in theaters now.
Get Tickets

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Denzel Washington On Oscars Award Snubs: 'Man Gives The Award, God Gives The Reward.'
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Denzel Washington is one of the most celebrated actors of his generation, and he's headlined more than a few iconic films. Because of his acclaimed work, the seasoned star of stage and screen has received various awards, including a pair of Academy Awards. As a two-time Oscar winner, Washington is in rarified air, though he doesn't seem to place too much emphasis on those achievements. In fact, he recently explained why he doesn't think too much about the wins or snubs he's received at the hands of the Academy. The upcoming A24 movie, Highest 2 Lowest, is Denzel Washington's latest feature film, and it sees him reuniting with longtime collaborator Spike Lee. Washington recently caught up with Jake Hamilton of Jake's Takes, during which Hamilton mentioned the actor's two Oscars. Ultimately, Washington was quick to express his disinterest in such accolades. The A-lister then referenced his long-known devotion to religion while explaining his rationale: I don't do it for Oscars, I really don't care about that kind of stuff. I've been at this a long time, and there are times where I won, shouldn't have won and shouldn't have won and won and didn't win and should've won. Man gives the awards, God gives the rewards. I'm not that interested in Oscars. Denzel Washington won his first Academy Award in 1990, as he earned Best Supporting Actor for his role as Private Silas Trip in the 1989 historical drama, Glory. And, in 2002, Washington became the second Black man to earn Best Actor, winning for his performance in 2001's Training Day. On top of that, the 70-year-old star has also received Oscar nominations for seven other films, like Malcolm X, Cry Freedom and Fences. Nevertheless, based on his interview (which is on YouTube), Washington is unfazed by those honors: People ask, 'Well, where do you keep it?' I say, 'Next to the other one.' … I'm not bragging. I'm just telling you how I feel about it. On my last day, [awards] ain't gonna do me a bit of good. This is honestly a very healthy perspective to have. Awards can be cool, as it's an honor for someone to be recognized by their peers or any governing body. However, it's also easy to become fixated on pursuing accolades. I'd imagine that when someone's an actor, it's especially easy to become focused on those gold statuettes the Academy hands out. All in all, the Philadelphia alum isn't looking to fall down the rabbit hole in the pursuit of trophies, and he's exuded that mentality many times. Just earlier this year, Denzel Washington addressed his Oscars snub for his scene-stealing work in Gladiator II. Washington offered a refreshing take at the time, saying that he'd 'been around too long' to concern himself with something like that. He also expressed pleasure in working on Othello, which he was performing at the time. Nevertheless, Washington does mind imparting wisdom upon those who are nominated, as he also offered some keen advice for Colman Domingo, who received two consecutive Oscar nominations. Regardless of what awards Denzel Washington wins or loses, I'm just prepared to savor all of the performances he's still aiming to give. That includes Black Panther 3 (which he's discussed) and of course, Highest 2 Lowest. Check out that latest Spike Lee Joint when it opens in theaters on August 15 as part of the 2025 movie schedule. Apple TV+ subscription holders will also be able to stream the film starting on September 5. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Singer Responds After Millions Online Call His Band's Song the ‘Worst Ever Made'
Singer Responds After Millions Online Call His Band's Song the 'Worst Ever Made' originally appeared on Parade. Can there be such a thing as "the worst song of all time?" Taste is subjective, and music trends shift over time. But recently, the Internet thought they found what they thought was "the worst song ever made": Edward Sharpe and the Magnetic Zeros' "Home." For those going "Who?" right now, Edward Sharpe and the Magnetic Zeros was a band Alex Ebert formed in 2005. They were part of an indie folk revival that also gave us Mumford & Sons, The Lumineers, Of Monsters & Men and other bands you, at first glance, would probably associate with ornate mustaches, knit hats and artisanal IPAs. Edward Sharpe and the Magnetic Zeros performed on NPR's Tiny Desk Concert series in 2009, and a clip of them performing "Home" recently went viral, getting 91 million views on X, with many dubbing it the absolute worst. "We were seized by some kind of faux frontiersman cult for urbanites. Probably the worst cultural era in history," said one user. This discourse prompted Ebert to weigh in on Aug. 7. In a video posted on Instagram, he said that the song's "bones are good," since it's been "covered multiple times" and still works." "' Home' isn't a good recording, it's just a good song," he said in the video. "But it not being a good recording is what I love about 'Home.' It's like a moment. We recorded it on tape, we didn't even know how to record on tape [and] it sounds like it's made in some muffled 'Home' is apparently a good song." In the caption, Ebert also detailed how he played "Home" on a piano for his 90-year-old father on his birthday, and that rendition is his "favorite version of the song." Elsewhere in the video, Ebert claimed that his band was "the first to do the stomp and clap [explicative] folk pop thing to the point where the Lumineers sought out one of the co-producers." He also alleged that Of Monsters & Men mimicked Edward Sharpe's sound. "[They] got so close to 'Home' that we almost sued." Was Edward Sharpe and the Magnetic Zeros' 'Home' A Hit? "Home" reached No. 25 on Billboard's Alternative Airplay chart in 2010. It fared better overseas: it peaked at No. 5 on the U.K. Indie Charts (while reaching 50 on the U.K. Singles chart). In 2020, Edith Wiskers (aka Tm Rosenthal) 's version went viral on TikTok. In 2021, Kelly Clarkson covered it on a "Kellyoke" Responds After Millions Online Call His Band's Song the 'Worst Ever Made' first appeared on Parade on Aug 11, 2025 This story was originally reported by Parade on Aug 11, 2025, where it first appeared. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Singer Responds After Millions Online Call His Band's Song the ‘Worst Ever Made'
Singer Responds After Millions Online Call His Band's Song the 'Worst Ever Made' originally appeared on Parade. Can there be such a thing as "the worst song of all time?" Taste is subjective, and music trends shift over time. But recently, the Internet thought they found what they thought was "the worst song ever made": Edward Sharpe and the Magnetic Zeros' "Home." For those going "Who?" right now, Edward Sharpe and the Magnetic Zeros was a band Alex Ebert formed in 2005. They were part of an indie folk revival that also gave us Mumford & Sons, The Lumineers, Of Monsters & Men and other bands you, at first glance, would probably associate with ornate mustaches, knit hats and artisanal IPAs. Edward Sharpe and the Magnetic Zeros performed on NPR's Tiny Desk Concert series in 2009, and a clip of them performing "Home" recently went viral, getting 91 million views on X, with many dubbing it the absolute worst. "We were seized by some kind of faux frontiersman cult for urbanites. Probably the worst cultural era in history," said one user. This discourse prompted Ebert to weigh in on Aug. 7. In a video posted on Instagram, he said that the song's "bones are good," since it's been "covered multiple times" and still works." "' Home' isn't a good recording, it's just a good song," he said in the video. "But it not being a good recording is what I love about 'Home.' It's like a moment. We recorded it on tape, we didn't even know how to record on tape [and] it sounds like it's made in some muffled 'Home' is apparently a good song." In the caption, Ebert also detailed how he played "Home" on a piano for his 90-year-old father on his birthday, and that rendition is his "favorite version of the song." Elsewhere in the video, Ebert claimed that his band was "the first to do the stomp and clap [explicative] folk pop thing to the point where the Lumineers sought out one of the co-producers." He also alleged that Of Monsters & Men mimicked Edward Sharpe's sound. "[They] got so close to 'Home' that we almost sued." Was Edward Sharpe and the Magnetic Zeros' 'Home' A Hit? "Home" reached No. 25 on Billboard's Alternative Airplay chart in 2010. It fared better overseas: it peaked at No. 5 on the U.K. Indie Charts (while reaching 50 on the U.K. Singles chart). In 2020, Edith Wiskers (aka Tm Rosenthal) 's version went viral on TikTok. In 2021, Kelly Clarkson covered it on a "Kellyoke" Responds After Millions Online Call His Band's Song the 'Worst Ever Made' first appeared on Parade on Aug 11, 2025 This story was originally reported by Parade on Aug 11, 2025, where it first appeared. Solve the daily Crossword