
Who is Glenn Greenwald? Known for Snowden revelations, expresses no regrets over leaked sex tapes
On May 30, 2025, videos showing Greenwald in intimate, private settings were leaked online without his knowledge or consent. In a statement on X, Greenwald confirmed the videos' authenticity, condemned the leak as 'maliciously political,' and defended the content, saying all acts were consensual. 'I have no embarrassment or regret about them,' he wrote. While the footage sparked viral interest, Greenwald insisted the real issue is the weaponization of privacy for political ends.
The
Snowden revelations
and Pulitzer-winning work
Greenwald rose to global prominence in 2013 after publishing a series of groundbreaking reports in The Guardian based on classified documents leaked by NSA contractor
Edward Snowden
. These documents revealed the extent of domestic and international surveillance conducted by the U.S. government under President Barack Obama. Snowden, who initially contacted Greenwald anonymously in late 2012, passed along a trove of classified documents that showed the U.S.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn
IC Markets
Đăng ký
Undo
government was collecting vast amounts of metadata and personal communication records, including from American citizens, often without warrants.
Greenwald's reports were published in The Guardian, beginning with a bombshell revelation on June 5, 2013, detailing how Verizon was ordered to provide the NSA with phone records for millions of Americans. These revelations triggered a worldwide debate over privacy, civil liberties, and the role of intelligence agencies in democratic societies.
Greenwald, along with his collaborators, faced both praise and intense scrutiny for the disclosures.
In 2014, The Guardian and The Washington Post jointly received the Pulitzer Prize for Public Service for their work on the NSA surveillance story. Greenwald's involvement also led to his appearance in the Oscar-winning documentary Citizenfour by Laura Poitras, and he was portrayed by actor Zachary Quinto in Oliver Stone's 2016 film Snowden.
Glenn Greenwald's early journalism and independent voice
Before the Snowden story catapulted him to global prominence, Greenwald had already established himself as a powerful voice in independent journalism. In 2005, he started the blog Unclaimed Territory, where he focused on controversial issues like the Valerie Plame CIA leak investigation and the NSA's warrantless wiretapping program. The blog earned the 2005 Koufax Award for Best New Blog.
In 2007, he joined Salon as a contributing writer, transitioning his blog to the media platform.
At Salon, Greenwald continued to tackle controversial subjects, including the 2001 anthrax attacks and the nomination of John Brennan for CIA Director. His opposition to Brennan's nomination, rooted in concerns about torture and civil liberties, contributed to Brennan temporarily withdrawing from consideration.
Greenwald's strong advocacy for whistleblowers became evident in his vocal support for Chelsea Manning.
In a 2010 article, he described Manning as a hero who acted out of conscience, likening her to Pentagon Papers whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg. His stances often defied party lines, earning him a reputation as a journalist who prioritized principles over political affiliations.
The Intercept and move to Substack
In 2014, Greenwald co-founded The Intercept with filmmaker Laura Poitras and journalist Jeremy Scahill. Funded by eBay co-founder Pierre Omidyar, The Intercept was envisioned as a platform for fearless, independent investigative journalism.
There, Greenwald continued to report on national security issues and political controversies.
However, in 2020, Greenwald resigned from The Intercept, claiming that editors had attempted to censor an article critical of then-presidential candidate Joe Biden. He cited a lack of editorial independence and launched his own newsletter on Substack, where he now publishes content free from institutional constraints.
As of 2025, he has over 324,000 paid and free subscribers, making him one of Substack's most influential voices.
Personal life and response to the leak
Greenwald's personal and professional lives have long been intertwined. He lived in Brazil with his husband, David Miranda, a leftist Brazilian congressman and LGBTQ rights advocate. The couple adopted two boys in 2018. Miranda died in 2023 due to complications from a gastrointestinal infection, a loss that deeply affected Greenwald.
The recent leak of his private videos, Greenwald stated, represents a criminal invasion of privacy aimed at discrediting him for political reasons. 'Obviously it can be uncomfortable and unpleasant when your private behavior is made public against your will,' he wrote on X. 'But the only wrongdoing here is the criminal and malicious publication of the videos.'
Despite the intrusion, Greenwald remains defiant and unapologetic — a stance consistent with the fearless, often controversial career he has built over the past two decades.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
13 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Opposition stalls felicitation of astronaut Shubhanshu Shukla over electoral roll row
A felicitation event for astronaut Shubhanshu Shukla after his successful return from the International Space Station (ISS) turned into a deadlock in Parliament for the second consecutive day on Tuesday, after the Opposition repeatedly disrupted proceedings over alleged electoral irregularities and a demand to revoke the special intensive revision (SIR) of Bihar's electoral rolls. Prime Minister Narendra Modi with astronaut Shubhanshu Shukla in New Delhi on Monday. (PMO) On Tuesday, Union parliamentary affairs minister Kiren Rijiju renewed his appeal to Opposition parties to let the discussion proceed. 'I again appeal to opposition parties to allow Parliament to felicitate Capt Subhanshu Shukla and entire Indian Scientists for India's remarkable and successful space mission. All our heroes deserve appreciation,' Rijiju wrote on X. The Opposition, however, accused the government of using national achievements to deflect from pressing debates. Trinamool Congress (TMC) MP Sushmita Dev retorted by saying, 'Dodge, dodge, dodge behind the armed forces, behind scientists, behind astronauts, behind Tiranga, behind ECI. We don't need the BJP to validate our armed forces, our scientists or our achievers or our flag. Sorry Kiren Rijiju ji, these stunts are not good to avoid debates that will leave the government embarrassed.' The three-hour debate, which began on Monday, opened with Union minister of state for science and technology Jitendra Singh hailing Shukla's mission as a milestone for India's space programme and its grassroots applications. Taking aim at the Opposition for stalling the discussion, Singh said, 'You seem to be miffed by land, sky and now by space. Today, what the Opposition is doing is their expression of anger towards themselves for their failure in every plan.' On the second day, BJP MP Nishikant Dubey carried the discussion forward, directly targeting the Congress. He accused the party of holding the House 'hostage' and of having 'dismantled' India's space sector in the past. Dubey revisited the 1994 espionage case against ISRO scientist Nambi Narayanan, alleging the Congress had acted 'at the behest of China, Pakistan and American businessman George Soros'. Narayanan was later exonerated of all charges. He also pointed to the 2005 Antrix-Devas deal, flagged by the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG), under which ISRO's commercial arm Antrix agreed to lease two S-band spectrum satellites to private firm Devas Multimedia. The deal, annulled in 2011 over fraud and security concerns, became another centerpiece of his attack. 'The entire Congress had dismantled satellites, space missions and scientists during its tenure,' Dubey said, before being interrupted as Opposition protests escalated once again. Amid the impasse, Congress MP Shashi Tharoor diverged from his party's line, urging participation in the debate. 'Since the Opposition are not participating in the special discussion, let me say how proud all Indians are of the recent mission of Commander Shubhanshu Shukla to the International Space Station (ISS). It served as a stepping stone to our nation's own human spaceflight program, Gaganyaan,' he wrote on X.


Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
Power Games: How Donald Trump tried to make Volodymyr Zelenskyy wear a suit and tie – but the latter refused
There's a running gag on the popular sitcom How I Met Your Mother where Barney Stinson keeps asking Ted Mosby to suit up, and the protagonist just ends up wearing a blazer. It would appear that running gag is now part of American politics where Volodymyr Zelenskyy when the Trump administration arm-twisted the Ukrainian President to up his sartorial game before meeting the leader of the 'free world'. Except the sartorial rebel – who has been wearing a sweatshirt to show solidarity with his troops in Ukraine – refused, turning up in a black jacket over a collared black shirt and no tie. The White House Wardrobe Request The Wall Street Journal reported that ahead of the Oval Office meeting, the White House pressed Zelenskyy to dress more conventionally: suit, tie, and the whole Capitol Hill starter pack. For Trump's team, it wasn't about fabric but fealty. A suit signals hierarchy; a tie signals submission to the script of American presidential theatre. But Zelenskyy has spent the last three years rewriting that script. His wartime wardrobe is not an accident of comfort but a deliberate symbol. Sweatshirts, fatigues, and henleys have become part of Ukraine's frontline diplomacy, reminding the world at every summit that Kyiv is not hosting cocktail parties but fighting for survival. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The 5 Books Warren Buffett Recommends You To Read in 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo The Jacket as Counter-Narrative President Donald Trump meet with Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in the Oval Office at the White House, Monday, Aug. 18, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson) Zelenskyy's black jacket at the White House was a carefully chosen middle finger wrapped in compromise. Colour & Cut: Deep black, military-inspired canvas fabric, shaped like a blazer but stripped of luxury. Details: Shirt-style collar, button closure, four front pockets, practical design. Pairing: Black trousers, sometimes combat boots — less Wall Street, more wartime chic. It was more formal than his sweatshirt-and-combat look, but still unmistakably not the suit-and-tie costume Trump's aides wanted. The jacket itself has appeared before — notably at a NATO summit — underlining that this is part of a strategy, not a whim. Visual Diplomacy Clothes in politics are rarely just clothes. Winston Churchill had his wartime boiler suit. Jawaharlal Nehru turned the achkan into a jacket now worn by diplomats worldwide. Narendra Modi made even pinstripes carry a monogrammed message. Zelenskyy's blazer is his version of that playbook. It tells two audiences two different things: To the West, it signals seriousness, diplomacy, and respect for the occasion. To Ukrainians, it signals continuity with his wartime image, proof that even in Washington's gilded halls, their president hasn't swapped uniforms for tuxedos. This is visual diplomacy — adapting to the stage without abandoning the role. Trump's Optics Over Substance If Zelenskyy was playing with subtlety, Trumpworld was not. During an earlier Oval Office meeting in February, Trump mocked Zelenskyy's casual wear, while Vice President JD Vance scolded him for not saying 'thank you' enough for US support. The fixation on clothing and gratitude reveals a mindset less about alliance and more about obedience. Washington couldn't force Moscow to retreat, but it could try to make Kyiv wear a tie. The irony? The world noticed the jacket far more than it would have noticed a generic navy suit. Power in a Jacket The black jacket represented three overlapping messages: Defiance in Fabric: Zelenskyy would not bow to Washington's costume demands. Compromise in Cut: The jacket was a step up from sweatshirts, but a step short of a tie. Consistency in Symbolism: His clothes continue to double as a uniform of resistance. When asked by a conservative reporter why he refused to wear a suit, Zelenskyy replied: 'I will wear costume after this war will finish. Maybe something like yours, maybe something better.' That quip captured the defiance: clothes, like peace, would come on his terms. Lyndon Johnson once said politics is about power — 'and power is where power goes.' Zelenskyy's jacket was power stitched in black canvas. It let him walk into the Oval Office without playing dress-up for Trump. In a city obsessed with costumes, he reminded everyone that the man in the jacket, not the man in the tie, was the one fighting a real war.


Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Without respect for Russians ... ': Moscow after Zelenskyy-Trump talks; rejects call for 'long-term agreements'
Russia on Tuesday categorically said that there could not be any "long-term peace deal" with Ukraine without considering the security interests of Russians and "Russian-speaking people who live in Ukraine". This comes a day after Zelenskyy-Trump talks, where the US president assured that he would talk to Vladimir Putin after the meet. "Without respect for Russia's security interests, without full respect for the rights of Russians and Russian-speaking people who live in Ukraine, there can be no talk of any long-term agreements," Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov told state TV channel Rossiya 24. Lavrov further said any meeting between Russian and Ukrainian presidents regarding conflict resolution must be prepared "very thoroughly". Trump had hinted at a possible trilateral meet if "everything worked out". "We're going to have a meeting. I think if everything works out well today we'll have a trilateral and I think there will be a reasonable chance of ending the war when we do that," he had said. "Any contacts involving leaders must be prepared very thoroughly," Lavrov said. Meanwhile, Trump has endorsed for a long-term peace agreement instead of a "two-year" one that would end up in "mess" again. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo What happened at Zelenskyy-Trump meet? The high-stakes meeting between US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on Monday signaled a new phase in Washington's engagement with Kyiv amid Russia's ongoing aggression. Trump assured that the United States would remain involved in Ukraine's 'future security' and emphasized that discussions were yielding 'substantial progress.' He framed the talks as part of a broader diplomatic push, noting his earlier meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin and his upcoming consultations with key European leaders. Trump's remarks underlined his push for what he described as a 'long-term peace,' rejecting the notion of a temporary or fragile settlement that might unravel within a few years. Stressing that 'we are going to work with Ukraine, we are going to work with everybody,' Trump suggested that a trilateral meeting involving Kyiv, Moscow, and Washington could be possible if the day's talks proved productive. While he claimed that Putin wanted the war to end, he dismissed calls for a formal ceasefire, instead portraying his diplomatic approach as one aimed at securing a more durable resolution. The presence of European leaders including UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, Nato secretary-general Mark Rutte, and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen lent additional weight to the White House gathering. Starmer described the talks as a 'historic step' for Ukraine and Europe's security, while Finnish President Alexander Stubb observed that more progress had been made in the last two weeks than in the previous three-and-a-half years.