Punjab budget: $428.54m foreign-funded uplift projects included
These projects focused on improving water supply & sanitation, urban development, environment, irrigation, agriculture, physical infrastructure, health, education, skills development and IT & governance.
As per budget document, foreign engagement in Punjab's development financing primarily takes two forms: project-based loans and grants (Foreign Project Assistance) and programme-based loans (budgetary support). Loans obtained from multilateral donor agencies through the Federal government for specific foreign-assisted development projects are termed as Foreign Project Assistance. Programme loans, on the other hand, provide direct budgetary support, linked with indicators and results, named Disbursement Linked Indicators and Result Based Lending.
The Punjab government, in line with its policy parameters on foreign borrowing, is guided by a preference for concessional financing and longer maturities, ensuring long-term fiscal sustainability.
World Bank-funded projects are: Punjab Clean Air Programme, Getting Results: Action, Delivery of Quality Education Services; Punjab Rural Sustainable Water Supply & Sanitation Project (PRSWSSP); Punjab Resilient and Inclusive Agriculture Transformation Project (PRIAT); Punjab Urban Land Systems Enhancement (PULSE) Project; Punjab Human Capital Investment Project; Punjab Resource Improvement and Digital Effectiveness; Punjab Family Planning Programme (PFPP); Punjab Affordable Housing Programme (PAHP); National Health Support Programme; Punjab Tourism for Economic Growth Project (PTEGP); Punjab Cities Programme and Punjab Green Development Programme (PGDP).
The ADB-funded projects included: Construction of Jalalpur Irrigation Project; Punjab Intermediate Cities Improvement Investment Programme; Project Readiness Financing (PRF) for Punjab Water Resources Management; Project Readiness Financing for Punjab Urban Development Projects; Improving Workforce Readiness in Punjab Project; Developing Resilient Environment and Advancing Municipal Services (DREAMS) in Punjab; Responsive Ready and Resilient STEM Secondary Education in Punjab.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
20 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Dollar holds gains ahead of inflation data; Aussie awaits RBA
TOKYO: The US dollar held steady on Tuesday, with markets braced for a key consumer inflation report later in the day that could shape expectations for Federal Reserve interest rate cuts. The Australian dollar was steady hours before a policy decision by the Reserve Bank of Australia. The US dollar index - which measures the currency against six counterparts, including the euro and yen - was steady at 98.497 as of 0046 GMT, after advancing 0.5% over the past two sessions. Prior to that, the dollar had retreated as U.S. President Donald Trump's dovish-leaning pick to replace a Fed governor, and similarly inclined potential candidates for chairman, led traders to increase easing bets. In addition, Fed officials have sounded increasingly uneasy about the labour market, signalling their as soon as September. Cooling inflation could cement bets for a reduction next month, but if signs emerge that Trump's tariffs are fuelling price pressures, that might keep the central bank on hold for now. Traders currently put the odds of a quarter-point cut on September 17 at about 89%. 'Risk-reward heading into U.S. CPI this week is for a modest USD bounce as any upside surprise will challenge market pricing of almost a full cut by September,' TD Securities strategists wrote in a research note. 'A downside surprise, on the other hand, is unlikely to move Fed pricing and the USD as much,' they said. 'The reasoning is that for the Fed to consider an outsized cut of 50 basis points, the catalyst will be further deterioration in the labour market and not a downside CPI miss.' Economists polled by Reuters expect core CPI to have risen 0.3% in July, pushing the annual rate higher to 3%. The greenback rose 0.1% to 148.28 yen on Tuesday. The euro was flat at $1.1615. The dollar on Monday largely ignored Trump's signing an in sharply higher tariffs on Chinese imports for another 90 days, a move that some market participants said was expected. With the United States and China seeking to close a deal averting triple-digit import tariffs, a U.S. official told Reuters that chip makers Nvidia and AMD had agreed to allocate 15% of China sales revenues to the U.S. government, aiming to secure for semiconductors. The yuan was flat at 7.1935 per dollar in offshore trading . The Aussie fetched $0.6518, little changed from Monday with economists and investors widely expecting a quarter-point rate reduction from the RBA, after second-quarter came in weaker than expected and the jobless rate hit a 3-1/2-year high. However, the risk of a surprise has been amplified by a change in decision-making at the central bank, and many traders were caught out when the policy board refrained from lowering rates last month. Cryptocurrency bitcoin was unchanged at around $118,845, after it climbed as high as $122,308.25 on Monday that took it close to the all-time peak of $123,153.22 from mid-July.
Business Recorder
a day ago
- Business Recorder
Trade ambitions and sanctions realities
EDITORIAL: It is a promising signal that Iran and Pakistan have chosen to deepen economic cooperation at a time when the region — and indeed the world — is realigning itself under shifting power equations. A USD 10 billion annual trade target is no small ambition, and President Pezeshkian's first official visit to Pakistan since taking office underlines Tehran's readiness to work with Islamabad to meet it. The warmth on display, from Lahore to Islamabad, and the repeated gestures of solidarity exchanged between the two delegations reflect encouraging maturity in bilateral ties. But ambition alone doesn't move trade. As with most things in this part of the world, the bigger story lies in what isn't being said. The last time Pakistan tried to pursue a transformative energy partnership with Iran, through the Iran-Pakistan gas pipeline, the entire project was brought to its knees by American pressure and the threat of sanctions. Today, the geopolitical temperature is even higher — and the sanctions' regime is far more aggressive. So the question is simple: how exactly do both sides plan to reach that USD 10 billion mark? The Americans have made it clear that even friends and strategic partners are not exempt from the rules. India was sharply reprimanded for engaging too openly with Russia. European states have faced secondary threats for exploring trade that could circumvent restrictions. In this environment, it is inconceivable that Washington will sit idle while two Muslim neighbours forge an expansive trade relationship with one of the world's most heavily sanctioned economies. And yet that's precisely why this initiative matters. If Pakistan and Iran can demonstrate an effective, legal framework to grow trade while navigating the sanctions' minefield, they may offer a blueprint for others in the region facing similar dilemmas. But that framework has to be clearly articulated. Otherwise, this remains yet another round of high-sounding intent with little prospect of implementation. Border markets, local currency settlements, barter mechanisms, and third-party intermediaries have all been discussed in the past. But without serious institutional design, and real political will, they haven't gone far. If this renewed push is to succeed, both capitals must show how the mechanics of trade will be shielded from punitive action, how banks and customs authorities will be protected, and how businesses will be incentivised to take part despite the obvious risk. There is also a diplomatic layer that cannot be ignored. For Pakistan, this balancing act will only become harder as it tries to maintain strategic relations with both Iran and the west. The same applies to Iran, which must decide how to engage regional players without endangering its existing partnerships. Quietly, both sides likely understand that a successful trade expansion must also include a quiet understanding with Washington; or, at the very least, the ability to convincingly demonstrate that the arrangement does not violate international obligations. It is also worth asking why there hasn't been more transparency from both governments about how these goals will be achieved. The statements from the Iranian president were full of brotherly warmth and regional vision. The Pakistani side echoed those sentiments. But beyond calls for unity and generic pledges of cooperation, there is still little detail on how a sanctions-proof architecture will be built. This silence is understandable, perhaps. But it is also dangerous. In an economic environment as fragile as Pakistan's, and as constrained as Iran's, lofty goals without credible roadmaps invite not just scepticism, but policy fatigue. Stakeholders — whether state-owned firms, private traders, or regional partners — need clarity before they can commit. Still, this moment holds promise. For once, both countries are aligned in political vision and economic intent. If they can now align on execution, the results could be transformative. But they must also be realistic. In today's world, trade isn't just about tariffs and logistics; it's about sovereignty, resilience, and the skill to navigate hostile global currents. That's the test before them now. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
a day ago
- Business Recorder
CTBCM: Electricity market that has never arrived
Delays, poor design, and lack of consultation with industries risk turning CTBCM into a missed opportunity for Pakistan's power sector and its industries. For years, Pakistan's power sector has operated on a single-buyer model that leaves industrial consumers with little to no choice, rising costs, and no meaningful competition in the sector. The Competitive Trading Bilateral Contracts Market (CTBCM) was supposed to change that. Approved by NEPRA in 2020, it promised to open the market so Bulk Power Consumers (BPCs), those using more than 1 MW, could buy electricity directly from generators at negotiated or cheapest prices. The vision was simple: competition would drive efficiency, private investment would flow, and tariffs would become more competitive. Billions have since been spent on training, IT systems, and legal frameworks to make this happen. Donors, consultants, and the market operator have put in years of work. Yet, five years later, the market is still not there. Therefore, the industry confidence is wearing thin. One of the biggest frustrations from businesses is the almost complete lack of awareness and engagement. Gurus sitting and making tariffs and decisions are absolutely unaware of ground realities of how industries in Pakistan operate, they seldom leave their air-conditioned offices to actually go and check the working and functionality of the industry. Beyond a handful of isolated efforts, a seminar at NED University led by then-Chairman Tauseef H. Farooqi, seminars, and efforts from Renewables First, and an analysis by Arzachel, there has been no sustained outreach. No consultation No regular workshops, no clear timelines, no detailed explanation of how the market will actually work. Many factory owners still don't know what CTBCM or Electricity is, let alone how to participate in it. There was one online consultation held in which the government and regulator's own officials kept throwing illogical comments and ideas at each other and industry was not even allowed to speak. While policymakers talk, industry is acting. In the last four years alone, Pakistan has imported over USD 4 billion worth of solar panels, with a record USD 2.1 billion in just the first half of 2024. Solar now often delivers electricity for under Rs 10 per unit, compared to Rs 30 or more from the grid. Large industrial zones, especially in Karachi, are covered in rooftop and ground-mounted solar arrays. And every month that CTBCM is delayed, more megawatts are locked into captive generation, shrinking the future customer base for the market before it even begins. This lack of urgency is paired with a lack of consultation. The Power Division never sits with industry when designing tariffs or market rules. ISMO is online, but there are 5 other agencies and departments overlapping the function of ISMO in different ways. That's how we end up with illogical structures like high-voltage industrial consumers (B3, B4) paying more per unit than low-voltage B2 consumers, which the Gurus of Power Division are still unable to understand, even though the former invest in their own transformers and save the grid significant costs. In the CTBCM process, the first real invitation for feedback only came in May 2025, when key rules and cost recovery mechanisms were already drafted. One such mechanism, forcing open-access consumers to pay for legacy capacity charges from old DISCO contracts, has been heavily criticized by industry groups like the Korangi Association of Trade & Industry. It violates the principle of open access and removes the very savings that would make the market attractive. Then, surprisingly, there's the proposed 800 MW cap for CTBCM's first phase. It's not in the NEPRA Act, the National Electricity Policy 2021, or the approved CTBCM design, yet it risks locking the market at barely 5% of national capacity. NEPRA has already warned that such a fixed limit could cause confusion and delay, and stakeholders think it will even lead to corruption. If there must be a cap, it should be auctioned transparently by NEPRA and expanded quickly if demand is strong. Wheeling charges are another red flag. The government's amended structure adds up to Rs 12.55 per unit before even adding a generator's bid price, largely because it includes policy and fiscal charges like the Rs 3.23 Debt Servicing Surcharge and Rs 3.47 cross-subsidy. These have nothing to do with using the network and, in many cases, are already being collected through other means. Internationally, such costs are kept out of wheeling to ensure open-access buyers aren't penalized for choosing competition. If Pakistan insists on loading them into wheeling, CTBCM will start life uncompetitive. There is a higher risk involved if this cross subsidy and DSS are made part of wheeling charges, they will be increased later on when open access becomes a reality because of the legendary and historic underperformance of the Power sector. There's also a missing piece in the current design: giving DISCOs and K-Electric the ability to compete as licensed suppliers. Power Division experts think it might become an obstruction for other competitive suppliers, but the reality is they can easily be managed with regulatory controls and checks. Right now, they're being boxed and forced into the role of 'supplier of last resort.' That might sound harmless, but it means they'll be left with only the least profitable consumers as the best-paying customers leave, which will blow up subsidy requirements and further erode performance. This is the biggest obstruction in Disco Privatization as well, as no one would want a disco with only loss-giving or subsidy-dependent consumers. In India and other markets, DISCOs compete for customers while also fulfilling last-resort obligations, creating an incentive to improve service and retain clients, thus requiring less subsidy. This is one of the biggest issues where the Minister of Power himself must take notice and even SIFC must intervene, ignoring the hue and cry of Power Division officials. Independent Power Producers (IPPs) also need more flexibility. If their contracts were amended to allow partial capacity sales into the competitive market, it would boost liquidity and give buyers more choice. DISCOs could play a larger role too, becoming active competitive suppliers. The more players in the market, from large generators to retail suppliers, the more competition, and with competition comes efficiency. If CTBCM is to succeed, the government must move from promises to delivery. That means announcing a clear go-live date, stripping non-network costs out of wheeling charges, fixing irrational tariffs, making any capacity caps transparent and flexible, empowering DISCOs and KE to compete, allowing IPPs to sell into the market, and involving industry in every step of the design. Without these changes, CTBCM risks becoming an expensive formality in a power sector already splintering into captive and off-grid solutions. With them, it could still deliver cheaper, more reliable power and finally put Pakistan's electricity market on a competitive footing. (The writer is an avid power sector expert and a leading industrialist from Karachi. He can be reached at rehanjawed@
