UN Secretary-General Appoints High-Level Expert Group On Beyond GDP
The Secretary-General has today appointed an independent High-Level Expert Group to develop recommendations for measures that complement or go beyond Gross Domestic Product (GDP). The appointment of the Expert Group follows a request by Member States in the Pact for the Future and reflects a shared and long-standing goal. When adopting the Sustainable Development Goals in 2015, Member States committed to the development of measures of progress that complement GDP by 2030. They did so in recognition that GDP, which is heavily relied upon as a gauge of prosperity and is the basis for government targets and rankings, provides an incomplete picture of the different dimensions of sustainable development.
'This initiative could not be timelier. Every day, we witness the consequences of our failure to balance economic, social and environmental dimensions of development,' the Secretary-General said. 'To achieve the progress we need, the well-being of people and the planet must be at the centre of what we measure and value. Measures that complement GDP can enable a paradigm shift in policymaking that refocuses efforts on sustainable development and prosperity for all,' he underscored.
In Our Common Agenda and the supporting Policy Brief on Valuing What Counts: Framework to Progress Beyond Gross Domestic Product, the Secretary-General elaborated the case for this initiative. He emphasized the need to overcome a 'harmful anachronism' at the heart of global policy making, in which our current metrics overlook many aspects that contribute to human well-being, while at the same time valuing some activities that harm people and planet. Complementary metrics are therefore crucial to expand the data on which policy decisions and prioritizations are made. Ultimately, these metrics can drive behavior change in how societies think about and pursue progress.
In the Pact for the Future, Member States recognized that 'sustainable development must be pursued in a balanced and integrated manner', and requested the creation of an Expert Group to identify complementary metrics. Today's announcement marks an important step in this endeavor.
About the High-Level Expert Group
The Expert Group will be tasked with elaborating a conceptual framework that identifies key dimensions of progress, and developing an initial list of corresponding country-owned, universally-applicable indicators of sustainable development to form a dashboard that equips governments with the information they need. In addition, it will provide guidance on the deployment of the dashboard to maximize its uptake, and on priorities for data collection and statistical capacity to operationalize the dashboard and indicators.
The Expert Group will closely consult with Member States and key stakeholders throughout the process, taking into account the work of the UN Statistical Commission, and building on the global indicator framework for the Sustainable Development Goals. The High-Level Expert Group will present the outcome of its work during the eightieth session of the General Assembly, which will inform a subsequent intergovernmental process.
The 14 members of the independent Expert Group represent eminent scholars and experts from various domains, as well as reflecting gender and geographical diversity. The Expert Group will be led by two co-chairs, Mr. Kaushik Basu and Ms. Nora Lustig, and be supported by a technical secretariat composed of staff from the Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA), the UN Conference for Trade and Development (UNCTAD), the UN Development Programme (UNDP) and the Executive Office of the Secretary-General (EOSG).
High-Level Expert Group Members
The High-Level Expert Group members – all working in their personal capacity – include:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
4 days ago
- Scoop
NZ's Budget For Austerity And War
Article – Socialist Equality Group The money for war comes at the direct expense of the working class. Notably, the govt expects to save $12.8 billion over four years by cancelling 33 separate pay equity negotiations, which were to increase pay for hundreds of thousands of … The budget announced by New Zealand's right-wing coalition government on May 22 represents a major escalation in the assault on workers' wages, living standards and public services, in order to fund tax breaks for the rich and to build up the military in preparation for war. Finance Minister Nicola Willis asserted that the budget was 'not austerity—far from it,' saying that it contained 'much-needed investments' in health and education. This flies in the face of reality. The government slashed the budget's operating allowance (total increase in spending) to $1.3 billion—the lowest figure in a decade. Over the next four years it intends to reduce total spending from 32.9 to 30.9 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP). The government cited deepening economic turmoil as a result of the Trump administration's tariffs, which come on top of last year's recession in New Zealand. The country's economy shrank by 0.5 percent in 2024, and unemployment rose from 4 to 5.1 percent, with tens of thousands of workers sacked across the public sector and by private companies. There is a stark social crisis, with soaring living costs, an estimated 500,000 people (one in ten) relying on food banks and one in five children living in poverty—all of which will get worse as a result of the budget changes. The most significant new spending is on the military, in line with demands from the US, Australia and the NATO imperialist powers. The defence budget will rise from 1 to 2 percent of GDP over the next eight years, starting with an investment of nearly $13 billion over four years. Far-right ACT Party leader and government minister David Seymour warned in parliament that the 'the chances are higher than ever' that New Zealand will need to use its military. The increased spending, he said, 'allows us to be part of a network of like-minded democratic societies committed to defending our freedoms in an uncertain world.' In fact, as was made clear in last month's Defence Capability Plan, the aim is to integrate New Zealand into aggressive US-led military preparations targeting China. As a minor imperialist power, New Zealand is already contributing to the brutal war in Ukraine and the bombing of Yemen, which are part of the imperialist countries' efforts to solve their economic crisis by violently redividing the world. The opposition Labour Party supports this agenda: its leader Chris Hipkins did not mention the vast military spending boost in his response to the budget. His ally, Green Party co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick stated that the government 'think it's harder to feed the poor [than] to arm up for somebody else's war.' The Greens' alternative budget, however, is silent on the rearmament program. As part of the last Labour-led coalition government from 2017 to 2023, the Greens supported increased military spending and the decision to send troops to Britain to assist in training Ukrainian conscripts for war against Russia. The party has recently adopted the militarist slogan of making NZ 'a country worth fighting for.' The money for war comes at the direct expense of the working class. Notably, the government expects to 'save' $12.8 billion over four years by cancelling 33 separate pay equity negotiations, which were to increase pay for hundreds of thousands of workers in female-dominated roles, including teachers. Other attacks include: Reduced government contributions to KiwiSaver, a retirement savings scheme covering most workers. Currently, members of the scheme can get $521 a year from the state, but this has been halved to $260.72 in order to save the government $2.46 billion over four years. Around 9,000 unemployed 18- and 19-year-olds will be kicked off unemployment benefits 'if it is determined that their parents or caregivers can support them.' The move is particularly brutal given that 13.2 percent of under-25-year-olds are not employed or in education—more than double the overall unemployment rate. The Best Start tax credit, given to parents in the first year of their child's life, will be income-tested, which will lead to 'a reduction in income' for around 61,000 families, according to government officials. $1 billion will be cut over five years to emergency housing for the homeless, under conditions where 2.3 percent of the population is severely housing deprived. None of these cuts will be offset by the pitifully small 'relief' touted by the government, consisting of a $7-a-week increase in tax credits for some working families. The government's rhetoric about increased investment in health and education is likewise a sham. Total annual health spending has increased by just 4.77 percent ($1.37 billion)—not enough to address the crisis of unmet need and understaffing of public hospitals and medical centres. With inflation at 2.5 percent and annual population growth of 1.5 to 2 percent, Auckland University health policy professor Tim Tenbensel wrote in the Conversation that a 4–5 percent funding increase 'amounts to merely standing still.' Doctors, nurses and other healthcare workers have held strikes over the past year-and-a-half to protest below-inflation pay offers and a hiring freeze in public hospitals. Funding for public education is being cut in real terms. Radio NZ reports that school operations grants have received an increase of just 1.5 percent. Meanwhile government subsidies for private schools, including several elite institutions, will rise by 11 percent. The budget will increase subsidies for university tuition by 3 percent or 4.75 percent, depending on the subject. Tertiary education providers, which have had their funding slashed by successive governments, will be permitted to increase fees by 6 percent, driving up student debt, which reached a total of $15.6 billion at the end of 2024. The government anticipates that its austerity measures will fuel social opposition and conflict and is therefore strengthening the repressive arms of the state. There is $472 million over four years to expand prisons and hire 580 more Corrections staff, in addition to 685 funded in last year's budget. Some $33 million over four years is allocated to expand military-style boot camps for young offenders. Labour Party leader Hipkins denounced several cuts in the budget, as well as $200 million in subsidies for fossil fuels development at gas fields. 'More people are homeless, more children are going hungry and women are going to be paid less. That's what Nicola Willis and [Prime Minister] Christopher Luxon will be remembered for,' Hipkins said. Such statements are typical of Labour's blatant hypocrisy. The National-led coalition government is, in fact, building upon the attacks of the last Labour government. Labour lost the 2023 election in a landslide defeat, fuelled by mass anger over soaring living costs, the crisis in the health system, increased child poverty and homelessness, as well as Labour's support for Israel's genocidal assault on Gaza. The Public Service Association's Fleur Fitzsimons similarly denounced the budget as 'wage theft on a national scale against New Zealand women.' The PSA, the biggest union, has enforced thousands of job cuts across the public sector, while also openly supporting the multi-billion dollar increase in military spending. The budget's austerity and warmongering will accelerate the movement to the left by workers and young people, who will come into conflict not only with the government, but with the opposition parties and the pro-capitalist union apparatus. The crucial task facing the working class is to establish its political independence from all these organisations and to consciously take up the fight for the socialist reorganisation of society. This means joining and fighting to build the world Trotskyist movement, which in New Zealand is represented by the Socialist Equality Group. 26 May 2025
Scoop
4 days ago
- Scoop
NZ's Budget For Austerity And War
Article – Socialist Equality Group The money for war comes at the direct expense of the working class. Notably, the govt expects to save $12.8 billion over four years by cancelling 33 separate pay equity negotiations, which were to increase pay for hundreds of thousands of … The budget announced by New Zealand's right-wing coalition government on May 22 represents a major escalation in the assault on workers' wages, living standards and public services, in order to fund tax breaks for the rich and to build up the military in preparation for war. Finance Minister Nicola Willis asserted that the budget was 'not austerity—far from it,' saying that it contained 'much-needed investments' in health and education. This flies in the face of reality. The government slashed the budget's operating allowance (total increase in spending) to $1.3 billion—the lowest figure in a decade. Over the next four years it intends to reduce total spending from 32.9 to 30.9 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP). The government cited deepening economic turmoil as a result of the Trump administration's tariffs, which come on top of last year's recession in New Zealand. The country's economy shrank by 0.5 percent in 2024, and unemployment rose from 4 to 5.1 percent, with tens of thousands of workers sacked across the public sector and by private companies. There is a stark social crisis, with soaring living costs, an estimated 500,000 people (one in ten) relying on food banks and one in five children living in poverty—all of which will get worse as a result of the budget changes. The most significant new spending is on the military, in line with demands from the US, Australia and the NATO imperialist powers. The defence budget will rise from 1 to 2 percent of GDP over the next eight years, starting with an investment of nearly $13 billion over four years. Far-right ACT Party leader and government minister David Seymour warned in parliament that the 'the chances are higher than ever' that New Zealand will need to use its military. The increased spending, he said, 'allows us to be part of a network of like-minded democratic societies committed to defending our freedoms in an uncertain world.' In fact, as was made clear in last month's Defence Capability Plan, the aim is to integrate New Zealand into aggressive US-led military preparations targeting China. As a minor imperialist power, New Zealand is already contributing to the brutal war in Ukraine and the bombing of Yemen, which are part of the imperialist countries' efforts to solve their economic crisis by violently redividing the world. The opposition Labour Party supports this agenda: its leader Chris Hipkins did not mention the vast military spending boost in his response to the budget. His ally, Green Party co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick stated that the government 'think it's harder to feed the poor [than] to arm up for somebody else's war.' The Greens' alternative budget, however, is silent on the rearmament program. As part of the last Labour-led coalition government from 2017 to 2023, the Greens supported increased military spending and the decision to send troops to Britain to assist in training Ukrainian conscripts for war against Russia. The party has recently adopted the militarist slogan of making NZ 'a country worth fighting for.' The money for war comes at the direct expense of the working class. Notably, the government expects to 'save' $12.8 billion over four years by cancelling 33 separate pay equity negotiations, which were to increase pay for hundreds of thousands of workers in female-dominated roles, including teachers. Other attacks include: Reduced government contributions to KiwiSaver, a retirement savings scheme covering most workers. Currently, members of the scheme can get $521 a year from the state, but this has been halved to $260.72 in order to save the government $2.46 billion over four years. Around 9,000 unemployed 18- and 19-year-olds will be kicked off unemployment benefits 'if it is determined that their parents or caregivers can support them.' The move is particularly brutal given that 13.2 percent of under-25-year-olds are not employed or in education—more than double the overall unemployment rate. The Best Start tax credit, given to parents in the first year of their child's life, will be income-tested, which will lead to 'a reduction in income' for around 61,000 families, according to government officials. $1 billion will be cut over five years to emergency housing for the homeless, under conditions where 2.3 percent of the population is severely housing deprived. None of these cuts will be offset by the pitifully small 'relief' touted by the government, consisting of a $7-a-week increase in tax credits for some working families. The government's rhetoric about increased investment in health and education is likewise a sham. Total annual health spending has increased by just 4.77 percent ($1.37 billion)—not enough to address the crisis of unmet need and understaffing of public hospitals and medical centres. With inflation at 2.5 percent and annual population growth of 1.5 to 2 percent, Auckland University health policy professor Tim Tenbensel wrote in the Conversation that a 4–5 percent funding increase 'amounts to merely standing still.' Doctors, nurses and other healthcare workers have held strikes over the past year-and-a-half to protest below-inflation pay offers and a hiring freeze in public hospitals. Funding for public education is being cut in real terms. Radio NZ reports that school operations grants have received an increase of just 1.5 percent. Meanwhile government subsidies for private schools, including several elite institutions, will rise by 11 percent. The budget will increase subsidies for university tuition by 3 percent or 4.75 percent, depending on the subject. Tertiary education providers, which have had their funding slashed by successive governments, will be permitted to increase fees by 6 percent, driving up student debt, which reached a total of $15.6 billion at the end of 2024. The government anticipates that its austerity measures will fuel social opposition and conflict and is therefore strengthening the repressive arms of the state. There is $472 million over four years to expand prisons and hire 580 more Corrections staff, in addition to 685 funded in last year's budget. Some $33 million over four years is allocated to expand military-style boot camps for young offenders. Labour Party leader Hipkins denounced several cuts in the budget, as well as $200 million in subsidies for fossil fuels development at gas fields. 'More people are homeless, more children are going hungry and women are going to be paid less. That's what Nicola Willis and [Prime Minister] Christopher Luxon will be remembered for,' Hipkins said. Such statements are typical of Labour's blatant hypocrisy. The National-led coalition government is, in fact, building upon the attacks of the last Labour government. Labour lost the 2023 election in a landslide defeat, fuelled by mass anger over soaring living costs, the crisis in the health system, increased child poverty and homelessness, as well as Labour's support for Israel's genocidal assault on Gaza. The Public Service Association's Fleur Fitzsimons similarly denounced the budget as 'wage theft on a national scale against New Zealand women.' The PSA, the biggest union, has enforced thousands of job cuts across the public sector, while also openly supporting the multi-billion dollar increase in military spending. The budget's austerity and warmongering will accelerate the movement to the left by workers and young people, who will come into conflict not only with the government, but with the opposition parties and the pro-capitalist union apparatus. The crucial task facing the working class is to establish its political independence from all these organisations and to consciously take up the fight for the socialist reorganisation of society. This means joining and fighting to build the world Trotskyist movement, which in New Zealand is represented by the Socialist Equality Group. By Tom Peters, Socialist Equality Group 26 May 2025
Scoop
15-05-2025
- Scoop
Over 60 Per Cent Of The Arab World Still Outside The Banking System
15 May 2025 Even more impressively, the number of Egyptian women with an account increased by 260 per cent, though gender gaps do remain. But how you widen financial inclusion overall is a question the Arab region is currently grappling with. A new report from the UN Economic and Social Commission in Western Asia (UNESCWA) published on Thursday highlights the challenge. Nearly 64 per cent of adults in the 22 countries in the Arab region are still without an account – or 'unbanked' – a higher number than all other regions of the world and significantly higher than the 24 per cent global average. The report warns that this level of financial exclusion will negatively impact economic opportunities and the region's ability to meet Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by 2030. 'The Arab region cannot afford to treat financial services as a luxury. Without inclusive finance, we cannot hope to lift people out of poverty, support small businesses, or achieve equitable growth,' said ESCWA's Mario Jales, lead author of the report. 'The digital divide within the divide' The report finds that women and disabled people have even less access to financial services – only 29 per cent of women and 21 per cent of disabled people in the region have an account. Similarly, rural communities and younger and older people also experience lower rates of inclusion in the banking system. The report also highlighted that access to loans for small and medium-sized businesses is worryingly low, reducing entrepreneurial and other income-producing activities. In addition to gender disparities, there are variations within the Arab region – 81 per cent of people in low-income countries do not have access to an account in comparison to 67 per cent in middle-income countries and 23 per cent in the high-income bracket. Models of success Given that regional rates of financial inclusion remain so low, how do countries work to improve them? The basis of Egypt's success was the implementation of a comprehensive national strategy to promote financial inclusion, a strategy which actively worked to target underserved communities, ESCWA points out. For example, in Egypt, 22 per cent of ATMs in the country have now been equipped with accessibility features including brighter lighting and Braille keyboards. Other countries in the region have also implemented national strategies which include targeted initiatives. Jordan, which has the second widest gender gap in the region, implemented a Microfund for Women to provide loans for income-generating activities. There are now 60 branches across the country, serving 133,000 borrowers, 95 per cent of whom are women. Moreover, some banks in the region have worked to implement financial literacy classes and others have worked to tailor their services to underserved communities including by lowering minimum deposits. The report concludes that an expansion of all these activities – national policymaking which targets underserved communities and private bank activities which lower barriers to entry and support financial literacy – will be essential in improving financial inclusion. ' The path forward exists, but it requires political will, targeted investment and a whole-of-society approach,' the report concludes.
