
Lt Gen Pratik Sharma takes over as Northern Army Commander amid heightened tensions with Pakistan
Lt Gen Sharma, who was earlier the deputy chief of the Indian Army (strategy), takes over following the superannuation of Lt Gen M.V. Suchindra Kumar on 30 April.
New Delhi: Lieutenant General Pratik Sharma Thursday took over as the general officer commanding-in-chief (GOC-in-C) of the critical Northern Command amid heightened tensions with Pakistan on one side and continued stand-off with China on the other.
Commissioned into the 2nd Battalion of the Madras Regiment, the new Northern Army commander has served as the director general of military operations (DGMO), the crucial wing of the Indian Army that oversees the operational requirements and strategies.
Lt Gen Sharma has also served as the commander of the Ambala-based 2 Corps, also known as the Kharga Corps, which is one of the two Strike Corps meant for the Western borders.
He has also commanded a Division in the Poonch sector of Jammu and Kashmir. Incidentally, Lt Gen Sharma had been stationed in Kashmir since the Pahalgam attack and was part of all security briefings and planning.
The Northern Command looks after both the borders with Pakistan and China, besides having a counter-infiltration and counter-terrorism role.
In over three decades, Lt Gen Sharma has served in multiple operational environments, including Operation Pawan, the Indian Peace Keeping Force (IPKF)'s operation in Jaffa, Sri Lanka in the late 1980s; Operation Meghdoot, the 1984 Indian Army operation to take back the Siachen Glacier, which continues; Operation Rakshak, a counter-terrorism operation in Jammu and Kashmir that began in the 1990s; and Operation Parakram, the 2001-02 standoff between India and Pakistan.
He has also served in the military secretary branch and was the director general, (information warfare), a recently institutionalised information directorate at the Army headquarters in New Delhi.
Other key appointments
Air Marshal Ashutosh Dixit, who was earlier the air officer commanding-in-chief of Central Air Command in Allahabad, has taken over as the new chief of integrated defence staff (CISC) following the superannuation of Lt Gen J.P. Mathew.
A seasoned test pilot and qualified flying instructor with over 3,300 flying hours, Air Marshal Dixit brings in extensive operational and planning experience and has commanded a Mirage squadron.
He will be replaced by Air Marshal Balakrishnan Manikantan, currently AOC-in-C of the Southern Air Command.
Meanwhile, Air Marshal Narmdeshwar Tiwari has taken over as the new vice-chief of the Air Staff following the superannuation of Air Marshal S.P. Dharkar.
Tiwari was earlier commanding the South Western Air Command in Gandhinagar, and he will be replaced by the current Training Command Chief, Air Marshal Nagesh Kapoor.
(Edited by Sanya Mathur)
Also Read: Ultra & Alpine Quest—technologies that keep Pakistani terrorists, especially LeT, going in J&K
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India.com
2 hours ago
- India.com
Ukraine's new 'Flamingo' missile can strike targets up to 3000 kms away, has ability to hit deep inside Russia, including Moscow and St. Petersburg
The war between Ukraine and Russia is constantly bringing new weapons into focus. Recently, Ukraine surprised the world by unveiling its new cruise missile called 'Flamingo.' Reports claim that this missile can strike targets up to 3,000 kilometers away and carry a heavy warhead weighing up to one ton. This means Ukraine now has the ability to hit deep inside Russia, including major cities like Moscow and St. Petersburg. How was the Flamingo missile made? Photos of the Flamingo missile were shared by Associated Press photojournalist Efrem Lukatsky. According to reports, it has been developed by a Ukrainian company named Fire Point. Its design is quite similar to the earlier FP-5 model, which was originally linked to a Dubai-based company called Milanion. The Flamingo missile is about six meters long and weighs nearly six tons. It flies at high subsonic speed and is an unmanned cruise missile, in simple words, it can be called a 'large drone.' Why Flamingo missile dangerous for Russia? So far, Russia's big cities have largely been shielded from the direct impact of the war. Most of the casualties have come from rural areas or non-Russian regions. But if missiles like Flamingo repeatedly strike Moscow or St. Petersburg, it could shake Putin's political grip. History shows that when ordinary city residents start suffering the pain of war, the foundation of power begins to weaken. The Soviet Union's withdrawal from Afghanistan was also accelerated for this very reason. Ukraine's challenges However, the Flamingo missile has its own weaknesses. Being a cruise missile, it can travel long distances but does not fly very fast. Cities like Moscow have strong air defense systems, making it unlikely that one or two missiles alone could succeed. To make an impact, Ukraine would need to launch them in large numbers, using decoys and electronic warfare for support. In this, weapons like the American MALD (Miniature Air-Launched Decoy), which has a range of over 900 km, could play a big role. Is this missile a gamechanger? The Flamingo missile alone will not change the course of the war. But if Ukraine launches it in large numbers, along with local decoys, electronic jamming, and ballistic weapons, the situation could shift. Such a strategy could bring the war's impact directly to ordinary citizens living in Russia's capital.


Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Decode Politics: Under ED scanner, why TN Minister Periyasamy is key to DMK game plan in 2026 polls
While Tamil Nadu Rural Development Minister and senior DMK leader I Periyasamy, the 72-year-old strongman from Dindigul, has kept a low profile during the last four years of the M K Stalin-led party government in the state, he has come under the spotlight in recent days. What is the row? Last Saturday, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) conducted searches at the premises of Periyasamy and his family members, including his son and DMK MLA I P Senthil Kumar, in Dindigul, his home turf, and Chennai. The ED's action was dubbed 'politically-motivated' by the DMK, which argued that it came just a few months after the BJP and the AIADMK formed their alliance for the state Assembly elections slated for April 2026. Top sources in the DMK government alleged that Periyasamy was raided by the ED as 'the AIADMK-BJP combine have decided to target the DMK strongmen who hold sway in districts and are critical to election funding and mobilisation for the party'. 'At least six DMK heavyweights, who are known to marshal resources at scale during campaigns, would be under watch in this regard,' a DMK minister claimed. Although Periyasamy has been a low-key DMK figure in the Stalin dispensation as compared to his stint during the period of the late party patriarch K Karunanidhi, he wields enormous clout in Dindigul which he has maintained for decades. He is known as one of the DMK's most rooted district satraps. The DMK camp pointed out that the ED's raids at the Periyasamy family's properties came just two days ahead of a hearing in the Supreme Court on a plea filed by them. On Monday, the Supreme Court stayed a Madras High Court's April order which revived a 2012 disproportionate assets case against Periyasamy, his wife, and two sons – including Senthil Kumar, the two-term DMK MLA from Dindigul's Palani – setting aside the 2017 discharge order of a trial court in the case. The ED however released a statement stating that there were seizures of documents and digital devices from its last week's raids at the Periyasamy family's premises and at Irulappa Mills India Pvt Ltd, a Dindigul-based company where Periyasamy and his younger son are directors. What are the cases? The legal cloud now hanging over Periyasamy involves two separate cases: one, a probe into the alleged illegal allotment of Tamil Nadu Housing Board (TNHB) plots in 2008, and, two, the more recent disproportionate assets case that led to the ED's raids. First case The first case lodged against Periyasamy alleges that as the housing minister in 2008, he oversaw 'irregular' allotment of a high-income group plot by the TNHB to Ganesan, the personal security officer of the then chief minister Karunanidhi. The state government's Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption (DVAC) registered the case against him in 2011, after the AIADMK swept to power under J Jayalalithaa. What followed was more than a decade of litigation. The then Assembly Speaker P Dhanapal granted sanction for Periyasamy's prosecution in 2012, which he contested while arguing that only the Governor could do so. His discharge plea was rejected by a trial court in 2016, which was upheld by both the Madras High Court and the Supreme Court in 2022. In March 2023, a special court discharged him in the matter. However, in April this year, high court judge Justice N Anand Venkatesh overturned Periyasamy's discharge, transferred the case to a special court for the MPs and MLAs, and ordered daily hearings with warnings of judicial custody if the accused delayed proceedings. 'The public must see that no one, however powerful, can escape trial,' the judge observed. Second case The second case against Periyasamy stems from a 2012 DVAC chargesheet that accused him and his family of amassing assets worth about Rs 2 crore, allegedly disproportionate to their known sources of income, during his tenure as the revenue and prisons minister. A special court in Dindigul had discharged him and his family, but the high court set aside the discharge in April 2025. The ED's weekend raids brought this case against the DMK minister back in focus. The agency officials alleged they uncovered 'paper (dummy) companies' linked to Irulappa Mills, indicating attempts at 'laundering funds'. While the investigation into the case has continued, the DMK renewed its charge that the central agencies were allegedly going after its leaders at the behest of the BJP-led Centre. What is Periyasamy's salience? In the 2021 Assembly elections, Periyasamy garnered the largest winning margin in the state, 135,571 votes, to retain his Athoor seat in Dindigul. In the 2011 polls, when the DMK was routed across the state, finishing with just 23 of 234 seats, he still managed to win Athoor by about 54,000 votes. Only the then incumbent CM Karunanidhi had a similar winning margin among the party MLAs – clinching his Tiruvarur seat by over 50,000 votes – as the party was decimated in the wake of the 2G spectrum scam. DMK sources said Periyasamy's dominance in Dindigul 'powers the party to pick at least four seats' in the region. In the rough and tumble of Tamil Nadu politics, this makes him crucial for the DMK: a 'votebank custodian' in a region where the BJP has been attempting social engineering for about a decade. He also belongs to the dominant Thevar (OBC) community. And yet, despite his political heft, Periyasamy has largely avoided the limelight during the Stalin regime. Unlike other ministers, he has seldom been the public face of the government. Those close to him describe him as a 'cautious leader shaped by years of legal battles and by his district-first instincts'. DMK ministers under scanner Several DMK ministers have faced raids by the central agencies in connection with various cases – mostly in the first year of the party-led government – who include Stalin's close aide and minister EV Velu, then minister K Ponmudy, party heavyweight K Senthil Balaji, and party veteran S Jagathrakshakan. Balaji, an accused in a cash-for-jobs scam, had been in prison for about 14 months. In these cases, the DMK has accused the BJP of allegedly 'leaning' on the central agencies to weaken its satraps. 'Our fear has not been conviction but disruption: senior ministers tied up in hearings, raids, and bail pleas; cadres demoralised by headlines; CM Stalin's attention diverted,' a DMK insider said. A senior DMK minister alleged, 'These cases are meant to diminish DMK's influence, not necessarily to secure convictions.' DMK spokesperson TKS Elangovan had said earlier, 'Those aligning with the NDA are spared (from these raids), those opposing it are not.' On its part, the BJP has refuted such allegations, maintaining that the agencies work independently as per the law. For Stalin, the challenge has also been about balancing optics with loyalty. Removing Balaji from his Cabinet was politically untenable for the DMK in Karur. Similarly, sidelining Periyasamy may spark a blowback for the party in Dindigul.


NDTV
3 hours ago
- NDTV
Amid "No-First-Use Policy", China Explands Its Nuclear Forces: Report
Honh Kong: Alongside a massive build-up in conventional military firepower, China has embarked on a rapid and sustained increase in the size and capability of its nuclear forces, according to the U.S. military and arms control experts. The commander of the U.S. Strategic Command, General Anthony Cotton, told Congress in March that the directive from Chinese leader Xi Jinping that China's military be ready to seize Taiwan by 2027 was driving a build-up of nuclear weapons that could be launched from land, air and sea. In its 2023 national defense policy, China renewed its longstanding pledge that it would not be the first to use nuclear weapons under any circumstances. The so-called 'no first use' policy also includes a promise that China will not use or threaten to use nuclear weapons against a non-nuclear armed state. In response to questions, the defense ministry in Beijing said 'a nuclear war cannot be won and must not be waged.' China, it said, adhered to a 'nuclear strategy of self-defense and pursues a no-first-use policy.' In its annual report on Chinese military power, the Pentagon said despite China's public stance, its strategy probably includes a possible first use in response to conventional attacks that threaten the viability of its nuclear forces, command and control or that approximates the effect of a nuclear strike. Beijing would also probably consider nuclear first use if a conventional military defeat in Taiwan 'gravely threatened' the Communist regime's survival, the Pentagon said in the report published late last year. China's defense ministry said it opposed 'any attempt to hype up the so-called 'Chinese nuclear threat' in an effort to smear and defame China and deliberately mislead the international community.' China is expanding and modernizing its weapons stockpile faster than any other nuclear-armed power and has accumulated about 600 warheads, according to the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, a Chicago-based non-profit. It said China is building about 350 new missile silos and several new bases for road mobile launchers. It estimated that China's military, the People's Liberation Army, had about 712 launchers for land-based missiles but not all were assigned for nuclear weapons. Of those launchers, 462 can be loaded with missiles 'that can reach the continental United States,' it said. Many of the PLA's launchers are for shorter range missiles intended to attack regional targets but most of those were not assigned for a nuclear strike, the Bulletin's assessment said. In its report, the Pentagon estimated that the PLA would have more than 1,000 operational nuclear warheads by 2030, as it seeks to build a bigger force ranging from low-yield precision strike missiles to intercontinental ballistic missiles with multi-megaton explosive impact.