Need Both Pakistan And India, Islamabad "A Phenomenal Partner": Top US General
A top US General, in a statement under oath, has stressed that Washington needs to have a strong relationship with both New Delhi and Islamabad/Rawalpindi, suggesting that the equation cannot be binary in nature. He added that the United States absolutely needs Pakistan as a partner in the region for America's fight against terrorism.
The remarks were made by General Michael Kurilla, head of the US Central Command, during a hearing at the House Armed Services Committee. The General praised Pakistan for its "counter-terror efforts" and helping the United States achieve its objectives in the region.
Describing Pakistan as a "phenomenal partner", the top US General mentioned how it is in an "active counter-terrorism fight" against the ISIS-Khorasan with the limited intelligence provided by Washington.
"ISIS Khorasan is perhaps one of the most active in trying to carry out external plots globally, which include against the homeland. Right now, what we saw is the Taliban going after the ISIS-K. They hate each other. They pushed a lot of them into the tribal areas on the Afghan-Pakistan border," General Kurilla said.
"Through a phenomenal partnership we have with Pakistan, they have gone after ISIS-Khorasan, killing dozens of them. Through a relationship that we have with Pakistan, we provide them intelligence, and so far they have captured at least 5 ISIS-Khorasan high value individuals. They extradited Jaffar, who was one of the key individuals behind the Abbeygate bombing and the first person who called - Chief of the Army Staff Munir - was me," he added.
He went on to say that Field Marshal Munir told him, "I have caught him (Jaffar) and we are going to extradite him back to the United States. Please tell the Secretary of Defence and the President. So, we are seeing Pakistan, with the limited intelligence that we have provided them, go after ISIS using their means to do that - and we are seeing the effect it has had on ISIS-Khorasan."
The top General then explained to the House committee how ISIS-K has been going back and forth at the Pakistan-Afghanistan border and have been active in that region. Explaining the role being played by the Pakistani army, he said, "I will honestly tell you that since the beginning of 2024, Pakistan had over a thousand terrorist attacks in the Western area, killing about 700 security personnel and civilians, and leaving more than 2,500 wounded. They (Pakistan) are in an active counter-terrorism fight right now and they have been a phenomenal partner in the counter-terrorism world."
General Kurilla told the panel that ISIS-K has gotten hit "very, very hard" in the last few months and are at a low-point right now, but continue to remain active.
Just as the panel was about to move to the next question, General Kurilla said he would like to add something to what he said. He then suggested that "We (United States) need to have a relationship with Pakistan and with India. I do not believe it to be a binary switch that we can't have one with Pakistan, if we have a relationship with India. We should look at the merits of the relationship for the positives that it has."
The top US military general's remarks have sent a clear signal to New Delhi, that Washington will continue to keep Pakistan as an ally while pursuing its geopolitical interests, and that India's fight against terror emanating from Pakistan is its own battle. The statement also makes it clear that India must not have the expectation that the United States will choose its strategic partnership with New Delhi over its ties with Islamabad.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Print
16 minutes ago
- The Print
Pakistan signs $1.5 billion deal to sell lethal combat weapons to Sudan's junta
Islamabad's planned arms sales will draw it into a toxic competition between Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, as well as a maze of Western sanctions designed to end the civil war. The deal was signed during a visit to Islamabad by 'Pilot' El Tahir Mohamed El Awad El Amin, the head of the SAF's air force, during which he reportedly held talks with Pakistan's defence minister, air force chief, and other senior military figures. New Delhi: Pakistan has signed an agreement to supply $1.5 billion worth of military equipment to the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF), the internationally sanctioned military junta fighting to control the war-torn north-east African country. The deal, believed to be paid for by a third nation, will give the regime of General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan access to light attack aircraft, engines, armoured fighting vehicles and a range of unmanned aerial vehicles. According to Swiss government sanctions, El Amin was responsible for the indiscriminate aerial bombing carried out by the air force of the SAF in densely populated residential areas, notably in Khartoum, Omdurman, Nyala (South Darfur) and North Kordofan, documented by the United Nations Integrated Transition Assistance Mission in Sudan. The indiscriminate air strikes, the sanctions documents reveal, caused the 'destruction of critical infrastructures, including medical facilities such as the East Nile Hospital in Khartoum in May 2023 and the Babiker Nahar Paediatric Hospital in El-Fasher in May 2024'. Earlier this year, the United States Treasury Department also imposed sanctions on the head of the SAF, Al-Burhan, holding that he had command responsibility for 'lethal attacks on civilians, including airstrikes against protected infrastructure including schools, markets, and hospitals'. The SAF is also held responsible for the routine and intentional denial of humanitarian access, using food deprivation as a war tactic. The Treasury Department had also indicted Ahmed Abdalla, a Sudanese-Ukrainian dual national, for routing Iranian-made UAVs through Azerbaijan to the SAF through his Hong Kong based firm, Portex. An arms embargo and asset freeze is also in place against both sides, enforced by the UN Security Council. However, both sides have continued to receive supplies of arms through third countries, while the Rapid Support Forces is alleged to have been using mercenaries recruited on its behalf by the UAE from Colombia. Fuelled by competition between Saudi Arabia and the UAE, the conflict in Sudan, which began in 2023, has claimed more than 70,000 lives, and left several hundred thousand people on the edge of starvation. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has backed the SAF, hoping to shut out Iran, and also bring stability to the Red Sea, where instability directly threatens key projects, like the city of Neom, and Yanbu Terminal expansion, which aims to diversify oil export routes away from the Strait of Hormuz, expert Elfadil Ibrahim explains. For its part, the UAE seeks to block jihadist groups, who were overthrown in 2019, from riding on the SAF's back to retake power. The Pakistani supplies—10 K8 Karakorum light attack aircraft, engines for MiG21 aircraft, HQ-9 and HQ-6 air defence systems, armoured fighting vehicles, and hundreds of various kinds of drones—would give a significant edge to the junta. Large numbers of countries, including India and Pakistan, had participated in UN peacekeeping operations in Sudan, which concluded in 2024. There have been inconclusive discussions since then on redeploying international forces to protect civilians. (Edited by Mannat Chugh) Also Read: Can Syria's tiny Druze minority survive West Asia's new storms? There's little hope
News18
25 minutes ago
- News18
Espionage case: Court extends YouTuber Jyoti Malhotra��s judicial custody
Hisar, Aug 18 (PTI) A local court on Monday extended by a week, the judicial custody of Hisar YouTuber Jyoti Malhotra, who was arrested on suspicion of espionage in May. Judicial magistrate (first class) Sunil Kumar extended the judicial custody after Malhotra (33) virtually appeared in the court. Her lawyer Kumar Mukesh said next date of hearing was set on August 25. He said after three months of investigation the police filed the chargesheet in the case on August 14. Malhotra was directed to remain physically present on the next hearing, when she would also be handed over a copy of the chargesheet, he added. On May 16, Hisar Police arrested Malhotra, who ran a YouTube channel 'Travel with JO". The YouTuber, who hails from Hisar, was arrested at the New Aggarsain Extension and booked under provisions of the Official Secrets Act and BNS. A court rejected her regular bail plea on June 9 after the police opposed it and argued the investigation in the case was underway. Hisar Police previously said no evidence emerged to indicate Malhotra had access to any military or defence-related information, but claimed she was in contact with some persons and was aware they were Pakistani intelligence operatives. Police sources have said she was in touch with Ehsan-ur-Rahim alias Danish, a staffer in the Pakistani High Commission, since November 2023. India expelled Danish on May 13 for allegedly being involved in espionage. The police in May claimed Pakistani intelligence operatives were developing Malhotra as an 'asset". PTI SUN AMK AMK (This story has not been edited by News18 staff and is published from a syndicated news agency feed - PTI) view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hans India
2 hours ago
- Hans India
Political Firestorm Erupts As Former Minister Challenges Pakistan Terror Link Claims
A major political controversy has engulfed the national discourse following senior Congress figure P Chidambaram's public questioning of the government's assertions linking Pakistan to the devastating Pahalgam terror incident. The former Union Minister's comments have triggered fierce exchanges between ruling and opposition parties, with accusations of undermining national security flying from multiple quarters. The contentious remarks emerged during Chidambaram's interview with The Quint, where he challenged the evidence presented by authorities connecting the April 22 attack to Pakistani elements. The assault, which claimed 26 lives including numerous civilians in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam region, has become a focal point of political debate regarding India's counter-terrorism approach and intelligence capabilities. In his controversial statements, Chidambaram questioned whether investigators had successfully identified the perpetrators or established their origins, suggesting the possibility that the attackers could have been domestically radicalized individuals rather than foreign operatives. His remarks specifically challenged the automatic assumption of Pakistani involvement, citing what he described as insufficient evidence to support such conclusions. The veteran politician has since responded vigorously to what he characterizes as a coordinated misinformation campaign designed to distort his actual position. Writing on social media platform X, Chidambaram accused critics of deliberately manipulating his interview by selectively editing portions and removing crucial context that would clarify his intended meaning. Chidambaram's defense focused on the methodology used by his critics, describing them as employing deceptive tactics by suppressing the complete recorded interview while extracting isolated sentences and muting specific words to create misleading impressions. He characterized such behavior as representing the most harmful form of information manipulation in contemporary political discourse. The ruling Bharatiya Janata Party launched an immediate and aggressive response to Chidambaram's statements, with senior leaders accusing the Congress party of providing unwarranted support to Pakistan's position while undermining India's national security interests. BJP IT cell chief Amit Malviya questioned why Congress leaders consistently appeared to defend Pakistan following terrorist incidents, comparing their responses to those of legal advocates for Islamabad rather than responsible opposition politicians. The criticism intensified with BJP parliamentarian Nishikant Dubey adopting particularly harsh language, characterizing the Congress organization as fundamentally treasonous in its approach to national security matters. Dubey connected Chidambaram's remarks to broader allegations against Congress leadership, including claims about Rahul Gandhi's international engagements and corruption allegations, suggesting a pattern of anti-national behavior. Additional BJP voices joined the chorus of condemnation, with MP Deepak Prakash asserting that Congress leaders were aligning themselves with traitorous elements and predicting that Indian voters would never forgive such positions. The coordinated nature of the BJP response suggested a strategic decision to maximize political damage from Chidambaram's controversial statements. Congress leadership rallied behind their senior colleague, with multiple party representatives defending his right to question government evidence while redirecting criticism toward the ruling party's perceived failures in addressing terrorism effectively. MP Manickam Tagore characterized the BJP's response as a diversionary tactic designed to deflect attention from what he described as the Modi government's inadequate follow-through on Operation Sindoor. Senior Congress figure Pramod Tiwari amplified the party's counter-narrative by highlighting the extended timeframe since the attack without successful identification of the perpetrators. His emotional appeal referenced the families of victims while questioning the government's effectiveness in delivering justice and accountability for the tragic incident. Interestingly, the controversy also revealed divisions within opposition ranks, as Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Priyanka Chaturvedi publicly disagreed with Chidambaram's position. Drawing on her experience and historical precedent, Chaturvedi argued that Pakistan's involvement in such attacks represented an established pattern spanning decades, pointing to The Resistance Front's initial claim of responsibility and Pakistan's advocacy for such groups in international forums. The political battle over Chidambaram's statements reflects deeper tensions regarding opposition responsibilities in matters of national security, the appropriate level of scrutiny for government claims, and the boundaries of legitimate political criticism during ongoing security investigations. The controversy has effectively overshadowed substantive discussions about the actual investigation's progress and the broader implications for India's counter-terrorism strategy. The timing of this political confrontation, occurring as Parliament prepared to discuss the Pahalgam attack and related security operations, has added another layer of complexity to an already charged political environment. The incident demonstrates how quickly national security matters can become partisan battlegrounds, potentially complicating efforts to achieve bipartisan cooperation on critical security challenges facing the nation.
