AMZN Trade Idea: Capture Gains Without Chasing the Stock
Revenue rose 8.6% year-over-year to $155.67 billion, also surpassing forecasts.
More News from Barchart
Insider Trading Alert: Here's Who Bought Nvidia and AMD Stock Before the U.S. Chip Deal with China
3 Unusually Active Cash-Secured Puts in Quality Companies for Attractive Income
Wall Street Does Not Want You to Take This 'Red Pill' on Albertsons Companies (ACI) Stock
Our exclusive Barchart Brief newsletter is your FREE midday guide to what's moving stocks, sectors, and investor sentiment - delivered right when you need the info most. Subscribe today!
The company's cloud division, AWS, continued to be a major profit driver, while retail and advertising segments showed steady growth.
Amazon's stock has shown solid momentum recently, trading around $225 per share as of mid-July 2025.
Over the past three months, it's surged by 29%, driven by optimism around its AI initiatives and strong cloud growth.
Today, we're looking at a calendar spread on Amazon stock.
Calendar spreads are an option trade that involves selling a short-term option and buying a longer-term option with the same strike.
Traders can use calls or puts and they can be set up to be neutral, bullish or bearish with neutral being the most common.
When doing bullish calendar spreads, we typically use calls to minimize the assignment risk. Likewise, if the calendar is set up with a bearish bias, we use puts.
Neutral calendars can use calls or puts, but calls are more common.
Let's look at an example using Amazon.
Amazon Calendar Spread Example
With Amazon stock trading around $225, setting up a calendar spread at $225 gives the trade a neutral outlook.
Selling the August 15 call option with a strike price of $225 will generate around $855 in premium, and buying the September 19, $920 call will cost approximately $1,150.
That results in a net cost for the trade of $295 per spread, and that is the most the trade can lose.
The estimated maximum profit is $580, but that could vary depending on changes in implied volatility.
The idea with the trade is that if AMZN stock remains around $225 for the next few weeks, the sold option will decay faster than the bought option allowing the trade to be closed for a profit.
The breakeven prices for the trade are estimated at around $210 and $245, but these can also change slightly depending on changes in implied volatility.
In terms of trade management if AMZN broke through either $210 or $245, I would look to adjust or close the trade.
Below is the payoff graph with the blue line representing the profit or loss at expiration and the purple line being the trade as of today.
Amazon Company Details
Amazon.com is one of the largest e-commerce providers, with sprawling operations spreading across the globe.
Its online retail business revolves around the Prime program well-supported by the company's massive distribution network.
Further, the Whole Foods Market acquisition helped Amazon establish footprint in physical grocery supermarket space.
Amazon also enjoys dominant position in the cloud-computing market, particularly in the Infrastructure as a Service space, thanks to Amazon Web Services, which is one of its high-margin generating businesses.
Amazon has also become a household name with its Alexa powered Echo devices.
Artificial Intelligence backed Alexa is helping the company sell products and services.
The company reports revenue under three broad heads' North America, International and AWS, respectively.
Amazon targets three categories of customers - consumers, sellers and website developers.
Mitigating Risk
Thankfully, calendar spreads are risk defined trades, so they have some build in risk management. Position sizing is crucial to ensure that minimal damage is done if the trade suffers a full loss.
One way to set a stop loss for a calendar spread is close the trade if the loss is 20-30% of the premium paid.
Please remember that options are risky, and investors can lose 100% of their investment. This article is for education purposes only and not a trade recommendation. Remember to always do your own due diligence and consult your financial advisor before making any investment decisions.
On the date of publication, Gavin McMaster did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Barchart.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Akre Capital's Akre Focus Fund 2nd-Quarter 2025 Letter: A Review
Greetings from Middleburg. We hope your summer is off to a good start. The Akre Focus Fund's (the Fund) second quarter 2025 performance for the Institutional share class was 6.46% compared with S&P 500 Total Return of 10.94%. Performance for the trailing 12-month period ending June 30, 2025, for the Institutional share class was 20.43% compared with 15.16% for the S&P 500 Total Return. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 7 Warning Signs with TSX:CSU. We recently read a very interesting report by Morgan Stanley's Michael Mauboussin and Dan Callahan entitled Drawdowns and Recoveries: Base Rates for Bottoms and Bounces (1). We were hooked from the opening sentence: One of the hardest aspects of being a long-term investor is that even the best investments, or investment portfolios, suffer large drawdowns. A drawdown is the price decline from peak to trough. For us, the report's key findings were as follows: Large drawdowns indeed! The report cites a study of roughly 28,600 public companies from 1926 through 2024. The top six of these in terms of wealth creation (Apple, Microsoft, NVIDIA, Alphabet, Amazon, ExxonMobil) suffered an average maximum drawdown of 80.3%! Amazon's share price dropped 95% from December 1999 to October 2001, for example. Nvidia's dropped 90% from January 2002 to October 2002. The study by Messrs. Mauboussin and Callahan involved 6,500 US stocks from 19852024. The median stock price recovery from the drawdown bottom was 89.6% of the pre-drawdown peak (a.k.a. par). In other words, the median stock failed to return to its prior peak after max drawdowns: a permanent loss of capital for those who bought high. Returns from the bottom of these drawdowns were spectacular even if the stock failed to return to par. Intuitively, the bigger the drawdown, the bigger the subsequent return from the bottom. As the report points out, buying at the very bottom of a drawdown is highly unlikely. But it holds that the lower one buys during a drawdown, the higher the subsequent return. The role business quality played in terms of long-term compounding was of particular interest to us. In this report, the proxy for business quality was the extent of the drawdown: the smaller the drawdown, the higher the business quality, and vice versa. Critically, the study shows that while the largest drawdown (lowest quality) businesses produced the highest returns from the bottom, they generally did not compound from their pre-drawdown peak. Specifically, the quintile of stocks with the largest drawdowns recovered just 80% of prior peak value five years after the drawdown bottom. On the other hand, the quintile of stocks with the smallest drawdowns (a.k.a. the highest quality stocks) nearly doubled in value from their prior peak value five years after bottoming. In rough math, given the seven-year time frame of the study (two-year drawdown followed by five years of recovery), the lowest quality businesses compounded at negative 3.1% annually from peak to recovery, declining from an indexed peak of $100 to $80 seven years later. The highest quality businesses compounded at positive 9.6% annually over those seven years, increasing from an indexed peak of $100 to approximately $190 seven years later. We cannot directly map these research findings to our portfolio or investment approach, particularly the correlation of drawdown depth to business quality. However, we believe the findings corroborate our long-held notion that a compounding investment approach has subtle but important distinctions from value investing. Those distinctions center on the primacy of business quality. Per the Morgan Stanley study (2), high quality businesses generally compounded positively over time, even from their pre-drawdown peak. Low quality businesses, which declined more and bounced higher off the bottom, generally did not. These findings reminded us of what we did, and did not do, during the sharp but short-lived COVID bear market of March 2020, a month during which we bought over $1.1 billion in equities. We did not buy the COVID ground zero names such as airlines and cruise lines, both among the hardest hit, deepest value sectors at the time. Value investors might reasonably look to play the bounce in such sectors. If you bought the all-airline US Global Jets ETF (JETS) on March 30, 2020, you made an 85.62% return after just one year! The harder the fall, the higher the bounce. To our way of thinking, however, airlines are not high-quality businesses. And indeed, that lack of quality weighed on their longer-term rate of compounding. By the second anniversary of that well-timed JETS purchase, the annual rate of return dropped to 22.31%. By June 30, 2025, the annualized return off the bottom stood at 9.15% [per Bloomberg]. The equity investments we made in March 2020 bounced less but have compounded more. A year later, as of March 30, 2021, our March 2020 investments in aggregate had appreciated 74.85%, excluding dividends. A nice rebound, to be sure, but less than that achieved by the harder hit, lower quality airline stocks. However, quality and compounding show over time. Our March 2020 equity investments in total would have compounded at approximately 19.07% annualized if all were held through June 30, 2025, excluding dividends. The investments we made in March 2020 and have held through June 30, 2025, have compounded at approximately 21.67% excluding dividends. We believe compounding-driven investors are distinguished by an emphasis on quality and quality's tendency to reward longer holding periods. Warren Buffett (Trades, Portfolio)'s adage, If you aren't thinking about owning a stock for ten years, don't even think about owning it for ten minutes, captures this distinction between compounding and bounce-seeking value investing. Furthermore, we think of traditional value investing as seeking to buy the proverbial $1 of intrinsic value for ~$0.60, sell at $0.85 or $0.90, rinse and repeat. For value investors, valuation is the primary investment (buy and sell) consideration. And there's nothing wrong with this whatsoever. However, in our view, such an approach implies a somewhat commoditized view of businesses as easily exchangeable like-for-like. We believe business quality is just as important as starting valuations if the goal is to compound capital at an attractive rate over the longest time. We endeavor to own the highest quality businesses we can understand and buy them only at attractive valuations. The Morgan Stanley study supports this notion that high business quality is key to long-term compounding, even from pre-drawdown peaks. Obviously, compounding is easier said than done. Even when done exceptionally well, an active manager is prone to getting fired during the inevitable sharp drawdown or its aftermath. Indeed, the Morgan Stanley piece cites another of our favorite reads of recent years, Wes Gray's Even God Would Get Fired as an Active Investor. Dr. Gray constructs portfolios consisting only of the 50 best performing stocks over five-year periods starting January 1, 1927. Every five years, these portfolios are reset to include only the 50 best performers over the next five years. Calling these God Portfoliosbuilt with perfect foresight to contain only the best performing stocks over each five-year periodthese portfolios performed brilliantly, with annualized returns over the study period (1927 through 2016) three times that of the S&P 500. However, even these perfect portfolios were subject to significant drawdowns, the worst being 76% (August 1929 to May 1932) along with five drawdowns of 30% and higher. As Messrs. Mauboussin and Callahan say, Even the perfect portfolio tests the resolve of those who own it. Even for the best performing stocks and the best performing portfolios, faith-testing drawdowns are inevitable. The Morgan Stanley study supports our long-held view that a dual focus on business quality and starting valuation are the keys to long-term compounding. The top five contributors to performance during the quarter were Constellation Software (TSX:CSU), Brookfield Corporation (NYSE:BN), (TOITF), KKR (NYSE:KKR), and Moody's (NYSE:MCO). No callouts worth mentioning. The top four detractors from performance this quarter were O'Reilly Automotive (NASDAQ:ORLY), Roper Technologies (NASDAQ:ROP), LVMH (LVMUY), and Danaher (NYSE:DHR). As of June 30, cash and equivalents stood at 8.1% of the Fund, up from 6.3% on March 31 and 1.4% on December 31st. We have made a point of raising our cash position in case our valuation discipline and patience gets rewarded in the weeks and months ahead. Over the life of the Fund, we have routinely held cash in the 5-10% range. Finally, as announced in the supplement to the Akre Focus Fund's Prospectus dated June 4, 2025, we received approval from the Board of Trustees to convert the Fund from a mutual fund to an exchange traded fund. The ETF structure is expected to offer enhanced tax efficiency, greater trading flexibility, and increased transparency of portfolio holdings. The investment process and investment team will remain the same. We thank you for your exceptional support. John The Fund's investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses must be considered carefully before investing. The summary and statutory prospectus contains this and other important information about the investment company and it may be obtained by calling (877) 862-9556 or visiting Read it carefully before investing. Performance data quoted represents past performance and does not guarantee future results. The investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor's shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Fund performance current to the most recent month-end may be lower or higher than the performance quoted and can be obtained by calling 1-877-862-9556. The Fund's annual operating expense (gross) for the Retail Class shares is 1.31% and 1.04% for the Institutional Class shares. The Fund imposes a 1.00% redemption fee on shares held less than 30 days. Performance data does not reflect the redemption fee, and if reflected, total returns would be reduced. Mutual fund investing involves risk. Principal loss is possible. The Fund is non-diversified, meaning it may concentrate its assets in fewer individual holdings than a diversified fund. Therefore, the Fund is more exposed to individual stock volatility than a diversified fund. In addition to large- capitalization companies, the Fund invests in small- and medium- capitalization companies, which involve additional risks such as limited liquidity and greater volatility than larger capitalization companies. (1) Drawdowns and Recoveries: Base Rates for Bottoms and Bounces (2) Drawdowns and Recoveries: Base Rates for Bottoms and Bounces This article first appeared on GuruFocus.
CNET
an hour ago
- CNET
Some of Our Favorite Security Cameras From Arlo Are Up to 63% Off
Security cameras are pretty essential. Whether you're going on a trip or simply want to keep an eye on things while you're at work or running errands, they can help keep you safe. But that doesn't mean that they are by any means affordable, especially if you want a nicer one. Arlo makes some of our favorite cams out there, but they aren't cheap either. Thankfully, Arlo is having a sale and you can save up to 63% off some of our favorite home security cameras for both indoors and outdoors. Shop the sale at Amazon or Best Buy and take a look at our favorite picks below. The Arlo Pro 5S 2K camera is our overall favorite home security camera. It has tons of smart features. This includes color night vision, 12x zoom, 160-degree field of view, motion detection and even a built-in spotlight. The only thing our experts didn't like was the price. It's certainly pricey, with the three-pack going for $400. But you can score 50% off, bringing the price down to $200, much better. One of our favorite outdoor security cameras, especially for use without Wi-Fi, is the Arlo Go 2. We love it because it has excellent LTE options for zones outside of Wi-Fi but you can still use Wi-Fi to save data. Similar to the 5S cam, it has spotlight and night vision included. And since it's an outdoor cam, it has good weather protection. Our experts didn't like the price for this one either. But now you can take $50 off, bringing the price from $250 to $200. Hey, did you know? CNET Deals texts are free, easy and save you money. If you're looking for a wireless security camera with a floodlight, the Arlo Pro 3 with Floodlight is our favorite one. It's powerful and can light up the darker areas outside your home. It also has 2K resolution and a 160-degree field of view, so you get a crystal clear picture. And if you have Apple Home, it's compatible with that, too. Just be aware that the battery runs out fairly fast. It lasts only a few days before needing a recharge. You can save $80 on it, bringing the price from $250 to a more reasonable $170. For the most savings, take a look at the Arlo Essential security camera. Normally $80 for one camera, you can get 63% off for a limited time bringing the camera to a record-low of just 30 bucks. This camera is wired and goes indoors. It works great as a baby monitor or a pet camera, too. Why this deal matters Arlo makes great security cameras which means they can cost quite a bit, too. That's why it's a great idea to take advantage of this sale now. The cameras are up to 63% off at Amazon and Best Buy. Some of our favorite security cameras are included in this sale. I'm even adding some of these to my cart, because who knows when we'll see discounts like this again.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Progress in Trade Talks Supports Energy Demand and Crude Prices
September WTI crude oil (CLU25) today is up +0.73 (+1.12%), and September RBOB gasoline (RBU25) is down -0.0145 (-0.69%). Crude oil and gasoline prices today are mixed. Crude oil is finding support in signs of progress in trade talks, which could support economic growth and energy demand. Also, today's rally in the S&P 500 to a new record high shows confidence in the economic outlook that is bullish for energy demand and oil prices. Today's dollar strength and mixed US economic reports are limiting gains in crude prices. More News from Barchart Nat-Gas Prices Tumble as US Weather Forecasts Cool Crude Oil Prices Could Tick Up on Consumer Resilience. Here Are the Levels to Watch Before You Buy. Crude Prices Finish Slightly Lower on a Mixed EIA Inventory Report Our exclusive Barchart Brief newsletter is your FREE midday guide to what's moving stocks, sectors, and investor sentiment - delivered right when you need the info most. Subscribe today! Signs of progress in US trade deals are boosting crude prices. On Wednesday, the US and Japan agreed to a trade deal, and Bloomberg reported that the US and European Union were close to a trade deal. Today's US economic news was mixed for energy demand and crude prices. On the positive side, weekly initial unemployment claims unexpectedly fell -4,000 to a 3-month low of 217,000, showing a stronger labor market than expectations of an increase to 226,000. Conversely, the July S&P US manufacturing PMI fell -3.4 to a 7-month low of 49.5, weaker than expectations of 52.7. Weakness in the crude crack spread is bearish for crude prices. The crack spread today fell to a 2.5-week low, which discourages refiners from purchasing crude and refining it into gasoline and distillates. Oil prices have been undercut by expectations for Iraq to boost crude exports from its northern Kurdish region through the Iraq-Turkey pipeline, where oil exports have been halted since March 2023. The Iraqi government approved a plan for the semi-autonomous Kurdish region to resume oil exports. Kurdistan expects to supply Iraq's crude market with 230,000 bpd of crude once exports resume. Iraq is the second-largest oil producer in OPEC. Crude prices have underlying support from last Friday when the European Union approved fresh sanctions on Russian oil due to its aggression against Ukraine. The sanctions package includes cutting off 20 more Russian banks from the international payments system SWIFT, as well as restrictions imposed on Russian petroleum refined in other countries. A large oil refinery in India, part-owned by Russia's Rosneft PJSC, was also blacklisted. Additionally, 105 more ships in Russia's shadow fleet were sanctioned, pushing the number of sanctioned ships above 400. Concern about a global oil glut is negative for crude prices. On July 5, OPEC+ agreed to raise its crude production by 548,000 barrels per day (bpd) beginning August 1, exceeding expectations of a 411,000 bpd increase. Saudi Arabia also stated that additional similar-sized increases in crude output could follow, which is viewed as a strategy to reduce oil prices and penalize overproducing OPEC+ members, such as Kazakhstan and Iraq. OPEC+ is boosting output to reverse the 2-year-long production cut, gradually restoring a total of 2.2 million bpd of production by September 2026. On May 31, OPEC+ agreed to a 411,000 bpd increase in crude production for July, following the same 411,000 bpd hike for June. June crude production rose +360,000 bpd to a 1.5-year high of 28.10 million bpd. In a supportive factor for oil prices, Bloomberg reported on July 10 that OPEC+ is discussing a pause in further production increases from October, following its next monthly hike in September of 548,000 barrels. OPEC+ may be concerned about a slowdown in global oil demand in the second half of this year that could lead to a supply glut if the group keeps boosting production. The International Energy Agency said inventories have been accumulating at a rate of 1 million bpd and that the global crude oil market faces a surplus by Q4-2025 equivalent to 1.5% of global crude consumption. A decrease in crude oil held worldwide on tankers is bullish for oil prices. Vortexa reported Monday that crude oil stored on tankers that have been stationary for at least seven days fell by -14% w/w to 66.31 million bbl in the week ended July 18. Wednesday's weekly EIA report showed that (1) US crude oil inventories as of July 18 were -8.6% below the seasonal 5-year average, (2) gasoline inventories were +0.2% above the seasonal 5-year average, and (3) distillate inventories were -18.5% below the 5-year seasonal average. US crude oil production in the week ending July 18 fell -0.8% w/w to 13.273 million bpd, modestly below the record high of 13.631 million bpd posted in the week of 12/6/2024. Baker Hughes reported last Friday that the number of active US oil rigs in the week ending July 18 decreased by -2 rigs to a new 3.75-year low of 422 rigs. Over the past 2.5 years, the number of US oil rigs has fallen sharply from the 5.25-year high of 627 rigs reported in December 2022. On the date of publication, Rich Asplund did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
