
Private credit has a problem: Too much money
Managers of private-lending funds have no shortage of money at their disposal. The question is whether they will have enough good places to put it.
During other recent bouts of volatility and uncertainty, private-credit managers of direct-lending funds—who raise money from investors to lend to relatively risky companies—have seen surges of activity and returns. Following the Covid-19 pandemic, direct-lending activity and investment returns both soared.
So President Trump's 'Liberation Day" trade policies, and the aftershocks and uncertainty for many companies in their wake, seem like they should herald another big moment for private credit.
This time around, however, there are some crucial differences. For one, this period of volatility is coming on the heels of a surge in private-credit fundraising. Traditional asset managers, banks and alternative-asset managers have all launched direct-lending vehicles, expanded partnerships and sought more retail funding.
At the same time, appetite from borrowers has been more limited than hoped for. This likely means that returns for investors, including the retail savers being courted by the private-credit industry, will be lower for some funds.
One big generator of higher-yielding loans is the private-equity industry, which requires a lot of borrowing to fund leverage buyouts. But economic uncertainty has put a damper on new deals, and the private-equity industry may be in even rougher shape than just that: Private-equity funds have been holding on to past investments longer, drying up cash flow back to investors in those funds. This hinders the deployment of funds for new deals.
'The industry has been beating the drum on M&A returning partly to justify the amount of capital they've raised," Josh Easterly, co-chief investment officer of alternative-asset manager Sixth Street, told analysts earlier this month on the earnings call for the firm's publicly traded business-development company Sixth Street Specialty Lending. 'The problem is that people paid too much for assets between 2019 and 2022, and nobody wants to sell those assets without an acceptable return."
This dynamic may also lead to lower yields on any new deals that do emerge, as lenders will be competing with each other on pricing.
'What you're seeing is an imbalance between supply and demand," says Marina Lukatsky, global head of research for credit and U.S. private equity at PitchBook LCD. 'When you see lenders competing for deals, that puts pressure on spreads." Spread refers to the additional yield on riskier loans over base rates.
Consider an estimate of the future performance of business-development companies. These are listed funds that raise public equity to invest in private loans. Back in 2021, the average BDC's annualized return on equity was 14.9%, according to figures from a recent letter by Easterly to shareholders of Sixth Street Specialty Lending. But in the letter, Easterly estimated that at the level of base rates expected by the market over three years, plus typical spreads for loans in the fourth quarter of 2024, the forward return on equity for a BDC would be 5.2%.
'At these spreads, the sector is not earning its…cost of equity," he wrote.
All of this helps explain why the biggest private-credit managers, such as Apollo Global, Ares Management, Blue Owl and Sixth Street, have put such an emphasis on originating new and proprietary kinds of loans, ranging from finding niches of consumer borrowing to multifaceted projects such as data centers.
Sixth Street's Easterly described it as 'more opportunity for complexity," and in particular lending to companies beyond those controlled by private-equity firms. Sixth Street Specialty Lending recently highlighted what executives called a 'bespoke" financing for a founder-owned rail and trucking software company, Bourque Logistics, at a weighted average yield of 13.9%.
Another advantage may accrue to managers that can combat the pressure on spreads on assets with lower funding-liability costs.
Apollo's chief executive, Marc Rowan, has often spoken of the dangers of too much capital without enough opportunity. Apollo's executives had also recently noted the unusually tight spreads earlier this year.
Yet the firm still opted to pursue inflows in the first quarter in the form of record issuance of so-called funding-agreement-backed notes to institutions via its Athene retirement-services unit. Essentially, Apollo decided that if money was coming cheap, it might as well tap that side of the market for now. That could boost future returns, even if spreads don't significantly widen.
'We were able to access cheap spread liabilities," but 'we didn't think it was appropriate to invest in tight spread assets at the same time," Apollo Chief Financial Officer Martin Kelly told analysts at a Barclays conference earlier this month.
Athene now has about $20 billion of cash and liquid assets waiting to be deployed, Kelly said. 'We'll put that to work as conditions come in, as we think is appropriate," he said.
If even the managers at the top of the heap expect to have to wait for the best pricing opportunities to come along, others may be waiting even longer.
Write to Telis Demos at Telis.Demos@wsj.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
R&D? Rarely
Dependence in critical areas makes the nation vulnerable. Strategic interest must prevail over economic sense Germany's crude reserves are so small, they won't last three months in an emergency. So how did Hitler wage war for five years? By turning coal into petrol. Over 92% of the Luftwaffe's aviation fuel was synthetic. As the world grapples with China's rare earth curbs, there's a useful lesson here. While the rare earths crisis that started with China's export curbs on April 4 may be blowing over – Trump announced on Truth Social yesterday, 'Full magnets, and any necessary rare earths, will be supplied, up front, by China' – it will have a once-bitten-twice-shy effect. Over the past few weeks, Western carmakers have considered producing cars minus some components that use rare earths. At home, Maruti's had to scale back production plans for its first EV due to a global shortage of rare earth magnets. As our second Op-Ed explains, these magnets contain about 25% of a rare earth element called neodymium. It's one of the so-called 'light' rare earths that are available in India, but we don't produce enough of it because cheap Chinese supplies made investment in this area unattractive. While you can make motors without rare earths, other devices like TV screens, computers and MRI machines can't do without them. That's why India needs to build a large rare earths industry. And with the world's fifth largest rare earth reserves, it's well-placed to do so. Likewise, it needs to end its dependence on China for 70% of active pharmaceutical ingredients or APIs, because while buying from the cheapest supplier makes economic sense, it's a strategic risk. The aim must be to reduce dependence because dependence, especially in critical products, is vulnerability. About 90% of our crude is imported. An electric future will take care of that, but not if it means 100% dependence on China for lithium batteries. To find alternatives – like Germany's WW-II 'synfuels' – we need big investments in R&D, which is not our strong suit. As a nation, we invest only 0.6% of our $4tn GDP in research. China invests 2.4% of $18tn, US 3.5% of $29tn. And our private sector is even stingier, accounting for only a third of the national R&D spend, as against 70% in US and S Korea. The rare earth crisis is a brief distraction, the real issue is India's rare investment problem, and it needs national attention now. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email This piece appeared as an editorial opinion in the print edition of The Times of India.


India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Very nice: Donald Trump responds to Musk's public apology after ugly feud
US President Donald Trump responded Wednesday to Elon Musk's public apology after a bitter social media spat between the two former allies. Musk admitted that his recent criticism of Trump had gone "too far," hoping that tensions between him and the president might ease after a week of sharp personal commented on the apology during a brief phone interview with the New York Post on Wednesday morning. Despite the harsh words, Trump said that he has "no hard feelings."advertisementTrump said, "I thought it was very nice that he did that." He also said he doesn't "blame" Musk for the blow-up that started with the latter's criticisms of the Big Beautiful Bill. However, he maintained that he was "a little disappointed," reported The Post. Elon Musk, a former Trump aide, unleashed a series of posts about Trump last week. The feud began when Musk lashed out at Trump's Big Beautiful Bill. Trump responded by downplaying Musk's role in his political success. In response, Musk claimed that Trump's 2024 election victory was largely due to his support. He went on to allege that the president had a role in blocking the release of documents related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, based on Trump's past connections with APOLOGISES AFTER HARSH CRITICISM OF TRUMPadvertisementHowever, Musk later deleted some of these posts and apologised, stating, "I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far." According to the New York Times, the apology came after Musk spoke privately with Vice President JD Vance and White House chief of staff Susie Wiles on Friday. The talks aimed to find a way to calm tensions between the two men, who had been engaged over a social media some reports claimed Musk personally reached out to Trump on Monday. Trump acknowledged the apology but did not make clear if he was ready to restore their previous in the feud, Trump had called Musk "crazy" and threatened to reconsider federal contracts with Musk's companies. He also accused Musk of suffering from "Trump Derangement Syndrome" and being upset over losing his government position and the removal of electric vehicle tax incentives from the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act."When asked about the possibility of repairing their relationship, Trump told Miranda Devine's "Pod Force One" podcast, "I guess I could, but we have to straighten out the country." He added, "My sole function now is getting this country back to a level higher than it's ever been. And I think we can do that."Tune InMust Watch


India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
Elon Musk spoke to Trump before apologising over social media feud: Report
Elon Musk privately called President Donald Trump on Monday before posting a message on X saying he regretted some of his social media comments, according to a White House source cited by apology, posted on X (formerly Twitter) on Wednesday, read: "I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far." Trump later called the gesture "very nice," signalling a possible thaw in their public feud. advertisementAccording to the New York Times that the apology came after Musk spoke privately with Vice President JD Vance and White House chief of staff Susie Wiles on Friday. The talks aimed to find a way to calm tensions between the two men, who had been engaged over a social media FEUD FOLLOWED BY A SOFTENING OF TONE The feud began last Thursday when Musk lashed out at Trump's Big Beautiful Bill. Trump responded by downplaying Musk's role in his political success. The argument quickly escalated after Musk even tried to link Trump to convicted sex offender Jeffrey the next few days, Musk signalled that he wanted to fix the relationship. After his conversation with Wiles and Vance, he deleted several social media posts, including one that alleged Trump's name was in government files related to Musk's efforts, Trump reportedly told his advisers he was not interested in talking to the billionaire and was "done with him." He repeated the same message in press interviews. However, behind closed doors, teams on both sides were working to bring about a MOVES TO MEND TIES Musk seemed more keep to make peace, despite the fact that both men had a lot on the line. Trump threatened to revoke SpaceX's billion-dollar government contracts. Ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, Musk, who is also one of the biggest donors to the Republican Party, has promised to contribute an additional $100 million to Trump's outside political knowledge of the inner circle of the administration also gives him a great deal of influence. Trump might not want to exclude Musk entirely in order to avoid the issues of his term in the office, where former staffers wrote books on him, revealing some 'critical' InMust Watch