Government ‘does not have a plan' to accommodate asylum seekers
His comments came after the council was granted a temporary injunction on Tuesday blocking asylum seekers from being housed at the hotel, which has been at the centre of a series of protests and counter-protests in recent weeks.
The interim injunction granted by Mr Justice Eyre means the hotel's owner, Somani Hotels Limited, must stop housing asylum seekers at the site by September 12, but the company could seek to challenge the ruling at the Court of Appeal.
Speaking to the PA news agency after the judgment, Mr Whitbread said the injunction marked an 'opportunity for my community to start to return to normal'.
A hearing on Friday was told by barristers representing Somani Hotels that the venue previously housed asylum seekers from May 2020 to March 2021, and from October 2022 to April 2024, and that the council 'never instigated any formal enforcement proceedings against this use'.
Asylum seekers were then placed in the Bell Hotel again from April 2025.
When asked on Tuesday why the council did not previously take legal action, Mr Whitbread said: 'It goes back to 2020 when we were in the pandemic originally, and at that time, it was used for young families, women and children, which is completely different to having it used for single males.
'Obviously, we have always raised our concerns with the Home Office, whether it be the previous government or this government, we raised our concerns.
'This government decided to start using the hotel again without consultation and purely by instruction; they didn't listen to our concerns.
'Five schools are in close proximity, a residential care home, lots of residential homes nearby, they didn't listen to us at all, that is the fundamental difference.'
When asked what message he believed this sent from the Government, he said: 'If I am honest with you, I don't think they have actually got a plan. I think that is my real concern.
'We talk about one in, one out, well, that is a gimmick. If you talk about smashing the gangs, that was a gimmick.
'What we really need to see is a government with a serious plan to deal with this problem, and that obviously comes down to processing, where they stay while they are being processed, and actually speeding up the system.
'We are not seeing that at the moment, and that is causing a lot of distress to people up and down the country.'
The hotel became the focal point of a series of protests after an asylum seeker housed at the site was charged with sexually assaulting a teenage girl.
Mr Whitbread said that while later protests had been 'more peaceful, more bearable but still disruptive' to the community, he had 'never seen anything like what we have seen in recent times'.
He said: 'I think what we have done as a council and what my brilliant team of council officers have done is actually take forward what the desire of residents is, to see the Bell closed, but do it in a sensible and proper way, and that is what we're doing.'
Mr Whitbread also said that there had been 'no conversations' about the next steps for removing those currently housed at the hotel.
Reacting to the judgment, border security minister Dame Angela Eagle said: 'This government inherited a broken asylum system, at the peak there were over 400 hotels open.
'We will continue working with local authorities and communities to address legitimate concerns. Our work continues to close all asylum hotels by the end of this Parliament.
'We will carefully consider this judgment. As this matter remains subject to ongoing legal proceedings it would be inappropriate to comment further at this stage.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ITV News
18 minutes ago
- ITV News
Government strikes returns deal with Iraq in latest bid to deter small boats
The Government has agreed a new deal with Iraq to return illegal migrants as part of wider moves to limit small boat crossings. The deal, signed by Home Office minister Dan Jarvis, will set up a formal process to return Iraqis who have arrived in the UK with no right to stay in the country. It comes after an £800,000 deal last year with Baghdad to help the country crack down on smuggling networks and organised crime. Earlier this year Sir Keir Starmer and Iraq's prime minister Mohammed Shia Al-Sudani agreed to strengthen co-operation on migration. Mr Jarvis signed the agreement during a visit to the UK by Iraq's deputy foreign minister Faud Hussein. The Home Office said the accord would allow the 'swift' return of illegal migrants. Home Office statistics said since previous deals, the number of Iraqis arriving in the UK by small boat has fallen to 1,900 in the year to March 2025, down from 2,600 in the previous year. Mr Jarvis said: 'By working together on security, development and migration challenges, we are building stronger relationships that benefit both our countries whilst tackling shared challenges like organised crime and irregular migration.' The returns deal is the latest as part of the Home Office's policies to stop small boats crossing the channel. Similar agreements have already been made with Albania and Vietnam since Labour came into power. Another deal with France recently came into force, where small boat migrants who have arrived over the English Channel from the French coast can be returned to the country. The small boats migrant will then be exchanged for a legitimate asylum seeker in France who can demonstrate a genuine family link to the UK. The number has been capped, but it is hoped it will act as a deterrent to those crossing the Channel. The latest figures from the Home Office showed 116 migrants arrived aboard two small boats on August 15. Mr Jarvis said: 'This visit reinforces the strength of the UK-Iraq partnership and demonstrates our government's commitment to serious diplomacy that delivers real results. 'As someone who served in Iraq, I understand first-hand the importance of building enduring relationships in the region, and the new agreement we have signed is a testament to the trust and co-operation we've built with our Iraqi counterparts.' However, the announcement was criticised by Conservative shadow home secretary Chris Philp. He said: 'Over 50,000 illegal immigrants have crossed the Channel in Labour's short time in power, the worst illegal immigration crisis in our history. 'Labour has surrendered our borders, and the consequences are being felt in our communities, from rising crime to shocking cases of rape and sexual assault by recent arrivals. 'Now they boast about a measly returns deal with Iraq, but barely any small boat arrivals are Iraqi, and most would qualify for asylum anyway. It's a sham designed to look tough while crossings keep soaring. 'Labour has scrapped Conservative deterrents and created the conditions for chaos, leaving the British people to foot the bill. Only the Conservatives will stop the crossings and restore control of Britain's borders.'
Western Telegraph
40 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Government strikes returns deal with Iraq in latest bid to deter small boats
The deal, signed by Home Office minister Dan Jarvis, will set up a formal process to return Iraqis who have arrived in the UK with no right to stay in the country. It comes after an £800,000 deal last year with Baghdad to help the country crack down on smuggling networks and organised crime. Earlier this year Sir Keir Starmer and Iraq's prime minister Mohammed Shia Al-Sudani agreed to strengthen co-operation on migration. Mr Jarvis signed the agreement during a visit to the UK by Iraq's deputy foreign minister Faud Hussein. The Home Office said the accord would allow the 'swift' return of illegal migrants. Home Office statistics said since previous deals, the number of Iraqis arriving in the UK by small boat has fallen to 1,900 in the year to March 2025, down from 2,600 in the previous year. Mr Jarvis said: 'By working together on security, development and migration challenges, we are building stronger relationships that benefit both our countries whilst tackling shared challenges like organised crime and irregular migration.' The returns deal is the latest as part of the Home Office's policies to stop small boats crossing the channel. Similar agreements have already been made with Albania and Vietnam since Labour came into power. Another deal with France recently came into force, where small boat migrants who have arrived over the English Channel from the French coast can be returned to the country. The small boats migrant will then be exchanged for a legitimate asylum seeker in France who can demonstrate a genuine family link to the UK. The number has been capped, but it is hoped it will act as a deterrent to those crossing the Channel. The latest figures from the Home Office showed 116 migrants arrived aboard two small boats on August 15. Mr Jarvis said: 'This visit reinforces the strength of the UK-Iraq partnership and demonstrates our government's commitment to serious diplomacy that delivers real results. 'As someone who served in Iraq, I understand first-hand the importance of building enduring relationships in the region, and the new agreement we have signed is a testament to the trust and co-operation we've built with our Iraqi counterparts.' However, the announcement was criticised by Conservative shadow home secretary Chris Philp. He said: 'Over 50,000 illegal immigrants have crossed the Channel in Labour's short time in power, the worst illegal immigration crisis in our history. 'Labour has surrendered our borders, and the consequences are being felt in our communities, from rising crime to shocking cases of rape and sexual assault by recent arrivals. 'Now they boast about a measly returns deal with Iraq, but barely any small boat arrivals are Iraqi, and most would qualify for asylum anyway. It's a sham designed to look tough while crossings keep soaring. 'Labour has scrapped Conservative deterrents and created the conditions for chaos, leaving the British people to foot the bill. Only the Conservatives will stop the crossings and restore control of Britain's borders.'
Press and Journal
an hour ago
- Press and Journal
How Aberdeenshire is already Scotland's toughest election battleground
All eyes will be on how voters in Aberdeenshire play their cards at next year's Scottish Parliament election – and the battle for local support is already in full swing. This politically charged region could throw up unexpected results in the May vote, and small shifts here could make all the difference. Changing moods can been seen in rising support for Reform UK, which kicks off its local campaign this weekend. Here's how Scotland's political parties are gearing up for the 2026 vote in what looks like one of the country's toughest battlegrounds. Five ex-Tories now sit for Reform UK on Aberdeenshire Council. It's a sign of shifting political winds in a region where the Conservatives have often had strong support. Aberdeenshire campaigners for Mr Farage's party started their official canvassing campaign in Peterhead on Saturday. Reform hopes to pick up several seats on the North East regional list which spans all the way down to Dundee – and support in Aberdeenshire will be key to that aim. Fraserburgh-born businessman Conrad Ritchie, himself an ex-Tory, won 26% of the vote for Reform in a local byelection last October. 'That's us in campaign mode,' he said. 'We've had a great reception. We've had hardly any negativity. 'It's all been positive.' Mr Ritchie hopes to stand in the Banff and Buchan Coast seat next May. Reform insiders believe there's an 'excellent opportunity' for the party to win the constituency – a view backed up by an expert who predicts up to three MSPs regionally. It's not just on the right where the Tories have to fend off a challenge. Once a stronghold for the party, the Lib Dems believe they can capitalise on Conservative chaos and gain MSPs in Aberdeenshire again. The party lost its only seat in the North East in 2021. This time around married Banchory couple Yi-Pei Chou and Michael Turvey – both ex-Tories – will stand as the top two Lib Dem candidates on the regional ballot. 'They're an interesting combination to watch,' said one local political insider. 'They are very ambitious.' They kick-started their 2026 campaign in Stonehaven earlier this month with party leader Alex Cole-Hamilton. 'Both Yi-Pei and Michael are absolute powerhouses as activists,' he said. 'With the Tories in absolute chaos, we are coming.' He added: 'There are Lib Dem traditions right across the north-east. 'We're going to be tapping into that door by door, street by street.' The Conservatives won one constituency and four North East list seats in 2021. Next year may tell a different story. But Andrew Bowie, MP for West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine, believes the party can defy expectations. 'Don't get me wrong, it's going to be tough next year, but it feels okay,' he tells the P&J. 'Of course Reform comes up on the doorstep, but not in the numbers I was worried of a few months ago. 'As they develop policies and make announcements, they get a lot more questioning, which is good.' He talked down any chances of a Lib Dem threat – but warned against complacency. 'I'm very confident we can see off that challenge,' he said. 'We're not seeing any resurgence to the level they would need to be at for them to cause great damage to us.' One local source said Conservative MSP Alex Burnett is worried about losing his seat next May. However, they added: 'Alex is a phenomenal campaigner, and really pulls the rabbit out of the hat at the very last minute.' The north-east was a rare bright spot for the SNP at last year's Westminster election. The party managed to unseat Scottish Tory leader Douglas Ross in Aberdeenshire North and Moray East despite losing out elsewhere. In 2021, the nationalists won all but one constituency in the North East Holyrood region. Party insiders hope they will benefit from First Minister John Swinney pursuing a more pragmatic position on the future of oil and gas than Nicola Sturgeon. But Gwyneth Petrie, SNP group leader in Aberdeenshire, warned there is a 'general apathy' about politics among voters. 'It's on us to make sure there's something positive for folk to vote for,' she said. SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn – vying for a Holyrood seat in Aberdeen – will be campaigning heavily across the north-east region. Insiders hope his name recognition will give the party a boost. But one political rival said he was 'real marmite' among floating voters. Former First Minister Alex Salmond, who lived in Strichen, had been hoping his Alba Party could make a big push in the north-east before his death last October. SNP sources said there was little enthusiasm for Alba in Aberdeenshire among pro-independence voters. Aberdeenshire has never been a Labour stronghold. The party currently holds two North East list seats – but support is more concentrated in the cities of Dundee and Aberdeen. But MSP Michael Marra, based down in Dundee, said every vote across the huge North East region will be 'absolutely crucial'. 'If you look across Aberdeenshire, there are people right across the region who are desperate to see change,' he said. However, not all Labour supporters are happy with the party's attitude to the north-east. Banchory-based Andy Brown, suspended as a candidate by the party at the last Westminster election, says Labour needs to shift its approach to the future of oil and gas. 'Drill, baby, drill, that's what we should be doing if it's there,' he said, echoing US President and Aberdeenshire golf course owner Donald Trump. Mr Brown said he will probably still vote for Labour next May, albeit 'with a heavy heart'. A region heavily linked to fossil fuels hardly sounds like fertile territory for the Scottish Greens. But the party pipped the Lib Dems four years ago to win one seat. Former oil and gas worker Guy Ingerson, based in Aberdeen, is the party's leading candidate in the North East next year. That's after he beat sitting MSP Maggie Chapman – his old boss – to the top spot. Mr Ingerson doesn't think it's a handicap being a Green in Aberdeenshire. 'People are smart,' he said. 'They understand oil and gas is not going to be around forever, and we need to invest in alternatives.' Despite longstanding support for the Tories and rising enthusiasm for Reform, he disputes the idea Aberdeenshire is more right-leaning than other parts of Scotland. 'I don't think most people feel that way,' he said. He said some potential Reform voters are even 'receptive' to Green policies when he speaks to them while out campaigning. Next year promises uncertainty. But polling expert Allan Faulds, who runs Ballot Box Scotland, expects the SNP to perform strongly in the constituency vote. That will leave their rivals scrambling for scraps on the regional ballot. 'They end up exceeding their fair share of the seats, which means other parties have to lose out,' he said. Mr Faulds reckon Reform are primed to pick up at least three MSPs. He says the Lib Dems and Greens can win a seat each provided they perform in line with expectations. That would mean it's Labour and the Tories who risk missing out, due to the Reform squeeze and SNP dominating constituencies. 'Labour's looking at about 12% of the vote – last time that was sufficient to get them two MSPs,' he said. 'This time it would only get them one.'
