logo
I can't wait to get my arms out this summer

I can't wait to get my arms out this summer

Times23-07-2025
Have you ever shapeshifted, wardrobe-wise? Transformed from one type of dresser into another? Perhaps without even realising it? It's suddenly become clear to me that I have and I honestly had no idea.
I have been packing for the kind of villa holiday I haven't gone on in years, a relaxed, doing-nothing affair. In doing so — creating neat(ish) piles of options on my spare bed — I have come face to face with the fact that something has changed in the way I dress come summer.
Suddenly it's all about my arms — arms that, thanks to the cumulative impact of years of pretty full-throttle yoga and very full-throttle handstand training, look different to how they used to. First I got biceps. Then I got triceps. Now, as of a few months ago, I have deltoids, by which I mean the sort that stick out in front like the fender flares on a car.
I didn't plan for this but I can't pretend I am not happy about it. So behold a line-up of frocks and tops that have straps rather than sleeves, including a silk slip Serena Bute dress from a couple of summers back, which was about the time when I (for which read: my arms) really went up a notch. (The latest gathered neck iteration, in bright blue, pink or red is £295, serenabutelondon.com.) And there's also a dress with just the one strap, Mondo Corsini's raspberry linen midi (£365, mondocorsini.com).
• Read more fashion advice and style inspiration from our experts
I also love Jigsaw's chocolate cotton with distinctive flower appliqué (£165, jigsaw-online.com), while Mint Velvet's burgundy floral slip dress is another stunner (£130, mintvelvet.com), and Mango's black or camel with a white-edged zigzag hem is very stealth wealth (£59.99, mango.com). New Look's black gingham bodice number scores pretty points (£34.99, newlook.com), Sézane's button-through cream Fabiola siren points (£115, sezane.com). Although what I probably need to add to my arsenal now is one with no straps, such as Nobody's Child's brown Gayle (£79, nobodyschild.com).
This is quite the move-on for a woman who used to dress for summer as if she were in The Flame Trees of Thika, who didn't knowingly flash any flesh at all away from a pool or beach for, er, the first 45 years of her life. But I am not going to hide these deltoids under a bushel. There may still be a couple of Tilly Grant-appropriate numbers in pile No 3 on my bed but I am not sure any more whether that pile is going to make it into my suitcase. Did I mention my deltoids already?
So my sartorial shapeshifting has come about as a result of an actual shift in body shape. How very humdrum of me. Turns out if you work hard enough and long enough you can get yourself good arms whatever your age, as evidenced by my yoga friends in their fifties and sixties (I am 53), not to mention a particularly impressive seventysomething I met recently who had flown in from Vienna for a weekend of yoga to techno music, as you do. She was nonchalantly knocking out handstands despite having had a hip replacement.
Who needs a mere It bag when you can get yourself It arms? So much more impressive to, ahem, engender something yourself than merely to buy it, surely? That designer tote might be fake but good arms are, perforce, the real and usually hard-won deal. Even weight-loss jabs won't help you with this one. Indeed, maybe muscle definition will become yet more coveted now that skinniness is available on subscription.
Great arms have become, for a woman of a certain age, the ultimate status symbol. They powered the rise of the sleeveless office-targeted sheath dress in the Nineties and have now moved out of the boardroom into, well, everywhere. Among the celebrity upper arms recently out on manoeuvres have been those of Heidi Klum (52), Jennifer Aniston (56) and — naturellement — Gwyneth Paltrow (also 52).
Somehow, getting your arms out — if you have the right arms — rarely looks muttony in the way that getting your legs out can at a certain point. It looks cool, not try-hard. It semaphores youthfulness and also power, very much including the literal variety.
Is this another example of a subconscious desire on the part of the modern woman to ape the physicality of her male counterpart, the better to compete in what is still, for the moment, a man's world? Another sartorial phenomenon to put in the same category as trouser suits and shoulder pads? These arms — or, to be more precise, my arms — are the kind that only men used to have.
Is it also, to proffer some more analysis, one more example of our collective resistance to ageing? To this I would answer, yes, definitely, and also that — like so much else related to the topic of ageing — there is a healthy level of resistance and one that equates not just to denial but to delusion. I have yoga friends who are ageing brilliantly, arms and all, and others who are definitely overcooking things and looking a bit like Ryvita.
Back to my togs. Added into my suitcase are an array of vests, the newest and the quirkiest by some margin an iteration with eyes from the Uniqlo x Anya Hindmarch collaboration (£7.90, reduced from £14.90, uniqlo.com). Though such is the potency of designer arms that designer vests — very expensive designer vests — have become a phenomenon too, as per the Prada number I am wearing in this photo. (That will be £720, thank you very much.)
• How to do summer like a French woman
What I won't be emulating is a second vest-related flex that definitely isn't in my, er, wheelhouse, which is to wear said vest without a bra. I am leaving that to the twentysomething daughter of a friend, with whose nipple profile I feel myself to have become far too well acquainted in the past couple of months.
Nope, no amount of handstands is going to help me with the — how best to put this? — suspension requirements of braless vest-wearing. So thank goodness, as always, for Selfridges's bra whisperer, Clare Basche, and her recommendation of Chantelle's strapless smooth Norah in golden beige for its comfort and minimal visibility under cotton jersey (£59, selfridges.com). For an option with a lower centre bridge that would work under a V-neck dress or top, she rates Simone Pérèle's Essentiel strapless (£75, selfridges.com).
I love a feminine top too, such as Boden's linen Sophie, in a range of brights and prints (£65, boden.com), Mabe's blue and white boho Viti (£87.50, reduced from £125, mabeapparel.com) and Mint Velvet's more minimalist ivory satin style (£99, mintvelvet.com).
A waistcoat — such as Nobody's Child's in black, or in black or brown gingham — is one final way to go (£79, nobodyschild.com).
That's quite enough of that. I may have earned the right to bare arms but not to bore on about them.
@annagmurphy
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Saturday's Lotto jackpot estimated at £7.3m after no ticket wins top prize
Saturday's Lotto jackpot estimated at £7.3m after no ticket wins top prize

The Independent

time12 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Saturday's Lotto jackpot estimated at £7.3m after no ticket wins top prize

Saturday's lottery jackpot will be an estimated £7.3 million after no players won Wednesday's top prize. The winning Lotto numbers were 17, 31, 47, 05, 58 and 09, while the bonus number was 35. No players matched all six main numbers, meaning the jackpot was missed, while no ticket-holders won £1 million by matching five of the six numbers plus the bonus ball. Set of balls 3 and draw machine Lotto2 were used in the first Lotto draw since the National Lottery paused over the weekend to enable the biggest technology upgrade in the game's 31-year history. In Lotto HotPicks, which uses the same numbers as the Lotto draw, no players matched all five numbers to win the £350,000 top prize. Two ticket-holders won £13,000 each after matching four of the five numbers. The winning Thunderball numbers were 19, 02, 27, 03 and 38, and the Thunderball was 11. No ticket-holders won £500,000 by matching all five numbers plus the Thunderball. One player matched all five regular numbers, which earned them £5,000.

Strictly Come Dancing favourite will NOT have a celebrity partner this year as they are tempted away by new gig
Strictly Come Dancing favourite will NOT have a celebrity partner this year as they are tempted away by new gig

Daily Mail​

time13 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Strictly Come Dancing favourite will NOT have a celebrity partner this year as they are tempted away by new gig

Gorka Marquez has pulled out of being partnered with a celebrity on the upcoming series of Strictly Come Dancing. The professional dancer, 34, will be missing from the BBC show for three weeks this year to work as a judge on the Spanish version Bailando Con Las Estrellas. His judging commitments means he can't have a professional partner on the new series and will be instead part of the ensemble dancers. According to The Sun, Gorka will appear as part of the ensemble for the first seven weeks and then will be gone for a month before returning in week 11. A source said: 'Strictly bosses were desperate to keep Gorka so have made it work around his schedule to make sure he's as involved as possible because he's such a fan favourite.' Gorka took to Instagram to confirm he would be a judge on the Spanish version of Strictly. He wrote: 'I am happy to announce that I will be back for season two of BAILANDO CON LAS ESTRELLAS as a judge from September. 'Due to the filming dates this means that I won't be competing with a partner this year in Strictly but I will be a part of lots of the group numbers and will be back for final weeks of the Show to support the rest of my fellow pros and their celebrities in what is going to be an AMAZING SERIES. 'As always thank you for all The love and supportand remember!' It comes after Strictly unveiled two new pros who are joining the lineup ahead of the much-anticipated new series this autumn. Alexis Warr and Julian Caillon will shimmy onto screens alongside a slew of much-loved pros later this year, with both already familiar to the show, having performed on the show's international versions, Dancing With The Stars. American-born Alexis Warr, 25, is best known for winning US dance series So You Think You Can Dance in 2022 and was crowned as 'America's Favourite Dancer', becoming the first female Ballroom and Latin dancer to claim the title. She has performed as a guest Professional Dancer and in the dance troupe on the US version of Strictly, Dancing With The Stars, and has been part of the series' accompanying US tour for the past three years. As well as appearing on America's Got Talent, World of Dance, and on national tours across the States, Alexis has also joined Dancing With The Stars judge Derek Hough for three tours, in addition to his Las Vegas residency. Prior to the announcement, Alexis hinted that she could be joining the Strictly pros in the new lineup, as she shared a video ahead of her flight to the UK over the weekend. The fiery redhead has been married to dentist Jake Burton for six years, and regularly shares sweet snaps with her spouse on Instagram. Speaking about joining the show, Alexis said: 'I've admired Strictly for years, so joining this incredible family is such an honour. 'I can't wait to step into the ballroom, pour my heart into every moment, and share my love of dance with the UK.' Australian-born Julian has been dancing since the age of 10, specialising in Ballroom and Latin American, and going onto represent Australia on the international stage. He appeared as a Professional Dancer on three seasons of Australia's Dancing With The Stars, has toured the globe with hit dance show Burn The Floor, and also competed on So You Think You Can Dance in Australia. Julian has a degree in Exercise Physiology from UNSW Sydney and, alongside his dance career, has worked as a Personal Trainer and Exercise Physiologist. Back in December, Julian announced his engagement to his girlfriend Sofia, posting a sweet video of their beachside proposal on Instagram. He said: 'Joining the cast of Strictly really is a dream come true. I've watched it for years, especially cheering on all the amazing dancers I know and work with who've been part of it. I can't wait to get stuck in, have some fun, and be part of something special! '

Gregg Wallace accusers slam BBC for ‘disregarding victims' after Masterchef airs with sacked hosts despite botched edit
Gregg Wallace accusers slam BBC for ‘disregarding victims' after Masterchef airs with sacked hosts despite botched edit

The Sun

time13 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Gregg Wallace accusers slam BBC for ‘disregarding victims' after Masterchef airs with sacked hosts despite botched edit

BBC bosses were last night feeling the heat over a string of scandals. The Corporation took a battering for airing a new series of MasterChef featuring sacked stars John Torode and Gregg Wallace. 13 13 Bosses struggled to cut down the shamed pair's screen time in the series opener though they did succeed in stripping the popular cookery contest of its usual jokes. It came as the corporation faced renewed demands to shelve the series after a misconduct probe led to the departures of its long-running hosts last month. Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy revealed yesterday she would not be watching. During the 58-minute opener which aired last night on BBC One, Wallace and Torode were featured more than 100 times. The presenters, both 60, were seen on seven occasions during the first minute alone. The nature of the show meant they then kept popping up repeatedly throughout — although there was a noticeable lack of banter between them and the contestants. A TV insider said: 'This was incredibly embarrassing for the Beeb who were probably hoping that there was something which could be done in the edit to drastically minimise how much they seemed to be on camera. MasterChef returns with Gregg Wallace and John Torode - but fans spot HUGE changes to show 'But the format of the show pivots so much around the presenters, who have to judge the meals, interview the guests and outline their suggested dishes and ingredients. 'There was simply no other way they could have made the show function without them being seen so much. 'But viewers did notice that there was far less joking around between Gregg and John and the contestants, as fans of the show have seen in the past.' The BBC's own website reported: 'MasterChef returns with sacked hosts but without their jokes.' On July 10, Wallace was sacked by the BBC and the show's production company Banijay after an investigation upheld 45 of 83 complaints against him. 13 13 13 13 Most of them, covering a 19-year period, centred around inappropriate sexual language and one of unwanted touching. Shortly afterwards, his Australian co-host Torode was also sacked after it emerged an allegation he used 'an extremely offensive racist term ' in the workplace was upheld. The BBC was then urged not to broadcast the new series, which had already been recorded, given that both men featured so heavily. 'Bigger than individuals' At one point it was suggested it might just be put on iPlayer, and not go out on BBC One. However BBC Director-General Tim Davie insisted MasterChef was 'bigger than individuals' before it was confirmed it would go ahead as planned. Mr Davie said his 'overwhelming concern' was for the amateur chefs who 'gave their heart and soul to this programme'. Yesterday morning the first three episodes, featuring a first batch of six amateur chefs, were available on the iPlayer. 13 13 13 Notably, the accompanying images were all of food and the MasterChef logo, in stark contrast to previous series which featured multiple shots of Torode and Wallace goofing around in the kitchen. The first episode then aired at 8pm on BBC One. It remained to be seen if viewing figures are drastically different to last year's series opener which pulled in 3.2million. Ms Nandy would not be among them. The minister said: 'It's absolutely not for me, as the Culture Secretary and a member of the government, to tell broadcasters what they can and can't broadcast.' I've watched MasterChef on and off over the years, but I certainly won't be watching this series Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy But, asked what she thought as a viewer, she said: 'I won't be watching it.' She added: 'I've watched MasterChef on and off over the years, but I certainly won't be watching this series.' Some of the women who made allegations against Wallace told BBC News they did not think it should be aired. One said it showed 'a blatant disregard for the people who have come forward'. Former Newsnight presenter Kirsty Wark, who alleged Wallace told 'sexualised' jokes while filming Celebrity MasterChef in 2011, said she knew many women had asked the BBC not to broadcast the new series. She told the BBC's Scotcast podcast that she 'probably won't be watching'. 'Enabling environment' Broadcast union Bectu said bad behaviour 'should not be rewarded with prime-time coverage'. Last week, Sarah Shafi, one of the contestants on the new series, said she was edited out after asking for it not to be aired. Ms Shafi said it should have been axed out of respect to those whose complaints were upheld. That would have sent 'a strong message the BBC are not supporting people in those prominent positions or facilitating some sort of enabling environment', she added. Replacements for Wallace and Torode have yet to be confirmed by the BBC. 13 13

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store