Map Shows Where Americans Spend Most on First Dates
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
A new survey has revealed how much Americans are willing to spend on a first date—and the answer varied widely depending on where they live.
The poll of 2,000 adults, conducted nationally, asked: "What's the maximum amount you would pay for a first date if you were the one paying?"
The results show significant regional differences, with the Northeast emerging as the region most willing to spend big, and the Midwest the most modest.
The data shows that Americans across the country say they are willing to spend an average of $125.60 on a first date. When broken down by region, the numbers reveal the exact contrasts:
Northeast: $138.40
West: $133.00
Southeast: $124.50
Southwest: $116.10
Midwest: $118.50
The Northeast not only topped the national average but also had higher proportions of people willing to spend in premium price ranges.
For instance, 10 percent of respondents in the region said they would spend between $151 and $200, and 4 percent said they would go over $300—more than any other region.
Meanwhile, the Midwest had the highest percentage of budget-conscious daters, with 25 percent saying they would cap spending at $50 or less. Only 1 percent in the Midwest said they would consider spending more than $350.
Interestingly, the most-common spending range across all regions was $51 to $100, with 34 percent of respondents in every region selecting it.
The cost of living seems to be a significant factor influencing how much people are willing to spend on a first date, marriage and family therapist Aly Bullock told Newsweek.
"If you're used to paying more for everything, you're likely willing to spend more on a first date," Bullock said. "It could also be influenced by the types of activities and restaurants available in your area, but I don't think these numbers are different enough to indicate much about first-date values or expectations."
When it comes to the relationship between spending more and relationship success, Bullock, who is also the head of relationships at dating app Paired, advised that it's best to find a balance in spending.
"You want to be right in the middle," she said. "Spending too much can look like love-bombing and set you up for unrealistic expectations in the relationship, and spending nothing can indicate that you're not super excited about making a great impression.
"A happy medium lets the person know that you're responsible, thoughtful, and also have boundaries with someone you just met."
This random double-opt-in survey was conducted by market research company Talker Research, whose team members are members of the Market Research Society (MRS) and the European Society for Opinion and Marketing Research (ESOMAR).
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mass. Sen. Warren: DOGE accessed ‘sensitive' student loan data at Education Dept., calls for probe
U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren says she wants to know how the quasi-governmental Department of Government Efficiency gained access to 'sensitive' student loan information at the U.S. Department of Education. On Monday, Warren and U.S. Sen. Ed Markey, both Democrats, called for the agency's acting inspector general to find out how that breach happened. They were joined by Democratic senators from eight states, including U.S. Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut. Warren said lawmakers learned of the potential breach of systems at Federal Student Aid after DOGE, which was helmed until recently by tech titan Elon Musk, infiltrated the agency. In response, Education Department officials revealed that DOGE workers 'supported' a review of the FSA's contracts. As a part of that review, one employee was granted 'read-only' access to two internal systems that held sensitive personal information about borrowers. The agency said it had since revoked that access. But, according to Warren, it did not explain why that access had been revoked, or whether the employee had continued access to other databases. 'Because of the [Education] department's refusal to provide full and complete information, the full extent of DOGE's role and influence at ED remains unknown,' the lawmakers wrote in a June 8 letter to René L. Rocque, the agency's acting inspector general. That 'lack of clarity is not only frustrating for borrowers but also dangerous for the future of an agency that handles an extensive student loan portfolio and a range of federal aid programs for higher education,' the lawmakers continued. Warren, Markey and their colleagues have called on Roque's office to determine whether the department adhered to the Federal Privacy Act, which dictates how the government can collect and use personal information. They also asked Roque to 'determine the impact of DOGE's new plans to consolidate Americans' personal information across government databases.' 'It won't end well for Trump' if he does this amid LA protests, ex-GOP rep says All Ivy League schools are supporting Harvard lawsuit — except these 2 Embassies directed to resume processing Harvard University student visas Over 12,000 Harvard alums lend weight to court battle with Trump in new filing Markey: Trump using National Guard in LA to distract from big cuts in 'Big Beautiful Bill' Read the original article on MassLive.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
You need to earn 70% more now than 6 years ago to afford a median US home — but there's still hope for buyers
Think owning a home is still the American Dream? Well, you now need a six-figure income just to afford the mid-tier of that dream. According to the latest April Housing Trends Report, the income needed to buy a median-priced home in the U.S. has soared to $114,000 — a staggering 70.1% jump from just $67,000 six years ago. Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10) For context, Americans' actual median household income was $80,610 in 2023, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. In other words, most Americans can't afford most homes on the market. In fact, 57% of households can't even buy a $300,000 home, according to the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB). It might be fair to call this situation a crisis. Here's how we got to this point and what comes next. A key factor driving the housing crisis is a lack of supply. Property developers across the country have chronically underbuilt homes since the Great Recession of 2008, according to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. As of 2025, the market faces an estimated shortage of 4.5 million homes. A lack of supply encourages buyers' bidding wars, which drive prices up. That's what we've seen over the past six years. Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says — and that 'anyone' can do it Unfortunately, there are signs that this crisis could get worse. In April 2025, construction began on 1.36 million new homes, down 1.7% compared to the same time last year, according to the Census Bureau. The NAHB points to the rise of interest rates as an exacerbatubg factor. High interest rates not only make it more difficult for construction companies to finance projects but for homebuyers to afford mortgages. However, it's not all doom-and-gloom for potential buyers. report found a silver lining emerging in the market. According to Realtor's analysis, some homeowners in certain parts of the country are 'meeting buyers in the middle.' In other words, they're willing to take a price cut on their home listing. Housing inventory is starting to build in several high-cost markets, including San Diego, San Jose, and Washington, D.C. These cities have also seen sharp increases in the number of homes listed on the market — rising by 70.1%, 67.6%, and 69.3% respectively since last year. As of April 2025, active listings were up 30.6% year-over-year across the country. That's a huge surge of inventory that could give buyers in some markets more bargaining power. In fact, some buyers are already snapping up bargains with 18% of listings seeing price reductions in April. The current housing market is far from ideal. But if you and your family earn an income high enough to qualify for a mortgage, this could be a good time to seek out deals and buy. Keep an eye on price trends and inventory levels in your local market and speak to an experienced realtor to find your dream home at a reasonable price. Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead How much cash do you plan to keep on hand after you retire? Here are 3 of the biggest reasons you'll need a substantial stash of savings in retirement Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Like what you read? Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise straight to your inbox every week. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
USA Today
32 minutes ago
- USA Today
'Trump accounts' for babies? Why the White House is pushing cash for kids
'Trump accounts' for babies? Why the White House is pushing cash for kids The program for babies born during Trump's second term would involve a one-time $1,000 federal contribution into an index fund tied to the stock market - with some of the money available at age 18. Show Caption Hide Caption Who will benefit from President Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill'? The nations richest Americans will see benefits from the Trump administration's "Big, Beautiful Bill," while the poorest will be left behind. WASHINGTON — In his first term, President Donald Trump made waves when he put his name on stimulus checks the U.S. government sent to millions of Americans during the COVID-19 pandemic. Now, the Republican president is celebrating a provision tucked into the GOP tax bill that would create and affix his name onto investment accounts for babies, if the legislation that very narrowly passed the House makes it through the Senate and becomes law. The program for American children born during Trump's current term would involve a one-time contribution from the federal government of $1,000 per toddler into a mutual or index fund that is tied to the performance of the stock market. The legislation also allows for parents to make contributions of up to $5,000 in outside contributions annually during childhood - and the child could then access some of the money when they turn 18 for things like education, training or a first-time home purchase. The full balance would be available at age 30. From gym memberships to gun silencers, Trump's tax bill is full of surprises House Republicans changed the name of the program from "MAGA accounts" to "Trump accounts" before the bill's passage last month, offering the president a tangible benefit for working-class Americans that he can put his stamp on. The program also serves as a counter to Democratic arguments that the legislation that extends the GOP's 2017 tax cuts primarily helps the nation's wealthiest Americans. Trump is set to announce at a June 9 event that a handful of large corporations have further pledged to contribute to their employees' accounts. The term-limited Trump is set to leave office on Jan. 20, 2029, but he and the GOP could benefit politically from the creation of the program in the 2026 campaign. Midterm elections have historically been unkind to the sitting president's political party, and Republicans have been sprinting to get their tax cut bill through quick enough to improve their political fortunes. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the bill would "change the lives of working, middle class families across America" through tax cuts, increasing the child tax credit, "AND by creating this incredible new ''Trump Account' program, which will put the lives of young Americans on the right financial path!' White House pushes 'Trump accounts' as Senate debates tax cut bill The House overcame a myriad of obstacles, coming from pockets of lawmakers in the GOP and a unified opposition from Democrat, to pass the lower chamber in late May. It has since run into trouble in the Senate, where conservative Republicans have raised fresh concerns that the bill would balloon the national debt. They are also fighting over provisions dealing with Medicaid and the state and local tax deduction that were critical to the bill's passage in the House. Only three Republicans can defect for the bill to pass. Sen. Rand Paul, R-Kentucky, has said he's a no, while senators such as Ron Johnson, R-Wisconsin, have pushed to get the pricetag down. Donald Trump Airport? Trump on the $500 bill? Republicans can't stop honoring ex-president Trump has been putting public and private pressure on lawmakers to vote for the bill. The White House last week touted support from police officers in a bid to bring attention to Trump's fulfillment of a campaign pledge in the legislation to eliminate taxes on overtime. This week, he's turning his attention to the investment fund for newborns in the legislation that would start as a pilot program. The benefit is backdated to begin on January 1, 2024 and end on January 1, 2029, just before the end of Trump's second term, though the White House hopes the program will be so popular that it is permanently extended. CEOs pledge to invest in 'Trump account' program The White House offered to sweeten the pot on June 9, when it said the CEOs of several large corporations would make billons of dollars in additional investments into accounts for the children of their employees. Dell Technologies, Salesforce, Uber and Goldman Sachs were among the companies the White House said would be participating. In a statement provided by the White House ahead of the event, Michael Dell, the CEO of Dell Technologies, said his company would "match dollar for dollar the government's seed investment into these accounts for all the children born to Dell team members." Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang called Trump's plan "visionary—a seed fund for America's next generation" and said his company would contribute an unspecified amount to the accounts of its employees children.
