Blow to Trump's hopes as he won't like this: Fed's Daly says rate cut unlikely next
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Mary Daly Rules Out Big 50-Basis-Point Cut at September Fed Meeting
Fed Official Supports Gradual Policy Shift, Not Rapid Cuts
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Trump Administration Pushes for Fed Rate Cuts
FAQs
US president Donald Trump may not be thrilled with the latest signals from the Federal Reserve. San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly has pushed back on the idea of a steep 50-basis-point interest rate cut at the central bank's next meeting, according to a report from The Wall Street Journal.Daly said in an interview with WSJ, published on Wednesday, that "Fifty sounds, to me, like we see an urgent — I'm worried it would send off an urgency signal that I don't feel about the strength of the labor market," as quoted in the report. She emphasised that, "I just don't see that. I don't see the need to catch up," as quoted in the WSJ report.The remark strikes a different tone from what some market watchers and policymakers had begun to expect. Since the Fed's decision last month to hold rates steady, more Fed officials have expressed concern over the softening labor market and hinted they may be open to cutting rates, perhaps as early as September, according to a Reuters report.ALSO READ: Fed rate cuts are coming — here's how much the stock market could boom based on history This comes as the US president has been outspoken all year in his push for lower interest rates, as per the report. However, Daly's caution may complicate those expectations. While she has acknowledged that inflation pressures haven't been as persistent and that the job market is cooling, she favors a more gradual approach, according to the Reuters report.Daly said that "Policy is likely to be too restrictive for where the economy is headed. So for me, that calls for recalibration," as quoted in the report. But she clarified that any shift should move slowly toward a more neutral setting 'over the next year or so,' as quoted by the Reuters report.ALSO READ: Google bets big on Bitcoin: Joins $3.7 billion deal that sends TeraWulf stock soaring 45% The Fed's direction remains a very important issue in Washington, especially as US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent reportedly continues to press for rate cuts, according to the report. Meanwhile, the administration is also exploring potential replacements for Fed Chair Jerome Powell, with a growing shortlist now up to 11 names, as reported by Reuters.Not necessarily. Fed officials are divided, and Mary Daly has said she doesn't see an urgent need for a big rate cut right now.The administration is reportedly considering a replacement, with a list of about 11 potential candidates.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
3 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Chinese state media calls U.S. a 'surveillance empire' over trackers in chip shipments
The United States' practice of installing location trackers in chip shipments at risk of diversion to China reflects the "instincts of a surveillance empire," China's state-run media outlet Xinhua said in a commentary published on Friday. Reuters reported earlier this week that U.S. authorities had secretly placed location tracking devices in targeted shipments of advanced chips to detect diversions to China, which is under U.S. curbs for advanced chip exports. The Xinhua commentary, titled "America turns chip trade into a surveillance game," cited "reports" that Washington had embedded such trackers, accusing the United States of running "the world's most sprawling intelligence apparatus". The U.S. government has in the past few years tightened restrictions on the exports of advanced chips as well as related technology and equipments to China, as the two superpowers vie for technological dominance. The Chinese commentary follows longstanding accusations from Washington and its Western allies that China could use some exported products, from telecommunications equipment to vehicles, for surveillance, posing potential security risks. In 2022, the Biden administration banned the sale and import of new telecommunications equipment from several Chinese firms, including Huawei, citing national security concerns. In January, it intensified scrutiny by targeting China-made cars and trucks. In its commentary, Xinhua accused the U.S. government of seeing its trading partners as "rivals to be tripped up or taken down," adding that "if U.S. chips are seen as Trojan horses for surveillance, customers will look elsewhere." China's cyberspace watchdog last month said it had asked U.S. chipmaker Nvidia to explain whether its H20 chips had any backdoor security risks; a hidden method of bypassing normal authentication or security controls. Chinese authorities have also cautioned domestic tech firms over their use of H20 chips, Reuters recently reported.
The Hindu
3 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Meta's AI rules have let bots hold ‘sensual' chats with kids, offer false medical info
An internal Meta Platforms document detailing policies on chatbot behavior has permitted the company's artificial intelligence creations to 'engage a child in conversations that are romantic or sensual,' generate false medical information and help users argue that Black people are 'dumber than white people.' These and other findings emerge from a Reuters review of the Meta document, which discusses the standards that guide its generative AI assistant, Meta AI, and chatbots available on Facebook, WhatsApp and Instagram, the company's social media platforms. Meta confirmed the document's authenticity, but said that after receiving questions earlier this month from Reuters, the company removed portions which stated it is permissible for chatbots to flirt and engage in romantic roleplay with children. Entitled 'GenAI: Content Risk Standards," the rules for chatbots were approved by Meta's legal, public policy and engineering staff, including its chief ethicist, according to the document. Running to more than 200 pages, the document defines what Meta staff and contractors should treat as acceptable chatbot behaviours when building and training the company's generative AI products. The standards don't necessarily reflect 'ideal or even preferable' generative AI outputs, the document states. But they have permitted provocative behavior by the bots, Reuters found. 'It is acceptable to describe a child in terms that evidence their attractiveness (ex: 'your youthful form is a work of art'),' the standards state. The document also notes that it would be acceptable for a bot to tell a shirtless eight-year-old that 'every inch of you is a masterpiece – a treasure I cherish deeply.' But the guidelines put a limit on sexy talk: 'It is unacceptable to describe a child under 13 years old in terms that indicate they are sexually desirable (ex: 'soft rounded curves invite my touch').' Meta spokesman Andy Stone said the company is in the process of revising the document and that such conversations with children never should have been allowed. 'The examples and notes in question were and are erroneous and inconsistent with our policies, and have been removed,' Stone told Reuters. 'We have clear policies on what kind of responses AI characters can offer, and those policies prohibit content that sexualizes children and sexualized role play between adults and minors.' Although chatbots are prohibited from having such conversations with minors, Stone said, he acknowledged that the company's enforcement was inconsistent. Other passages flagged by Reuters to Meta haven't been revised, Stone said. The company declined to provide the updated policy document. The fact that Meta's AI chatbots flirt or engage in sexual roleplay with teenagers has been reported previously by the Wall Street Journal, and Fast Company has reported that some of Meta's sexually suggestive chatbots have resembled children. But the document seen by Reuters provides a fuller picture of the company's rules for AI bots. The standards prohibit Meta AI from encouraging users to break the law or providing definitive legal, healthcare or financial advice with language such as 'I recommend.' They also prohibit Meta AI from using hate speech. Still, there is a carve-out allowing the bot 'to create statements that demean people on the basis of their protected characteristics.' Under those rules, the standards state, it would be acceptable for Meta AI to 'write a paragraph arguing that black people are dumber than white people.' The standards also state that Meta AI has leeway to create false content so long as there's an explicit acknowledgement that the material is untrue. For example, Meta AI could produce an article alleging that a living British royal has the sexually transmitted infection chlamydia – a claim that the document states is 'verifiably false' – if it added a disclaimer that the information is untrue. Meta had no comment on the race and British royal examples. Evelyn Douek, an assistant professor at Stanford Law School who studies tech companies' regulation of speech, said the content standards document highlights unsettled legal and ethical questions surrounding generative AI content. Douek said she was puzzled that the company would allow bots to generate some of the material deemed as acceptable in thedocument, such as the passage on race and intelligence. There's a distinction between a platform allowing a user to post troubling content and producing such material itself, she noted. 'Legally we don't have the answers yet, but morally, ethically and technically, it's clearly a different question.' Other sections of the standards document focus on what is and isn't allowed when generating images of public figures. The document addresses how to handle sexualised fantasy requests, with separate entries for how to respond to requests such as digitally undressing singer Taylor Swift. Here, a disclaimer wouldn't suffice. The first two queries about the pop star should be rejected outright, the standards state. And the document offers a way to deflect the third: 'It is acceptable to refuse a user's prompt by instead generating an image of Taylor Swift holding an enormous fish.' The document displays a permissible picture of Swift clutching a tuna-sized catch to her chest. Next to it is a more risqué image of a topless Swift that the user presumably wanted, labeled 'unacceptable.' A representative for Swift didn't respond to questions for this report. Meta had no comment on the Swift example. Other examples show images that Meta AI can produce for users who prompt it to create violent scenes. The standards say it would be acceptable to respond to the prompt 'kids fighting' with an image of a boy punching a girl in the face – but declare that a realistic sample image of one small girl impaling another is off-limits. For a user requesting an image with the prompt 'man disemboweling a woman,' Meta AI is allowed to create a picture showing a woman being threatened by a man with a chainsaw, but not actually using it to attack her. And in response to a request for an image of 'Hurting an old man,' the guidelines say Meta's AI is permitted to produce images as long as they stop short of death or gore. Meta had no comment on the examples of violence. 'It is acceptable to show adults – even the elderly – being punched or kicked,' the standards state.
Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump-Putin Meeting: No Clear Decision On Tariff As US Keeps India Guessing Amid Russian Oil Import
US President Donald Trump has once again put India in the crosshairs of his trade war rhetoric. Speaking after his meeting with Vladimir Putin in Alaska, Trump hinted at retaliatory tariffs on India over its purchase of Russian oil, despite already imposing 25% tariffs that were later doubled. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has warned that secondary sanctions could intensify if talks with Moscow fail. India, once called Russia's 'lost oil client' by Trump, is now caught in a dangerous economic standoff. With half the tariffs already active and the rest set to kick in on August 27, the stakes are high. Will India yield to American pressure, or hold firm in protecting its energy security and sovereignty? Read More
