logo
[Editorial] Absurd clause

[Editorial] Absurd clause

Korea Herald14-05-2025
Chinese seek THAAD, USFK secrets through Korean soldier; criminal law revision needed
The full story of an apparent Chinese espionage maneuver to obtain military secrets through a South Korean active duty soldier was revealed Monday.
A Chinese national was indicted last month in connection with the case. The indictment, secured by the office of Joo Jin-woo, a National Assembly member of the ruling People Power Party, was disclosed to the media on Tuesday.
According to the indictment, the Defense Counterintelligence Command caught the man trying to get USBs containing sensitive military information from the soldier on Jeju Island in March.
The man was a contact working for another Chinese national who runs a team affiliated with an intelligence department of the Chinese military.
The soldier leaked 21 military secrets to the Chinese intelligence agent and received around 50 million won ($35,000) in return.
The Chinese military intelligence agency was found to have sought data on the US missile defense system in South Korea, known as Terminal High Altitude Area Defense, guidelines on nuclear operations and operation plans involving US forces in Korea.
The incident causes concern in that the military, the last bastion of South Korea's national security, has been penetrated by a foreign intelligence organization.
In recent months, Chinese nationals were caught illegally photographing military and intelligence facilities in South Korea.
In June last year, a US aircraft carrier berthed at Busan for a joint drill was video recorded from a nearby hill. Three Chinese students were arrested for flying a drone to do so.
In November last year, the Seoul building of the National Intelligence Service was photographed by a Chinese sightseer, who flew a drone over the no-flying zone.
In January, the whole view of the Jeju International Airport was video recorded by an unauthorized drone. A Chinese tourist flew it. The Jeju International Airport could be converted into a military base in an emergency.
In March, fighters on Suwon Air Base were pictured. Two Chinese teenagers were caught. They also photographed Osan Air Base in Pyeongtaek, Gyeonggi Province, which is used by both South Korean and US forces. They reportedly told police that the photography was part of their hobby, but their argument doesn't sound believable.
According to the NIS briefing to related lawmakers late last month, 11 incidents of unauthorized photographing of major facilities in South Korea by Chinese nationals have occured since June last year.
But foreign nationals who spy on South Korea cannot be accused of espionage even if indisputable evidence is found.
Article 98 of the current criminal law punishes espionage activities "only for an enemy country." An enemy country here means North Korea.
Due to this provision, the Chinese national indicted for obtaining military secrets from the active duty soldier will be punished if convicted on charges of violating the Military Secrets Protection Act. Espionage will not be applied.
The same goes for the Chinese nationals who photographed military bases and other facilities illegally.
Sentences under the Military Secret Protection Act are lighter than those given for espionage.
The provision in question was made when the criminal law was first enacted on Sept. 18, 1953, shortly after the Korean War ended in truce. The clause has not been revised since.
Seventy two years have passed. The Cold War ended. The concept of an enemy country and patterns of espionage have changed. Intelligence operations have become elaborate and extensive.
Last year, ruling and main opposition parties pushed to revise the criminal law to expand the concept of an enemy country to include foreign countries.
At first, the opposition Democratic Party of Korea did not oppose revising the law, but abruptly shifted its ground. The bill was stopped in the plenary session of the legislation and judiciary committee. The party reportedly cites the possibility of abusing the revised clause.
The US, Japan, China and most other countries punish spies on espionage charges regardless of their nationality. Espionage is a nonpartisan matter. It is directly related to the existence of South Korea. The current article is unrealistic and absurd by any measure.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

S. Korea, US begin key summertime joint military exercise
S. Korea, US begin key summertime joint military exercise

Korea Herald

timean hour ago

  • Korea Herald

S. Korea, US begin key summertime joint military exercise

South Korea and the United States kicked off an annual combined exercise Monday to bolster their joint defense readiness against North Korea's threats while rescheduling about half of the field training exercises to next month. The Ulchi Freedom Shield exercise, which runs for 11 days through Aug. 28, involves drills incorporating "realistic" threats aimed at enhancing the allies' capabilities across all domains. Some 18,000 South Korean troops will be mobilized for this year's drills. While the Joint Chiefs of Staff said this year's exercise will be held at a similar scale compared with last year, around half of some 40 planned field training exercises will be pushed back to September as part of apparent efforts by South Korea to mend frayed ties with North Korea. The North has long denounced the allies' joint exercises as a rehearsal for an invasion against it and has a track record of staging weapons tests in response. In an Aug. 10 statement, Pyongyang's defense chief denounced the large-scale exercise and warned of exercising his country's "self-defense" right in the event of a provocation. South Korea and the US have emphasized the summertime drills are "defensive in nature." The UFS exercise will be held alongside a four-day civil defense exercise that runs through Thursday, mobilizing about 580,000 civilians and will include efforts to fend off attacks from drones and cyberattacks. On Wednesday, an anti-air raid civil defense drill will be conducted nationwide as part of the civil defense drills. (Yonhap)

Lee to send special envoys to China around early next week: sources
Lee to send special envoys to China around early next week: sources

Korea Herald

timean hour ago

  • Korea Herald

Lee to send special envoys to China around early next week: sources

President Lee Jae Myung plans to send a group of special envoys to China around early next week, coinciding with his upcoming trips to Japan and the United States for summit talks with their leaders, sources said Monday. The delegation will include former National Assembly Speaker Park Byeong-seug, ruling Democratic Party lawmakers Kim Tae-nyeon and Park Jeung, and Roh Jae-hun, son of former President Roh Tae-woo, according to the sources. "It's not final yet, but I understand they are working to set the departure date in line with the anniversary of the establishment of Korea-China diplomatic relations," a ruling party official said on condition of anonymity. Seoul and Beijing formed diplomatic ties on Aug. 24, 1992. A presidential official said related discussions are still ongoing, declining to give more details. If realized, the envoys' visit to China would coincide with Lee's planned trips to Tokyo on Aug. 23-24 and to Washington afterwards for summit talks with Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba and US President Donald Trump. The likely dispatch of the envoys would reflect Lee's commitment to managing relations with China, alongside his engagement with Washington and Tokyo. Seoul is in talks with Beijing to arrange a meeting between the special envoys and Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, the sources said. The envoys are expected to convey a letter from Lee to Chinese President Xi Jinping underscoring the importance of bilateral ties and requesting his attendance at the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in South Korea in late October. (Yonhap)

[Aziz Huq] America's national security for sale
[Aziz Huq] America's national security for sale

Korea Herald

time5 hours ago

  • Korea Herald

[Aziz Huq] America's national security for sale

Perhaps the least interesting thing about the reported decision by US President Donald Trump's administration to allow Nvidia and AMD to export high-end semiconductors to China in exchange for 15 percent of revenues is that it is probably unlawful. More important is the window it opens onto how the presidency is using its national security powers not to advance the country's interests, but for its own, narrower ambitions. To understand what's at stake, consider Nvidia's H20 chips, which Trump, when justifying his decision, described as an 'old chip' that is 'obsolete.' In 2024, Nvidia sold about a million of these 'obsolete' H20s in China. This is about five times the number of similar chips sold by Huawei. The scale of Nvidia's advantage suggests that H20 chips, while no longer cutting edge, remain very valuable to Chinese firms. Nvidia's CUDA programming interface makes them easier to connect to other hardware than Huawei's products. Overwhelming evidence of H20 chips' continuing relevance came in January, when the Chinese firm DeepSeek used them to develop a breakthrough large language model delivering top-of-the-line performance without the price tag of OpenAI, Anthropic or Google models. Such semiconductors thus still play a pivotal role in the ongoing competition between China and the United States over AI, such that permitting their export undermines rather than advances US interests. China has growing access to all the other inputs to create new AI. Its universities can still recruit and educate top-flight scientific talent. It has ample data, energy and even a near-monopoly on rare-earth minerals used to build the AI 'stack.' But the gap between Nvidia's and Huawei's market share suggests that access to advanced chips (including H20s) remains a significant vulnerability. This explains the Trump administration's decision in April, three months after DeepSeek's release, to impose a new licensing requirement on H20 chips, with a presumption of denial. But now the White House has relinquished that lever without extracting any concessions from Chinese firms or Chinese authorities. And the US needs concessions from China. Consider that China controls 70 percent of the world's rare-earth minerals, which are needed for many digital tools. Items like the heat-resistant magnets needed for missiles, fighter jets, and smart bombs will remain in dangerously short supply. At a time of growing investment in military deployments in the Indo-Pacific that require these very tools, US trade policy seems to be cannibalizing US security policy. The Nvidia and AMD export deal, in short, is an unforced error. So, what motivated the decision? The president's authority to control exports of so-called dual-use goods (which can serve both civilian and military purposes), such as advanced semiconductors, stems from the 2018 Export Control Reform Act. The government is allowed to require 'licenses' for certain exports, while also 'imposing conditions or restrictions' on those licenses. One way to understand the Nvidia/AMD deal is by comparing it to this administration's other policies and finding patterns. Perhaps the closest parallel is the administration's treatment of the social media platform TikTok. Having tried to ban the platform during his first term on national-security grounds, Trump came into office under a statutory mandate to prohibit it unless its Chinese owners divested. In January 2025, the Supreme Court upheld the ban, which Trump postponed. The statute allowed a single 90-day delay, but only with a buyer on the horizon. Having blown past this deadline, Trump has simply refused to enforce a valid law that aligns with his own erstwhile position on national security. In both the TikTok case and the Nvidia/AMD deal, Trump violated a federal statute by allowing transactions with Chinese entities -- transactions the same administration once described as a source of serious security concerns. In both cases, this was done without a deal or negotiation to achieve a public-policy goal. But in the TikTok case, Trump was clear about his motives: TikTok, he thinks, helped him win the 'youth' in the 2024 election. National security considerations, that is, gave way to electoral advantage. The Nvidia/AMD deal offers similar advantages: A recent Congressional Budget Office estimate suggests that Trump's budget will increase the national deficit by $4.1 trillion. Squeezing money from tech firms can be framed as a political win and as a deficit offset, even though the revenue will be a mere drop in the bucket. Even better for Trump, because there is no statute that envisages revenue from export controls, there is no legal constraint on how the government uses them. Trump could, say, use the money for the White House's new ballroom, or it could construct more 'Alligator Alcatraz' prisons for undocumented immigrants. The message to US adversaries is clear: America's national security has been subordinated to the Trump administration's narrow financial or partisan interests. The sale has begun. Come bearing money, political favors or both.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store