
Prosecutors appeal ruling in ex-NCT member Taeil's rape case
Prosecutors have filed an appeal against the three-and-a-half-year prison sentence handed down to Moon Tae-il, a former member of the K-pop group NCT, who was convicted of special quasi-rape earlier this month.
According to local media reports on Wednesday, prosecutors and the legal teams of Taeil's two co-defendants — also convicted in the same case — submitted formal appeals to the court the previous day. Whether Taeil himself has filed an appeal remains unconfirmed.
On July 10, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced Taeil and two others to three years and six months in prison, along with mandatory completion of 40 hours of a sexual violence treatment program and a five-year employment ban in institutions related to children and adolescents. All three were taken into custody immediately following the sentencing.
The court found that the three defendants had taken advantage of the victim's incapacitated state due to intoxication and sexually assaulted her at one of their residences.
'The defendants exploited the victim, who was too intoxicated to resist, and the nature of the crime is particularly egregious,' the court ruled. 'As a foreign national assaulted in an unfamiliar setting, the victim likely suffered severe psychological distress.'
However, the court also considered mitigating factors, including the defendants' lack of prior criminal records, admission of guilt and a settlement reached with the victim, who no longer wished to pursue criminal punishment.
Prosecutors pushed back on the "voluntary surrender" claim.
During the initial trial, prosecutors had sought seven-year prison sentences for each of the three defendants, along with a 10-year employment ban in child- and youth-related fields. They argued that the court's sentence was too lenient and challenged the defense's claim that the accused had voluntarily turned themselves in.
'The defendants submitted written statements claiming voluntary surrender, but this cannot be considered genuine,' prosecutors said during the first trial. 'They were identified after a two-month police investigation, which included surveillance camera tracking and a search and seizure operation. Only after that did they submit letters labeled as confessions.'
Prosecutors further argued that the crime could not be classified as spontaneous. 'Messages in the group chat between the defendants show they were aware the victim was a foreign national and attempted to manipulate the taxi's GPS location to mislead any future investigation,' they added.
'This case involves three defendants targeting a foreign female tourist they had never met before, who they encountered at a club in Itaewon,' prosecutors said. 'They took her to an apartment in Seocho District at 2 a.m. under the pretense of drinking more, where they collectively assaulted her. It defies common sense to claim this was not premeditated.'
The case dates back to June 2024, when a female Chinese victim reported the incident to Seoul police. Taeil was summoned for questioning in August, and was later indicted on charges of special quasi-rape — a charge punishable by a minimum of seven years to life imprisonment if convicted.
During the first hearing held on June 18, all three defendants admitted to the charges. Prosecutors also requested that the court impose mandatory sex offender registration, public disclosure of personal information and restrictions on employment in fields involving minors.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Korea Herald
a day ago
- Korea Herald
Hybe chairman referred to prosecution over alleged unfair trading
Financial authorities on Wednesday referred Bang Si-hyuk, chairman and founder of K-pop powerhouse Hybe, to the prosecution over alleged fraudulent securities transactions related to the company's listing, officials said. The Securities and Futures Commission under the Financial Services Commission decided to forward the complaint against Bang and three former Hybe officials for their alleged violation of the Capital Markets Act regarding the company's initial public offering. Bang is accused of misleading investors, including venture capital firms, in 2019 into believing that Hybe's IPO would be delayed and inducing them to sell their shares to a special purpose company (SPC) established by a private equity fund created and funded by Hybe executives. Investors sold their shares to the SPC, but financial authorities determined that Hybe was, at the time, already in the process of preparing for its listing. After the company went public, the SPC sold its shares, and Bang reportedly received 30 percent of the profit from the share sale in accordance with a prior shareholder agreement. "We plan to actively cooperate with the prosecution's investigation to thoroughly uncover the allegations surrounding this high-profile case," the SFC said. "Any violations found will be thoroughly investigated and strictly punished." Hybe earlier apologized for the allegations related to the IPO process, while claiming that the listing was carried out in compliance with relevant laws and regulations. (Yonhap)


Korea Herald
a day ago
- Korea Herald
Prosecutors appeal ruling in ex-NCT member Taeil's rape case
Authorities seek stronger punishment, challenge first trial's leniency amid controversy over defendants' claims of voluntary surrender Prosecutors have filed an appeal against the three-and-a-half-year prison sentence handed down to Moon Tae-il, a former member of the K-pop group NCT, who was convicted of special quasi-rape earlier this month. According to local media reports on Wednesday, prosecutors and the legal teams of Taeil's two co-defendants — also convicted in the same case — submitted formal appeals to the court the previous day. Whether Taeil himself has filed an appeal remains unconfirmed. On July 10, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced Taeil and two others to three years and six months in prison, along with mandatory completion of 40 hours of a sexual violence treatment program and a five-year employment ban in institutions related to children and adolescents. All three were taken into custody immediately following the sentencing. The court found that the three defendants had taken advantage of the victim's incapacitated state due to intoxication and sexually assaulted her at one of their residences. 'The defendants exploited the victim, who was too intoxicated to resist, and the nature of the crime is particularly egregious,' the court ruled. 'As a foreign national assaulted in an unfamiliar setting, the victim likely suffered severe psychological distress.' However, the court also considered mitigating factors, including the defendants' lack of prior criminal records, admission of guilt and a settlement reached with the victim, who no longer wished to pursue criminal punishment. Prosecutors pushed back on the "voluntary surrender" claim. During the initial trial, prosecutors had sought seven-year prison sentences for each of the three defendants, along with a 10-year employment ban in child- and youth-related fields. They argued that the court's sentence was too lenient and challenged the defense's claim that the accused had voluntarily turned themselves in. 'The defendants submitted written statements claiming voluntary surrender, but this cannot be considered genuine,' prosecutors said during the first trial. 'They were identified after a two-month police investigation, which included surveillance camera tracking and a search and seizure operation. Only after that did they submit letters labeled as confessions.' Prosecutors further argued that the crime could not be classified as spontaneous. 'Messages in the group chat between the defendants show they were aware the victim was a foreign national and attempted to manipulate the taxi's GPS location to mislead any future investigation,' they added. 'This case involves three defendants targeting a foreign female tourist they had never met before, who they encountered at a club in Itaewon,' prosecutors said. 'They took her to an apartment in Seocho District at 2 a.m. under the pretense of drinking more, where they collectively assaulted her. It defies common sense to claim this was not premeditated.' The case dates back to June 2024, when a female Chinese victim reported the incident to Seoul police. Taeil was summoned for questioning in August, and was later indicted on charges of special quasi-rape — a charge punishable by a minimum of seven years to life imprisonment if convicted. During the first hearing held on June 18, all three defendants admitted to the charges. Prosecutors also requested that the court impose mandatory sex offender registration, public disclosure of personal information and restrictions on employment in fields involving minors.


Korea Herald
10-07-2025
- Korea Herald
Detained Yoon skips hearing as court battle escalates, probe deepens
Ex-president now faces tough legal challenge that could keep him behind bars until Supreme Court ruling Former President Yoon Suk Yeol skipped his insurrection hearing Thursday, just hours after being detained over evidence-tampering concerns in a separate case, prompting a sharp dispute over the legitimacy of his sudden health-related absence. The special counsel team urged the Seoul Central District Court to take appropriate measures against Yoon so that the former president does not miss his criminal trial hearing in which he was supposed to appear as a defendant. It also decided to summon the arrested former president at 2 p.m. on Friday. 'The defendant was absent without a valid reason. We request that the court insist that the defendant prevent such an incident from occurring again. Should the defendant be absent again, we ask that measures such as forcing the defendant to attend the hearing be considered by the court,' said the special counsel team. Yoon's attorneys argued that he submitted a notice of absence before the hearing, citing health reasons and that it was not appropriate for him to attend the trial just hours after he was detained. The Seoul Central District Court approved the special counsel's request for a warrant while it investigated allegations including abuse of power. Yoon was formally taken into detention early Thursday, four months after he was released in March, when a warrant related to the insurrection case expired. 'The defendant had been detained for less than eight hours. And even if he was notified by fax or phone call to appear at court, we question whether such a summons was legally valid,' said Yoon's legal representatives. Now in custody, Yoon is expected to face at least 20 more criminal trial hearings this year, with the possibility of being detained for up to 18 months as his case moves through the courts. The court issued a 20-day detention warrant ahead of his indictment by the special counsel. If indicted while in custody, he could be held for up to six months during the district court trial, with additional six-month detentions possible at both the appellate and Supreme Court stages. The former president will now attend his criminal trial hearings from the Seoul Detention Center in Uiwang, Gyeonggi Province. Following the court's approval of his detention, Yoon had his personal information verified, was assigned an inmate number and had his mugshot taken. Presidential security personnel who were previously assigned to the former president have also been withdrawn. The Former President Special Treatment Act stipulates security and protection may be provided to a former president and his or her spouse for a necessary period. However, as he has been taken into custody and transferred to correctional authorities, such privileges are no longer applied. Yoon is expected to travel to and from court without security personnel, accompanied only by correctional officers and transported in a convoy. Yoon was protected by Presidential Security Service officials during his first 52-day detention period — from mid-January to early March — as he was awaiting the Constitutional Court's ruling that formally confirmed his impeachment in early April. The special counsel team is also expected to gain momentum with its investigation. The special counsel team — led by Cho Eun-suk -- is investigating potential illegalities related to the former president's short-lived martial law declaration. Yoon's alleged treason is one of the key allegations that investigators will focus on, as the special counsel team did not include this suspicion in the latest warrant request, as substantial materials remained for investigation. The proposed treason charge centers on the former president allegedly ordering a military drone to be deployed over Pyongyang as part of a scheme to justify his martial law imposition by goading North Korea into aggressive action. Additional probes into former Prime Minister Han Duck-soo are also expected, as he was named as an accomplice who attempted to prepare false public documents. The special counsel previously revealed that Yoon fabricated an official martial law document on Dec. 5, 2024, two days after declaring martial law. Though the martial law imposition was lifted by the National Assembly in a matter of hours, Han and then-Defense Minister Kim Yong-hyun reportedly signed the backdated document to make Yoon's martial law declaration appear as if it had been issued through an appropriate legal procedure. Kang Eui-gu, who at the time was a secretary at the presidential office and drafted the document, reportedly testified in the special counsel investigation that the document was discarded at Han's request and upon Yoon's approval. The decision violated Article 82 of the Constitution, which stipulates that acts of the president under law be executed in writing and that such documents should be signed by the prime minister and Cabinet members concerned.