logo
Dutch Government Collapses After Right-Wing Leader Wilders Walks Out

Dutch Government Collapses After Right-Wing Leader Wilders Walks Out

The Dutch government has collapsed after Geert Wilders' far-right Party for Freedom (PVV) withdrew from the ruling coalition, leaving the administration without a parliamentary majority and plunging the Netherlands into political uncertainty.
Prime Minister Dick Schoof, an independent who took office last July, has resigned from his role in the wake of the collapse. The government's fall after less than a year in power is expected to trigger snap elections, although experts say a vote before October is unlikely and the process of forming a new government could take months.
Without PVV's 37 seats in the House of Representatives, the coalition government now only has 51 seats out of 150.
Wilders' party won the previous general election in November 2023 in a shock result, signaling a significant shift to the right in the Netherlands that has been echoed in other elections across Europe over the last year, including in Germany, France, and the European Parliament.
Who is Geert Wilders?
Wilders, 61, is one of the most prominent and polarizing figures in Dutch politics. Originally from Venlo in the south of the Netherlands, Wilders is a seasoned politician, first joining the field in 1990 as an assistant to Frits Bolkestein, a centre-right politician and then-leader of the People's Party for Freedom and Democracy (VVD), before securing his first elected position in 1997 as a VVD city councillor in Utrecht.
He was elected to the House of Representatives a year later, and has gone on to become the longest serving lawmaker in Dutch politics. In 2004, he left the VVD and formed his own party, later renamed PVV, which he currently leads.
Anti-immigration policy is at the top of Wilders' agenda. His manifesto during the 2023 general election included a ban on all mosques, Islamic schools, the use of Qurans, and anyone wearing a Hijab entering government buildings in the Netherlands. The manifesto also said the PVV wants to reduce non-Western immigration and implement a 'general asylum freeze.'
Wilders' speeches have been marked by hardline anti-immigrant and anti-Islam rhetoric as well: In late 2016, a panel of judges found him guilty of inciting discrimination against Dutch Moroccans over comments he made in a post-election address in 2014; months later, ahead of parliamentary elections in 2017, Wilders described some Moroccans in the Netherlands as 'scum.'
As of January 2024, just under 3 million people in the Netherlands were born abroad, 176,000 thousand of whom were born in Morocco. One or both of another 250,000 residents ' parents were also born in Morocco.
Wilders has been calling for the Dutch government to implement his party's 10-point plan, which includes slashing migration, turning away asylum seekers, and returning thousands of Syrians back to their home country.
He has also been calling for changes to the 'Main Outline Agreement' signed when the government coalition formed last year.
On Tuesday morning, after walking out of a meeting of coalition party leaders, Wilders said in a post on X: 'No signature for our asylum plans. No changes to the Main Outline Agreement. PVV leaves the coalition.'
What could happen next?
Wilders' announcement that his PVV party will be leaving the coalition means that any party members holding ministerial positions in the cabinet will leave, while remaining ministers from three other parties will continue as part of a caretaker cabinet.
After Prime Minister Schoof's resignation on Tuesday, a general election is likely to be called as the current government will struggle to function with a minority in the House of Representatives.
The ruling coalition comprised four parties: PVV (37 seats), VVD (24 seats), NSC (20 seats), and BBB (7 seats), which together held 88 seats in the 150-seat House of Representatives. With PVV's withdrawal, the coalition loses its majority, retaining only 51 seats.
Based on previous election timeframes, Reuters reported that an election before October is unlikely, and forming a new government in the meantime could take months due to the country's fractured politics.
VVD leader Dilan Yesilgöz-Zegerius, whose party formed part of the government coalition, called for elections 'as soon as possible' in a post on X, adding that the Netherlands needs a strong cabinet to 'continue to deliver on the right-wing policies that the voters voted for.'
Earlier on Tuesday, Yesilgöz-Zegerius said in a separate post: 'Wilders is putting his own interests above the interests of our country by walking away … Everything that could be done, we were already going to do. Everything we had already agreed upon.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US diplomats asked if non-Whites qualify for Trump refugee program for South Africans
US diplomats asked if non-Whites qualify for Trump refugee program for South Africans

USA Today

time3 hours ago

  • USA Today

US diplomats asked if non-Whites qualify for Trump refugee program for South Africans

WASHINGTON, July 25 (Reuters) - In early July, the top official at the U.S. embassy in South Africa reached out to Washington asking for clarification on a contentious U.S. policy: could non-Whites apply for a refugee program geared toward white South Africans if they met other requirements? President Donald Trump's February executive order establishing the program specified that it was for "Afrikaners in South Africa who are victims of unjust racial discrimination," referring to an ethnic group descended mostly from Dutch settlers. In a diplomatic cable sent July 8, embassy Charge d'Affairs David Greene asked whether the embassy could process claims from other minority groups claiming race-based discrimination such as "coloured" South Africans who speak Afrikaans. In South Africa the term coloured refers to mixed-raced people, a classification created by the apartheid regime still in use today. The answer came back days later in an email from Spencer Chretien, the highest-ranking official in the State Department's refugee and migration bureau, saying the program is intended for White people. Reuters was unable to independently verify the precise language in the email which was described to the news agency by three sources familiar with its contents. The State Department, responding to a request for comment on July 18, did not specifically comment on the email or the cable but described the scope of the policy as wider than the guidance in Chretien's email. The department said U.S. policy is to consider both Afrikaners and other racial minorities for resettlement, echoing guidance posted on its website in May saying that applicants "must be of Afrikaner ethnicity or be a member of a racial minority in South Africa." Chretien declined to comment through a State Department spokesperson. Greene did not respond to Reuters requests for comment. The internal back-and-forth between the embassy and the State Department - which hasn't been previously reported - illustrates the confusion in how to implement a policy designed to help White Afrikaners in a racially diverse country that includes mixed-race people who speak Afrikaans, as well as Whites who speak English. So far the State Department has resettled 88 South Africans under the program, including the initial group of 59 who arrived in May. Another 15 are expected to arrive by the end of August, one of the sources said. Trump, a Republican who recaptured the White House pledging a wide-ranging immigration crackdown, placed an indefinite freeze on refugee admissions from around the world after taking office, saying the U.S. would only admit refugees who "can fully and appropriately assimilate." Weeks later, he issued an executive order that called for the U.S. to resettle Afrikaners, describing them as victims of "violence against racially disfavored landowners," allegations that echoed far-right claims but which have been contested by South Africa's government. Since the executive order, U.S. diplomats working to implement the program have been deliberating internally about which racial groups could be considered eligible, one of the sources said. In the July 8 cable, Greene laid out a summary of the different ethnic and racial groups in the country before seeking guidance on eligibility. In addition to Afrikaners and mixed-race South Africans, Greene mentioned indigenous South Africans known as the Khoisan people. He said that members of the Jewish community had also expressed interest, but that in South Africa they are considered a religious minority and not a racial group. "In the absence of other guidance, [the U.S. embassy] intends to give consideration to well-founded claims of persecution based on race for other racial minorities," Greene wrote. At least one family identified as "coloured" has already traveled to the U.S. as refugees, two people familiar with the matter said. The cable forced the administration to clarify its position on whether the policy is for Whites only, and if it does include other aggrieved minorities, who would qualify, two of the people familiar with the matter said. Chretien, a conservative who wrote op-eds promoting the Heritage Foundation's "Project 2025" plan to overhaul the federal government, is the senior official at the State Department's Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration. During the apartheid era, which ended with the first democratic elections in 1994, South Africa maintained a racially segregated society with separate schools, neighborhoods and public facilities for people classified as Black, coloured, White or Asian. Blacks make up 81% of South Africa's population, according to 2022 census data. Coloured South Africans make up 8%, and Indians 3%. Afrikaners and other White South Africans constitute 7% of the population but own three-quarters of the privately held land in the country. When asked about the program in May, Trump said he was not giving Afrikaners preferential treatment because they are White. "They happen to be White, but whether they are White or Black makes no difference to me," he said. In response to a request for comment, a White House official said the administration's policy reflected Trump's executive order. 'We will prioritize refugee admissions for South African citizens, including Afrikaners and other racial minorities in South Africa, who have been targeted by the discriminatory laws of the South African government," the official said. The assertion that minority White South Africans face discrimination from the Black majority has spread in far-right circles for years and been echoed by White South African-born Elon Musk, a U.S. citizen who served as a top White House aide during the first four months of Trump's administration. The South African government has rejected the allegations of persecution and a "White genocide." There is no evidence to back up claims of widespread, race-based attacks in the country. During a combative Oval Office meeting with South African President Cyril Ramaphosa in May, Trump showed a printed image of a Reuters video taken in the Democratic Republic of Congo as part of what he falsely presented as evidence of mass killings of White South Africans. The South African Chamber of Commerce said earlier this year that 67,000 people were interested in the program. (Reporting by Ted Hesson and Humeyra Pamuk in Washington and Kristina Cooke in San Francisco; Additional reporting by Jonathan Landay in Washington; Editing by Don Durfee and Michael Learmonth)

Israeli gunfire and strikes kill at least 25 in Gaza, many while seeking aid
Israeli gunfire and strikes kill at least 25 in Gaza, many while seeking aid

Los Angeles Times

time5 hours ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Israeli gunfire and strikes kill at least 25 in Gaza, many while seeking aid

DEIR AL BALAH, Gaza Strip — Israeli airstrikes and gunshots killed at least 25 people overnight into Saturday, according to Palestinian health officials and the local ambulance service, as ceasefire talks appear to have stalled and Gaza faces famine. Gunfire killed the majority of people as they waited for aid trucks close to the Zikim crossing with Israel, said staff at Shifa Hospital, where the bodies were taken. Israel's army didn't respond to a request for comment about the shootings. Those killed in strikes included four people in an apartment building in Gaza City, hospital staff and the ambulance service said. Ceasefire talks between Israel and Hamas were at a standstill after the U.S. and Israel recalled negotiating teams Thursday. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Friday his government was considering 'alternative options' to ceasefire talks. A Hamas official, however, said negotiations were expected to resume next week and described the recall of the Israeli and U.S. delegations as a pressure tactic. Egypt and Qatar, which mediate the talks alongside the United States, called the pause only temporary and said talks would resume. They did not say when. The United Nations and experts say Palestinians in the Gaza Strip are at risk of famine, with reports of increasing numbers of people dying from causes related to malnutrition. And now children with no preexisting conditions have begun to starve to death. While Israel's army says it's allowing aid into the enclave with no limit on the number of trucks that can enter, the U.N. says it is hampered by Israeli military restrictions on its movements and incidents of criminal looting. The Hamas-run police had provided security for safe aid delivery, but it has been unable to operate after being targeted by Israeli airstrikes. Israel on Saturday said more than 250 trucks carrying aid from the U.N. and other organizations entered Gaza this week. About 600 trucks were entering per day during the latest ceasefire that Israel ended in March. The latest Zikim crossing shootings come days after at least 80 Palestinians were killed trying to reach aid entering through the crossing. Israel's military at the time said its soldiers shot at a gathering of thousands of Palestinians who posed a threat. During the shootings late Friday, Sherif Abu Aisha said people started running when they saw a light that they thought was from the aid trucks, but as they got close they realized it was from Israel's tanks. That's when the army started firing on people, he told the Associated Press. He said his uncle, a father of eight, was among those killed. 'We went because there is no food ... and nothing was distributed,' he said. Men carried the latest bodies through the rubble Saturday. A small boy wailed over a corpse. Israel faces growing international pressure to alleviate Gaza's catastrophic humanitarian crisis. More than two dozen Western-aligned countries and over 100 charity and human rights groups have called for an end to the war, harshly criticizing Israel's blockade and a new aid delivery model it has rolled out. More than 1,000 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli forces since May while trying to get food, mostly near the new aid sites run by a U.S. contractor, the U.N. human rights office says. The charities and rights groups said even their own staffers were struggling to get enough food. For the first time in months, Israel said it is allowing airdrops of aid, requested by neighboring Jordan. A Jordanian official said the airdrops will mainly be food and milk formula. Britain plans to work with partners such as Jordan to airdrop aid and evacuate children requiring medical assistance, Prime Minister Keir Starmer's office said Saturday. The office did not give details. But the head of the United Nations agency for Palestinian refugees, Philippe Lazzarini, warned on social media that airdrops are 'expensive, inefficient and can even kill starving civilians' and won't reverse the increasing starvation or prevent aid diversion. Shurafa and Magdy write for the Associated Press and reported from Deir al Balah and Cairo, respectively.

The House is taking a summer break — and now the stock market can get to work
The House is taking a summer break — and now the stock market can get to work

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

The House is taking a summer break — and now the stock market can get to work

Last Tuesday, House Speaker Mike Johnson unexpectedly adjourned the U.S. House of Representatives until September. The next day, the S&P 500 SPX hit another all-time high. Coincidence? Several academic studies suggest not. That's because the stock market historically has performed better when Congress is out of session. America's 63 million family caregivers are mostly unpaid, stressed and begging for help 'His income is limited': Should I pay $800 a month towards my husband's $67,000 student debt? My ex-husband's benefit will be $2,600 at retirement age, and mine is $2,200. Can I claim on his record instead? One such study was conducted by Michael Ferguson, head of the department of finance at the University of Cincinnati's Carl Lindner College of Business, and Douglas Witte, a professor of finance, economics and risk management at Missouri State University's business school. In their study, titled 'Congress and the Stock Market,' they found that the Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA from 1897 through 2004 produced the equivalent of a 13.8% annualized return when Congress was not in session, versus 2% when Congress was in session. They found a similar result for the period beginning in 1957, when the S&P 500 was created. Another study, which in effect constitutes an out-of-sample test of this result, focused on the Australian stock market from mid-1993 through late 2011. In a paper entitled 'The Effects of Political Uncertainty on Stock Prices,' the study's authors at the University of Melbourne (Yoni Cukierman, Asjeet Lamba and Carsten Murawski) found that 'returns in the Australian stock market are lower and more volatile whenever the Australian federal parliament is in session.' This year constitutes another out-of-sample test. Since the beginning of the year, as you can see from the chart above, the S&P 500 has produced far better average returns when Congress was not in session than when it was. Though these year-to-date results are not statistically significant in and of themselves, they corroborate the two studies referenced above. Though we can only speculate as to why the stock market performs better when Congress is in recess, most hypotheses trace to the economic and political uncertainty that exists when Congress is in session. As humorist Will Rogers famously wrote a century ago in a letter to the editor of the New York Times: 'This country has come to feel the same when Congress is in session as we do when a baby gets hold of a hammer. It's just a question of how much damage he can do with it before we take it away from him.' Mark Hulbert is a regular contributor to MarketWatch. His Hulbert Ratings tracks investment newsletters that pay a flat fee to be audited. He can be reached at More: How Trump's policies are boosting tech stocks — and helping to inflate a bubble As latest meme-stock drama unfolds, there's one thing that is different this time around 'If I was writing the checks at Coke, I wouldn't write the check for this,' one expert says about cane-sugar Coke Homeowners in these states are the winners if Trump ends capital-gains taxes for home sellers Newly built homes are cheaper than previously owned homes as builders ramp up price cuts Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store