logo
Explained: Delhi's new law to control private school fees and hidden charges

Explained: Delhi's new law to control private school fees and hidden charges

The Hindu02-05-2025

On April 29, the Delhi cabinet approved the Delhi School Education Transparency in Fixation and Regulation of Fees Bill, 2025, aiming to regulate fee structures across all 1,677 private unaided and government-aided schools in the capital. The Hindu examines why such legislation is crucial—and why it must avoid the fate of many existing laws that remain unenforced.
Hikes sudden and steep
A steep increase in the annual school fees pushed Anna Mable Ritheesh to shift her son from an unaided private school in Delhi to a state government school. Two years later, her son's grades improved without the family having to burn a hole in their pockets. 'We used to pay anywhere between ₹17,000 to ₹20,000 a quarter – which summed to 20% of our (her husband included) earnings for the same period,' Anna told The Hindu. At the government school, she pays just ₹750 per month.
The substandard infrastructure in the private schools doesn't justify the exorbitant fee structure, Anna says, adding that the teaching was not up to the par either. 'When you seek admission in a private school, the first thing they ask is not about the child, but about your job and monthly income,' Anna said. 'Their only concern is money.' Unlike these schools, the government schools are regularly updating their online portals, making daily activities of students easily accessible to parents, she adds.
Over the past three weeks, as private schools and unaided private schools announced steep fees hike as much as 40-80%, enraged parents took part in citywide protests, triggering political action. ​Unaided private schools are run on Delhi government's land leased from various departments including the Delhi Development Authority or Land and Development Office for subsidized rates.
They also enjoy freedom from property tax and minimal regulatory enforcement. Parents allege the campuses are sublet for commercial operations, violating norms. Ashok Agarwal, a Supreme Court advocate and an education activist, talks about a private school that paid only ₹20,001 as lease rent, fixed more than five decades ago, to operate on six acres of government land.
The Delhi government is intensifying its crackdown on unauthorized fee hikes by private schools, particularly those operating on government-leased land. Chief Minister Rekha Gupta has declared a zero tolerance policy towards schools that increase fees without approval. She emphasized that any school found violating regulations will face strict action and directed the Directorate of Education (DOE) to conduct an inquiry into such complaints.
The hidden costs
The hike comes in many hidden ways. One private school announced a 30 percent fee increase, raised the monthly bus commute fee from ₹2,500 to ₹4,950, and introduced five different uniforms for children for the academic year 2024–25. 'From KG to Class 8, the fee for one student is ₹17,000 a month. The total expenses amount to about half of the combined monthly earnings of me and my husband,' said Daksha Anand, head of the parents' association of the school.
'The school refuses to give us books unless we buy the stationery too. Why are we forced to change our children's uniforms almost every other year?' questioned Daksha. The Directorate of Education has issued a notice to the school, ordering a rollback of the fee hikes from the past two years, but the school has yet to respond.
Parents who challenge fee hikes in Delhi private schools report that their children face punitive actions. Instances include students being barred from classes, denied access to facilities like libraries and washrooms, and even having their names struck off school rolls. ​'The management asks us to change the school if we cannot afford it. In Delhi, it is easier to get a job than get a school admission,' said Anna.
The increase is stealing away many parents from their dream of providing quality private education to their children. Ajay Kumar Gowtham, a cab driver earning ₹18,000 a month, had to pull his son out of Panchsheel Balak Inter College in Noida after three years due to mounting dues. 'The fees were ₹55,000, but with penalties, it shot up to ₹1.65 lakh. They don't allow online payments and make us wait for hours without accepting the fees. I couldn't wait as it meant missing work and that's how the dues shot up,' he said. 'I badly wanted to give my kids a private school education, but I've realised I just can't afford it,' he added.
Parents repeatedly question the lack of basic infrastructure in unaided private schools that continue to hike fees each year without justification. 'My son's school had no access to drinking water or hygienic restrooms. For over a year, the Accounts teacher was made to teach Business Studies due to a staff shortage,' said Vidhya Nambiar, whose son recently graduated from an unaided management school. Despite paying ₹9,000 a month in fees, the school reportedly had dysfunctional fans. 'And we all know what Delhi's heat feels like,' she added.
Missing the objective
​Unaided private schools in Delhi are legally mandated to operate as non-profit entities, focusing on philanthropic and community service objectives rather than commercial gain. 'These schools cannot create surplus income. But many of the managements of these schools are tough entrepreneurs, for whom money plays a major role,' said Ashok Agarwal.
In Delhi, the regulation of fee hikes by private unaided schools is governed by the Delhi School Education Act and Rules (DSEAR), 1973. According to Section 17 of DSEAR, private unaided schools are required to obtain prior approval from the DoE before increasing their fees. However, a 2024 judgement by the Delhi High Court brought down the DoE's power.
The court stayed a DoE circular mandating prior sanction for fee hikes by such schools. The court emphasized that the DoE must respect this legal position and cease issuing circulars threatening action against schools for fee increases without prior approval. 'This judgment has emboldened many school managements to hike fees without seeking the DoE's approval. Despite having lower operational costs, unaided private schools charge fees almost on par with fully private institutions,' said Daksha Anand.
However, the managements of these schools put forth a different perspective. 'Our school has 2,200 students and 89 staff members. We pay salaries equivalent to the Seventh Pay Commission scales, and even then, we struggle to pay them on time. We raised the fees by 9% last year and again by 9% this year—without these hikes, survival is impossible,' said Father Stanley, Manager, St Mary's Senior Secondary School, Mayur Vihar.
'There are schools that operate purely as profit-making ventures, increasing fees so steeply every year. That is simply not acceptable,' Father Stanley said.
Indiscriminate fee hikes have long been a persistent problem in Delhi. Hearing the public interest litigations of parents and school managements, the Delhi High Court, in a landmark judgment in 1998, said that the tuition fee and other charges are required to be fixed in a validly constituted meeting giving opportunity to the representatives of Parent Teachers Association and nominee of the DoE to place their viewpoints. The judgment is seldom adhered to. 'We are simply informed of the fee increase, and they aren't open about the expenses,' said Daksha.
'Delhi is one of the pioneers in regulating private school fees. The 1998 High Court judgment became a turning point, prompting states like Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra and several others to enact their own fee regulation laws,' Ashok said.
It is a reality that many states still do not have fee regulation laws in India. 'For example, the cost of constructing a building should be spread over the next 30 years, and if a digital board is installed, its cost should be distributed over five years—rather than placing the entire burden on the next batch of students. This is why we need localized laws to regulate fees effectively,' education policy analyst Prince Gajendrababu said.
Features of the new Bill
The DSEAR provided a foundational framework but it lacks provisions to control fee increases. The new Bill has guidelines for forming three-tier committees at the school, district and state levels. Schools violating the regulations may face penalties and the possibility of derecognition. But without effective implementation, the Delhi School Education Transparency in Fixation and Regulation of Fees Bill, 2025 may well be just another toothless law.
Experts say the Delhi bill appears overly complicated and potentially unworkable at first glance. 'There was no need to have so many layers of committees. One effective committee would have sufficed,' said Ashok Agarwal.
However, some parents and educationists view the bill as a potential catalyst for change across India. 'This should be a clarion call for other states to enact similar legislation and implement it effectively, just like the 1998 judgment did,' said Prince Gajendra Babu.
One of the significant features of the bill is the provision preventing schools from taking coercive action against students over fee-related disputes. However, experts raised a critical concern about the penalties imposed on erring schools. 'Yes, the bill proposes fines running into lakhs of rupees. But the big question is, where will this money come from? Eventually, it will be recovered from the parents through increased fees. So, who is really being punished -- the school or the parents?' Mr. Agarwal questioned.
The Bill introduces a fixed fee revision cycle, allowing schools to revise fees only once every three years, offering financial predictability for parents. It also mandates that any fee hike must be based on 18 clearly defined parameters, such as infrastructure quality, academic performance, and financial status. To ensure compliance, the Bill imposes strict penalties for violations, deterring arbitrary hikes.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

DDA issues eviction notices in Bhoomiheen JJ camp
DDA issues eviction notices in Bhoomiheen JJ camp

Hindustan Times

time2 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

DDA issues eviction notices in Bhoomiheen JJ camp

New Delhi, The Delhi Development Authority has pasted fresh eviction notices at houses in the Bhoomiheen jhuggi-jhopri camp, warning encroachers to leave the spot within the next three days. The camp, where most residents are migrant workers, has faced demolition drives thrice in the past this year May and June and July of 2023. According to officials, only 1,862 households from the camp have been found eligible and were allotted economically weaker government accommodation. 'All the residents of Bhoomiheen Camp in Kalkaji Extension, are being informed that, as per the court's directions, illegal JJ clusters will be demolished,' the DDA eviction notice read. 'In this regard, three days June 8, 9 and 10 are being given. After this, the demolition drive will be carried out, DDA will not be responsible after that," it added. While there was no response from DDA to present queries, earlier on June 6, the land-owning agency had stated that it carried out demolition of jhuggis at Bhoomiheen Camp in May, following the dismissal of writ petitions by the Delhi High Court. According to the DDA, based on the DUSIB policy which includes dwellers staying in JJ colonies before January 1, 2015, 1,862 households were found eligible. The residents have to have documentary evidence showing their names in electoral rolls and other such identity documents as residents of the camp before the 2015 cut-off date, it said. "This action is crucial for reclaiming DDA land, completing housing projects for other JJ clusters in the vicinity, and preventing further illegal encroachments," the authority said. The DDA noted that about 1,618 jhuggi structures were present in the Bhoomiheen Camp. Of these, 935 jhuggi structures were demolished in the past, while the remaining 683 structures could not be removed due to stay against demolition, adjacent jhuggis, and seven religious structures.

Article 143: What is the context of the Presidential reference to SC regarding TN Governor case?
Article 143: What is the context of the Presidential reference to SC regarding TN Governor case?

The Hindu

time4 hours ago

  • The Hindu

Article 143: What is the context of the Presidential reference to SC regarding TN Governor case?

Article 143 of the Constitution allows the President to seek the Supreme Court's opinion on matters of law. This provision has been invoked by President Droupadi Murmu to raise 14 questions on a recent Supreme Court judgement. It concerns a case filed by the Tamil Nadu government against its Governor, who had withheld assent to 10 bills indefinitely. The Supreme Court has ruled in favour of the Tamil Nadu government, laying down a three-month timeline for Governors and the President to act on Bills passed by the State legislatures. The larger context of this development is the ongoing tussle between the Union government and Opposition-ruled States, with many wondering if this Presidential reference represents a political pushback from the Union government. Historically, what has been the logic for such references? How is this particular Presidential reference different in its substance from a review petition? Is the Supreme Court bound to take it up or can it decline the reference? Guest: Supreme Court advocate Deepak Joshi Host: G Sampath, Social Affairs Editor, The Hindu Recorded by Jude Francis Weston and Tayyab Hussain Edited by Jude Francis Weston For more In Focus episodes:

Bangladesh anti-Sheikh Hasina student protester Newton Das found to be Bengal voter
Bangladesh anti-Sheikh Hasina student protester Newton Das found to be Bengal voter

Scroll.in

time7 hours ago

  • Scroll.in

Bangladesh anti-Sheikh Hasina student protester Newton Das found to be Bengal voter

A man allegedly linked to the 2024 students' protests in Bangladesh was found to be a voter in West Bengal's Kakdwip Assembly constituency, The Hindu reported on Sunday. Several images of the man, identified as Newton Das, participating in the agitation in the neighbouring country were widely shared on social media. Das has claimed that he was an Indian citizen but acknowledged that he had actively participated in the protests in Bangladesh, The Hindu reported. 'I went to Bangladesh in 2024 for issues related to an ancestral property and got caught in the revolution,' The Hindu quoted Newton Das as saying in a video. 'I have been a voter in Kakdwip since 2014 but lost my voter card in 2017.' Newton Das said that he had received a fresh voter card in 2018 with the help of Trinamool Congress MLA Manturam Pakhira. He also claimed that he had voted for Pakhira, who represents Kakdwip, in the 2016 Assembly polls, The Hindu reported. The constituency is in South 24 Parganas district. 'This is a conspiracy against me by a particular community,' India Today quoted Newton Das as saying in the video. He did not specify whether he was currently in India or Bangladesh. His cousin Tapan Das, who resides in Kakdwip, claimed that Newton Das was born in Bangladesh and had exercised voting rights in both countries, The Hindu reported. Tapan Das claimed that his cousin had gone to Bangladesh after the Covid-19 pandemic to sell land and had not returned. 'Since he was born in Bangladesh, he is a voter of Bangladesh too,' The Hindu quoted Tapan Das as saying. 'It is his fault that he is registered as a voter in both the countries.' Kakdwip is close to the Sundarbans and India's border with Bangladesh. Political row The incident sparked a political row in the state. The Bharatiya Janata Party's West Bengal unit on Sunday criticised West Bengal's ruling Trinamool Congress claiming that a ' Bangladeshi protester ' was voting in both countries. 'Let that sink in,' the Hindutva party said on social media. 'This isn't an accident. This is the TMC blueprint – flood Bengal's voter rolls with illegal infiltrators and secure elections with ghost votes.' West Bengal 'isn't just lawless – it's compromised from within', the BJP claimed. BJP leader Suvendu Adhikari claimed that lakhs of Bangladesh citizens were registered as voters in the state, The Hindu reported. The Opposition leader claimed that an alleged member of Bangladeshi militant group Ansarullah Bangla was also enlisted as a voter in Murshidabad. West Bengal BJP chief Sukanta Majumdar on Saturday described the incident as an example of the 'so-called Egiye [progressive] Bangla Model'. 'The same Newton who was seen wielding a stick during Bangladesh's quota reform movement is now a registered voter in Kakdwip,' the BJP leader said on social media. 'Thousands of Bangladeshi 'Newtons' voting in Bengal – courtesy of [Chief Minister] Mamata Banerjee's infiltration theory and appeasement politics,' he alleged. 'With illegal voters and these lathi-wielders miscreants as her support base, she's not running West Bengal… she's scripting a blueprint for Greater Bangladesh.' The Trinamool Congress rejected the BJP's allegations and said that the responsibility for border security was with the Border Security Force, India Today reported. The Border Security Force reports to the Union home ministry. 'Whether these people come from land, water or air, the BSF and Union government are responsible,' The Hindu quoted Trinamool leader Kunal Ghosh as saying. 'The state administration will do its role for sure.' The state's ruling party also claimed that the Election Commission was complicit in voter list tampering. In February, Banerjee had accused the BJP of allegedly attempting to add residents of Gujarat, Rajasthan, Punjab and Haryana to West Bengal's voter lists. The chief minister had also accused the BJP of adding fake voters to electoral lists to win the Assembly elections in Delhi and Maharashtra. In 2024, weeks of widespread student-led protests in Bangladesh against Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and her Awami League government had led to her resignation and her fleeing to India on August 5. In August, weeks of student-led protests in Bangladesh against a controversial quota scheme for government jobs snowballed into a broader agitation against the Sheikh Hasina government.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store